Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning with Negative Data Augmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.09958 v1 pith:EOE4VU4D submitted 2021-06-18 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords noveltydetectiontrainingdatadiscriminativegenerativenetworkrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Novelty detection is the process of determining whether a query example differs from the learned training distribution. Previous methods attempt to learn the representation of the normal samples via generative adversarial networks (GANs). However, they will suffer from instability training, mode dropping, and low discriminative ability. Recently, various pretext tasks (e.g. rotation prediction and clustering) have been proposed for self-supervised learning in novelty detection. However, the learned latent features are still low discriminative. We overcome such problems by introducing a novel decoder-encoder framework. Firstly, a generative network (a.k.a. decoder) learns the representation by mapping the initialized latent vector to an image. In particular, this vector is initialized by considering the entire distribution of training data to avoid the problem of mode-dropping. Secondly, a contrastive network (a.k.a. encoder) aims to ``learn to compare'' through mutual information estimation, which directly helps the generative network to obtain a more discriminative representation by using a negative data augmentation strategy. Extensive experiments show that our model has significant superiority over cutting-edge novelty detectors and achieves new state-of-the-art results on some novelty detection benchmarks, e.g. CIFAR10 and DCASE. Moreover, our model is more stable for training in a non-adversarial manner, compared to other adversarial based novelty detection methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Empirical Evidences for the Effects of Feature Diversity in Open Set Recognition and Continual Learning

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a small synthetic dataset, a classifier required to use both shape and color separates open-set samples better and transfers to new tasks better than a color-only classifier, but the effect is not statistically validated.

  2. Enhancing Large Language Models with Reliable Knowledge Graphs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A thesis composed of four published papers proposes contrastive KG error detection, attribute-aware error-aware embedding, inductive graph completion, and KG prompting, but adds no new result beyond those papers.

Pith tools