Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Enhancing LLM-Based Feedback: Insights from Intelligent Tutoring Systems and the Learning Sciences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.04645 v2 pith:EOYADOAM submitted 2024-05-07 cs.HC cs.CY

Enhancing LLM-Based Feedback: Insights from Intelligent Tutoring Systems and the Learning Sciences

classification cs.HC cs.CY
keywords feedbackdesigngenerationaiededucationemphasisempiricalevidence-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) focuses on the intersection of technology, education, and psychology, placing a strong emphasis on supporting learners' needs with compassion and understanding. The growing prominence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to the development of scalable solutions within educational settings, including generating different types of feedback in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. However, the approach to utilizing these models often involves directly formulating prompts to solicit specific information, lacking a solid theoretical foundation for prompt construction and empirical assessments of their impact on learning. This work advocates careful and caring AIED research by going through previous research on feedback generation in ITS, with emphasis on the theoretical frameworks they utilized and the efficacy of the corresponding design in empirical evaluations, and then suggesting opportunities to apply these evidence-based principles to the design, experiment, and evaluation phases of LLM-based feedback generation. The main contributions of this paper include: an avocation of applying more cautious, theoretically grounded methods in feedback generation in the era of generative AI; and practical suggestions on theory and evidence-based feedback design for LLM-powered ITS.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating Strategy Diversity in LLM Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Frontier LLMs achieve 95-100% accuracy on AMC/AIME problems but recover far fewer distinct valid strategies than human references, while collectively generating 50 novel strategies.

  2. "Code Is Cheap. Show Me the Talk.": Lessons from Teaching and Managing AI Coding Tool Usage in a Visualization Course

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In a CS visualization course, AI coding labs showed refinement as half of student prompts, explanation nearly absent, optional AI preferred by only 56%, and final projects more polished but visually homogeneous.