Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning on the Edge: Explicit Boundary Handling in CNNs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.03106 v1 pith:EP7WUQMI submitted 2018-05-08 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords boundaryfiltersexplicithandlingcnnsimageimprovementresult
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) handle the case where filters extend beyond the image boundary using several heuristics, such as zero, repeat or mean padding. These schemes are applied in an ad-hoc fashion and, being weakly related to the image content and oblivious of the target task, result in low output quality at the boundary. In this paper, we propose a simple and effective improvement that learns the boundary handling itself. At training-time, the network is provided with a separate set of explicit boundary filters. At testing-time, we use these filters which have learned to extrapolate features at the boundary in an optimal way for the specific task. Our extensive evaluation, over a wide range of architectural changes (variations of layers, feature channels, or both), shows how the explicit filters result in improved boundary handling. Consequently, we demonstrate an improvement of 5% to 20% across the board of typical CNN applications (colorization, de-Bayering, optical flow, and disparity estimation).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Overcoming Labelled Data Scarcity for Defect Classification in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A few-shot learning workflow segments and classifies STM defects on Si, Ge, and TiO2, reaching 93% 1-shot accuracy on silicon but only 61-70% on the other surfaces.

Pith tools