Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Optimal disk packing of chloroplasts in plant cells

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The box-shaped cells of the water plant Elodea densa lie on a ridge of optimal disk packing that balances dense light capture against sidewall escape.

desk verdict A genuine, out-of-sample packing prediction (Elodea width ≈ 5 chloroplast diameters) that deserves referee time, but the ridge agreement is visually supported and one modeling convention in Eq. (2) is load-bearing without being defended. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14335 v1 pith:EPS2IGMY submitted 2025-01-24 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

Nico Schramma , Eric R. Weeks , Maziyar Jalaal This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords chloroplastpackingrandomcloseconfinedharddisksElodeadensacellshapeoptimalityphotoprotectionpolydisperseplantlightadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Chloroplasts in the water plant Elodea densa must pack densely on the bottom face of a cell to absorb dim light, yet also be able to move to the sidewalls when light is too strong. This paper argues that these two needs, expressed as two geometric constraints on how many hard disks fit in a rectangle, define a ridge of optimal cell shapes. Measured cell shapes lie close to that ridge, which peaks at a packing fraction of roughly 81 percent, only a few percent below random close packing in free space. The authors conclude that the cuboid cells have the shape and dimensions that balance dense bottom packing with sidewall capacity, and that growth along one axis keeps cells on the ridge. A sympathetic reader would take the claim as evidence that the physics of disk packing helps set cell geometry.

What carries the argument

The central object is the function $\phi^*(L_x,L_y,L_z)$, the minimum of two constraints. Constraint I is the random close packing fraction of polydisperse hard disks in a confined rectangle, $\phi_I(L_x,L_y) = \phi_{\mathrm{rcp}} - \alpha(1/L_x + 1/L_y) + \beta(\cos(2\pi L_x)e^{-L_x/\xi} + \cos(2\pi L_y)e^{-L_y/\xi})$, with $\phi_{\mathrm{rcp}} = 0.8478$ and parameters fitted to 23,479 packing simulations. Constraint II is the sidewall capacity, $\phi_{II} = \frac{2L_z}{A}(\phi_I(L_x-1,L_z)(L_x-1) + \phi_I(L_y-1,L_z)(L_y-1))$, which requires that the disks covering the bottom area also fit on the four sidewalls. The ridge of optimality is where these two incompatible constraints cross, and it is the curve along which the measured Elodea cell shapes fall.

What would settle it

Measure the vertical positions of chloroplasts under dim light: if a substantial fraction sit above the bottom monolayer, or if cells with markedly different wall height $L_z$ still show the same roughly 67 percent packing and normal avoidance behavior, then the sidewall constraint of Eq. (2) is not what shapes the cells.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that chloroplast packing, not just molecular signaling, sets the box-like shape of Elodea cells. Treating the roughly 4451 measured chloroplasts as polydisperse hard disks (radii $2.12\pm0.29\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, polydispersity 13.6 percent) confined to cell walls, the authors construct two upper bounds: Eq. (1), the random-close-packing fraction of disks in a $L_x \times L_y$ rectangle with an oscillatory confinement correction, and Eq. (2), the requirement that the disks that pack the bottom face also fit on the four sidewalls. The maximal packing fraction is $\phi^* = \min(\phi_I, \phi_{II})$ (Eq. 3), and this function has a maximum ridge in the cell-area-perimeter plane. The measured cell shapes coincide closely with this ridge, while the actual measured chloroplast packing fraction of about $67\%\pm6\%$ lies roughly 10 percent below $\phi^*$, which the authors attribute to the finite inter-chloroplast spacing needed for rearrangement and to other organelles occupying space. They further show that unidirectional cell growth follows the ridge, whereas bidirectional growth leaves it.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes each chloroplast is a hard circular disk that moves only along the cell walls, so the bottom face and each sidewall can be treated as independent two-dimensional packing problems; if chloroplasts stack in three dimensions, clump together, or are far from circular, the optimal-ridge construction no longer applies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is right, a cell's ability to switch between light harvesting and light avoidance is set by its geometry, so cells with too few or too many chloroplasts, or with wrong chloroplast sizes, lose this adaptability.
  • The constant-width, variable-length shapes of Elodea cells can be understood as unidirectional growth that keeps cells near the ridge of $\phi^*$.
  • Packing densities below $\phi^*$ are not a flaw but a requirement: a small gap between chloroplasts, about $0.42\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, enables rearrangement and places the system near a liquid-hexatic transition.
  • Volumetric scaling of the cell, which is equivalent to changing chloroplast size, can raise or lower the optimal packing fraction, explaining why many small chloroplasts outperform a few enlarged ones.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to image other plant species with different chloroplast sizes and cell shapes; if the same two-constraint ridge predicts their geometry, the principle would generalize beyond Elodea.
  • The paper models the two steady configurations but not the transition dynamics; one could ask whether the ridge also predicts how quickly chloroplasts can move from bottom to sidewalls, not just whether they fit.
  • The observed 10 percent gap between measured and maximal packing suggests an effective excluded radius around each chloroplast; re-fitting Eqs. (1)-(3) with an increased effective radius might recover the gap quantitatively.
  • The ridge prediction could be tested experimentally with chloroplast-division mutants: if cell shape remains unchanged when chloroplast size is halved, then Eq. (3) is not the control variable driving the observed morphology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the cuboid cells of Elodea densa and asks whether cell dimensions are co-optimized with chloroplast size for two conflicting packing objectives: dense monolayer packing on the bottom face under dim light, and relocation to the sidewalls under strong light. The authors measure cell lengths, widths, heights, chloroplast radii, and packing fractions, and run 23,479 simulations of polydisperse hard disks in rectangular confinement. From these simulations they fit a phenomenological expression for the maximum packing fraction as a function of confinement (Eq. (1)) and combine it with a sidewall-capacity constraint (Eq. (2)) to define an optimal ridge phi* = min(phi_I, phi_II) in the cell perimeter-area plane (Eq. (3) and Fig. 4). They report that the measured cell shapes lie close to this ridge, while measured chloroplast packing fractions are about 10% below the predicted maximum, and they argue that unidirectional cell growth keeps cells on the ridge. The paper closes by discussing implications for chloroplast size control and light adaptation.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, the paper provides a concrete, quantitative example of a packing optimum constraining organelle and cell geometry, with a falsifiable prediction that cell elongation tracks the ridge during development. The study has real strengths: the simulation campaign is extensive and carefully matched to the measured radius polydispersity; Eq. (1) is a nontrivial empirical fit with oscillatory corrections for strong confinement; and the comparison of experimental cell shapes with the theoretical ridge is an out-of-sample test, since the four fitted parameters come from simulations rather than from the cell-shape data. The Voronoi and bond-orientational-order comparisons are useful supporting evidence. The main weaknesses are that the ridge coincidence is not quantified and that the sidewall-capacity constraint in Eq. (2) rests on an underived wall-reduction convention.

major comments (3)
  1. [Constraint (II), Eq. (2)] The sidewall dimension reduction in Eq. (2) is asymmetric and not derived. The text says that 'the effective wall length and width are reduced by one chloroplast diameter,' but Eq. (2) reduces only Lx and Ly in the arguments of phi_I, leaving Lz unchanged both in the prefactor 2Lz and inside phi_I. If the same exclusion were applied to the vertical direction, then phi_I(Lx-1,Lz-1) and phi_I(Ly-1,Lz-1) would be lower by roughly 0.09 for the measured Lz ~ 2.34, and the prefactor 2Lz would decrease by about 43%. For the representative cell (Lx,Ly,Lz)=(18.2,4.5,2.34), this alternative convention changes phi_II from about 0.84 to about 0.42, moving the ridge in Fig. 4(a) substantially. The physical justification for reducing only the horizontal dimensions (e.g., overlap avoidance at vertical sidewall junctions with empty top and bottom faces) must be stated precisely, or a sensitivity analysis over the alternative convention must be provided. Because the data-ridge coincidence is the central claim, this convention is load-bearing.
  2. [Cell shape is optimal, Fig. 4(a)] The claim that 'the data of cell shapes coincides closely with this maximum ridge' is supported only by visual inspection of the perimeter-area plane. There is no quantitative measure of distance to the ridge, no null model (for example, random rectangles with the same Lx and Ly distributions, or rectangles constrained by the same unidirectional growth rule), and no propagation of the measured Lz = 2.34 +/- 1 into the ridge location. The inset of Fig. 4(a) compares measured packing fractions with phi*, which is a different statement from ridge proximity. A statistical test of ridge coincidence, with propagated uncertainty in Lz, is required before the optimality claim can be accepted.
  3. [Constraint (II) and Fig. S2] The model assumes that during light avoidance all chloroplasts can be accommodated on the sidewalls as independent two-dimensional random-close-packed monolayers on planes B and C. The confocal images in Fig. S2 show blob-like aggregates and clusters whose vertical extent is not captured by Eq. (2), and the text itself describes 'three-dimensional collective swirling motion of aggregates.' If chloroplasts stack or form multilayer aggregates, the two-constraint balance in Eq. (3) does not follow from the monolayer packing argument. Please provide direct measurements of sidewall occupation under blue light (number of chloroplasts per wall, local packing fraction, and wall coverage) and compare them with the capacity predicted by Eq. (2).
minor comments (6)
  1. [After Fig. 2] There is a typo in 'Furthmore,' which should read 'Furthermore.'
  2. [Fig. S4 caption] The caption contains 'cthe onfinement area,' which should read 'the confinement area.'
  3. [Reference [38]] The author name 'G/suppress lowacka' appears corrupted; it should be 'K. Głowacka.'
  4. [Eq. (2) and surrounding text] The normalization N*pi/4 is introduced very compactly; please define all normalized quantities (A, Lz, and the disk-area-to-square-area ratio) explicitly before the inequality in Eq. (2).
  5. [Discussion, irregular height profile] The sentence about the anticlinal and periclinal walls having 'approximately the same area and shape' is unclear in the context of deep trenches; please rewrite it to specify which walls are being compared.
  6. [Growth model, Fig. 4(b,c)] The growth variables alpha_i and alpha(t) are not fully defined; please state how they are chosen and whether the plotted growth curves are representative or fitted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the optimal-shape model is fit to independent packing simulations and tested against out-of-sample cell-shape data; the few author-overlapping citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: (1) the paper measures the chloroplast radius distribution and cell geometry; (2) it runs 23,479 confined random-close-packing simulations using that radius distribution; (3) it fits the phenomenological Eq. (1) to those simulations, obtaining phi_rcp, alpha, beta, and xi; (4) it combines Eq. (1) with the sidewall-area bookkeeping of Eq. (2) to define phi* in Eq. (3); and (5) it compares the measured (Lx, Ly, Lz) values against the phi* ridge in Fig. 4. None of the four fitted parameters is fit to the experimental cell shapes or to the measured chloroplast packing fractions, so the central comparison is an out-of-sample prediction. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the measured density is roughly 10% below phi*, showing that the data do not merely reproduce the fitted maximum by construction. The author-overlapping citations, refs. [9] and [59], provide supporting context for the glassy dynamics, the hexatic-order comparison, and the disk-packing algorithm, but the optimal-shape result rests on the paper's own simulations and quoted equations, not on those citations. The asymmetric sidewall reduction in Eq. (2), where only the horizontal dimensions are reduced by one chloroplast diameter, is a modeling assumption with a stated physical rationale about avoiding three-dimensional overlap at the box edges; whether that choice is correct is a sensitivity and robustness concern, not a circularity, because no equation used for the ridge is defined in terms of the measured cell shapes or densities. The Discussion also candidly lists limitations such as imperfect cuboid shapes, non-ideal disk shapes, and the presence of other organelles, which further supports the reading that the comparison is a genuine test rather than a restatement of inputs. No step in the claimed derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only minor issue is the presence of same-author references, but they are not load-bearing for the optimal-shape conclusion; accordingly, the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is grounded on four parameters fitted to simulation data (phi_rcp, alpha, beta, xi). The biological argument adds the domain assumptions that chloroplasts are hard disks moving only on walls, that the packing formula interpolates across all confinements, and that sidewall capacity can be treated as independent 2D packings with one-diameter length reduction. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • phi_rcp = 0.8478
    Free-space random close packing fraction of the polydisperse disk distribution, fitted to simulation data in Eq. (1).
  • alpha = 0.2444
    Coefficient of the inverse-length confinement correction in Eq. (1), fitted to simulation data.
  • beta = 0.0825
    Amplitude of the damped oscillatory correction in Eq. (1), fitted to simulation data.
  • xi = 1.284
    Decay length of the oscillatory correction in Eq. (1), fitted to simulation data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The disk packing algorithm from refs. [72,73,59] produces random close packing states representative of confined polydisperse disk systems.
    The paper uses this algorithm to generate all packing statistics and to fit Eq. (1); the output is assumed to approximate the relevant random close packing states.
  • domain assumption The phenomenological relation Eq. (1) with damped oscillations correctly interpolates packing fraction for all confinements in the biologically relevant range, including strongly confined sidewalls.
    The formula is fitted to simulation data but its functional form is assumed valid across the parameter space used to define the optimal ridge, including Lz around 2.34.
  • domain assumption The sidewall capacity constraint Eq. (2) treats sidewalls as independent planar 2D packings with wall lengths reduced by one disk diameter, ignoring edge overlaps and 3D chloroplast shape.
    This reduction and independence assumption enters directly in the derivation of Eq. (2); if the effective sidewall area differs, the optimal ridge shifts.
  • domain assumption Chloroplasts move only along the cell walls and can be modeled as hard disks in a monolayer, with no 3D stacking or aggregate formation during the configurations considered.
    The model treats bottom and sidewall configurations as 2D disk packings; the paper acknowledges chloroplasts are 3D and form aggregates under strong light, which complicates this idealization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimal disk packing of chloroplasts in plant cells." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EPS2IGMY

@misc{pith2026250114335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimal disk packing of chloroplasts in plant cells},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EPS2IGMY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14335}
}
read the original abstract

Photosynthesis is vital for the survival of entire ecosystems on Earth. While light is fundamental to this process, excessive exposure can be detrimental to plant cells. Chloroplasts, the photosynthetic organelles, actively move in response to light and self-organize within the cell to tune light absorption. These disk-shaped motile organelles must balance dense packing for enhanced light absorption under dim conditions with spatial rearrangements to avoid damage from excessive light exposure. Here, we reveal that the packing characteristics of chloroplasts within plant cells show signatures of optimality. Combining measurements of chloroplast densities and three-dimensional cell shape in the water plant Elodea densa, we construct an argument for optimal cell shape versus chloroplast size to achieve two targets: dense packing into a two-dimensional monolayer for optimal absorption under dim light conditions and packing at the sidewalls for optimal light avoidance. We formalize these constraints using a model for random close packing matched with packing simulations of polydisperse hard disks confined within rectangular boxes. The optimal cell shape resulting from these models corresponds closely to that measured in the box-like plant cells, highlighting the importance of particle packing in the light adaptation of plants. Understanding the interplay between structure and function sheds light on how plants achieve efficient photo adaptation. It also highlights a broader principle: how cell shape relates to the optimization of packing finite and relatively small numbers of organelles under confinement. This universal challenge in biological systems shares fundamental features with the mechanics of confined granular media and the jamming transitions in dense active and passive systems across various scales and contexts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of experiment and packing model. (a) The aquatic plant Elodea densa. (b) A 3D confocal image of the cell walls shows a bi-layered leaf structure. We focus on the abaxial (lower) cell layer, depicted on top. Cyan channel: cell wall. Disk-like green structures: chloroplasts. Dotted line: guide to the eye to distinguish abaxial (lower) from adaxial (upper) cell layer. (c) Orthogonal view of cell walls (cyan) a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Chloroplast and cell geometry. (a) Gaussian statistics of chloroplast radii in experiments and simulations. Note: radii are normalized by the mean value, ⟨r⟩. Inset: the histogram of the aspect ratio shows that experimental chloroplasts are mostly circular. (b) Chloroplast number scales with cell area in simulation and experiment. Line depicts expected number for random close packing fraction ϕrcp = 0.8478 in free s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Packing statistics of simulation and experiment (a) Map of simulated maximal disk packing fraction in respective confinements (Lx, Ly). Inset: fit of equation (1). (b) Packing fraction of simulation (points) and fit (black solid line) depending on the width Ly, at cell lengths Lx ∈ 17, 18.5 (dashed white lines in the inset of (a)). Black dashed line: expected asymptotic packing fraction for uniaxial confinement Ly →… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Maximal packing under geometric constraints. (a) Color represents the maximal possible packing fraction ϕ ∗ according to eq. (3). The shaded area is inaccessible to rectangles and exceeds the formula for squares A = C2/16. Circles represent individual cells from micros…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analytical solution for the polydisperse random close packing problem in 2D

    cond-mat.soft 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper derives an analytical expression for the random close packing density of polydisperse hard disks in 2D, which grows from 0.886 to about 0.98 with size polydispersity and matches a recent simulation at modera...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Slow, fast and furious: Understanding the physics of plant movements

    Y. Forterre, “Slow, fast and furious: Understanding the physics of plant movements”, Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 4745–4760 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    Spatio-temporal integration in plant tropisms

    Y. Meroz, R. Bastien, and L. Mahadevan, “Spatio-temporal integration in plant tropisms”, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 16, 10.1098/rsif.2019.0038 (2019)

    work page arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Multiscale integration of environmental stimuli in plant tropism produces complex behaviors

    D. E. Moulton, H. Oliveri, and A. Goriely, “Multiscale integration of environmental stimuli in plant tropism produces complex behaviors”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117, 32226–32237 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Noisy Circumnutations Facilitate Self-Organized Shade Avoidance in Sunflowers

    C. Nguyen, I. Dromi, A. Kempinski, G. E. Gall, O. Peleg, and Y. Meroz, “Noisy Circumnutations Facilitate Self-Organized Shade Avoidance in Sunflowers”, Physical Review X 14, 31027 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Navigating the plant cell: Intracellular transport logistics in the green kingdom

    A. Geitmann and A. Nebenf˜ ahr, “Navigating the plant cell: Intracellular transport logistics in the green kingdom”, Molecular Biology of the Cell 26, 3373–3378 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Chloroplast avoidance movement reduces photodamage in plants

    M. Kasahara, T. Kagawa, K. Olkawa, N. Suetsugu, M. Miyao, and M. Wada, “Chloroplast avoidance movement reduces photodamage in plants”, Nature 420, 829–832 (2002)

    2002

  7. [7]

    Changes in leaf optical properties associated with light- dependent chloroplast movements

    P. A. Davis, S. Caylor, C. W. Whippo, and R. P. Hangarter, “Changes in leaf optical properties associated with light- dependent chloroplast movements”, Plant, Cell and Environment 34, 2047–2059 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    Actin-mediated movement of chloroplasts

    M. Wada and S. G. Kong, “Actin-mediated movement of chloroplasts”, Journal of Cell Science 131, 10.1242/jcs.210310 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1242/jcs.210310 2018

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    Chloroplasts in plant cells show active glassy behavior under low-light conditions

    N. Schramma, C. Perugachi Isra¨ els, and M. Jalaal, “Chloroplasts in plant cells show active glassy behavior under low-light conditions”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2216497120 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Short actin-based mechanism for light-directed chloroplast movement in Arabidopsis

    A. Kadota, N. Yamada, N. Suetsugu, M. Hirose, C. Saito, K. Shoda, S. Ichikawa, T. Kagawa, A. Nakano, and M. Wada, “Short actin-based mechanism for light-directed chloroplast movement in Arabidopsis”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Ameri...

    2009

  3. [11]

    Two kinesin-like proteins mediate actin-based chloroplast movement in Arabidopsis thaliana

    N. Suetsugu, N. Yamada, T. Kagawa, H. Yonekura, T. Q. Uyedad, A. Kadota, and M. Wada, “Two kinesin-like proteins mediate actin-based chloroplast movement in Arabidopsis thaliana”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 8860–8865 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Light-induced displacement of PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1 precedes light- dependent chloroplast movements

    M. E. Dwyer and R. P. Hangarter, “Light-induced displacement of PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1 precedes light- dependent chloroplast movements”, Plant Physiology 189, 1866–1880 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Chloroplast- actin filaments decide the direction of chloroplast avoidance movement under strong light in Arabidopsis thaliana

    M. Wada, T. Higa, K. Katoh, N. Moritoki, T. Nakai, Y. Nishino, A. Miyazawa, S. Shibata, and Y. Mineyuki, “Chloroplast- actin filaments decide the direction of chloroplast avoidance movement under strong light in Arabidopsis thaliana”, Journal of Plant Research 137, 659–667 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Chloroplast unusual positioning 1 is a plant-specific actin polymerization factor regulating chloroplast movement

    S.-G. Kong, Y. Yamazaki, A. Shimada, S. T. Kijima, K. Hirose, K. Katoh, J. Ahn, H.-G. Song, J.-W. Han, T. Higa, et al., “Chloroplast unusual positioning 1 is a plant-specific actin polymerization factor regulating chloroplast movement”, The Plant Cell 36, 1159–1181 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Senn, Die gestalts-und lagever¨ anderung der pflanzen-chromatophoren: mit einer beilage: die lichtbrechung der lebenden pflanzenzelle (W

    G. Senn, Die gestalts-und lagever¨ anderung der pflanzen-chromatophoren: mit einer beilage: die lichtbrechung der lebenden pflanzenzelle (W. Engelmann, 1908)

    1908

  8. [16]

    The influence of chloroplast displacements on the optical properties of leaves

    J Zurzycki, “The influence of chloroplast displacements on the optical properties of leaves”, Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 30 (1961). 10

    1961

  9. [17]

    Chloroplast accumulation response enhances leaf photosynthesis and plant biomass production

    E. Gotoh, N. Suetsugu, W. Yamori, K. Ishishita, R. Kiyabu, M. Fukuda, T. Higa, B. Shirouchi, and M. Wada, “Chloroplast accumulation response enhances leaf photosynthesis and plant biomass production”, Plant Physiology 178, 1358–1369 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Chloroplast Movement in the Shade Plant Tradescantia albiflora Helps Protect Photosystem II against Light Stress

    Y. I. Park, W. S. Chow, and J. M. Andersen, “Chloroplast Movement in the Shade Plant Tradescantia albiflora Helps Protect Photosystem II against Light Stress”, Plant Physiology 111, 867–875 (1996)

    1996

  11. [19]

    Plant in light

    A. V. Ruban, “Plant in light”, Communicative & Integrative Biology 2, 50–55 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    Sensing and responding to excess light

    Z. Li, S. Wakao, B. B. Fischer, and K. K. Niyogi, “Sensing and responding to excess light”, Annual Review of Plant Biology 60, 239–260 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    Photoprotective function of chloroplast avoidance movement: In vivo chlorophyll fluorescence study

    O. Sztatelman, A. Waloszek, A. Katarzyna Bana´ s, and H. Gabry´ s, “Photoprotective function of chloroplast avoidance movement: In vivo chlorophyll fluorescence study”, Journal of Plant Physiology 167, 709–716 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Chloroplast movement provides photoprotection to plants by redistributing PSII damage within leaves

    P. A. Davis and R. P. Hangarter, “Chloroplast movement provides photoprotection to plants by redistributing PSII damage within leaves”, Photosynthesis Research 112, 153–161 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    THRUMIN1 is a light-regulated actin-bundling protein involved in chloroplast motility

    C. W. Whippo, P. Khurana, P. A. Davis, S. L. Deblasio, D. Desloover, C. J. Staiger, and R. P. Hangarter, “THRUMIN1 is a light-regulated actin-bundling protein involved in chloroplast motility”, Current Biology 21, 59–64 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Stationary organization of the actin cytoskeleton in Vallisneria: The role of stable microfilaments at the end walls

    J. H. Ryu, S. Takagi, and R. Nagai, “Stationary organization of the actin cytoskeleton in Vallisneria: The role of stable microfilaments at the end walls”, Journal of Cell Science 108, 1531–1539 (1995)

    1995

  17. [25]

    Reorganized actin filaments anchor chloroplasts along the anticlinal walls of Vallisneria epidermal cells under high-intensity blue light

    Y. Sakai and S. Takagi, “Reorganized actin filaments anchor chloroplasts along the anticlinal walls of Vallisneria epidermal cells under high-intensity blue light”, Planta 221, 823–830 (2005)

    2005

  18. [26]

    Blue-light-induced rapid chloroplast de-anchoring in Vallisneria epidermal cells

    Y. Sakai, S. I. Inoue, A. Harada, K. I. Shimazaki, and S. Takagi, “Blue-light-induced rapid chloroplast de-anchoring in Vallisneria epidermal cells”, Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 57, 93–105 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Roles of actin cytoskeleton for regulation of chloroplast anchoring

    Y. Sakai and S. Takagi, “Roles of actin cytoskeleton for regulation of chloroplast anchoring”, Plant Signaling and Behavior 12, 10.1080/15592324.2017.1370163 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Interpretations on chloroplast reproduction derived from correlations between cells and chloroplasts

    S. I. Honda, T. Hongladarom-Honda, P. Kwanyuen, and S. G. Wildman, “Interpretations on chloroplast reproduction derived from correlations between cells and chloroplasts”, Planta 97, 1–15 (1971)

    1971

  21. [29]

    Cell size and chloroplast size in relation to chloroplast replication in light-grown wheat leaves

    J. Ellis and R. Leech, “Cell size and chloroplast size in relation to chloroplast replication in light-grown wheat leaves”, Planta 165, 120–125 (1985)

    1985

  22. [30]

    Chloroplast division in higher plants requires members of two functionally divergent gene families with hemology to bacterial ftsZ

    K. W. Osteryoung, K. D. Stokes, S. M. Rutherford, A. L. Percival, and W. Y. Lee, “Chloroplast division in higher plants requires members of two functionally divergent gene families with hemology to bacterial ftsZ”, Plant Cell 10, 1991–2004 (1998)

    1998

  23. [31]

    Chloroplast division and expansion is radically altered by nuclear mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana

    K. A. Pyke and R. M. Leech, “Chloroplast division and expansion is radically altered by nuclear mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana”, Plant Physiology 99, 1005–1008 (1992)

    1992

  24. [32]

    Chloroplast movement can be impeded by crowding

    D. C. McCain, “Chloroplast movement can be impeded by crowding”, Plant Science 135, 219–225 (1998)

    1998

  25. [33]

    Arabidopsis thaliana leaves with altered chloroplast numbers and chloroplast movement exhibit impaired adjustments to both low and high light

    M. K¨ oniger, J. A. Delamaide, E. D. Marlow, and G. C. Harris, “Arabidopsis thaliana leaves with altered chloroplast numbers and chloroplast movement exhibit impaired adjustments to both low and high light”, Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 2285–2297 (2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    A large population of small chloroplasts in tobacco leaf cells allows more effective chloroplast movement than a few enlarged chloroplasts

    W. J. Jeong, Y. I. Park, K. H. Suh, J. A. Raven, J. Y. Ook, and R. L. Jang, “A large population of small chloroplasts in tobacco leaf cells allows more effective chloroplast movement than a few enlarged chloroplasts”, Plant Physiology 129, 112–121 (2002)

    2002

  27. [35]

    Dutta, J

    S. Dutta, J. A. Cruz, Y. Jiao, J. Chen, D. M. Kramer, and K. W. Osteryoung, “Non-invasive, whole-plant imaging of chloro- plast movement and chlorophyll fluorescence reveals photosynthetic phenotypes independent of chloroplast photorelocation defects in chloroplast division mu...

    2015

  28. [36]

    Variations in chloroplast movement and chlorophyll fluorescence among chloroplast division mutants under light stress

    S. Dutta, J. A. Cruz, S. M. Imran, J. Chen, D. M. Kramer, and K. W. Osteryoung, “Variations in chloroplast movement and chlorophyll fluorescence among chloroplast division mutants under light stress”, Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 3541–3555 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    A few enlarged chloroplasts are less efficient in photosynthesis than a large population of small chloroplasts in Arabidopsis thaliana

    D. Xiong, J. Huang, S. Peng, and Y. Li, “A few enlarged chloroplasts are less efficient in photosynthesis than a large population of small chloroplasts in Arabidopsis thaliana”, Scientific Reports 7, 1–12 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Is chloroplast size optimal for photosynthetic efficiency?

    K. G/suppress lowacka, J. Kromdijk, C. E. Salesse-Smith, C. Smith, S. M. Driever, and S. P. Long, “Is chloroplast size optimal for photosynthetic efficiency?”, New Phytologist 239, 2197–2211 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Aste and D

    T. Aste and D. Weaire, The Pursuit of perfect packing , 2nd ed., Vol. 1 (Taylor & Francis, 2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    Robust algorithm to generate a diverse class of dense disordered and ordered sphere packings via linear programming

    S. Torquato and Y. Jiao, “Robust algorithm to generate a diverse class of dense disordered and ordered sphere packings via linear programming”, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 82, 1–14 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Jammed hard-particle packings: From Kepler to Bernal and beyond

    S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, “Jammed hard-particle packings: From Kepler to Bernal and beyond”, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2633–2672 (2010)

    2010

  34. [42]

    Packing problems

    K. A. Dowsland and W. B. Dowsland, “Packing problems”, European Journal of Operational Research 56, 2–14 (1992)

    1992

  35. [43]

    A mathematical theory of communication

    C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication”, The Bell system technical journal 27, 379–423 (1948)

    1948

  36. [44]

    The packing of spheres

    N. J. Sloane, “The packing of spheres”, Scientific American 250, 116–125 (1984)

    1984

  37. [45]

    Kepler, Strena seu de nive sexangula (Frankfurt am Main: Godfried Tampach, 1611)

    J. Kepler, Strena seu de nive sexangula (Frankfurt am Main: Godfried Tampach, 1611)

  38. [46]

    Historical overview of the Kepler conjecture

    T. C. Hales, “Historical overview of the Kepler conjecture”, Discrete and Computational Geometry 36, 5–20 (2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    A proof of the kepler conjecture

    T. C. Hales, “A proof of the kepler conjecture”, Annals of mathematics, 1065–1185 (2005)

    2005

  40. [48]

    Hexagonal packing of Drosophila wing epithelial cells by the planar cell polarity pathway

    A. K. Classen, K. I. Anderson, E. Marois, and S. Eaton, “Hexagonal packing of Drosophila wing epithelial cells by the planar cell polarity pathway”, Developmental Cell 9, 805–817 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    Exploring generic principles of compartmentalization in a develop- mental in vitro model

    P. Y. Gires, M. Thampi, S. W. Krauss, and M. Weiss, “Exploring generic principles of compartmentalization in a develop- mental in vitro model”, Development (Cambridge) 150, 10.1242/dev.200851 (2023). 11

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    Temporal variability and cell mechanics control robustness in mammalian embryogenesis

    D. Fabr` eges, B. C. Murtra, P. Moghe, A. Kickuth, T. Ichikawa, C. Iwatani, T. Tsukiyama, N. Daniel, J. Gering, A. Stokkermans, A. Wolny, A. Kreshuk, V. Duranthon, V. Uhlmann, E. Hannezo, and T. Hiiragi, “Temporal variability and cell mechanics control robustness in mammalian ...

    2024

  43. [51]

    Hyperdisordered cell packing on a growing surface

    R. J. H. Ross, G. D. Masucci, C. Y. Lin, T. L. Iglesias, S. Reiter, and S. Pigolotti, “Hyperdisordered cell packing on a growing surface”, ArXiv preprint (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Topological packing statistics of living and nonliving matter

    D. J. Skinner, H. Jeckel, A. C. Martin, K. Drescher, and J. Dunkel, “Topological packing statistics of living and nonliving matter”, Science advances 9, eadg1261 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Cellular organization in lab-evolved and extant multicellular species 2 obeys a maximum entropy law

    T. C. Day, S. S. H¨ ohn, S. A. Zamani-Dahaj, D. Yanni, A. Burnetti, J. Pentz, A. R. Honerkamp-Smith, H. R. Sleath, W. C. Ratcliff, R. E. Goldstein, and P. J. Yunker, “Cellular organization in lab-evolved and extant multicellular species 2 obeys a maximum entropy law”, eLife, 1...

    2021

  46. [54]

    Point Processes and the Statistics of Cellular Neighborhoods in Simple Multicellular Organisms

    A. Srinivasan, S. S. M. H. H¨ ohn, and R. E. Goldstein, “Point Processes and the Statistics of Cellular Neighborhoods in Simple Multicellular Organisms”, ArXiv (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Optimizing packing fraction in granular media composed of overlapping spheres

    L. K. Roth and H. M. Jaeger, “Optimizing packing fraction in granular media composed of overlapping spheres”, Soft Matter 12, 1107–1115 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    Coupling effects of particle size and shape on improving the density of disordered polydisperse packings

    Y. Yuan, L. Liu, Y. Zhuang, W. Jin, and S. Li, “Coupling effects of particle size and shape on improving the density of disordered polydisperse packings”, Physical Review E 98, 42903 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Common packing patterns for jammed particles of different power size distributions

    D. S. Shimamoto and M. Yanagisawa, “Common packing patterns for jammed particles of different power size distributions”, Physical Review Research 5, 1–6 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Estimating random close packing in polydisperse and bidisperse hard spheres via an equilibrium model of crowding

    C. Anzivino, M. Casiulis, T. Zhang, A. S. Moussa, S. Martiniani, and A. Zaccone, “Estimating random close packing in polydisperse and bidisperse hard spheres via an equilibrium model of crowding”, Journal of Chemical Physics 158, 10.1063/5.0137111 (2023)

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    Estimating random close packing density from circle radius distributions

    D. J. Meer, I. Galoustian, J. G. D. F. Manuel, and E. R. Weeks, “Estimating random close packing density from circle radius distributions”, Physical Review E 109, 1–11 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Is random close packing of spheres well defined?

    S. Torquato, T. M. Truskett, and P. G. Debenedetti, “Is random close packing of spheres well defined?”, Physical Review Letters 84, 2064–2067 (2000)

    2000

  53. [61]

    Jamming transitions in amorphous packings of frictionless spheres occur over a continuous range of volume fractions

    P. Chaudhuri, L. Berthier, and S. Sastry, “Jamming transitions in amorphous packings of frictionless spheres occur over a continuous range of volume fractions”, Physical Review Letters 104, 1–4 (2010)

    2010

  54. [62]

    Jamming of polydisperse hard spheres: The effect of kinetic arrest

    M. Hermes and M. Dijkstra, “Jamming of polydisperse hard spheres: The effect of kinetic arrest”, Europhysics Letters 89, 10.1209/0295-5075/89/38005 (2010)

    2010 doi

  55. [63]

    Random close packing of disks and spheres in confined geometries

    K. W. Desmond and E. R. Weeks, “Random close packing of disks and spheres in confined geometries”, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 80, 1–11 (2009)

    2009

  56. [64]

    Influence of confinement on dynamical heterogeneities in dense colloidal samples

    K. V. Edmond, C. R. Nugent, and E. R. Weeks, “Influence of confinement on dynamical heterogeneities in dense colloidal samples”, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 85, 1–10 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Confined disordered strictly jammed binary sphere packings

    D. Chen and S. Torquato, “Confined disordered strictly jammed binary sphere packings”, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 92, 1–11 (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    Self- Assembly and Transport Phenomena of Colloids : Confinement and Geometrical Effects

    C. O. Solano-cabrera, P. Castro-villarreal, R. E. Moctezuma, F. Donado, J. C. Conrad, and R. Casta˜ neda-priego, “Self- Assembly and Transport Phenomena of Colloids : Confinement and Geometrical Effects”, Annual Reviews Condensed Matter Physics 16, 41–59 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    Photosynthetic strategies in leaves and stems of Egeria densa

    N. Rascio, P. Mariani, E. Tommasini, M. Bodner, and W. Larcher, “Photosynthetic strategies in leaves and stems of Egeria densa”, Planta 185, 297–303 (1991)

    1991

  60. [68]

    Organ-level analysis of idioblast patterning in egeria densa planch. Leaves

    T. Hara, E. Kobayashi, K. Ohtsubo, S. Kumada, M. Kanazawa, T. Abe, R. D. Itoh, and M. T. Fujiwara, “Organ-level analysis of idioblast patterning in egeria densa planch. Leaves”, PLoS ONE 10, 1–18 (2015)

    2015

  61. [69]

    A cytochemical and immunocytochemical analysis of the wall labyrinth apparatus in leaf transfer cells in Elodea canadensis

    R. Ligrone, K. C. Vaughn, and N. Rascio, “A cytochemical and immunocytochemical analysis of the wall labyrinth apparatus in leaf transfer cells in Elodea canadensis”, Annals of Botany 107, 717–722 (2011)

    2011

  62. [70]

    Regulation of Intracellular Movements in Plant Cells by Environmental Stimuli

    R. Nagai, “Regulation of Intracellular Movements in Plant Cells by Environmental Stimuli”, International Review of Cy- tology 145, 251–310 (1993)

    1993

  63. [71]

    Existence of isostatic, maximally random jammed monodisperse hard-disk packings

    S. Atkinson, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, “Existence of isostatic, maximally random jammed monodisperse hard-disk packings”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 18436–18441 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Random close packing revisited: Ways to pack frictionless disks

    N. Xu, J. Blawzdziewicz, and C. S. O’Hern, “Random close packing revisited: Ways to pack frictionless disks”, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 71, 1–9 (2005)

    2005

  65. [73]

    Numerical simulation of the dense random packing of a binary mixture of hard spheres: Amorphous metals

    A. S. Clarke and J. D. Wiley, “Numerical simulation of the dense random packing of a binary mixture of hard spheres: Amorphous metals”, Physical Review B 35, 7350–7356 (1987)

    1987

  66. [74]

    Effect of container walls on packing density of particles

    L. Verman and S Banerjee, “Effect of container walls on packing density of particles”, Nature 157, 584–584 (1946)

    1946

  67. [75]

    Effect of container walls on packing density of particles

    R. Brown and P. Hawksley, “Effect of container walls on packing density of particles”, Nature 157, 585–585 (1946)

    1946

  68. [76]

    Random packing of rods in small containers

    J. O. Freeman, S. Peterson, C. Cao, Y. Wang, S. V. Franklin, and E. R. Weeks, “Random packing of rods in small containers”, Granular Matter 21, 1–11 (2019)

    2019

  69. [77]

    Emergence of Gamma distributions in granular materials and packing models

    T. Aste and T. Di Matteo, “Emergence of Gamma distributions in granular materials and packing models”, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 77, 1–8 (2008)

    2008

  70. [78]

    Packing of spheres: co-ordination of randomly packed spheres

    J Mason and J. D. Bernal, “Packing of spheres: co-ordination of randomly packed spheres”, Nature 188, 910–911 (1960)

    1960

  71. [79]

    Colloidal Hard Spheres: Triumphs, Challenges and Mysteries

    C. P. Royall, P. Charbonneau, M. Dijkstra, J. Russo, F. Smallenburg, T. Speck, and C. Valeriani, “Colloidal Hard Spheres: Triumphs, Challenges and Mysteries”, Reviews of Modern Physics 96, 45003 (2023)

    2023

  72. [80]

    The sphere packing problem in dimension 8

    M. S. Viazovska, “The sphere packing problem in dimension 8”, Annals of mathematics, 991–1015 (2017)

    2017

  73. [81]

    Emergent chirality in active solid rotation of pancreas spheres

    T. H. Tan, A. Amiri, I. Seijo-Barandiaran, M. F. Staddon, A. Materne, S. Tomas, C. Duclut, M. Popovi´ c, A. Grapin-Botton, and F. J¨ ulicher, “Emergent chirality in active solid rotation of pancreas spheres”, PRX Life 2, 1–28 (2024). 12

    2024

  74. [82]

    The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing

    R. Farhadifar, J.-C. R¨ oper, B. Aigouy, S. Eaton, and F. J¨ ulicher, “The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing”, Current biology 17, 2095–2104 (2007)

    2007

  75. [83]

    Tunable hyperuniformity in cellular structures

    Y. Tang, X. Li, and D. Bi, “Tunable hyperuniformity in cellular structures”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08976 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Cell shape affects bacterial colony growth under physical confinement

    M. Sreepadmanabh, M. Ganesh, P. Sanjenbam, C. Kurzthaler, D. Agashe, and T. Bhattacharjee, “Cell shape affects bacterial colony growth under physical confinement”, Nature communications 15, 9561 (2024)

    2024

  77. [85]

    Sizing up the nucleus: nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly

    M. Webster, K. L. Witkin, and O. Cohen-Fix, “Sizing up the nucleus: nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly”, Journal of cell science 122, 1477–1486 (2009)

    2009

  78. [86]

    Three-dimensional chromatin packing and positioning of plant genomes

    E. S. Do˘ gan and C. Liu, “Three-dimensional chromatin packing and positioning of plant genomes”, Nature plants4, 521–529 (2018)

    2018

  79. [87]

    Cell size regulation in bacteria

    A. Amir, “Cell size regulation in bacteria”, Physical Review Letters 112, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.208102 (2014)

    2014 doi

  80. [88]

    Modeling Cell Size Regulation: From Single-Cell-Level Statistics to Molecular Mechanisms and Population-Level Effects

    P. Y. Ho, J. Lin, and A. Amir, “Modeling Cell Size Regulation: From Single-Cell-Level Statistics to Molecular Mechanisms and Population-Level Effects”, Annual Review of Biophysics 47, 251–271 (2018)

    2018

  81. [89]

    Plastid division and development

    K. A. Pyke, “Plastid division and development”, Plant Cell 11, 549–556 (1999)

    1999

  82. [90]

    Chloroplast development in green plant tissues: the interplay between light, hormone, and transcriptional regulation

    L. Cackett, L. H. Luginbuehl, T. B. Schreier, E. Lopez-Juez, and J. M. Hibberd, “Chloroplast development in green plant tissues: the interplay between light, hormone, and transcriptional regulation”, New Phytologist 233, 2000–2016 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    Cell shape development in plants

    J. Mathur, “Cell shape development in plants”, Trends in Plant Science 9, 583–590 (2004)

    2004

  84. [92]

    Leaf growth in dicots and monocots: So different yet so alike

    H. Nelissen, N. Gonzalez, and D. Inz´ e, “Leaf growth in dicots and monocots: So different yet so alike”, Current Opinion in Plant Biology 33, 72–76 (2016)

    2016

  85. [93]

    Observations of First-Order Liquid-to-Hexatic and Hexatic-to-Solid Phase Transitions in a Confined Colloid Suspension

    A. H. Marcus and S. A. Rice, “Observations of First-Order Liquid-to-Hexatic and Hexatic-to-Solid Phase Transitions in a Confined Colloid Suspension”, Physical Review Letters 77, 2577–2580 (1996)

    1996

  86. [94]

    Two-step melting in two dimensions: First-order liquid-hexatic transition

    E. P. Bernard and W. Krauth, “Two-step melting in two dimensions: First-order liquid-hexatic transition”, Physical Review Letters 107, 1–4 (2011)

    2011

  87. [95]

    Global equation of state and the phase transitions of the hard disc system

    H. Liu, “Global equation of state and the phase transitions of the hard disc system”, Molecular Physics 119, 10.1080/ 00268976.2021.1905897 (2021)

    2021

  88. [96]

    Microorganisms maintain crowding homeostasis

    J. Van Den Berg, A. J. Boersma, and B. Poolman, “Microorganisms maintain crowding homeostasis”, Nature Reviews Microbiology 15, 309–318 (2017)

    2017

  89. [97]

    Macromolecular crowding: Sensing without a sensor

    L. J. Holt and M. Delarue, “Macromolecular crowding: Sensing without a sensor”, Current Opinion in Cell Biology 85, 102269 (2023)

    2023

  90. [98]

    Scaling of Subcellular Structures

    W. F. Marshall, “Scaling of Subcellular Structures”, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 36, 219–236 (2020)

    2020

  91. [99]

    Topological damping in an ultrafast giant cell

    R. Chang and M. Prakash, “Topological damping in an ultrafast giant cell”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120, 1–12 (2023)

    2023

  92. [100]

    Automated segmentation of soft X-ray tomography: native cellular structure with sub-micron resolution at high throughput for whole-cell quantitative imaging in yeast

    J. Chen, M. Mirvis, A. Ekman, B. Vanslembrouck, and M. L. Gros, “Automated segmentation of soft X-ray tomography: native cellular structure with sub-micron resolution at high throughput for whole-cell quantitative imaging in yeast”, bioRxiv preprint, 1–44 (2024)

    2024

  93. [101]

    Star-convex polyhedra for 3D object detection and segmentation in microscopy

    M. Weigert, U. Schmidt, R. Haase, K. Sugawara, and G. Myers, “Star-convex polyhedra for 3D object detection and segmentation in microscopy”, Proceedings - 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, WACV 2020, 3655–3662 (2020)

    2020

  94. [102]

    Fluorescence visualization of cellulose and pectin in the primary plant cell wall

    A. J. Bidhendi, Y. Chebli, and A. Geitmann, “Fluorescence visualization of cellulose and pectin in the primary plant cell wall”, Journal of Microscopy 278, 164–181 (2020)

    2020

  95. [103]

    Schindelin, I

    J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-Y. Tinevez, D. J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, and A. Cardona,Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, ...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.