Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Proactive Conversational Agents with Inner Thoughts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.00383 v2 pith:EQBTO5RQ submitted 2024-12-31 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords thoughtsconversationsframeworkproactiveinnerlikeconversationalmulti-party
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the long-standing aspirations in conversational AI is to allow them to autonomously take initiatives in conversations, i.e., being proactive. This is especially challenging for multi-party conversations. Prior NLP research focused mainly on predicting the next speaker from contexts like preceding conversations. In this paper, we demonstrate the limitations of such methods and rethink what it means for AI to be proactive in multi-party, human-AI conversations. We propose that just like humans, rather than merely reacting to turn-taking cues, a proactive AI formulates its own inner thoughts during a conversation, and seeks the right moment to contribute. Through a formative study with 24 participants and inspiration from linguistics and cognitive psychology, we introduce the Inner Thoughts framework. Our framework equips AI with a continuous, covert train of thoughts in parallel to the overt communication process, which enables it to proactively engage by modeling its intrinsic motivation to express these thoughts. We instantiated this framework into two real-time systems: an AI playground web app and a chatbot. Through a technical evaluation and user studies with human participants, our framework significantly surpasses existing baselines on aspects like anthropomorphism, coherence, intelligence, and turn-taking appropriateness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ProactiveVA: Proactive Visual Analytics with LLM-Based UI Agent

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-based UI agent monitors visual analytics interactions, detects when users struggle, infers their intent, and proactively provides context-aware guidance.

  2. RetroChat: Designing for the Preservation of Past Digital Experiences

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM chat agent prompted with 2000-2010 Chinese BBS dialogue and deployed in a restored MSN window elicited nostalgic memory flashbacks and language adaptation from participants familiar with that era.

Pith tools