Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 42 references

E-MIIM: An Ensemble Learning based Context-Aware Mobile Telephony Model for Intelligent Interruption Management

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Replacing the single decision tree in a mobile interruption management system with a random forest ensemble improves prediction of how people respond to incoming calls.

desk verdict A routine ensemble-learning extension whose reported edge over MIIM is confounded by added features; needs an ablation before the claim holds. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.11029 v1 pith:EQT75CAI submitted 2019-08-25 cs.CY cs.LGstat.ML

Iqbal H. Sarker , A.S.M. Kayes , Md Hasan Furhad , Mohammad Mainul Islam , Md Shohidul Islam This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.LGstat.ML
keywords mobileinterruptionscontext-awarecomputingensemblelearningrandomforestdecisiontreeuserbehaviormodelingtelephonyinterruptionmanagement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the single decision tree at the core of the existing MIIM interruption-management model is prone to overfitting, which limits how accurately it predicts how a person will respond to an incoming call. To address this, the authors build E-MIIM, a context-aware model that replaces the single tree with a random forest ensemble and predicts whether a user will accept, reject, or miss a call. Experiments on ten real phone-log datasets from the Reality Mining collection show E-MIIM achieving higher precision, recall, F-measure, and kappa than MIIM under 10-fold cross-validation. The paper's significance is that a generic ensemble upgrade, together with data-centric contextual features, may make personalized interruption management accurate enough for real deployment without manual rules.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the random forest ensemble: many decision trees, each trained on a bootstrap sample of the user's telephony data with a random subset of context features considered at each split, whose predictions are combined by majority vote. Each node is split using the Gini index, so the whole ensemble is a variance-reduced version of a single decision tree. Around this, the paper wraps two data-centric feature constructions: BOTS, a behavior-oriented time-series segmentation technique that turns raw timestamps into nominal time segments reflecting the individual's calling patterns, and a social context derived from unique phone numbers in the log, which distinguishes people within the same relationship category. These features give the ensemble the inputs it learns from.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment on the same ten Reality Mining datasets, giving a single decision tree and a random forest identical contextual features, preprocessing, and hyperparameter tuning, would settle the claim; if the single tree matches or beats the forest, the central assertion that ensembling alone improves interruption prediction is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a random-forest version of a context-aware mobile telephony model predicts an individual's response to incoming calls (accept, reject, or missed) more accurately than the single decision tree used in the MIIM model. The paper attributes the improvement to variance reduction: each tree is trained on a bootstrap sample with a random subset of contexts, and the trees vote, so overfitting by any one tree is averaged away. The evaluation uses the same ten users' datasets and the same train/test folds for both models and reports higher average precision, recall, F-measure, and kappa for E-MIIM. The paper also introduces BOTS-derived time segments and per-contact social relationships as data-centric contexts, which it presents as helping the ensemble personalize behavior beyond static relationship labels.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison is only meaningful if the MIIM baseline is given the same contextual features and tuning as E-MIIM, since the added BOTS time segments and per-contact social contexts could themselves account for part or all of the accuracy gain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An interruption-management model can be built directly from phone logs with no user-defined rules or manual configuration.
  • Using multiple trees reduces variance and overfitting, which should make predictions on unseen contexts more reliable than a single decision tree.
  • The model becomes more accurate as more relevant contexts are added, because the ensemble combines multiple contextual associations rather than relying on one precedence order.
  • Data-centric personalization, via time segments and per-contact relationships, captures behavioral differences that static labels such as 'friend' cannot.
  • The same ensemble learning approach can be applied to other mobile user-behavior prediction tasks, a direction the paper explicitly points to for future application development.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ablation tests that run a single decision tree on E-MIIM's full feature set would separate the contribution of ensembling from the contribution of BOTS and per-contact social features; the paper does not report such a test.
  • If the data-centric features are the main driver of accuracy, the same gains might be achievable with a cheaper classifier, making the ensemble's added complexity unnecessary for deployment.
  • Using per-contact phone numbers as social context raises a privacy consideration, since the model needs to know the identity of each caller to personalize predictions.
  • The natural next test is behavioral: whether E-MIIM actually reduces disruptive rings or missed important calls in a field study, rather than only improving offline classification metrics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes E-MIIM, a context-aware mobile telephony interruption management model that replaces the single decision tree of the prior MIIM system with a random forest ensemble. The model uses temporal, spatial, and social contexts extracted from individual phone logs, including BOTS-based time segments and a data-centric social context derived from the caller's unique phone number, to predict three call-response classes (Accept, Reject, Missed). The evaluation uses 10-fold cross-validation on ten users from the Reality Mining dataset and reports precision, recall, F-measure, and kappa, claiming that E-MIIM consistently outperforms the existing MIIM model. The central claim is that ensemble learning reduces variance and improves prediction accuracy compared to a single decision tree on real mobile telephony data.

Significance. If the comparative evidence were fully supported, the contribution would be a modest but useful application of random forests to personalized interruption management, with real user data and multi-dimensional context modeling. The paper is transparent about the individualized, behavior-oriented design and uses 10-fold cross-validation, which are strengths. However, the reported gain is currently confounded by differences in the feature sets used by the two models and by the absence of baseline implementation details, numeric comparison values, and statistical significance tests. The contribution is therefore not yet established at the level claimed in the abstract and Section 6.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.2.2 and §4.1] The comparison between E-MIIM and MIIM does not control for the feature set. Section 4.1 describes features added for E-MIIM, namely BOTS behavior-oriented time segments and a per-contact social context built from the caller's unique phone number, while Section 3 indicates that the original MIIM uses day-of-week/time-of-day, location, and calendar information. The text in Section 5.2.2 says both models use the same datasets and folds, but it never states that they use the same features. Because a caller-identity feature can be nearly deterministic for accept/reject behavior in phone logs, the reported gain may come from feature engineering rather than from ensembling. The authors should report an ablation: a random forest trained on MIIM's original feature set, and/or a single decision tree trained on E-MIIM's feature set, so that the effect of ensembling is isolated.
  2. [§5.2.2] No implementation details for the MIIM baseline are provided. The reader cannot tell which decision tree algorithm, splitting criterion, pruning strategy, or hyperparameter settings were used, nor whether the baseline received the same class preprocessing (call duration thresholds) as E-MIIM. If the baseline is an untuned default decision tree, the comparison may overstate the benefit of the ensemble. The authors should specify the exact MIIM reproduction, including algorithm, parameters, and feature encoding.
  3. [§5.2.1, Table 1, Table 2, and Fig. 2] The paper claims that E-MIIM is more effective and outperforms MIIM, but the average comparison in Fig. 2 is presented only graphically, with no numerical values, standard deviations, confidence intervals, or statistical significance tests. The per-class results in Tables 1 and 2 are reported for only two users, and the text uses phrases such as 'significantly high' without a statistical basis. The authors should report the numeric averages with standard deviations across the ten datasets and apply a paired test (for example, McNemar's test per fold, or a paired comparison across users) to support the claim of consistent improvement.
  4. [§4.2 and §6] The claimed mechanism for the improvement, namely variance reduction through averaging over decorrelated trees, is asserted rather than tested. No evidence is provided on tree diversity, out-of-bag performance, or the variance of individual trees versus the ensemble. Showing that the random forest's improvement is connected to variance reduction, rather than to the added features or to improved preprocessing, would directly support the paper's interpretation of why E-MIIM is better.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Tables 1 and 2] The tables report 'Class 1', 'Class 2', and 'Class 3' without labeling them as Accept, Reject, and Missed in the table headers or footnotes; the mapping should be explicit.
  2. [Figures 1 and 2] The figures do not show numerical values, so the reader cannot determine the magnitude of the reported gains. Adding value labels or a corresponding numeric table would make the results reproducible and assessable.
  3. [§4.2] The random forest hyperparameters N, d, and maximum tree depth or leaf size are not specified; providing these values is needed for reproducibility, even if default settings were used.
  4. [General] There are several typos and formatting inconsistencies, including the author name 'F urhad', the section headings 'W ork' and 'F uture', and inconsistent use of 's/he' and 'his/her'; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  5. [§4.1] The description of the activity classes should clarify how call duration thresholds define Accept, Reject, and Missed, since this preprocessing affects the target labels and therefore the reported accuracy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ensemble-vs-single-tree comparison is empirical, and although self-cited preprocessing and a feature-set confound exist, no result is forced by definition or by a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a random-forest ensemble (E-MIIM) outperforms a single decision tree (MIIM) on real phone-log datasets. That claim is tested empirically with 10-fold cross-validation on the same datasets and folds for both models (Section 5.2.2). No parameter is fitted to the target accuracy and then renamed as a prediction; the accuracy figures are computed from held-out test cases. The main fairness concern is that the two models may not use identical feature sets: Section 4.1 introduces BOTS time segments from the authors' prior work [32] and a data-centric social context built from the caller's phone number, whereas Section 3 says the original MIIM used day-of-week, time-of-day, location, and calendar schedule. If E-MIIM uses these extra features and MIIM does not, part of the measured gain could be due to feature engineering rather than ensembling, and the paper reports no ablation or feature-parity baseline. However, that is an experimental confounding issue, not circularity: the comparison does not reduce by construction to the input data, the self-citations are to preprocessing techniques rather than to the claimed ensemble advantage, and no result is mathematically identical to its own assumptions. The absence of numerical values in Figures 1 and 2 weakens the support but does not make the argument circular. Therefore no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new ontology or entities; it reuses a public dataset and prior feature-engineering. The central result depends on several unreported hyperparameters and on the fairness of the baseline comparison.

free parameters (5)
  • Number of random forest trees (N) = Not reported
    The paper does not specify the number of decision trees in the ensemble, a key hyperparameter that influences variance and accuracy.
  • Number of randomly selected features per split (d) = Not reported
    Random forest samples d features at each node; default values are often sqrt(D) or log2(D), but the paper does not state it.
  • Maximum tree depth or leaf size = Not reported
    Tree depth controls overfitting; without reporting it, the comparison with the decision tree baseline may not be tuned fairly.
  • BOTS segmentation parameters = Not reported
    The time-series segmentation technique from prior work converts raw timestamps to nominal segments; its thresholds are not given, affecting the temporal features.
  • Call duration thresholds for activity classes = Not reported
    Section 4.1 states activities are preprocessed using call duration and call type to produce Accept, Reject, Missed classes; the specific thresholds are not provided.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Random forest ensemble reduces variance and improves accuracy over a single decision tree (Breiman 2001).
    This is the theoretical motivation for E-MIIM; the paper cites Breiman but does not prove it for this domain.
  • domain assumption The Reality Mining dataset provides accurate labels of accepted, rejected, and missed calls along with context annotations.
    The ground truth for the three behavior classes comes from the public dataset; the paper does not audit mislabeling or class imbalance.
  • domain assumption The 10-fold cross-validation with the same folds for both models is an unbiased estimator of predictive performance.
    The paper states it uses 10-fold CV but does not describe how folds are constructed or whether stratification matches class distribution.
  • ad hoc to paper The MIIM baseline is a correct and comparable implementation of Zulkernain et al.'s decision tree model.
    No details of the baseline implementation are given; if the baseline used different features or default unpruned trees, the comparison is biased.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of E-MIIM: An Ensemble Learning based Context-Aware Mobile Telephony Model for Intelligent Interruption Management." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQT75CAI

@misc{pith2026190911029,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: E-MIIM: An Ensemble Learning based Context-Aware Mobile Telephony Model for Intelligent Interruption Management},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQT75CAI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.11029}
}
read the original abstract

Nowadays, mobile telephony interruptions in our daily life activities are common because of the inappropriate ringing notifications of incoming phone calls in different contexts. Such interruptions may impact on the work attention not only for the mobile phone owners but also the surrounding people. Decision tree is the most popular machine learning classification technique that is used in existing context-aware mobile intelligent interruption management (MIIM) model to overcome such issues. However, a single decision tree based context-aware model may cause overfitting problem and thus decrease the prediction accuracy of the inferred model. Therefore, in this paper, we propose an ensemble machine learning based context-aware mobile telephony model for the purpose of intelligent interruption management by taking into account multi-dimensional contexts and name it "E-MIIM". The experimental results on individuals' real life mobile telephony datasets show that our E-MIIM model is more effective and outperforms existing MIIM model for predicting and managing individual's mobile telephony interruptions based on their relevant contextual information.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.11029 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparing prediction results of our context-aware model E-MIIM with existing model MIIM in terms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparing average prediction results (utilizing all the datasets) of our context-aware model E-MIIM with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    http://www.bls.gov

    Bureau of labor statistics. http://www.bls.gov

    work page

  2. [2]

    Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees

    Yali Amit and Donald Geman. Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees. Neural computation, 9(7):1545–1588, 1997

    work page 1997

  3. [3]

    On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interrup- tion on task performance, error rate, and affective state

    Brian P Bailey and Joseph A Konstan. On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interrup- tion on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in human behavior , 22(4):685–708, 2006

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Interrupted by a phone call: exploring designs for lowering the impact of call notifications for smartphone users

    Matthias B¨ ohmer, Christian Lander, Sven Gehring, Dun- can P Brumby, and Antonio Kr¨ uger. Interrupted by a phone call: exploring designs for lowering the impact of call notifications for smartphone users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Comput- ing Systems , pages 3045–3054. ACM, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Classification and regression trees, chapman & hall

    L Breiman, JH Friedman, RA Olshen, and CJ Stone. Classification and regression trees, chapman & hall. New York, USA, 1984

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    Bagging predictors

    Leo Breiman. Bagging predictors. Machine learning , 24(2):123–140, 1996

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Random forests

    Leo Breiman. Random forests. Machine learning , 45(1):5–32, 2001

    2001

  8. [8]

    Investigating mobile users’ ringer mode usage and attentiveness and respon- siveness to communication

    Yung-Ju Chang and John C Tang. Investigating mobile users’ ringer mode usage and attentiveness and respon- siveness to communication. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interac- tion with Mobile Devices and Services , pages 6–15. ACM, 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Should i call now? understanding what context is considered when deciding whether to initiate remote com- munication via mobile devices

    Edward S De Guzman, Moushumi Sharmin, and Brian P Bailey. Should i call now? understanding what context is considered when deciding whether to initiate remote com- munication via mobile devices. In Proceedings of Graph- ics interface 2007 , pages 143–150. ACM, 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Mini- mizing mobile phone disruption via smart profile manage- ment

    Amnon Dekel, Dan Nacht, and Scott Kirkpatrick. Mini- mizing mobile phone disruption via smart profile manage- ment. In Proceedings of the 11th International Confer- ence on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile De- vices and Services , page 43. ACM, 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    Reality mining: sensing complex social systems

    Nathan Eagle and Alex Sandy Pentland. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 10(4):255–268, 2006

    2006

  4. [12]

    Understanding the crucial differences between classification and discovery of association rules: a position paper

    Alex A Freitas. Understanding the crucial differences between classification and discovery of association rules: a position paper. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter , 2(1):65–69, 2000

    2000

  5. [13]

    Technology- mediated interruption management

    Sukeshini Grandhi and Quentin Jones. Technology- mediated interruption management. International Jour- nal of Human-Computer Studies , 68(5):288–306, 2010

    2010

  6. [14]

    Context-aware system for proactive personalized service based on context history

    Jongyi Hong, Eui-Ho Suh, Junyoung Kim, and SuYeon Kim. Context-aware system for proactive personalized service based on context history. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4):7448–7457, 2009

    2009

  7. [15]

    Improving cell phone awareness by using calendar information

    Ashraf Khalil and Kay Connelly. Improving cell phone awareness by using calendar information. In Human- Computer Interaction, pages 588–600. Springer, 2005

    2005

  8. [16]

    Context-aware tele- phony: privacy preferences and sharing patterns

    Ashraf Khalil and Kay Connelly. Context-aware tele- phony: privacy preferences and sharing patterns. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work , pages 469–478. ACM, 2006

    2006

  9. [17]

    Deploying personalized mobile services in an agent-based environment

    Wei-Po Lee. Deploying personalized mobile services in an agent-based environment. Expert Systems with Ap- plications, 32(4):1194–1207, 2007

    2007

  10. [18]

    The calendar as a sensor: analysis and im- provement using data fusion with social networks and lo- cation

    Tom Lovett, Eamonn O’Neill, James Irwin, and David Pollington. The calendar as a sensor: analysis and im- provement using data fusion with social networks and lo- cation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Confer- ence on Ubiquitous computing , pages 3–12. ACM, 2010

    2010

  11. [19]

    Interruptme: Design- ing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive appli- cations

    Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. Interruptme: Design- ing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive appli- cations. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Comput- ing, pages 897–908. ACM, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Ross Quinlan

    J. Ross Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Machine Learning, 1993. 10 Sarker et al

    1993

  13. [21]

    Using decision-theoretic experience sampling to build personalized mobile phone interruption models

    Stephanie Rosenthal, Anind K Dey, and Manuela Veloso. Using decision-theoretic experience sampling to build personalized mobile phone interruption models. In Per- vasive Computing , pages 170–187. Springer, 2011

    2011

  14. [22]

    The phone rings but the user doesn’t an- swer: unavailability in mobile communication

    Antti Salovaara, Antti Lindqvist, Tero Hasu, and Jonna H¨ akkil¨ a. The phone rings but the user doesn’t an- swer: unavailability in mobile communication. In Pro- ceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services , pag...

    2011

  15. [23]

    Behavminer: Mining user behaviors from mobile phone data for personalized services

    Iqbal H Sarker. Behavminer: Mining user behaviors from mobile phone data for personalized services. In Proceed- ings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Per- vasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2018), Athens, Greece. IEEE, 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    Mobile data science: Towards under- standing data-driven intelligent mobile applications

    Iqbal H Sarker. Mobile data science: Towards under- standing data-driven intelligent mobile applications. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems , 5(19), 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Research issues in mining user behav- ioral rules for context-aware intelligent mobile applica- tions

    Iqbal H Sarker. Research issues in mining user behav- ioral rules for context-aware intelligent mobile applica- tions. Iran Journal of Computer Science , pages 1–11, 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Silentphone: Inferring user unavailability based opportune moments to minimize call interruptions

    Iqbal H Sarker. Silentphone: Inferring user unavailability based opportune moments to minimize call interruptions. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Mobile Communications and Applications, 4(15), 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Understanding the role of data-centric social context in personalized mobile applications

    Iqbal H Sarker. Understanding the role of data-centric social context in personalized mobile applications. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Context-aware Systems and Applications, 5(15), 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    A machine learning based robust predic- tion model for real-life mobile phone data

    Iqbal H Sarker. A machine learning based robust predic- tion model for real-life mobile phone data. Internet of Things, 5:180–193, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Re- cencyminer: mining recency-based personalized behavior from contextual smartphone data

    Iqbal H Sarker, Alan Colman, and Jun Han. Re- cencyminer: mining recency-based personalized behavior from contextual smartphone data. Journal of Big Data , 6(1):49, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Behavior-oriented time segmentation for mining individ- ualized rules of mobile phone users

    Iqbal H Sarker, Alan Colman, MA Kabir, and Jun Han. Behavior-oriented time segmentation for mining individ- ualized rules of mobile phone users. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Sci- ence and Advanced Analytics (IEEE DSAA), Montreal, Canada., pa...

    2016

  23. [31]

    Phone call log as a context source to modeling individual user behavior

    Iqbal H Sarker, Alan Colman, MA Kabir, and Jun Han. Phone call log as a context source to modeling individual user behavior. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Inter- national Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp): Adjunct, Germany , pages 630–

    2016

  24. [32]

    Individualized time-series segmentation for mining mo- bile phone user behavior

    Iqbal H Sarker, Alan Colman, MA Kabir, and Jun Han. Individualized time-series segmentation for mining mo- bile phone user behavior. The Computer Journal, Oxford University, UK , 61(3):349–368, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Evidence-based behavioral model for calendar schedules of individual mobile phone users

    Iqbal H Sarker, MA Kabir, Alan Colman, and Jun Han. Evidence-based behavioral model for calendar schedules of individual mobile phone users. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Sci- ence and Advanced Analytics (IEEE DSAA), Montreal, Canada., pages ...

    2016

  26. [34]

    Designing architecture of a rule-based system for manag- ing phone call interruptions

    Iqbal H Sarker, MA Kabir, Alan Colman, and Jun Han. Designing architecture of a rule-based system for manag- ing phone call interruptions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Intern...

    2017

  27. [35]

    Effective- ness analysis of machine learning classification models for predicting personalized context-aware smartphone usage

    Iqbal H Sarker, ASM Kayes, and Paul Watters. Effective- ness analysis of machine learning classification models for predicting personalized context-aware smartphone usage. Journal of Big Data , 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Pyp: design and implementation of a context-aware configuration man- ager for smartphones

    Sin-seok Seo, Arum Kwon, Joon-Myung Kang, John Strassner, and James Won-Ki Hong. Pyp: design and implementation of a context-aware configuration man- ager for smartphones. In Proceedings of the 1st Interna- tional Workshop on Smart Mobile Applications (Smar- tApps 11) , 2011

    2011

  29. [37]

    Ringlearn: Long-term mitigation of disruptive smartphone interruptions

    Johan Smith and Naranker Dulay. Ringlearn: Long-term mitigation of disruptive smartphone interruptions. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2014 IEEE International Con- ference on, pages 27–35. IEEE, 2014

    2014

  30. [38]

    The cost of not paying attention: How interruptions impact knowledge worker productivity

    Jonathan B Spira and Joshua B Feintuch. The cost of not paying attention: How interruptions impact knowledge worker productivity. Report from Basex , 2005

    2005

  31. [39]

    What’s on users’ minds? toward a usable smart phone security model

    Alessandra Toninelli, Rebecca Montanari, Ora Lassila, and Deepali Khushraj. What’s on users’ minds? toward a usable smart phone security model. Pervasive Com- puting, IEEE , 8(2):32–39, 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    Weka: Practical machine learning tools and techniques with java implementations

    Ian H Witten, Eibe Frank, Leonard E Trigg, Mark A Hall, Geoffrey Holmes, and Sally Jo Cunningham. Weka: Practical machine learning tools and techniques with java implementations. 1999

    1999

  33. [41]

    A context aware interruption management system for mobile devices

    Sina Zulkernain, Praveen Madiraju, and Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed. A context aware interruption management system for mobile devices. In Mobile Wireless Middle- ware, Operating Systems, and Applications , pages 221–

  34. [42]

    A mobile intelligent inter- ruption management system

    Sina Zulkernain, Praveen Madiraju, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, and Karl Stamm. A mobile intelligent inter- ruption management system. J. UCS , 16(15):2060–2080, 2010

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.