REVIEW 1 cited by
Comparison of non-linear activation functions for deep neural networks on MNIST classification task
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Comparison of non-linear activation functions for deep neural networks on MNIST classification task
read the original abstract
Activation functions play a key role in neural networks so it becomes fundamental to understand their advantages and disadvantages in order to achieve better performances. This paper will first introduce common types of non linear activation functions that are alternative to the well known sigmoid function and then evaluate their characteristics. Moreover deeper neural networks will be analysed because they positively influence the final performances compared to shallower networks. They also strictly depend on the weight initialisation hence the effect of drawing weights from Gaussian and uniform distribution will be analysed making particular attention on how the number of incoming and outgoing connection to a node influence the whole network.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
FlexAct: Why Learn when you can Pick?
A Gumbel-Softmax router that discretely selects among five fixed activation functions, plus a gradient-norm regularizer, recovers the generating activation on toy regression tasks but never beats the matching fixed ac...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.