Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Turning Gate Synthesis Errors into Incoherent Errors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1612.01011 v1 pith:ERP3IL7H submitted 2016-12-03 quant-ph

Turning Gate Synthesis Errors into Incoherent Errors

classification quant-ph
keywords errorsgategatesdesiredepsilonerrorqubitstarget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using error correcting codes and fault tolerant techniques, it is possible, at least in theory, to produce logical qubits with significantly lower error rates than the underlying physical qubits. Suppose, however, that the gates that act on these logical qubits are only approximation of the desired gate. This can arise, for example, in synthesizing a single qubit unitary from a set of Clifford and $T$ gates; for a generic such unitary, any finite sequence of gates only approximates the desired target. In this case, errors in the gate can add coherently so that, roughly, the error $\epsilon$ in the unitary of each gate must scale as $\epsilon \lesssim 1/N$, where $N$ is the number of gates. If, however, one has the option of synthesizing one of several unitaries near the desired target, and if an average of these options is closer to the target, we give some elementary bounds showing cases in which the errors can be made to add incoherently by averaging over random choices, so that, roughly, one needs $\epsilon \lesssim 1/\sqrt{N}$. We remark on one particular application to distilling magic states where this effect happens automatically in the usual circuits.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Suppressing errors in analog logical rotation gates via balanced fusion

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Balanced fusion RUS implements small logical rotations with error O(pφ^1.5) instead of O(pφ), by fusing resource states in a balanced tree rather than directly preparing ever-larger angles.

  2. Optimal Lower Bounds for Hamiltonian Simulation

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    There exist simple weighted-local Hamiltonians for which quantum simulation requires Ω(min over K of (Kt + t²λ_K²/ε)) gates — exactly matching the composite qDRIFT algorithm's cost.