Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Align-Pro: A Principled Approach to Prompt Optimization for LLM Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.03486 v1 pith:ETQXKHTF submitted 2025-01-07 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords optimizationpromptalignmentmodelstheoreticalempiricalfine-tuninghuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human values is critical as these models become increasingly integrated into various societal and decision-making processes. Traditional methods, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), achieve alignment by fine-tuning model parameters, but these approaches are often computationally expensive and impractical when models are frozen or inaccessible for parameter modification. In contrast, prompt optimization is a viable alternative to RLHF for LLM alignment. While the existing literature has shown empirical promise of prompt optimization, its theoretical underpinning remains under-explored. We address this gap by formulating prompt optimization as an optimization problem and try to provide theoretical insights into the optimality of such a framework. To analyze the performance of the prompt optimization, we study theoretical suboptimality bounds and provide insights in terms of how prompt optimization depends upon the given prompter and target model. We also provide empirical validation through experiments on various datasets, demonstrating that prompt optimization can effectively align LLMs, even when parameter fine-tuning is not feasible.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SafeAgent: Safeguarding LLM Agents via an Automated Risk Simulator

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper introduces AutoSafe, an automated pipeline that generates agent risk scenarios, samples safe actions via self-reflection, and fine-tunes LLM agents to improve safety on synthetic and real-world benchmarks.

Pith tools