REVIEW 5 cited by
Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As the capabilities of generative language models continue to advance, the implications of biases ingrained within these models have garnered increasing attention from researchers, practitioners, and the broader public. This article investigates the challenges and risks associated with biases in large-scale language models like ChatGPT. We discuss the origins of biases, stemming from, among others, the nature of training data, model specifications, algorithmic constraints, product design, and policy decisions. We explore the ethical concerns arising from the unintended consequences of biased model outputs. We further analyze the potential opportunities to mitigate biases, the inevitability of some biases, and the implications of deploying these models in various applications, such as virtual assistants, content generation, and chatbots. Finally, we review the current approaches to identify, quantify, and mitigate biases in language models, emphasizing the need for a multi-disciplinary, collaborative effort to develop more equitable, transparent, and responsible AI systems. This article aims to stimulate a thoughtful dialogue within the artificial intelligence community, encouraging researchers and developers to reflect on the role of biases in generative language models and the ongoing pursuit of ethical AI.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
What Current AI Benchmarks Leave Unmeasured: Modality, Search, Citations, and Implications (for Safety Evaluations)
Chat UI and API access to the same chatbot produce different accuracy, consistency, citation, and refusal behaviors on safety benchmarks, and web search changes these patterns further.
-
Identifying Pre-training Data in LLMs: A Neuron Activation-Based Detection Framework
NA-PDD detects pre-training data in LLMs by comparing which neurons activate for a test text against neurons linked to known training versus non-training texts, and claims large AUC improvements on three benchmarks.
-
The Potential Impact of Disruptive AI Innovations on U.S. Occupations
AI patents that are 'disruptive' are associated with mental, unpredictable, solo tasks, while 'consolidating' patents are associated with physical, routine, solo tasks.
-
Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation
A taxonomy-driven survey arguing that reward design is the central mechanism shaping reliable LLM reasoning, with maps of reward paradigms, reward-hacking failure modes, and benchmark pitfalls.
-
The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs
A structured survey of LLM safety evaluation that proposes a why/what/where/how taxonomy and catalogs metrics, datasets, benchmarks, evaluators, and frameworks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.