Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.01627 v2 pith:EVUIT3DL submitted 2024-06-01 q-bio.GN cs.LG

classification q-bio.GNcs.LG
keywords genomicfoundationgenbenchmodelmodelstasksbenchmarkingdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Genomic Foundation Model (GFM) paradigm is expected to facilitate the extraction of generalizable representations from massive genomic data, thereby enabling their application across a spectrum of downstream applications. Despite advancements, a lack of evaluation framework makes it difficult to ensure equitable assessment due to experimental settings, model intricacy, benchmark datasets, and reproducibility challenges. In the absence of standardization, comparative analyses risk becoming biased and unreliable. To surmount this impasse, we introduce GenBench, a comprehensive benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. Through systematic evaluations of datasets spanning diverse biological domains with a particular emphasis on both short-range and long-range genomic tasks, firstly including the three most important DNA tasks covering Coding Region, Non-Coding Region, Genome Structure, etc. Moreover, We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance. Our findings reveal an interesting observation: independent of the number of parameters, the discernible difference in preference between the attention-based and convolution-based models on short- and long-range tasks may provide insights into the future design of GFM.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. OmniGenBench: A Modular Platform for Reproducible Genomic Foundation Models Benchmarking

    q-bio.GN 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OmniGenBench packages five genomic benchmark suites, 31+ foundation models, automated evaluation, and interpretability tools into standardized one-command workflows.

  2. Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models

    q-bio.GN 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Frozen genomic language model embeddings recover most fine-tuned performance on promoter tasks (95-100%) but only 60-88% on splice-site tasks, a gap that persists across readouts and model families.

Pith tools