Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.09184 v2 pith:EWH2U6EL submitted 2019-01-26 cs.LG stat.ML

Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Control

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords actionrobustadversarialalgorithmsapproachcasecontinuouscriteria
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A policy is said to be robust if it maximizes the reward while considering a bad, or even adversarial, model. In this work we formalize two new criteria of robustness to action uncertainty. Specifically, we consider two scenarios in which the agent attempts to perform an action $a$, and (i) with probability $\alpha$, an alternative adversarial action $\bar a$ is taken, or (ii) an adversary adds a perturbation to the selected action in the case of continuous action space. We show that our criteria are related to common forms of uncertainty in robotics domains, such as the occurrence of abrupt forces, and suggest algorithms in the tabular case. Building on the suggested algorithms, we generalize our approach to deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and provide extensive experiments in the various MuJoCo domains. Our experiments show that not only does our approach produce robust policies, but it also improves the performance in the absence of perturbations. This generalization indicates that action-robustness can be thought of as implicit regularization in RL problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Guided Action Flow: Q-Guided Inference for Flow-Matching Vision-Language-Action Policies

    cs.RO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Guided Action Flow applies a rollout-trained critic to steer frozen flow-matching VLA policies at inference time via action gradients, reporting success rate gains on LIBERO manipulation tasks.