Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 77 references

Adding on-site disorder to a Tavis–Cummings polariton model turns dark states into direct pump-probe probes, with a line shape that evolves from derivative-like to absorptive as the lower polariton relaxes into them.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 17:33 UTC pith:EWKYIAJP

load-bearing objection Useful extension of the group's polariton line-shape work, but the stated relaxation rates don't give the claimed 50/50 branching—the kinetic model needs fixing before the main prediction can be trusted. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17587 v1 pith:EWKYIAJP submitted 2026-07-20 physics.chem-ph

Disorder-induced Dark States Line Shape in Pump-Probe Spectroscopy of Polaritons

Luca Nils Philipp , Julian L\"uttig , Roland Mitri\'c This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords polaritonsdark statesTavis-Cummings modelon-site disorderpump-probe spectroscopytransient absorptionline shape analysisrelaxation dynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks what pump-probe signals look like at the energy of the dark molecular states in a disordered polariton system. In a clean Tavis–Cummings model, dark states have zero dipole moment and are spectroscopically silent; once random on-site energies are included, they acquire small photonic weight and a weak signal appears. The central finding is that this line shape is derivative-like right after the lower polariton is excited, then collapses into a single positive absorptive peak as the polariton relaxes into the dark-state manifold and the ground state. The authors trace this to a balance of Liouville-space pathways and show the signal scales as the inverse molecule number, the same scaling as the polariton lines, making the dark-state line shape a usable fingerprint of polaritonic response.

Core claim

Within a Tavis–Cummings model extended by on-site molecular disorder, the pump–probe spectrum at the dark-state (DS) energy is not featureless. Disorder gives the DSs small photonic weights, so transitions to and from them acquire small dipole moments. The paper finds that right after the lower polariton (LP) is pumped, the DS line shape is derivative-like, produced by partial cancellation of a positive ESA_DLP pathway and a negative GSB_DS pathway whose transition energies differ slightly. As the LP population relaxes into the DSs and the ground state, the ESA_DLP contribution vanishes and the remaining pathways all emit at nearly the same energy, so the line shape collapses into a single p

What carries the argument

The paper's central object is the disordered Tavis–Cummings Hamiltonian (Eq. 1), with a single cavity mode, N two-level molecules, and random excitation energies drawn from a uniform distribution of width Δ. The key identity is the simplified two-Gaussian line-shape model (Appendix A): for two opposite-sign contributions of amplitudes A and B at energies separated by δ ≪ σ, the spectrum equals a Gaussian of amplitude A−B plus a derivative term (Bδ/σ²)ω times a Gaussian. This decomposition carries the argument: it explains why the DS line shape is derivative-like when the offset δ is finite (early times) and absorptive when δ→0 (late times), and it shows that both contributions scale as O(N^{

Load-bearing premise

The predicted time-evolution rests on a parallel, Markovian rate-equation model in which the lower polariton decays 50% into the dark-state manifold and 50% into the ground state, and all coherences during the delay time are neglected.

What would settle it

Pump a disordered microcavity at the lower-polariton energy, record the pump-probe spectrum at the dark-state energy from zero to several hundred femtoseconds, and check for the predicted derivative-to-absorptive transition and its O(N^{-1}) amplitude scaling with molecule number; if the signal stays derivative-like long after the polariton decays, or if the amplitude does not fall as 1/N, the central claim would be disproved.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A derivative-like line shape at the dark-state energy in a fresh pump-probe spectrum marks the response as polaritonic, whereas a purely absorptive peak there can indicate molecular dark states after relaxation.
  • The time constant of the derivative-to-absorptive switch reflects the rate at which the lower polariton transfers population to the dark-state manifold, giving a direct observable for that relaxation.
  • Because the dark-state signal scales as N^{-1} just like the lower and upper polariton signals, it remains observable relative to them at experimentally realistic molecule numbers rather than vanishing faster.
  • The separation between the two extrema of the derivative line shape provides a measure of the disorder-induced width of the dark-state manifold when inhomogeneous broadening dominates.
  • Observing a purely absorptive dark-state line shape at all delay times would indicate either negligible disorder-induced DS transitions or no relaxation into the DS manifold, helping to constrain relaxation regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive experiment would compare the same molecules coupled and uncoupled to a cavity: the bare molecular sample should show an absorptive line at the molecular energy at all delays, while the cavity-coupled sample should show the derivative-to-absorptive evolution at the dark-state energy.
  • If the Markovian assumption is relaxed to allow coherent mixing during the delay time, the derivative-like shape could persist longer than predicted, making the transition time a direct test of the kinetic model.
  • The two-Gaussian line-shape model suggests that at very large disorder the derivative extrema would merge, so the crossover disorder strength could be used to extract the homogeneous line width.
  • Because the DS signal is several orders of magnitude weaker than the polariton signals but scales identically with N, techniques that enhance signal-to-noise, such as higher-order spectroscopies or heterodyne detection, might make the fingerprint practical.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the authors' previous disorder-free Tavis-Cummings (TC) pump-probe study by adding on-site energetic disorder, which gives nominally dark states (DS) a small photonic weight so they can be probed. Using third-order response functions and double-sided Feynman diagrams, it computes the transient absorption signal near the DS energy after pumping the lower polariton. A Markovian rate-equation model for LP relaxation into the ground state and the DS manifold is used to follow the delay-time dependence. The authors report a transition from a derivative-like to an absorptive line shape with delay, analyze the dependence on disorder width, and claim that both early- and late-time DS signals scale as O(N^{-1}) for large N, comparable to the LP/UP signals.

Significance. If substantiated, the predicted derivative-to-absorptive transition at the dark-state energy would be a useful spectroscopic fingerprint of dark-state participation in polariton relaxation, and the O(N^{-1}) scaling is relevant for experimental feasibility in large ensembles. The paper uses standard response-function formalism, gives an explicit analytic line-shape decomposition in Appendix A, and assigns pathway/scaling contributions in Fig. 2. However, the central quantitative results depend on the kinetic relaxation model and on numerical scalings that are not fully documented; the parameter inconsistency in the rate equations is a load-bearing issue that must be corrected.

major comments (3)
  1. [II.B and III.A, Eqs. (9)-(14)] The stated rate parameters do not produce the asserted 50/50 branching. With 1/k_LP=100 fs, 1/k_GS=50 fs, 1/k_DS=50/(N-1) fs, one has k_DS=(N-1)/50 fs^-1. For N=10, (N-1)k_DS=81/50=1.62 fs^-1 while k_GS=0.02 fs^-1, so about 99% of the LP decays into the DS manifold and only about 1% into the ground state, not 50/50. In addition, the text states k_LP=k_GS+(N-1)k_DS, which makes Eq. (9) double-count the DS rate, and Eq. (14) uses k_LP instead of k_GS in the numerator. Since the late-time 'absorptive' line shape is the net of positive and negative pathway classes whose weights are set by these branching fractions, the central time-evolution result as written is not reproducible. Please correct the equations/notation and either adjust the parameters to match the 50/50 statement or recompute the spectra for the actual branching.
  2. [III.B, Fig. 5 and surrounding text] The O(N^{-1}) scaling claim for the DS line shape rests on the sentence 'we have numerically checked that mu^2_LP->DLP scales with O(N^{-1}) and mu^2_DS->2DS scales with O(N^{-2})' and on Fig. 5a, which shows no error bars, fit residuals, or convergence in N or in the number of disorder realizations. Moreover, the text states that every pathway class except SE_DS contributes O(1); it is then not explained how the net late-time 'trivial' line shape, observed to scale as O(N^{-1}), arises unless there is an O(N^{-1}) cancellation among O(1) contributions. The LP/UP argument in Appendix A is explicit, but the DS case is not. Please provide the scaling data/fits and an explicit demonstration of the net cancellation, or amend the argument.
  3. [II.B, Eqs. (9)-(14), and Abstract] The derivative-to-absorptive transition is computed from a Markovian parallel-decay rate-equation model with phenomenological rates and with all coherences during T neglected. The abstract states this transition as a general consequence of 'relaxation to dark states and disorder.' The claim should be explicitly qualified as a property of this kinetic model, and the sensitivity of the transition to the branching ratio and to the Markovian assumption should be discussed or tested. This is distinct from the parameter typo above; even with the intended 50/50 rates, different relaxation mechanisms could change the timing or even the sign of the late-time line shape.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (13)-(14)] The solutions are written as dP_DSi(T) and dP_GS(T), but they should be the populations P_DSi(T) and P_GS(T); the notation is confusing.
  2. [Fig. 5a] The horizontal-axis label appears as 'inverse number of molecules N 1'; it should be 'N^{-1}'.
  3. [III.A, disorder average] No error bars or convergence checks are reported for the 1000-realization disorder average. Reporting the standard error or showing convergence with realization count would make the numerical claims more robust.
  4. [Appendix A] The approximation in Eq. (A6) is valid for omega*delta << sigma^2; the range of validity should be stated more explicitly, especially because the derivative-like extrema are later quoted as ±sigma.
  5. [Data Availability] The data are available only 'upon request.' For reproducibility of the scaling and line-shape claims, consider depositing the disorder-averaging and rate-equation code.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward TC/rate-equation computation; self-citations and the rate-parameter inconsistency are not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a forward model study with no fitted parameters and no target line shape used to determine the model inputs. The spectral evolution is computed from the disordered Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian, the response-function formalism, and a Markovian rate model (Eqs. 9-14). The derivative-to-absorptive transition is not an input; it emerges from computed energy offsets and pathway amplitudes (Eq. 16, Figs. 2-3). Self-citations (refs. 39, 42, 46) supply background eigenstate classification, disorder conventions, and response-theory details, but the present derivation does not reduce to them: the TC eigenstates are standard (refs. 40-43), and the O(N^-1) scalings are re-derived in the appendix and by numerical diagonalization. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior work of the same authors. One caveat: the stated rate constants 1/k_GS=50 fs and 1/k_DS=50/(N-1) fs do not yield the claimed 50/50 GS/DS branching when inserted into Eqs. 9-14 (for N=10 the DS channel dominates). This is an internal consistency/correctness problem in the dynamical model, but it is not circularity because the line-shape output is still computed, not fitted, from the model equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard cavity-QED model plus several modeling choices: the Hamiltonian and disorder sampling, the third-order response-function treatment, and especially the Markovian relaxation rates that set the delay-time evolution. No experimental data are fitted, so these are inputs rather than fitted outputs, but they are hand-chosen and the asymptotic-scaling statements partly rely on numerical checks that are not shown.

free parameters (7)
  • disorder width Delta = 0.05 eV baseline; varied 0.025-0.1 eV
    Controls the magnitude of the DS transition moments and the width of the DS manifold; chosen by hand, not derived from data.
  • light-matter coupling g sqrt(N) = 0.1 eV
    Strong-coupling strength setting the polariton splitting; an input scale of the model.
  • homogeneous linewidth sigma = 0.01 eV
    Gaussian broadening replacing delta functions to mimic dominant inhomogeneous broadening; the extrema separation of the derivative line shape is 2 sigma in the simplified model.
  • LP total decay rate k_LP = 1/100 fs
    Total LP decay rate in the population rate equations; chosen to set the 100 fs relaxation timescale.
  • LP -> GS rate k_GS = 1/50 fs
    Rate for LP-to-ground-state relaxation; together with k_DS gives 50% branching to the DS manifold.
  • LP -> DS rate k_DS = 50/(N-1) fs inverse
    Per-dark-state rate chosen so the total DS branching is 50%; the delay-time evolution to the absorptive line shape depends on these rates.
  • resonance energy hbar omega_m = hbar omega_c = 1.75 eV
    Sets the energy window; a standard model input, not fitted.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian with N noninteracting two-level molecules and a single cavity mode (Eq. 1).
    The central model: molecular interactions beyond the light-matter coupling are neglected.
  • domain assumption On-site disorder drawn from a uniform distribution on [-Delta/2, Delta/2].
    Section II.A: the authors state the choice of distribution is not expected to change results qualitatively.
  • standard math Semi-impulsive limit and third-order perturbative expansion of the density matrix.
    Section II.B: standard nonlinear spectroscopy assumptions used to derive the third-order response function.
  • domain assumption Only the photonic degree of freedom is driven by the external field, mu = lambda(a + a^dagger).
    Section II.B: restricts transitions to those with photonic character; DS transitions become allowed only through disorder-induced photonic weight.
  • domain assumption Markovian population rate equations with parallel decay of the LP into GS and dark states; coherences during T are neglected.
    Eqs. (9)-(14): the predicted time evolution of the line shape is a direct output of this kinetic model.
  • domain assumption Inhomogeneous broadening is dominant; delta-function line shapes are replaced by a Gaussian of width sigma = 0.01 eV.
    Section II.B: this choice is necessary to obtain smooth line shapes after disorder averaging.
  • standard math Holstein-Primakoff equivalence of the TC model to two coupled harmonic oscillators for large N.
    Section III.B: used as a rationalization for why the PP signal decreases with N, not as a direct derivation of the DS scaling.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13884 in / 13897 out tokens · 122253 ms · 2026-08-01T17:33:11.521552+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The formation of hybrid light--matter states called polaritons provides a route to shape the photophysics and photochemistry of molecules. Accordingly, the dynamics of polaritons following photoexcitation is extensively studied. In particular, the role of the dark state manifold in such processes remains unclear. Here, we investigate the line shape of pump-probe spectra of polaritons emerging at the dark states energy under the influence of disorder. Previously, we already investigated the pump-probe line shapes of polaritons in a disorder-free model and identified distinct signatures of relaxation into dark states, thus providing an indirect probe of this relaxation. Since the transition dipole moment of dark states vanishes in a disorder-free model, they cannot be directly probed. However, dark states acquire small transition dipole moments as soon as disorder is explicitly included in the model enabling them to be directly probed. In this work, we demonstrate that the inclusion of the relaxation to dark states and disorder leads to the evolution of the spectral shape at the DS energy from a derivative-like into an absorptive line shape. Furthermore, we investigate the dependence of the line shape on the disorder strength and its asymptotic scaling for a large number of coupled molecules. Our results demonstrate that probing dark states can help to single out the polaritonic response from the total signal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17587 by Julian L\"uttig, Luca Nils Philipp, Roland Mitri\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. a) Energy-level structure of the one- and two particle states of the TC model with and without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Double-sided Feynman diagrams representing the Liouville space pathways, which describe the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. a) Population dynamics of the kinetic polariton relaxation model. b) Time-dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Influence of different disorder widths on the line shape in the PP spectrum at the DSs energy for a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. a) Maximum of the PP spectrum at the DSs energy depending on the inverse number of molecules [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Cavity-. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.196403 , number =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.196403 2015

  2. [2]

    Extraordinary. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.196402 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.196402 2015

  3. [3]

    Ultrafast polariton relaxation dynamics in an organic semiconductor microcavity , volume =. Phys. Rev. B , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.245309 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.245309 2011

  4. [4]

    Exact. Phys. Rev. , author =. 1968 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.170.379 , number =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.170.379 1968

  5. [5]

    Approximate. Phys. Rev. , author =. 1969 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.188.692 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.188.692 1969

  6. [6]

    Polariton. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00247 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00247 2020

  7. [7]

    Femtosecond. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03183 , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03183 2021

  8. [8]

    Entropy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02000 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02000 2020

  9. [9]

    Single-. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.190504 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.190504 2008

  10. [10]

    Science , author =

    Photon-. Science , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.288.5471.1620 , abstract =

    arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    Room. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3316 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.3316 1999

  12. [12]

    Polariton spectra under the collective coupling regime. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0249705 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0249705 2025

  13. [13]

    Untargeted effects in organic exciton–polariton transient spectroscopy:. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0063173 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0063173 2021

  14. [14]

    ChemPhysChem , author =

    Polariton. ChemPhysChem , author =. 2013 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/cphc.201200734 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/cphc.201200734 2013

  15. [15]

    Exploring superconductivity under strong coupling with the vacuum electromagnetic field , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0231202 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0231202 2025

  16. [16]

    Science , author =

    Tilting a ground-state reactivity landscape by vibrational strong coupling , volume =. Science , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.aau7742 , abstract =

    doi:10.1126/science.aau7742 2019

  17. [17]

    Ground-. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , author =. 2016 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/anie.201605504 , abstract =

    doi:10.1002/anie.201605504 2016

  18. [18]

    Reversible. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.196405 , abstract =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.196405 2011

  19. [19]

    Modifying. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , author =. 2012 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/anie.201107033 , abstract =

    doi:10.1002/anie.201107033 2012

  20. [20]

    Modifying. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/anie.202013465 , abstract =

    doi:10.1002/anie.202013465 2021

  21. [21]

    Cavity-. Phys. Rev. X , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041022 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.041022 2015

  22. [22]

    Cavity-. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.238301 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.238301 2016

  23. [23]

    ACS Photonics , author =

    Polaritonic. ACS Photonics , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00680 , abstract =

    doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00680 2018

  24. [24]

    Cavity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , author =. 2019 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/anie.201905407 , abstract =

    doi:10.1002/anie.201905407 2019

  25. [25]

    Science , author =

    Modification of ground-state chemical reactivity via light–matter coherence in infrared cavities , volume =. Science , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.ade7147 , abstract =

    doi:10.1126/science.ade7147 2023

  26. [26]

    Conductivity in organic semiconductors hybridized with the vacuum field , volume =. Nat. Mater. , author =. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nmat4392 , abstract =

    doi:10.1038/nmat4392 2015

  27. [27]

    ACS Nano , author =

    Conductivity and. ACS Nano , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c03496 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c03496 2020

  28. [28]

    ACS Photonics , author =

    Long-. ACS Photonics , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01332 , abstract =

    doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01332 2018

  29. [29]

    Energy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , author =. 2017 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/anie.201703539 , abstract =

    doi:10.1002/anie.201703539 2017

  30. [30]

    Harvesting excitons through plasmonic strong coupling , volume =. Phys. Rev. B , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.121402 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.121402 2015

  31. [31]

    Ultralong-. Adv. Mater. , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/adma.202002127 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202002127 2020

  32. [32]

    Non-. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , author =. 2016 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/anie.201600428 , abstract =

    doi:10.1002/anie.201600428 2016

  33. [33]

    The. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A , author =. 2011 , keywords =. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0333 , abstract =

    arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    Multiboson. Phys. Rev. D , author =. 1986 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.2332 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.2332 1986

  35. [35]

    Decoupling from a. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03789 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03789 2020

  36. [36]

    APL Photonics , author =

    Ultrafast thermal modification of strong coupling in an organic microcavity , volume =. APL Photonics , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0031560 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0031560 2021

  37. [37]

    Motional. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03217 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03217 2024

  38. [38]

    Theory and quantum dynamics simulations of exciton-polariton motional narrowing , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0225387 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0225387 2024

  39. [39]

    Uncoupled. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.156402 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.156402 2016

  40. [40]

    Dark state semilocalization of quantum emitters in a cavity , volume =. Phys. Rev. B , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.144202 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.144202 2020

  41. [41]

    ACS Photonics , author =

    Generation of. ACS Photonics , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00552 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00552 2018

  42. [42]

    State-. J. Phys. Chem. A , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.9b04601 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.9b04601 2019

  43. [43]

    Artifacts in femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy , volume =. Appl. Phys. B , author =. 2002 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s003400100750 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s003400100750 2002

  44. [44]

    Principles of

    Mukamel, Shaul , year =. Principles of

  45. [45]

    Efficient cavity-mediated energy transfer between photosynthetic light harvesting complexes from strong to weak coupling regime

    Wu, Fan and Phan, Tu C. Nguyen- and Cogdell, Richard and Pullerits, Tonu , month = feb, year =. Efficient cavity-mediated energy transfer between photosynthetic light harvesting complexes from strong to weak coupling regime , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.10144 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.10144

  46. [46]

    Optical cavity-mediated exciton dynamics in photosynthetic light harvesting 2 complexes , volume =. Nat. Commun. , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34613-x , abstract =

    doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34613-x 2022

  47. [47]

    Concepts and

    Hamm, Peter and Zanni, Martin , year =. Concepts and. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511675935 , abstract =

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511675935

  48. [48]

    Quantum. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03447 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03447 2020

  49. [49]

    Non-. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0188613 , abstract =

    doi:10.1063/5.0188613 2024

  50. [50]

    Multi-scale dynamics simulations of molecular polaritons:. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0037868 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0037868 2021

  51. [51]

    Singlet fission of amorphous rubrene modulated by polariton formation , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.5108698 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5108698 2019

  52. [52]

    Tracking. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02192 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02192 2019

  53. [53]

    ACS Photonics , author =

    Anisotropic. ACS Photonics , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.4c01219 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.4c01219 2025

  54. [54]

    Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy:

    Hamm, Peter , pages =. Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy:

  55. [55]

    Nonlinear. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.193803 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.193803 2025

  56. [56]

    Nanophotonics , author =

    Extracting accurate light–matter couplings from disordered polaritons , volume =. Nanophotonics , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024-0049 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024-0049 2024

  57. [57]

    Molecular polaritonics in dense mesoscopic disordered ensembles , volume =. Phys. Rev. Res. , author =. 2021 , pages =

    2021

  58. [58]

    Tracking relaxation dynamics of polaritons and reservoir states in organic exciton-polaritons , url =. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00666 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00666 2025

  59. [59]

    Probing plexciton dynamics with higher-order spectroscopy , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0278118 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0278118 2025

  60. [60]

    Line shapes in pump–probe spectroscopy of polaritons , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0281720 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0281720 2025

  61. [61]

    Rödel, Maximilian and Lisinetskaya, Polina and Rudloff, Maximilian and Stark, Thomas and Manara, Jochen and Mitric, Roland and Pflaum, Jens , month = mar, year =. The. J. Phys. Chem. C , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c10084 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c10084

  62. [62]

    Plasmon-

    Quenzel, Thomas and Timmer, Daniel and Gittinger, Moritz and Zablocki, Jennifer and Zheng, Fulu and Schiek, Manuela and Lützen, Arne and Frauenheim, Thomas and Tretiak, Sergei and Silies, Martin and Zhong, Jin-Hui and De Sio, Antonietta and Lienau, Christoph , month = mar, year =. Plasmon-. ACS Nano , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c11398 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c11398

  63. [63]

    Understanding radiative transitions and relaxation pathways in plexcitons , volume =

    Finkelstein-Shapiro, Daniel and Mante, Pierre-Adrien and Sarisozen, Sema and Wittenbecher, Lukas and Minda, Iulia and Balci, Sinan and Pullerits, Tõnu and Zigmantas, Donatas , month = apr, year =. Understanding radiative transitions and relaxation pathways in plexcitons , volume =. Chem , publisher =. doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2021.02.028 , number =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2021.02.028 2021

  64. [64]

    Nano Lett

    Molecularly. Nano Lett. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c04514 , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c04514 2024

  65. [65]

    and Somaschi, Niccolo and Michetti, Paolo and Clark, Caspar and Lagoudakis, Pavlos G

    Coles, David M. and Somaschi, Niccolo and Michetti, Paolo and Clark, Caspar and Lagoudakis, Pavlos G. and Savvidis, Pavlos G. and Lidzey, David G. , month = jul, year =. Polariton-mediated energy transfer between organic dyes in a strongly coupled optical microcavity , volume =. Nature Mater , publisher =. doi:10.1038/nmat3950 , abstract =

    doi:10.1038/nmat3950

  66. [66]

    and Khan, Saeed-Uz-Zaman and Park, Kyu Hyung and Kudisch, Bryan and Rand, Barry P

    DelPo, Courtney A. and Khan, Saeed-Uz-Zaman and Park, Kyu Hyung and Kudisch, Bryan and Rand, Barry P. and Scholes, Gregory D. , month = oct, year =. Polariton. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02644 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02644

  67. [67]

    Advanced Optical Materials , author =

    Direct. Advanced Optical Materials , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/adom.202400821 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/adom.202400821 2024

  68. [68]

    and Schmiedel, Alexander and Holzapfel, Marco and Humeniuk, Alexander and Röhr, Merle I

    Lambert, Christoph and Koch, Federico and Völker, Sebastian F. and Schmiedel, Alexander and Holzapfel, Marco and Humeniuk, Alexander and Röhr, Merle I. S. and Mitric, Roland and Brixner, Tobias , month = jun, year =. Energy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b03644 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.5b03644

  69. [69]

    Fluorescence band exchange narrowing in a series of squaraine oligomers: energetic vs

    Turkin, Arthur and Malý, Pavel and Lambert, Christoph , month = sep, year =. Fluorescence band exchange narrowing in a series of squaraine oligomers: energetic vs. structural disorder , volume =. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , publisher =. doi:10.1039/D1CP02136B , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/d1cp02136b

  70. [70]

    and Martínez-Martínez, Luis A

    Ribeiro, Raphael F. and Martínez-Martínez, Luis A. and Du, Matthew and Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, Jorge and Yuen-Zhou, Joel , month = aug, year =. Polariton chemistry: controlling molecular dynamics with optical cavities , volume =. Chem. Sci. , publisher =. doi:10.1039/C8SC01043A , abstract =

    doi:10.1039/c8sc01043a

  71. [71]

    and Feist, Johannes and García-Vidal, Francisco J

    Sánchez-Barquilla, Mónica and Fernández-Domínguez, Antonio I. and Feist, Johannes and García-Vidal, Francisco J. , month = jun, year =. A. ACS Photonics , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00048 , abstract =

    doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00048

  72. [72]

    Nano Lett

    Mapping. Nano Lett. , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6c00326 , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6c00326 2026

  73. [73]

    and de Jong, Lianne M

    Berghuis, Anton Matthijs and Tichauer, Ruth H. and de Jong, Lianne M. A. and Sokolovskii, Ilia and Bai, Ping and Ramezani, Mohammad and Murai, Shunsuke and Groenhof, Gerrit and Gómez Rivas, Jaime , month = jul, year =. Controlling. ACS Photonics , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00007 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00007

  74. [74]

    and Ribeiro, Raphael F

    Du, Matthew and Martínez-Martínez, Luis A. and Ribeiro, Raphael F. and Hu, Zixuan and Menon, Vinod M. and Yuen-Zhou, Joel , month = aug, year =. Theory for polariton-assisted remote energy transfer , volume =. Chem. Sci. , publisher =. doi:10.1039/C8SC00171E , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/c8sc00171e

  75. [75]

    Energy transfer and correlations in cavity-embedded donor-acceptor configurations , volume =

    Reitz, Michael and Mineo, Francesca and Genes, Claudiu , month = jun, year =. Energy transfer and correlations in cavity-embedded donor-acceptor configurations , volume =. Sci Rep , publisher =. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-27396-z , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-27396-z

  76. [76]

    Embrace the darkness:. Chem. Phys. Rev. , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0168948 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0168948 2023

  77. [77]

    Exciton–. J. Phys. Chem. C , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6c00645 , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6c00645 2026