Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 41 references

Eigenstates in coupled-channel scattering amplitude and their effects on spectrum

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In coupled-channel scattering, the pole that starts as a bound state below threshold does not become the resonance above threshold; instead the two poles interchange roles.

desk verdict A careful and genuinely useful two-channel pole-trajectory result, with a path-dependent Xi-sector application that deserves peer review and a revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.21949 v1 pith:EXEKNGJE submitted 2025-06-27 hep-ph nucl-th

Takuma Nishibuchi , Tetsuo Hyodo This is my paper
classification hep-phnucl-th PACS 13.75.Jz14.20.Jn
keywords coupled-channelscatteringRiemannsheetsresonancepolesquasiboundstatevirtualWeinberg-TomozawainteractionchiralunitaryapproachXi(1620)
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish where resonance poles come from when a scattering system has several open decay channels. Using a two-channel model, the authors trace what happens to an s-wave bound state as the attraction weakens: instead of the bound-state pole moving continuously upward to become the resonance, it crosses the cuts and becomes an anti-resonance or shadow pole, while a virtual-state pole rises to become the observable resonance. The same logic is applied to four chiral-unitary models of the Xi(1620) and Xi(1690) resonances. The authors find that poles in different models that sit near the same energy are not necessarily the same state, and that the apparent Xi(1690) region is controlled by a threshold cusp from off-diagonal amplitudes rather than by a narrow pole on the physical sheet.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the multi-sheeted Riemann surface of the analytically continued coupled-channel T-matrix, labelled [tt], [tb], [bt], and [bb] for the t/b sheets of each channel. Pole trajectories are tracked as the subtraction constant, the transition coupling, or the interaction strength is varied, and the argument principle guarantees that the total number of poles is conserved. Structural identities include the exceptional point where two poles collide, the t/b sheet crossings at branch cuts, and the classification of poles as quasibound, quasivirtual, shadow, resonance, and anti-resonance states. The paper also uses a linear interpolation in model parameters (subtraction constants and decay constants) and in hadron masses to test whether poles appearing in different models are continuations of one another.

What would settle it

A high-statistics measurement of Xi_c -> pi pi Xi that shows a narrow, genuine peak at the Xi(1690) mass with a shape that the Weinberg-Tomozawa models cannot produce through their off-diagonal cusp would falsify the claim that no narrow physical-sheet pole generates that resonance; equivalently, a next-to-leading-order chiral calculation that puts a narrow pole on the physical sheet in the Xi(1690) region would do the same.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the quasibound-state pole below the threshold is not continuously connected to the resonance pole above the threshold. Tracing the poles while varying the attractive interaction in a two-channel model, the authors show that the original bound-state pole crosses branch cuts, becomes a quasivirtual pole, and ends as an anti-resonance or shadow pole, while the original virtual-state pole moves through threshold and becomes the resonance; the total number of poles is conserved. Applied to the S = -2 meson-baryon sector, this means models that agree on the existence of Xi(1620) need not agree on its origin, and no narrow pole on the physically relevant Riemann sheet produces a Xi(1690) peak. The strong cusp seen at the KbarSigma threshold in the piXi invariant mass distribution is traced to the off-diagonal K^-Sigma^+ -> pi^+Xi^- transition amplitude, whose channel carries the largest weight in the decay.

Load-bearing premise

Everything hinges on the chosen linear interpolation paths and on the leading-order Weinberg-Tomozawa interaction being faithful; if higher-order terms or the omitted p-wave Xi(1530) move poles across Riemann sheets, the claimed different origins could dissolve.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Resonance classification by pole energy alone is insufficient; the Riemann sheet and the continuation history of the pole define its physical role.
  • Models that yield similar Xi(1620) masses can still disagree about whether the state is a quasibound or quasivirtual state, which changes its coupling to decay channels.
  • The Xi(1690) region should appear as a KbarSigma threshold cusp in piXi invariant mass spectra, not as a narrow resonance peak, within these models.
  • For the Xi_c -> pi pi Xi decay, off-diagonal transition amplitudes contribute more than diagonal ones because the diagonal pi+Xi- weight vanishes, so the cusp structure is a genuine observable of the transition amplitude.
  • Pole-count conservation means one cannot create or destroy resonances by changing couplings; observed peaks must be matched to pre-existing poles across sheets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same pole-interchange mechanism should appear in any near-threshold s-wave coupled-channel system, such as the Lambda(1405) or the a0(980)/f0(980) sector, where a quasibound state near a lower threshold decays into a higher-energy channel.
  • A testable extension is to repeat the interpolation procedure with nonlinear paths in parameter space, for example loops around the exceptional point, to see whether pole identity changes with the path, which would sharpen or weaken the claim that poles in different models have different origins.
  • If the off-diagonal cusp is confirmed experimentally, it would support using decay spectra, not just scattering cross sections, as direct probes of transition amplitudes between coupled channels.
  • The isospin-breaking non-commutativity found for poles near the KbarSigma threshold suggests that lattice or femtoscopy analyses should report pole locations with explicit isospin-breaking treatment, since physical and isospin-symmetric sheets label different states.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the analytic structure of coupled-channel scattering amplitudes, focusing on how poles on different Riemann sheets evolve and affect physical spectra. In a two-channel model with the Weinberg-Tomozawa interaction, the authors trace poles as the subtraction constant a2 or the interaction strength alpha is varied, with the transition coupling beta either zero or finite. They find that, along the studied trajectories, the quasibound state below threshold does not become the above-threshold resonance; instead the pole that starts as a (quasi)virtual state becomes the observable resonance, so that a kind of pole interchange occurs. The analysis is then applied to S = -2 meson-baryon models for the Xi(1620) and Xi(1690) resonances. By linearly interpolating between four literature models (Set 1, Set Fit, Model 1, Model 2) and by varying isospin breaking through linear mass interpolations, the authors classify which poles are continuously connected and which are not. They conclude that the Xi(1620) quasibound state in Model 1 and the quasivirtual state in Model 2 have different origins, while the Xi(1690)-related poles z3 and z4 are connected to each other only after isospin-symmetric interpolation, acting as shadow poles. Finally, they compute the pi+ Xi- invariant mass distribution in Xi_c -> pi pi Xi decay, observing a strong KbarSigma threshold cusp that they attribute to off-diagonal transition amplitudes rather than to diagonal scattering lengths.

Significance. If the central pole-interchange result holds, it clarifies an important distinction between quasibound states and resonances in coupled-channel systems and provides useful guidance for interpreting near-threshold structures in hadron spectra. The paper is transparent and largely non-circular: no parameters are fitted to the claims, the two-channel model uses hand-set parameters, the Xi-sector models are taken from prior literature, and the pole trajectories are presented with explicit numerical positions in Tables I, III, IV, and VI and in Figures 1-4. The two independent parameter variations (a2 and alpha) giving qualitatively identical results strengthen the toy-model demonstration. The invariant mass calculation yields a concrete, falsifiable prediction about the origin of the KbarSigma cusp. The paper also explicitly acknowledges its main limitation, the restriction to leading-order Weinberg-Tomozawa interactions. The principal weakness is that some connectivity claims in the Xi sector rely on specific interpolation paths in parameter space, and the paper itself demonstrates path dependence for another set of poles.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. IV B and Eqs. (18)-(21)] The claim that the quasibound state z1 of Model 1 and the quasivirtual state z2 of Model 2 are 'not continuously connected and thus have different origins' is established only for the straight-line parameter interpolations defined by Eqs. (18)-(19) and their isospin-symmetric variants in Eqs. (20)-(21). The paper itself shows in Sec. IV C and Fig. 7 that pole identity is path-dependent in this system: for the z3/z4 pair, interchanging the order of the model interpolation and the isospin-symmetry interpolation swaps the endpoints. For the z1/z2 pair, however, only the straight x-interpolation and its isospin-symmetric variant are examined; no non-linear route or closed loop in the multi-dimensional space of subtraction constants and decay constants is tested. Since such an alternative route could in principle connect z1 to z2, the categorical statement that the two poles 'have different origins' is not fully supported. This point is load-bearing for the paper's Xi(1620) interpretation. I recommend either adding additional path tests (for example, a closed loop around the relevant branch points or a path via a third model) or explicitly qualifying the conclusion as holding only for the interpolations considered.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'does not continuously connected' should be 'is not continuously connected.'
  2. [Table II] The last column header is printed as 'aπΞ' but should be 'aηΞ' to match the text and the model parameters.
  3. [Sec. V A] The text refers to 'Table V B' where it should refer to 'Table V.'
  4. [Sec. III B] There is a missing space in 'arounda2 ~ -2.80'; please fix the typo.
  5. [Fig. 10] In the manuscript version provided, the panels and caption of Fig. 10 appear duplicated; please verify the production version of the figure.
  6. [Sec. IV B, footnote 4] The wording 'the pole crosses the real energy axis, it passes through the branch cuts' could be clarified as 'the pole crosses the unitarity cuts on the real axis,' since a pole on the real axis below a threshold does not literally pass through a branch cut in the complex plane before crossing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: pole trajectories and spectrum predictions are computed consequences of the model equations, not restatements of the inputs.

full rationale

The two-channel analysis in Sec. III uses hand-set fictitious masses and parameters (Eqs. (14)-(16)); the pole trajectories and the quasibound-to-shadow/quasivirtual-to-resonance interchange are solutions of the algebraic scattering equation (1), not restatements of the parameter choices. The application section takes Model 1 and Model 2 from the authors' Ref. [10], but their subtraction constants are listed in Table II and those models were constrained by Belle and ALICE data in the prior work, so the citation is external evidence rather than a self-citation chain. The paper explicitly reports that z4/z5 appear at nearly identical positions because the three models share common subtraction constants, showing awareness that common inputs produce common output. The path-dependence of the model interpolation (demonstrated by the non-commutativity of the z3/z4 trajectories in Fig. 7) is a robustness caveat about the strength of the 'different origins' language, not a circular reduction. No fitted parameter in this paper is renamed as a prediction; the cusp and the absence of a narrow physical-sheet pole near the Xi(1690) follow from the calculated amplitudes and the stated definition of the physically relevant sheet. Limitations (higher-order terms, omitted p-wave Xi(1530)) are acknowledged in Sec. VI. Accordingly no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. All fitted content enters through the four published models' subtraction constants, which were fit to data in Refs. [10,20,22], and through hand-chosen toy-model parameters in Sec. III. The central claims are computed consequences of stated equations.

free parameters (6)
  • subtraction constant a2 (two-channel model) = -3.00 to -2.00, varied
    Controls the attraction in channel 2; the entire trajectory study is a scan over this parameter (Sec. III B). Free in the sense that it is chosen by hand to scan physics, not fixed by data.
  • transition coupling beta (two-channel model) = 0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2
    Sets the strength of the decay-channel coupling; chosen by hand to illustrate the effect (Sec. III A).
  • interaction strength alpha (two-channel model) = 4.0, varied to 3.0
    Attractive interaction in channel 2; alternate scanning parameter verified in Appendix A.
  • fictitious meson/baryon masses = m1=150, M1=1100, m2=200, M2=1300 MeV
    Hand-picked to place channel 1 below the poles so that channel 1 acts as a decay channel (Sec. III A).
  • subtraction constants of Xi models = Table II values
    Taken from prior fits to Belle and ALICE data; not refit here, but they determine all pole positions in Sec. IV.
  • weak decay vertex VP = constant, arbitrary
    A normalization constant in Eq. (11); only relative shapes of the invariant mass distribution are used.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The T-matrix satisfies the algebraic N/D scattering equation and is continued to the full multi-sheeted Riemann surface by the loop function Gk(W).
    Used in Sec. II without proof; standard in the chiral unitary approach.
  • domain assumption The Weinberg-Tomozawa interaction, Eq. (2), is the relevant leading-order kernel for the S=-2 meson-baryon sector.
    Adopted in Sec. II; its truncation at leading order is acknowledged as a limitation in Sec. VI.
  • domain assumption Continuation of the amplitude across the real axis between channel thresholds follows the t/b sheet convention of Refs. [6,10].
    Underlies all pole classifications in Tables I, III, IV.
  • standard math Pole number is conserved under continuous parameter deformation by the argument principle unless the pole meets a zero of the amplitude.
    Invoked in Sec. III C citing Ref. [38]; supports the 'interchange rather than creation' interpretation.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear interpolation in parameter space adequately probes the connection between models.
    Eqs. (18)-(19) define the comparison; the conclusions about which poles are connected depend on this path choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Eigenstates in coupled-channel scattering amplitude and their effects on spectrum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EXEKNGJE

@misc{pith2026250621949,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Eigenstates in coupled-channel scattering amplitude and their effects on spectrum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EXEKNGJE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.21949}
}
abstract

In general, discrete eigenstates such as resonances are represented by poles of the scattering amplitude, analytically continued to the complex energy plane. In multi-channel scattering, however, the Riemann surface becomes more complicated, leading to the emergence of various types of poles with distinct characteristics. In this study, we investigate the relationship between poles located on different Riemann sheets and analyze how they influence the observable spectra. In particular, we clarify the effect of the decay channel on the pole trajectory, where an $s$-wave bound state evolves into a resonance via a virtual state. It is shown that the quasibound state pole below the threshold does not continuously connected to the resonance pole above the threshold, and a kind of interchange of poles occurs. As a concrete example, we consider several models based on the chiral unitary approach that describe meson-baryon scattering amplitudes involving the $\Xi(1620)$ and $\Xi(1690)$ resonances. We examine their impact on the $\pi\Xi$ invariant mass distributions in the $\Xi_{c} \to \pi\pi\Xi$ decay, discussing how the pole structure manifests itself in experimental observables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.21949 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Pole trajectories in the [tt] sheet (left top), [bt] sheet (right top), [tb] sheet (left bottom), [bb] sheet (right bottom), with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Same with Fig. 1 but in the complex momentum [tt/bb] plane (left) and [bt/tb] plane (right). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Pole trajectories in the complex energy plane with the variation of the subtraction constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Same with Fig. 3 but in the complex momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Trajectory of pole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Trajectory of pole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Trajectories of pole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Invariant mass distribution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Invariant mass distribution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Transition scattering amplitudes for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Pole trajectories in the [tt] sheet (left top), [bt] sheet (right top), [tb] sheet (left bottom), [bb] sheet (right bottom), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Same with Fig. 11 but in the complex momentum [tt/bb] plane (left) and [bt/tb] plane (right). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Pole trajectories in the complex energy plane with the variation of the coupling strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Same with Fig. 13 but in the complex momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    physically relevant Rie- mann sheet

    Since the pole does not cross any branch cut during the interpolation, both poles in these models lie on the same [bbtttt] Riemann sheet. Therefore, the poles for the Ξ(1620) in these models share the same origin and can be interpreted as a ¯K 0Λ quasibound state based on their Riemann sheet structure. As shown in Sec. III, a quasibound state located be- ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Navas et al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navas et al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states, PTEP 2016, 062C01 (2016), arXiv:1603.09229 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, The XY Z states: experimental and theoretical sta- tus and perspectives, Phys. Rept. 873, 1 (2020), arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 14 -10 -5 0 5 10 1480 1485 1490 1495 1500 1505 1510 [tt] Im W [MeV] Re W [MeV] -10 -5 0 5 10 1480 1485 1490 1495 1500 1505 1510 [bt] Im W [MeV] Re W [MeV] -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 1420 1440 1460 148...

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Hyodo and M

    T. Hyodo and M. Niiyama, QCD and the strange baryon spectrum, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103868 (2021), arXiv:2010.07592 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory on Nonrelativistic Collisions(Wiley, New York, 1972)

    work page 1972

  8. [8]

    S. A. Rakityansky, Jost Functions in Quantum Mechan- ics (Springer, 2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Mai, U.-G

    M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner, and C. Urbach, Towards a the- ory of hadron resonances, Phys. Rept. 1001, 1 (2023), arXiv:2206.01477 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Mai, Theory of resonances, (2025), arXiv:2502.02654 [hep-ph]

    M. Mai, Theory of resonances, (2025), arXiv:2502.02654 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Nishibuchi and T

    T. Nishibuchi and T. Hyodo, Analysis of the Ξ(1620) 15 -10 0 10 20 30 40 1490 1495 1500 1505 1510 1515 [tb] [bt] Im W [MeV] Re W [MeV] -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 1400 1420 1440 1460 1480 1500 1520 [bb] Im W [MeV] Re W [MeV] FIG. 13. Pole trajectories in the complex e...

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Hyodo, Hadron mass scaling near the s-wave thresh- old, Phys

    T. Hyodo, Hadron mass scaling near the s-wave thresh- old, Phys. Rev. C 90, 055208 (2014), arXiv:1407.2372 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Hanhart, J

    C. Hanhart, J. Pelaez, and G. Rios, Remarks on pole tra- jectories for resonances, Phys. Lett. B 739, 375 (2014), arXiv:1407.7452 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Sumihama et al.(Belle), Observation of Ξ(1620)0 and evidence for Ξ(1690) 0 in Ξ + c → Ξ−π+π+ decays, Phys

    M. Sumihama et al.(Belle), Observation of Ξ(1620)0 and evidence for Ξ(1690) 0 in Ξ + c → Ξ−π+π+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 072501 (2019), arXiv:1810.06181 [hep- ex]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Acharya et al.(ALICE), ΛK femtoscopy in Pb-Pb col- lisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharya et al.(ALICE), ΛK femtoscopy in Pb-Pb col- lisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 103, 055201 (2021), arXiv:2005.11124 [nucl-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Accessing the strong inter- action between Λ baryons and charged kaons with the femtoscopy technique at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138145 (2023), arXiv:2305.19093 [nucl-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kaiser, P

    N. Kaiser, P. B. Siegel, and W. Weise, Chiral dynamics and the low-energy kaon–nucleon interaction, Nucl. Phys. A 594, 325 (1995), nucl-th/9505043

    1995 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Oset and A

    E. Oset and A. Ramos, Nonperturbative chiral approach to s wave anti-K N interactions, Nucl. Phys. A635, 99 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9711022 [nucl-th]

    1998 arXiv

  11. [19]

    J. A. Oller and U. G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics in the presence of bound states: kaon–nucleon interactions re- visited, Phys. Lett. B 500, 263 (2001), hep-ph/0011146

    2001 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Hyodo and D

    T. Hyodo and D. Jido, The nature of the Λ(1405) reso- nance in chiral dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 55 (2012), arXiv:1104.4474 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Ramos, E

    A. Ramos, E. Oset, and C. Bennhold, On the spin, parity and nature of the xi(1620) resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 252001 (2002), nucl-th/0204044

    2002 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Garcia-Recio, M

    C. Garcia-Recio, M. F. M. Lutz, and J. Nieves, Quark mass dependence of s wave baryon resonances, Phys. Lett. B 582, 49 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0305100

    2004 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Sekihara, Ξ(1690) as a ¯KΣ molecular state, PTEP 2015, 091D01 (2015), arXiv:1505.02849 [hep-ph]

    T. Sekihara, Ξ(1690) as a ¯KΣ molecular state, PTEP 2015, 091D01 (2015), arXiv:1505.02849 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martinez Torres, A. Hosaka, H. Nagahiro, F. S. Navarra, and M. Nielsen, Why Ξ(1690) and Ξ(2120) are so narrow?, Phys. Rev. D97, 034005 (2018), arXiv:1608.07086 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Feijoo, V

    A. Feijoo, V. Valcarce Cadenas, and V. K. Magas, The Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690) molecular states from S = −2 meson-baryon interaction up to next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 841, 137927 (2023), arXiv:2303.01323 [hep- ph]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Li, G.-J

    H.-P. Li, G.-J. Zhang, W.-H. Liang, and E. Oset, The- oretical interpretation of the Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690) reso- nances seen in Ξ + c → Ξ−π+π+ decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 954 (2023), arXiv:2308.11879 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    V. M. Sarti, A. Feijoo, I. Vida˜ na, A. Ramos, F. Gi- acosa, T. Hyodo, and Y. Kamiya, Constraining the low-energy S=-2 meson-baryon interaction with two- particle correlations, Phys. Rev. D 110, L011505 (2024), arXiv:2309.08756 [hep-ph]. 16

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Feijoo, V

    A. Feijoo, V. M. Sarti, J. Nieves, A. Ramos, and I. Vida˜ na, Bridging correlation and spectroscopy mea- surements to access the hadron interaction behind molec- ular states: The case of the Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690) in the K-Λ system, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014022 (2025), arXiv:2411.102...

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Miyahara, T

    K. Miyahara, T. Hyodo, and E. Oset, Weak decay of Λ + c for the study of Λ(1405) and Λ(1670), Phys. Rev. C 92, 055204 (2015), arXiv:1508.04882 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Miyahara, T

    K. Miyahara, T. Hyodo, M. Oka, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Theoretical study of the Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690) resonances in Ξc → π+M Bdecays, Phys. Rev. C 95, 035212 (2017), arXiv:1609.00895 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Oset et al., Weak decays of heavy hadrons into dy- namically generated resonances, Int

    E. Oset et al., Weak decays of heavy hadrons into dy- namically generated resonances, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E25, 1630001 (2016), arXiv:1601.03972 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hyodo, D

    T. Hyodo, D. Jido, and A. Hosaka, Origin of resonances in the chiral unitary approach, Phys. Rev. C 78, 025203 (2008), arXiv:0803.2550 [nucl-th]

    2008 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ikeda, T

    Y. Ikeda, T. Hyodo, D. Jido, H. Kamano, T. Sato, and K. Yazaki, Structure of Λ(1405) and threshold behavior of πΣ scattering, Prog. Theor. Phys. 125, 1205 (2011), arXiv:1101.5190 [nucl-th]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Hyodo, Structure of Near-Threshold s-Wave Resonances, Phys

    T. Hyodo, Structure of Near-Threshold s-Wave Resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 132002 (2013), arXiv:1305.1999 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    W.D.Heiss, Repulsion of resonance states and excep- tional points, Phys. Rev. E61, 929 (1999), arXiv:9909047 [quant-ph]

    1999

  28. [36]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A 45, 444016 (2012), arXiv:1210.7536 [quant-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    N. Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Eden and J

    R. Eden and J. Taylor, Poles and Shadow Poles in the Many-Channel S Matrix, Phys. Rev. 133, B1575 (1964)

    1964

  31. [39]

    Kamiya and T

    Y. Kamiya and T. Hyodo, Structure of hadron resonances with a nearby zero of the amplitude, Phys. Rev. D97, 054019 (2018), arXiv:1711.04558 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, A. E. Kudryavt- sev, and U.-G. Meissner, Flatt´ e-like distributions and the a0(980)/f0(980) mesons, Eur. Phys. J. A 23, 523 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0410099

    2005 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Sone and T

    K. Sone and T. Hyodo, General amplitude of near- threshold hadron scattering for exotic hadrons, (2024), arXiv:2405.08436 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.