Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 100 references

Probing Bulk Band Topology from Time Boundary Effect in Synthetic Dimension

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A sudden parameter jump in a chiral lattice produces refracted and reflected waves whose coefficients braid with linking number equal to the winding-number difference across the jump, making band topology readable from scattering.

desk verdict Eq. (3) is a clean theorem; the paper's zero-counting tomography is overreached and contradicted by its own example. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16390 v1 pith:EXG3IK4U submitted 2025-04-23 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph

Huisheng Xu , Zhaohui Dong , Luqi Yuan , Liang Jin This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords temporalinterfacetimerefractionreflectionbulk-boundarycorrespondencewindingnumberlinkingsyntheticfrequencydimensiontopologicalphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the boundary in time between two suddenly different lattice Hamiltonians is itself a topological object. For a two-band chiral lattice, a wave crossing that temporal interface splits into time-refracted and time-reflected components; the paper writes their coefficients r+(k) and r−(k) as projections of the initial upper-band eigenstate onto the two final-band eigenstates. Its central claim is that these two coefficient curves braid as functions of momentum, and once mapped onto a torus their linking number exactly equals the difference of the bulk winding numbers across the interface, L = wi − wf. It also claims that a zero of either coefficient occurs at the momentum where the band gap closes at a topological phase transition, so counting and locating zeros provides momentum-resolved phase-diagram tomography. These features matter because they make band topology readable from a single scattering measurement, without edge states or boundary fine-tuning, and the paper demonstrates them in a synthetic frequency lattice whose long-range couplings produce high winding numbers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of complex coefficient curves r+(k) and r−(k), together with their torus link. Because the chiral Hamiltonian's eigenstates are fixed by the phase φ(k)=arg G(k), a quench from H_i to H_f produces r±(k) = {1 ± $e^{{i[φ_i(k)−φ_f(k)]}}$}/2; the identity L = wi − wf follows from how many times the phase difference Δφ = φ_i − φ_f winds around the circle as k runs over the Brillouin zone. Each full winding of Δφ makes r+ circle r− once on the torus, so the topological invariant of the bulk becomes a braiding property of ordinary scattering coefficients. The zeros of r± are the k points where Δφ is an integer multiple of 2π, which coincide with the degenerate points of gap-closing transitions. This reduction of band topology to coefficient braiding is what carries the paper's argument.

What would settle it

Take the paper's SSH example with couplings (g0=1, g1=1.5) before and (g0=1, g1=-0.5) after the temporal interface. r−(k) vanishes at k=0, yet the straight-line quench crosses only the phase boundary at g1=g0, whose gap-closing momentum is k=π; a direct simulation or experiment showing this zero without the corresponding boundary being crossed settles that zeros alone cannot identify which transition was traversed, while the torus-linking number L=1 still agrees with the winding-number difference.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a temporal-analog bulk-boundary correspondence: the change in bulk topology across a sudden parameter jump is encoded in the scattering of a wave at the jump. For chiral Hamiltonians of the form H(k) = [[0, G†(k)],[G(k),0]], the eigenstates are (1, ±$e^{{iφ(k)}}$)/√2 with winding number w = ∮∂kφ dk/2π, and the time-refraction/reflection coefficients are r±(k) = (1 ± $e^{{i[φ_i(k)−φ_f(k)]}}$)/2. The paper shows that when k is taken as the toroidal direction, the two coefficient curves form a link on a torus with linking number L = wi − wf, so the difference in bulk winding numbers is read directly from how r+ and r− wind around each other. It further shows that zeros of r+ and r− sit at the gap-closing degenerate momenta of the phase boundaries, and that in the SSH model and in a synthetic frequency lattice the links realized are the unlink, the Hopf link, and the Solomon link for |wi − wf| = 0, 1, 2.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a zero of either time-refraction or time-reflection always records a topological phase transition across the temporal interface; that requires the parameter path from the initial to the final Hamiltonian to cross every gap-closing boundary whose momentum makes the two eigenstates coincide, which is not true in the paper's own example, where one zero belongs to a boundary the quench never crosses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single temporal-interface scattering experiment can extract the winding-number difference |wi − wf| by counting link crossings of r+ and r−, bypassing direct measurement of the Zak phase or edge states.
  • Zeros of r+(k) and r−(k) localize the momenta at which the gap closes during the topological phase transition, giving momentum-resolved phase-diagram tomography from bulk wave data.
  • The link crossing number 2L provides a lower bound on the number of dynamical quantum phase transitions satisfying |r+|² = |r−|² = 1/2 after the quench.
  • Because the construction relies only on eigenstate projections, the predicted zeros and links are insensitive to spatial boundary conditions and robust against disorder in the synthetic frequency lattice.
  • The same argument extends to higher-dimensional topological phases, so a time boundary in a two-dimensional Chern insulator can in principle probe changes in the Chern number.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linking-number identity suggests a composition rule the paper leaves implicit: two consecutive temporal interfaces with intermediate winding number w_m should produce links whose crossing numbers add, so a sequence of quenches could act as a topological accumulator that sums invariant differences without ever measuring a band.
  • If the zero-counting claim is used as tomography, it should be read as conditional on the quench path actually crossing each phase boundary; the linking number remains valid even when some zeros correspond to uncrossed boundaries, so a safer experimental protocol would combine several quench directions to reconstruct the phase diagram.
  • The r± formalism is not tied to photonics: any two-band unitary quench, including cold-atom or acoustic realizations, can test Eq. (3), and in non-Hermitian chiral lattices the breakdown of |r+|² + |r−|² = 1 would reveal whether the braiding invariant survives when the winding number becomes complex.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies time-refraction and time-reflection coefficients at a temporal interface in chiral two-band lattices. For an initial upper-band excitation, the coefficients r±(k) are overlaps between the initial and final band eigenstates; for off-diagonal chiral Hamiltonians they reduce to r±(k) = [1 ± e^{i(φ_i(k)-φ_f(k))}]/2. The paper claims two topological signatures: (i) zeros of r+ or r- record topological phase transitions across the temporal interface, enabling phase-diagram tomography; and (ii) when the curves r+(k) and r-(k) are mapped onto a torus, their linking number equals the difference of the bulk winding numbers across the interface, L = w_i - w_f. The results are demonstrated in a synthetic frequency lattice with long-range couplings, and numerical markers in Fig. 4 are compared with the analytic curves.

Significance. If the linking-number identity (Eq. (3)) is correct, it is a clean and parameter-free result: the temporal-interface scattering coefficients directly encode the difference of bulk winding numbers, without requiring edge states or boundary conditions. The proposed synthetic frequency lattice with long-range couplings is concrete, and the numerical agreement in Fig. 4 supports the braiding/linking claim. The zero-counting tomographic claim, however, is not supported by the formalism and is internally contradicted by the paper's own SSH example. The linking-number result may be publishable on its own, but the advertised 'vanishing records a topological phase transition' statement needs substantial qualification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Topological effects for temporal interface, Eq. (1)] The statement that 'the vanishing of either time refraction or time reflection records a topological phase transition across the temporal interface' is not supported by the formula. From r±(k) = (1 ± e^{i[φ_i(k)-φ_f(k)]})/2, one has r_-(k)=0 whenever φ_i(k) = φ_f(k) mod 2π. This condition depends only on the endpoint eigenstates and does not imply that any path in parameter space connecting H_i and H_f experiences a gap closing at that momentum. The paper's own SSH example in Fig. 1 exhibits this: for g0=1, g1: 1.5 → -0.5, one has φ_i(0)=φ_f(0)=0, so r_-(0)=0, but the straight-line segment g1(s)=1.5-2s does not cross the boundary g1=-g0, which would require s=1.25 outside the quench interval. Only the r_+ zero at k=π is associated with the crossed boundary g1=g0. The r_- zero at k=0 is a consequence of endpoint phase alignment, not of a crossed phase boundary. The abstract's claim that vanishing 'records a topological phase transition' and the proposed 'phase diagram tomography' therefore overstate what the time-boundary coefficients measure; they should be qualified to specify which zeros correspond to gap closings along a chosen interpolation, or replaced by the precise algebraic condition.
  2. [Topological time boundary, Fig. 4] The inference that 'the interchange of zeros between r_+(k) and r_-(k) signifies a topological phase transition, and the associated momentum pinpoints the location of degenerate point' inherits the same problem. In Fig. 4, the redistribution of zeros at k=0 and k=π between r_+ and r_- is controlled by Δφ(k) = φ_i(k) - φ_f(k) at the endpoints; without an additional argument, a zero at Δφ=0 cannot be taken as evidence that the chosen parameter path crosses a degeneracy at that momentum. The linking-number identity L = w_i - w_f (Eq. (3)) is independent of this issue and appears sound; the authors should explicitly separate the exact braiding/linking result from the heuristic zero-counting tomography, which requires additional assumptions about the interpolation path. The related statement that the minimal number of zeros in r_± determines the minimal number of degenerate points encountered during the topological phase transition also needs a proof that covers the r_- zeros.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3) and Supplemental Material B] Since Eq. (3) is the main quantitative result, the main text should include a short sketch of the homotopy argument rather than only a reference to the Supplemental Material.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The physical labels 'time refraction' and 'time reflection' are assigned differently in the pink and yellow regions; the criterion for this assignment should be stated in the main text rather than deferred to the Supplemental Material.
  3. [Notation] The quantity kDQPT is used without definition in the main text; please define it and its relation to the zeros of r± at first use.
  4. [References and captions] Reference [25] contains a typo in the title ('Winding numer'), and the caption of Fig. 1 states that 'Topological phase transition occurs at g1=±g0 in orange', which is unclear; please label the phase boundaries explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the linking-number identity and zero conditions follow directly from the definitions of the eigenstates and overlaps, with no fitted parameter or self-citation chain carrying the derivation.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Equation (1) defines the time-refraction and time-reflection coefficients as overlaps of the initial upper-band eigenstate with the final eigenstates; for the chiral Hamiltonian of Eq. (2) the eigenstates are written explicitly as |ψ±(k)⟩ = (1, ±e^{iϕ(k)})ᵀ/√2, which immediately gives r±(k) = {1 ± e^{i[ϕ_i(k)−ϕ_f(k)]}}/2. The zero condition and the linking-number identity L = w_i − w_f follow mathematically from these definitions together with the definition of the winding number. No parameter is fitted to any subset of data, and the winding numbers of the initial and final Hamiltonians are independent inputs. The paper's interpretation that a zero of r+ or r− 'records a topological phase transition across the temporal interface' can be questioned on correctness grounds—a zero can occur for endpoints in the same topological phase without crossing a phase boundary—but that is an overreach in physical interpretation, not circular reasoning: Eq. (3) does not rely on that interpretation. Self-citations [32, 41, 42, 54, 75] supply background, experimental context, or standard bulk-boundary statements; they are not load-bearing unverified premises. No claim is renamed input, no fitted quantity is called a prediction, and no ansatz is smuggled in by citation. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitting: all coupling parameters are chosen for illustration. The central result is an exact consequence of the overlap formulas, resting on the chiral off-diagonal form, momentum conservation, and the instantaneous quench. The straight-line interpolation used to connect zeros to gap closings is an auxiliary modeling choice.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The synthetic frequency lattice Hamiltonian is of chiral off-diagonal form H(k) = [[0, G†(k)], [G(k), 0]] (Eq. 2), with G(k)=Σ_l g_l e^{iφ_l} e^{ikl}.
    This is the key modeling step connecting the two-ring modulator setup to a two-band Bloch Hamiltonian; it relies on the rotating-wave approximation and the choice of modulation frequencies lΩ±2κ. If additional couplings or counter-rotating terms are non-negligible, the off-diagonal form and the winding-number interpretation fail.
  • domain assumption Momentum k is conserved across the temporal interface because the lattice is spatially translation-invariant before and after the switch.
    Used in Eq. (1) where r±(k) are defined for each incident k independently; any disorder or boundary that breaks translation invariance would mix k and modify the coefficients.
  • domain assumption The parameter switch is abrupt enough that the state is unchanged at t=0 and evolves afterward only under H_f.
    The projection formula r± = <ψ_f,±|ψ_i,+> assumes the wave function at t=0+ equals the wave function at t=0- and that no dynamics occurs during the switch. This is the standard sudden-quench assumption.
  • standard math For the chiral classes AIII and BDI, the winding number w=(1/2π)∫∂_k φ dk is a well-defined integer, equal to the number of zeros of G(z) inside the unit circle by Cauchy's argument principle.
    Used to define wi and wf and to construct the phase diagrams in Fig. 3. This is standard topological band theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The straight-line interpolation in coupling space between Hi and Hf is used to identify zeros of r± with specific band-gap-closing degenerate points.
    The association of r- zeros with uncrossed boundaries depends on extending the linear path beyond the segment; a different homotopy of paths would change which boundary is associated with which zero. The linking-number formula itself is path-independent.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Bulk Band Topology from Time Boundary Effect in Synthetic Dimension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EXG3IK4U

@misc{pith2026250416390,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Bulk Band Topology from Time Boundary Effect in Synthetic Dimension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EXG3IK4U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16390}
}
read the original abstract

An incident wave at a temporal interface, created by an abrupt change in system parameters, generates time-refracted and time-reflected waves. We find topological characteristics associated with the temporal interface that separates distinct spatial topologies and report a novel bulk-boundary correspondence for the temporal interface. The vanishing of either time refraction or time reflection records a topological phase transition across the temporal interface, and the difference of bulk band topology predicts nontrivial braiding hidden in the time refraction and time reflection coefficients. These findings, which are insensitive to spatial boundary conditions and robust against disorder, are demonstrated in a synthetic frequency lattice with rich topological phases engendered by long-range couplings. Our work reveals the topological aspect of temporal interface and paves the way for using the time boundary effect to probe topological phase transitions and topological invariants.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16390 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Probing bulk band topology from the time bound [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Coupled ring resonators. (b) The frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Phase diagrams for the synthetic frequency lat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (b) shows case II, where r+(k) and r−(k) braid once, forming a Hopf link with L = 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akhmanov, A

    S. Akhmanov, A. Sukhorukov, and A. Chirkin, Nonsta- tionary phenomena and space-time analogy in nonlinear optics, Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 748 (1969)

    1969

  2. [2]

    Kolner, Space-time duality and the theory of tem- poral imaging, IEEE J

    B. Kolner, Space-time duality and the theory of tem- poral imaging, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 30, 1951 (1994)

    1994

  3. [3]

    Mendon¸ ca and P

    J. Mendon¸ ca and P. Shukla, Time refraction and time reflection: Two basic concepts, Phys. Scr. 65, 160 (2002)

    2002

  4. [4]

    Y. Xiao, D. N. Maywar, and G. P. Agrawal, Reflection and transmission of electromagnetic waves at a temporal boundary, Opt. Lett. 39, 574 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    B. W. Plansinis, W. R. Donaldson, and G. P. Agrawal, What is the temporal analog of reflection and refraction of optical beams? Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 183901 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Bacot, M

    V. Bacot, M. Labousse, A. Eddi, M. Fink, and E. Fort, Time reversal and holography with spacetime transfor- mations, Nat. Phys. 12, 972 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Y. Zhou, M. Z. Alam, M. Karimi, J. Upham, O. Reshef, C. Liu, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, Broad- band frequency translation through time refraction in an epsilon-near-zero material, Nat. Commun. 11, 2180 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    J. Bohn, T. S. Luk, S. Horsley, and E. Hendry, Spa- tiotemporal refraction of light in an epsilon-near-zero indium tin oxide layer: frequency shifting effects arising from interfaces, Optica 8, 1532 (2021)

    2021

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    Moussa, G

    H. Moussa, G. Xu, S. Yin, E. Galiffi, Y. Ra’di, and A. Al` u, Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces, Nat. Phys. 19, 863 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    T. R. Jones, A. V. Kildishev, M. Segev, and D. Per- oulis, Time-reflection of microwaves by a fast optically- controlled time-boundary, Nat. Commun. 15, 6786 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    B. L. Kim, C. Chong, and C. Daraio, Temporal Refrac- tion in an Acoustic Phononic Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 077201 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    M. S. Mirmoosa, M. H. Mostafa, A. Norrman, and S. A. Tretyakov, Time interfaces in bianisotropic media, Phys. Rev. Research 6, 013334 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Bar-Hillel, A

    L. Bar-Hillel, A. Dikopoltsev, A. Kam, Y. Sharabi, O. Segal, E. Lustig, and M. Segev, Time Refraction and Time Reflection above Critical Angle for Total Internal Reflection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 263802 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    H. Li, S. Yin, and A. Al` u, Nonreciprocity and Fara- day Rotation at Time Interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 173901 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    H. Ye, C. Qin, S. Wang, L. Zhao, W. Liu, B. Wang, S. Longhi, and P. Lu, Reconfigurable refraction manipu- lation at synthetic temporal interfaces with scalar and vector gauge potentials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2300860120 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Galiffi, G

    E. Galiffi, G. Xu, S. Yin, H. Moussa, Y. Ra’di, and A. Al` u, Broadband coherent wave control through photonic collisions at time interfaces, Nat. Phys. 19, 1703 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Z. Dong, X. Wu, Y. Yang, P. Yu, X. Chen, and L. Yuan, Temporal multilayer structures in discrete physi- cal systems towards arbitrary-dimensional non-Abelian Aharonov-Bohm interferences, Nat. Commun. 15, 7392 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Hayran, J

    Z. Hayran, J. B. Khurgin, and F. Monticone, ℏω ver- sus ℏk: Dispersion and Energy Constraints on Time- Varying Photonic Materials and Time Crystals, Opt. Mater. Exp. 12, 3904 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Boltasseva, V

    A. Boltasseva, V. M. Shalaev, and M. Segev, Photonic time crystals: from fundamental insights to novel appli- cations: opinion, Opt. Mater. Exp. 14, 592 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    M. M. Asgari, P. Garg, X. Wang, M. S. Mirmoosa, C. Rockstuhl, V. Asadchy, Theory and applications of pho- tonic time crystals: a tutorial, Adv. Opt. Photon. 16, 958 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Lustig, Y

    E. Lustig, Y. Sharabi, and M. Segev, Topological as- pects of photonic time crystals, Optica 5, 1390 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Giergiel, A

    K. Giergiel, A. Dauphin, M. Lewenstein, J. Zakrzewski, and K. Sacha, Topological time crystals, New J. Phys. 21, 052003 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Li, J.-W

    M.-W. Li, J.-W. Liu, X. Wang, W.-J. Chen, G. Ma, J.-W. Dong, Topological temporal boundary states in a non-Hermitian spatial crystal, arXiv:2306.09627

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Y. Ren, K. Ye, Q. Chen, F. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Pan, W. Li, X. Li, L. Zhang, H. Chen, and Y. Yang, Observation of momentum-gap topology of light at temporal inter- faces in a time-synthetic lattice, Nat. Commun. 16, 707 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    X. G. Wen and A. Zee, Winding numer, family index theorem, and electron hopping in a magnetic field, Nucl. Phys. B 316, 641 (1989)

    1989

  18. [26]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the in- teger quantum Hall effect, Phys

    Y. Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the in- teger quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  19. [27]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021004 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Price, Y

    H. Price, Y. Chong, A. Khanikaev, H. Schomerus, L. J. Maczewsky, M. Kremer, M. Heinrich, A. Szameit, O. Zilberberg, Y. Yang, B. Zhang, A. Al` u, R. Thomale, I. Carusotto, P. St-Jean, A. Amo, A. Dutt, L. Yuan, 6 S. Fan, X. Yin, C. Peng, T. Ozawa, and A. Blanco- Redondo, Roadmap...

    2022

  23. [31]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in Polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  24. [32]

    Z. Dong, H. Li, T. Wan, Q. Liang, Z. Yang, and B. Yan, Quantum time reflection and refraction of ultra- cold atoms, Nat. Photon. 18, 68 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Hannaford and K

    P. Hannaford and K. Sacha, Reflection and refraction at a time boundary, Nat. Photon. 18, 7 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler, and I. Bloch, Direct measure- ment of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands, Nat. Phys. 9, 795 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    W. Hu, J. C. Pillay, K. Wu, M. Pasek, P. P. Shum, and Y. D. Chong, Measurement of a Topological Edge In- variant in a Microwave Network, Phys. Rev. X5, 011012 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Cardano, A

    F. Cardano, A. D’Errico1, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, B. Piccirillo, C. de Lisio, G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, E. Santamato, L. Marrucci, M. Lewenstein, and P. Massig- nan, Detection of Zak phases and topological invariants in a chiral quantum walk of twisted photons, Nat. Com- mu...

    2017

  29. [37]

    Xu, Q.-Q

    X.-Y. Xu, Q.-Q. Wang, W.-W. Pan, K. Sun, J.-S. Xu, G. Chen, J.-S. Tang, M. Gong, Y.-J. Han, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Measuring the Winding Number in a Large-Scale Chiral Quantum Walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 260501 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Wang, Y.-H

    Y. Wang, Y.-H. Lu, F. Mei, J. Gao, Z.-M. Li, H. Tang, S.-L. Zhu, S. Jia, and X.-M. Jin, Direct Observation of Topology from Single-Photon Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 193903 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    F. N. ¨Unal, B. Seradjeh, and A. Eckardt, How to Di- rectly Measure Floquet Topological Invariants in Opti- cal Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 253601 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Z.-Q. Jiao, S. Longhi, X.-W. Wang, J. Gao, W.-H. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y.-X. Fu, L. Wang, R.-J. Ren, L.-F. Qiao, and X.-M. Jin, Experimentally Detecting Quan- tized Zak Phases without Chiral Symmetry in Photonic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 147401 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    G. Li, L. Wang, R. Ye, Y. Zheng, D.-W. Wang, X.-J. Liu, A. Dutt, L. Yuan, and X. Chen, Direct extraction of topological Zak phase with the synthetic dimension, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 81 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Pellerin, R

    F. Pellerin, R. Houvenaghe, W. A. Coish, I. Carusotto, and P. St-Jean, Wave-Function Tomography of Topolog- ical Dimer Chains with Long-Range Couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 183802 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. M. Tay- lor, Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics, Nat. Photon. 7, 1001 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    Mittal, S

    S. Mittal, S. Ganeshan, J. Fan, A. Vaezi, and M. Hafezi, Measurement of topological invariants in a 2D photonic system, Nat. Photon. 10, 180 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    L.-C. Wang, Y. Chen, M. Gong, F. Yu, Q.-D. Chen, Z.-N. Tian, X.-F. Ren, and H.-B. Sun, Edge State, Lo- calization Length, and Critical Exponent from Survival Probability in Topological Waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 173601 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    H. S. Xu, K. L. Zhang, L. Jin, and Z. Song, Signature of edge states in resonant wave scattering, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033501 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    L. Yuan, Y. Shi, and S. Fan, Photonic gauge potential in a system with a synthetic frequency dimension, Opt. Lett. 41, 741 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, N. Goldman, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Synthetic dimensions in integrated photonics: From optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum Hall physics, Phys. Rev. A 93, 043827 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Z. Yang, E. Lustig, G. Harari, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, M. A. Bandres, and M. Segev, Mode-Locked Topological Insulator Laser Utilizing Synthetic Dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011059 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    A. Dutt, Q. Lin, L. Yuan, M. Minkov, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, A single photonic cavity with two independent physical synthetic dimensions, Science 367, 59 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    A. Dutt, M. Minkov, I. A. D. Williamson, and S. Fan, Higher-order topological insulators in synthetic dimen- sions, Light Sci. Appl. 9, 131 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    J. Suh, G. Kim, H. Park, S. Fan, N. Park, and S. Yu, Photonic Topological Spin Pump in Synthetic Frequency Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 033803 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Villa, I

    G. Villa, I. Carusotto, and T. Ozawa, Mean-chiral dis- placement in coherently driven photonic lattices and its application to synthetic frequency dimensions, Com- mun. Phys. 7, 246 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    O. Y. Long, K. Wang, A. Dutt, and S. Fan, Time re- flection and refraction in synthetic frequency dimension, Phys. Rev. Research 5, L012046 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Supplemental Material provides a proof of the connec- tion between the zeros in the time refraction (reflection) and the degenerate points from the topological phase transition across the temporal interface, a proof of the equivalence between the linking number of time refrac- ...

  48. [56]

    Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys

    J. Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2747 (1989)

    1989

  49. [57]

    Leykam, S

    D. Leykam, S. Mittal, M. Hafezi, and Y. D. Chong, Re- configurable topological phases in next-nearest-neighbor coupled resonator lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 023901 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Lustig, S

    E. Lustig, S. Weimann, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, M. A. Bandres, A. Szameit, and M. Segev, Photonic topolog- ical insulator in synthetic dimensions, Nature 567, 356 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    W. A. Benalcazar and A. Cerjan, Chiral-Symmetric Higher-Order Topological Phases of Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 127601 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Chen and A

    K. Chen and A. B. Khanikaev, Non-Hermitian CN H = 2 Chern insulator protected by generalized rotational symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 105, L081112 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Z. Wang, X. Wang, Z. Hu, D. Bongiovanni, D. Juki´ c, L. Tang, D. Song, R. Morandotti, Z. Chen, and H. Buljan, Sub-symmetry-protected topological states, Nat. Phys. 19, 992 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    H. Liu, X. Huang, M. Yan, J. Lu, W. Deng, and Z. Liu, Acoustic Topological Metamaterials of Large Winding Number, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054028 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    M. Li, D. Zhirihin, M. Gorlach, X. Ni, D. Filonov, A. Slobozhanyuk, A. Al` u, and A. B. Khanikaev, Higher- order topological states in photonic kagome crystals 7 with long-range interactions, Nat. Photon. 14, 89 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    G. J. Tang, X. T. He, F. L. Shi, J. W. Liu, X. D. Chen, and J. W. Dong, Topological photonic crystals: Physics, designs, and applications, Laser Photon. Rev. 16, 2100300 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    M. Kim, Z. Jacob, and J. Rho, Recent advances in 2D, 3D and higher-order topological photonics, Light Sci. Appl. 9, 130 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    Ozawa and H

    T. Ozawa and H. M. Price, Topological quantum matter in synthetic dimensions, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 349 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Senanian, L

    A. Senanian, L. G. Wright, P. F. Wade, H. K. Doyle, and P. L. McMahon, Programmable large-scale simulation of bosonic transport in optical synthetic frequency lattices, Nat. Phys. 19, 1333 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    K. Wang, A. Dutt, C. C. Wojcik, and S. Fan, Topolog- ical complex-energy braiding of non-Hermitian bands, Nature 598, 59 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    R. Ye, Y. He, G. Li, L. Wang, X. Wu, X. Qiao, Y. Zheng, L. Jin, D.-W. Wang, L. Yuan, and X. Chen, Observing non-Hermiticity induced chirality breaking in a synthetic Hall ladder, Light Sci. Appl. 14, 39 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    L. Yuan, M. Xiao, Q. Lin, and S. Fan, Synthetic space with arbitrary dimensions in a few rings undergoing dy- namic modulation, Phys. Rev. B 97, 104105 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Cheng, E

    D. Cheng, E. Lustig, K. Wang, and S. Fan, Multi- dimensional band structure spectroscopy in the syn- thetic frequency dimension, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 158 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symme- try classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hy- brid structures, Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  65. [73]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    The initial state is a Gaussian wave packet that ex- cites the eigenstate of the upper band. At the mo- ment t = 0, the amplitudes of antisymmetric ( ψ Dm) and symmetric ( ψ Cm) supermodes in the mth unit cell are in the form of |Ψm(0)⟩ ≡ (ψ Dm,ψ Cm)T = (e− (m− mc )2/(2σ2)eikm...

  67. [75]

    The number of topological interface states formed at the spatial interface is the change in the winding number across the spatial interface, |wi −wf | [ 98–100]

  68. [76]

    Huang and A

    Z. Huang and A. V. Balatsky, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: Role of topological nodes in wave function overlaps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 086802 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    M. H. Mostafa, M. S. Mirmoosa, M. S. Sidorenko, V. S. Asadchy, and S. A. Tretyakov, Temporal interfaces in complex electromagnetic materials: an overview, Opt. Mater. Exp. 14, 1103 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, M. Atala, J. T. Barreiro, S. Nascimb` ene, N. R. Cooper, I. Bloch, and N. Goldman, Measuring the Chern number of Hof- stadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms, Nat. Phys. 11, 162 (2015)

    2015

  71. [79]

    Wimmer, H

    M. Wimmer, H. M. Price, I. Carusotto, and U. Peschel, Experimental measurement of the Berry curvature from anomalous transport, Nat. Phys. 13, 545 (2017)

    2017

  72. [80]

    Tarnowski, F

    M. Tarnowski, F. N. ¨Unal, N. Fl¨ aschner, B. S. Rem, A. Eckardt, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Measur- ing topology from dynamics from obtaining the Chern number from a linking number, Nat. Commun. 10, 1728 (2019)

    2019

  73. [81]

    Leykam and D

    D. Leykam and D. A. Smirnova, Probing bulk topolog- ical invariants using leaky photonic lattices, Nat. Phys. 17, 632 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    Leykam, E

    D. Leykam, E. Smolina, A. Maluckov, S. Flach, and D. A. Smirnova, Probing Band Topology Using Modula- tional Instability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 073901 (2021)

    2021

  75. [83]

    Chen, R.-Z

    C. Chen, R.-Z. Liu, J. Wu, Z.-E. Su, X. Ding, J. Qin, L. Wang, W.-W. Zhang, Y. He, X.-L. Wang, C.-Y. Lu, L. Li, B. C. Sanders, X.-J. Liu, and J.-W. Pan, Berry Cur- vature and Bulk-Boundary Correspondence from Trans- port Measurement for Photonic Chern Bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1...

    2023

  76. [84]

    D. Yu, B. Peng, X. Chen, X.-J. Liu, and L. Yuan, Topo- logical holographic quench dynamics in a synthetic fre- quency dimension, Light Sci. Appl. 10, 209 (2021)

    2021

  77. [85]

    Mizoguchi, Y

    T. Mizoguchi, Y. Kuno, and Y. Hatsugai, Detecting Bulk Topology of Quadrupolar Phase from Quench Dy- namics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 016802 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    Zhang, F

    X.-L. Zhang, F. Yu, Z.-G. Chen, Z.-N. Tian, Q.-D. Chen, H.-B. Sun, and G. Ma, Non-Abelian braiding on photonic chips, Nat. Photon. 16, 390 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    Y. Yang, B. Yang, G. Ma, J. Li, S. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Non-Abelian physics in light and sound, Science 383, 844 (2024)

    2024

  80. [88]

    Cheng, K

    D. Cheng, K. Wang, C. Roques-Carmes, E. Lustig, O. Y. Long, H. Wang, and S. Fan, Non-Abelian lattice gauge fields in photonic synthetic frequency dimensions, Nature 637, 52 (2025)

    2025

  81. [89]

    Leykam and Y

    D. Leykam and Y. D. Chong, Edge Solitons in Nonlinear-Photonic Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 143901 (2016)

    2016

  82. [90]

    Smirnova, D

    D. Smirnova, D. Leykam, Y. Chong, and Y. Kivshar, Nonlinear topological photonics, Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 021306 (2020)

    2020

  83. [91]

    Mukherjee and M

    S. Mukherjee and M. C. Rechtsman, Observation of Uni- directional Solitonlike Edge States in Nonlinear Floquet Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041057 (2021)

    2021

  84. [92]

    Villa, J

    G. Villa, J. del Pino, V. Dumont, G. Rastelli, M. Micha/suppress lek, A. Eichler, and O. Zilberberg, Topological classification of driven-dissipative nonlinear systems, arXiv:2406.16591

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    T. Dai, Y. Ao, J. Mao, Y. Yang, Y. Zheng, C. Zhai, Y. Li, J. Yuan, B. Tang, Z. Li, J. Luo, W. Wang, X. Hu, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, Non-Hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity, Nat. Phys. 20, 101 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    Fritzsche, T

    A. Fritzsche, T. Biesenthal, L. J. Maczewsky, K. Becker, M. Ehrhardt, M. Heinrich, R. Thomale, Y. N. Joglekar, and A. Szameit, Parity-time-symmetric photonic topo- logical insulator, Nat. Mater. 23, 377 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Sharabi, A

    Y. Sharabi, A. Dikopoltsev, E. Lustig, Y. Lumer, and M. Segev, Spatiotemporal photonic crystals, Optica 9, 585 (2022)

    2022

  88. [96]

    Peng, Topological Space-Time Crystal, Phys

    Y. Peng, Topological Space-Time Crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 186802 (2022)

    2022

  89. [97]

    J. Feis, S. Weidemann, T. Sheppard, H. M. Price, and A. Szameit, Spacetime-topological events, arXiv:2407.02176

    arXiv

  90. [98]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Topological photonics, Nat. Photonics 8, 821 (2014); Topological states in photonic systems, Nat. Phys. 12, 626 (2016). 8

    2014

  91. [99]

    A. B. Khanikaev and G. Shvets, Two-dimensional topo- logical photonics, Nat. Photonics 11, 763 (2017)

    2017

  92. [100]

    Y. Wu, C. Li, X. Hu, Y. Ao, Y. Zhao, and Q. Gong, Applications of topological photonics in integrated pho- tonic devices, Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1700357 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.