pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.00987 · v1 · pith:EYWZKMJ2new · submitted 2019-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Applying Liouville's Theorem to Gaia Data

Matthew R. Buckley , David W. Hogg , Adrian M. Price-Whelan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 11:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords phase-space densityLiouville theoremtidal streamsGaia observationsglobular clustersstellar kinematicsentropy minimizationMilky Way
0
0 comments X

The pith

Liouville's theorem connects Gaia stellar kinematics to the original masses of tidally disrupted clusters via phase-space density conservation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that phase-space density remains conserved according to Liouville's theorem even after tidal disruption. Measurement errors and orbital integration add entropy, which lowers apparent density, but this can be corrected by finding the orbital parameters that minimize the entropy of the stellar stream. Applying this to cold streams from disrupted systems allows inference of the true underlying density and thus the initial mass and structure of the parent cluster or dwarf galaxy. A test on the intact globular cluster M4 shows the method recovers its known mass. This opens a route to properties of non-equilibrium systems that cannot be measured directly.

Core claim

Minimizing the phase-space entropy of cold stellar streams recovers the orbital parameters and true phase-space density, enabling reconstruction of the original properties of tidally disrupted star clusters from Gaia observations.

What carries the argument

Minimization of phase-space entropy to recover true orbital parameters despite entropy injection from uncertainties, applied to stellar streams in phase space.

If this is right

  • The initial masses of globular clusters can be derived from their tidal debris.
  • Density profiles of disrupted dwarf galaxies become measurable.
  • Phase-space density provides a conserved quantity linking current observations to past states.
  • Non-equilibrium tidal remnants can be analyzed for their original characteristics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the method to multiple streams could help map the gravitational potential of the Milky Way.
  • Extensions to larger Gaia datasets might allow statistical studies of cluster disruption rates.
  • Simulations of known streams could test the accuracy of the entropy minimization approach.

Load-bearing premise

Minimizing phase-space entropy correctly identifies the true orbital parameters and recovers the underlying phase-space density.

What would settle it

A simulation of a disrupted cluster with known initial mass where the entropy-minimized density does not match the true conserved value would show the method fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.00987 by Adrian M. Price-Whelan, David W. Hogg, Matthew R. Buckley.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Left: Heatmap of the six-dimensional probability density as a function of radial distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Log-likelihood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Proper motions of all stars in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Measurement errors reported by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Scatter plot of the radial position and speed relative to the average motion of the 20,000 simulated M4 stars, without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Histograms of the phase-space density of the stars. Left: simulated stars drawn from a King profile with the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Log-likelihood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Scatter plot of the radial position and speed relative to the average motion of the M4 stars in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Log-likelihood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Measured phase-space volume (divided by the initial volume) of 1000 stars evolving in an isochrone potential with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Left: Evolution in position-space of a globular cluster being tidally-stripped in a Milky Way potential, starting as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Left: Histogram of the entropy of the phase-space density of 1000 stars calculated using action-angles derived from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Log-likelihood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Milky Way is filled with the tidally-disrupted remnants of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies. Determining the properties of these objects -- in particular, initial masses and density profiles -- is relevant to both astronomy and dark matter physics. However, most direct measures of mass cannot be applied to tidal debris, as the systems of interest are no longer in equilibrium. Since phase-space density is conserved during adiabatic phase mixing, Liouville's theorem provides a connection between stellar kinematics as measured by observatories such as Gaia and the original mass of the disrupted system. Accurately recovering the phase-space density is complicated by uncertainties resulting from measurement errors and orbital integration, which both effectively inject entropy into the system, preferentially decreasing the measured density. In this paper, we demonstrate that these two issues can be overcome. First, we measure the phase-space density of the globular cluster M4 in Gaia data, and use Liouville's theorem to derive its mass. We then show that, for tidally disrupted systems, the orbital parameters and thus phase-space density can be inferred by minimizing the phase-space entropy of cold stellar streams. This work is therefore a proof of principle that true phase-space density can be measured and the original properties of the star cluster reconstructed in systems of astrophysical interest.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that Liouville's theorem connects Gaia stellar kinematics to the conserved phase-space density (and thus original mass) of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies. It reports a measurement of the phase-space density of M4 and asserts that, for tidally disrupted systems, orbital parameters and the underlying density can be recovered by minimizing the measured phase-space entropy of cold stellar streams, providing a proof-of-principle for reconstructing initial cluster properties.

Significance. If validated with quantitative results, the approach would enable mass and density-profile estimates for non-equilibrium tidal debris, with direct relevance to Milky Way assembly history and dark-matter constraints. The use of entropy minimization to invert error-induced entropy injection is a potentially powerful inference step if the minimum is shown to be unique and to recover the ground-truth density.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that entropy minimization recovers the true orbital parameters and phase-space density is presented without any quantitative results, error budgets, or validation against simulated streams with known ground truth; the text only describes the method and states that the issues 'can be overcome.'
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on complications from uncertainties): the assertion that measurement errors and orbital integration 'effectively inject entropy' but that minimization compensates for it is load-bearing for the disrupted-system claim, yet no demonstration is given that the entropy surface S(orbit) has a unique global minimum at the true orbit or that the injection is invertible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed report and constructive suggestions. The manuscript is framed as a proof-of-principle demonstration using real Gaia data for M4 and streams. We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit quantitative results and that the entropy-minimization claim requires clearer validation of uniqueness and invertibility. We have prepared revisions to address both points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that entropy minimization recovers the true orbital parameters and phase-space density is presented without any quantitative results, error budgets, or validation against simulated streams with known ground truth; the text only describes the method and states that the issues 'can be overcome.'

    Authors: We agree the abstract is too high-level. The body reports a specific phase-space density measurement for M4 together with the derived mass via Liouville's theorem, and applies entropy minimization to real disrupted streams. However, the current version lacks simulated ground-truth tests. In revision we will (i) insert numerical values and error bars from the M4 analysis into the abstract and (ii) add a short validation subsection using mock streams with known initial conditions to show parameter recovery. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on complications from uncertainties): the assertion that measurement errors and orbital integration 'effectively inject entropy' but that minimization compensates for it is load-bearing for the disrupted-system claim, yet no demonstration is given that the entropy surface S(orbit) has a unique global minimum at the true orbit or that the injection is invertible.

    Authors: The manuscript relies on the physical expectation that the true orbit minimizes entropy, but does not explicitly demonstrate uniqueness of the global minimum or invertibility. This is a valid observation. We will revise by adding a figure or test that maps S(orbit) for a controlled case and shows the minimum coincides with the input truth, together with a brief discussion of the conditions under which the mapping remains invertible within measurement uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; entropy minimization is an independent inference step

full rationale

The paper measures phase-space density directly for M4 using Gaia data and applies Liouville's theorem to obtain mass. For disrupted streams it proposes minimizing measured phase-space entropy over trial orbits as a recovery method. This minimization is presented as an external optimization procedure whose success depends on the shape of the entropy surface, not on any equation that defines the target density in terms of the minimized quantity or vice versa. No self-citation chain, fitted-input renaming, or ansatz smuggling appears in the provided derivation; the central claim therefore does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard conservation laws in stellar dynamics and assumptions about observational entropy that are not independently verified in the provided abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Phase-space density is conserved during adiabatic phase mixing (Liouville's theorem)
    Stated as providing the connection between current kinematics and original mass.
  • domain assumption Measurement errors and orbital integration inject entropy that preferentially decreases measured density and can be overcome
    Identified as the key complications that the method addresses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5759 in / 1266 out tokens · 36077 ms · 2026-05-25T11:36:58.401121+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 48 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Astrophys. J. 142, 1317 (1965)

    work page 1965

  2. [2]

    W. H. Press and P. Schechter, Astrophys. J. 187, 425 (1974)

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 177, 717 (1976)

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Searle and R

    L. Searle and R. Zinn, Astrophys. J. 225, 357 (1978)

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, J. R. Primack, and M. J. Rees, Nature 311, 517 (1984)

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    R. A. Ibata, G. Gilmore, and M. J. Irwin, Nature 370, 194 (1994)

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    Dark Matter Debris Flows in the Milky Way

    M. Lisanti and D. N. Spergel, Phys. Dark Univ. 1, 155 (2012), 1105.4166

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [9]

    K. V. Johnston, Astrophys. J. 495, 297 (1998), astro-ph/9710007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [10]

    K. V. Johnston, A. A. Sheffield, S. R. Majewski, and S. Sharma, Astrophys. J. 760, 95 (2012), 1202.5311

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [11]

    Ghostly Tributaries to the Milky Way: Charting the Halo's Stellar Streams with the Gaia DR2 catalogue

    K. Malhan, R. A. Ibata, and N. F. Martin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 481, 3442 (2018), 1804.11339

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [12]

    A. M. Price-Whelan and A. Bonaca, Astrophys. J. 863, L20 (2018), 1805.00425

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [13]

    Building up the Stellar Halo of the Galaxy

    A. Helmi and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 307, 495 (1999), astro-ph/9901102

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  13. [14]

    G. C. Myeong, N. W. Evans, V. Belokurov, N. C. Amorisco, and S. E. Koposov, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 475, 1537 (2018), 1712.04071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [15]

    D. G. York, J. Adelman, J. Anderson, John E., S. F. Anderson, J. Annis, N. A. Bahcall, J. A. Bakken, R. Barkhouser, S. Bastian, E. Berman, et al., Astron. J. 120, 1579 (2000), astro-ph/0006396

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  15. [16]

    D. J. Eisenstein, D. H. Weinberg, E. Agol, H. Aihara, C. Allende Prieto, S. F. Anderson, J. A. Arns, ´E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, E. Balbinot, et al., Astron. J. 142, 72 (2011), 1101.1529

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [17]

    M. R. Blanton, M. A. Bershady, B. Abolfathi, F. D. Albareti, C. Allende Prieto, A. Almeida, J. Alonso-Garc´ ıa, F. Anders, S. F. Anderson, B. Andrews, et al., Astron. J. 154, 28 (2017), 1703.00052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [18]

    SEGUE: A Spectroscopic Survey of 240,000 stars with g=14-20

    B. Yanny, C. Rockosi, H. J. Newberg, G. R. Knapp, J. K. Adelman-McCarthy, B. Alcorn, S. Allam, C. Allende Prieto, D. An, K. S. J. Anderson, et al., Astron. J. 137, 4377 (2009), 0902.1781

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  18. [19]

    S. R. Majewski, R. P. Schiavon, P. M. Frinchaboy, C. Allende Prieto, R. Barkhouser, D. Bizyaev, B. Blank, S. Brunner, A. Burton, R. Carrera, et al., Astron. J. 154, 94 (2017), 1509.05420

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [20]

    The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview

    Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, T. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, J. Aleksi´ c, S. Allam, A. Amara, D. Bacon, E. Balbinot, M. Banerji, K. Bechtol, et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460, 1270 (2016), 1601.00329

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [21]

    Gaia Collaboration, A. G. A. Brown, A. Vallenari, T. Prusti, J. H. J. de Bruijne, C. Babusiaux, C. A. L. Bailer-Jones, M. Biermann, D. W. Evans, L. Eyer, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 616, A1 (2018), 1804.09365

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [22]

    The Field of Streams: Sagittarius and its Siblings

    V. Belokurov, D. B. Zucker, N. W. Evans, G. Gilmore, S. Vidrih, D. M. Bramich, H. J. Newberg, R. F. G. Wyse, M. J. Irwin, M. Fellhauer, et al., Astrophys. J. 642, L137 (2006), astro-ph/0605025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [23]

    420 (2016)

    Tidal Streams in the Local Group and Beyond , vol. 420 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [24]

    Co-formation of the Galactic disc and the stellar halo

    V. Belokurov, D. Erkal, N. W. Evans, S. E. Koposov, and A. J. Deason, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478, 611 (2018), 1802.03414. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [25]

    The merger that led to the formation of the Milky Way's inner stellar halo and thick disk

    A. Helmi, C. Babusiaux, H. H. Koppelman, D. Massari, J. Veljanoski, and A. G. A. Brown, Nature 563, 85 (2018), 1806.06038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [26]

    Moore, S

    B. Moore, S. Ghigna, F. Governato, G. Lake, T. Quinn, J. Stadel, and P. Tozzi, Astrophys. J. 524, L19 (1999), astro- ph/9907411

    work page arXiv 1999

  26. [27]

    J. R. Hargis, B. Willman, and A. H. G. Peter, Astrophys. J. 795, L13 (2014), 1407.4470

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [28]

    S. Y. Kim, A. H. G. Peter, and J. R. Hargis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 211302 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [29]

    V. H. Robles, T. Kelley, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, arXiv e-prints arXiv:1903.01469 (2019), 1903.01469

    work page arXiv 1903

  29. [30]

    M. R. Buckley and A. H. G. Peter, Phys. Rept. 761, 1 (2018), 1712.06615

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [31]

    Major Mergers of Galaxy Haloes: Cuspy or Cored Inner Density Profile?

    M. Boylan-Kolchin and C.-P. Ma, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 349, 1117 (2004), astro-ph/0309243

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  31. [32]

    Infall Regions of Galaxy Clusters

    A. Diaferio and M. J. Geller, Astrophys. J. 481, 633 (1997), astro-ph/9701034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  32. [33]

    Mass estimation in the outer regions of galaxy clusters

    A. Diaferio, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 309, 610 (1999), astro-ph/9906331

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  33. [34]

    Galaxy And Mass Assembly: Estimating galaxy group masses via caustic analysis

    M. Alpaslan, A. S. G. Robotham, S. Driver, P. Norberg, J. A. Peacock, I. Baldry, J. Bland -Hawthorn, S. Brough, A. M. Hopkins, L. S. Kelvin, et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 2832 (2012), 1204.0510

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [35]

    K. V. Johnston, H. Zhao, D. N. Spergel, and L. Hernquist, Astrophys. J. 512, L109 (1999), astro-ph/9807243

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  35. [36]

    G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, R. Flores, and J. R. Primack, Astrophys. J. 301, 27 (1986)

    work page 1986

  36. [37]

    Modeling Tidal Streams in evolving dark matter halos

    J. Pe˜ narrubia, A. J. Benson, D. Mart´ ınez-Delgado, and H. W. Rix, Astrophys. J.645, 240 (2006), astro-ph/0512507

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [38]

    Evidence Against Dark Matter Halos Surrounding the Globular Clusters MGC1 and NGC 2419

    C. Conroy, A. Loeb, and D. Spergel, Astrophys. J. 741, 72 (2011), 1010.5783

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [39]

    J. R. Neeley, M. Marengo, G. Bono, V. F. Braga, M. Dall’Ora, P. B. Stetson, R. Buonanno, I. Ferraro, W. L. Freedman, G. Iannicola, et al., Astrophys. J. 808, 11 (2015), 1505.07858

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [40]

    D. E. McLaughlin and R. P. van der Marel, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 161, 304 (2005), astro-ph/0605132

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [41]

    B. Holl, L. Lindegren, and D. Hobbs, Astron. Astrophys. 543, A15 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [42]

    Multi-Dimensional Density Estimation and Phase Space Structure Of Dark Matter Halos

    S. Sharma and M. Steinmetz, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 373, 1293 (2006), astro-ph/0507550

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  42. [43]

    de Bruijne, M

    J. de Bruijne, M. Perryman, L. Lindegren, et al. (2005), gAIA-JDB-022, URL http://www.rssd.esa.int/doc_fetch.php? id=448635

    work page 2005

  43. [44]

    The geometry of phase mixing

    S. Tremaine, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 307, 877 (1999), astro-ph/9812146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  44. [45]

    The stellar halo of the Galaxy

    A. Helmi, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 15, 145 (2008), 0804.0019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [46]

    A statistical method for measuring the Galactic potential and testing gravity with cold tidal streams

    J. Pe˜ narrubia, S. E. Koposov, and M. G. Walker, Astrophys. J. 760, 2 (2012), 1209.2126

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [47]

    Fitting orbits to tidal streams

    J. Binney, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 386, L47 (2008), 0802.1485

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [48]

    R. E. Sanderson, A. Helmi, and D. W. Hogg, IAU Symp. 298, 207 (2014), [Astrophys. J.801,98(2015)], 1404.6534

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [49]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, D. W. Hogg, K. V. Johnston, and D. Hendel, Astrophys. J. 794, 4 (2014), 1405.6721

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [50]

    H. Lux, J. I. Read, G. Lake, and K. V. Johnston, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 436, 2386 (2013), 1308.2235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [51]

    A. M. Price-Whelan and K. V. Johnston, Astrophys. J. 778, L12 (2013), 1308.2670

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  51. [52]

    Bayes versus the virial theorem: inferring the potential of a galaxy from a kinematical snapshot

    J. Magorrian, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 437, 2230 (2014), 1303.6099

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [53]

    H. J. T. Buist and A. Helmi, Astron. Astrophys. 601, A37 (2017), 1512.05138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [54]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic dynamics (1987)

    work page 1987

  54. [55]

    V. I. Arnold, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics (1978)

    work page 1978

  55. [56]

    galpy: A Python Library for Galactic Dynamics

    J. Bovy, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 216, 29 (2015), 1412.3451

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [57]

    Actions for axisymmetric potentials

    J. Binney, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 1324 (2012), 1207.4910

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [58]

    Angle-action estimation in a general axisymmetric potential

    J. Sanders, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 128 (2012), 1208.2813

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [59]

    J. L. Sanders and J. Binney, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 441, 3284 (2014), 1401.3600

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [60]

    P. J. McMillan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465, 76 (2017), 1608.00971

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [61]

    Shepherding Tidal Debris with the Galactic Bar: The Ophiuchus Stream

    K. Hattori, D. Erkal, and J. L. Sanders, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460, 497 (2016), 1512.04536

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [62]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, B. Sesar, K. V. Johnston, and H.-W. Rix, Astrophys. J. 824, 104 (2016), 1601.06790

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [63]

    Gaps and length asymmetry in the stellar stream Palomar 5 as effects of Galactic bar rotation

    S. Pearson, A. M. Price-Whelan, and K. V. Johnston, Nature Astronomy 1, 633 (2017), 1703.04627

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [64]

    Oliphant, NumPy: A guide to NumPy , USA: Trelgol Publishing (2006–), [Online; accessed ¡today¿], URL http: //www.numpy.org/

    T. Oliphant, NumPy: A guide to NumPy , USA: Trelgol Publishing (2006–), [Online; accessed ¡today¿], URL http: //www.numpy.org/

    work page 2006

  64. [65]

    Jones, T

    E. Jones, T. Oliphant, P. Peterson, et al., SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python (2001–), [Online; accessed ¡today¿], URL http://www.scipy.org/

    work page 2001

  65. [66]

    Astropy Collaboration, T. P. Robitaille, E. J. Tollerud, P. Greenfield, M. Droettboom, E. Bray, T. Aldcroft, M. Davis, A. Ginsburg, A. M. Price-Whelan, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013), 1307.6212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [67]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, B. M. Sip˝ ocz, H. M. G¨ unther, P. L. Lim, S. M. Crawford, S. Conseil, D. L. Shupe, M. W. Craig, N. Dencheva, A. Ginsburg, et al., Astron. J. 156, 123 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [68]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, The Journal of Open Source Software 2 (2017)

    work page 2017