Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparison Between Decision Trees and Decision Tree Forest Models for Software Development Effort Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1508.07275 v1 pith:EZUQ4JBB submitted 2015-08-28 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords softwaredecisionmodeleffortestimationtreebeenforest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate software effort estimation has been a challenge for many software practitioners and project managers. Underestimation leads to disruption in the projects estimated cost and delivery. On the other hand, overestimation causes outbidding and financial losses in business. Many software estimation models exist; however, none have been proven to be the best in all situations. In this paper, a decision tree forest (DTF) model is compared to a traditional decision tree (DT) model, as well as a multiple linear regression model (MLR). The evaluation was conducted using ISBSG and Desharnais industrial datasets. Results show that the DTF model is competitive and can be used as an alternative in software effort prediction.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools