pith. sign in

arxiv: 1112.1745 · v1 · pith:F2TR2WMJnew · submitted 2011-12-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · physics.data-an

Measurement Error Models in Astronomy

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM physics.data-an
keywords measurementerrormethodsmodelsregressionaccountingapproachastronomical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

I discuss the effects of measurement error on regression and density estimation. I review the statistical methods that have been developed to correct for measurement error that are most popular in astronomical data analysis, discussing their advantages and disadvantages. I describe functional models for accounting for measurement error in regression, with emphasis on the methods of moments approach and the modified loss function approach. I then describe structural models for accounting for measurement error in regression and density estimation, with emphasis on maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods. As an example of a Bayesian application, I analyze an astronomical data set subject to large measurement errors and a non-linear dependence between the response and covariate. I conclude with some directions for future research.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.