Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLM In-Context Recall is Prompt Dependent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.08865 v1 pith:F2Z4TQTP submitted 2024-04-13 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelperformancerecallllmspromptapplicationshaystackin-context
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the critical importance of conducting thorough evaluations to discern their comparative advantages, limitations, and optimal use cases. Particularly important is assessing their capacity to accurately retrieve information included in a given prompt. A model's ability to do this significantly influences how effectively it can utilize contextual details, thus impacting its practical efficacy and dependability in real-world applications. Our research analyzes the in-context recall performance of various LLMs using the needle-in-a-haystack method. In this approach, a factoid (the "needle") is embedded within a block of filler text (the "haystack"), which the model is asked to retrieve. We assess the recall performance of each model across various haystack lengths and with varying needle placements to identify performance patterns. This study demonstrates that an LLM's recall capability is not only contingent upon the prompt's content but also may be compromised by biases in its training data. Conversely, adjustments to model architecture, training strategy, or fine-tuning can improve performance. Our analysis provides insight into LLM behavior, offering direction for the development of more effective applications of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models for In-File Vulnerability Localization Can Be "Lost in the End"

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Large language models detect in-file vulnerabilities best when the vulnerable code appears early in the file, a 'lost-in-the-end' effect, and chunking files into smaller blocks can increase recall.

  2. Red-Teaming Coding Agents from a Tool-Invocation Perspective: An Empirical Security Assessment

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Attacker-controlled tool descriptions and return values can hijack tool invocation in popular LLM coding agents, yielding remote code execution and denial of service.

  3. A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that catalogs and categorizes training-free LLM alignment methods into pre-decoding, in-decoding, and post-decoding, with a limited experimental comparison on one model.

Pith tools