Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 84 references

Nonlinear dispersive waves in soft elastic laminates under finite magneto-deformations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Nonlinear shear waves across a soft magneto-active laminate are governed by a single effective dispersive wave equation, with explicit coefficients and magnetically tunable solitary-wave solutions.

desk verdict New effective equation is a solid homogenization result; the solitary-wave section applies it where the two-scale expansion does not hold, so the speed-bound claims need reframing or direct simulation. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06324 v1 pith:F3OIYXYA submitted 2025-08-08 math-ph math.MPphysics.class-ph

Harold Berjamin , Stephan Rudykh This is my paper
classification math-phmath.MPphysics.class-ph MSC 74Q0574J3074F1535Q51
keywords homogenizationnonlinearshearwavesmagneto-activelaminateshard-magneticsoftsolidssolitarymKdVequationbandgapsdispersion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives a single effective wave equation that governs finite-amplitude shear waves travelling across a periodic stack of soft magneto-active layers. Starting from a layer-wise nonlinear wave equation with cubic stiffness, asymptotic homogenisation in the long-wave, moderate-amplitude regime yields a dispersive nonlinear equation whose coefficients are explicit functions of the two phases' volume fractions, stiffnesses, and densities. The equation supports solitary waves with a computed speed–amplitude relation, and the paper shows that the maximum admissible solitary-wave speed can be moved by changing an applied magnetic field or the microstructure. If correct, this gives a design tool for tunable acoustic filters and wave control in soft magneto-active composites.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the homogenized nonlinear dispersive wave equation $$$c^{2}$(1+\zeta $u_y^{2}$)u_{yy}+\eta\$ell^{2}$ $c^{2}$ u_{yyyy}=u_{tt},$$ with effective coefficients $\zeta$ and $\eta$ given by explicit formulas in terms of the layer properties. This equation carries the argument by replacing the alternating-layer microstructure with a homogeneous dispersive medium, so that nonlinearity, dispersion, and magneto-elastic tunability are all encoded in a handful of coefficient formulas.

What would settle it

Measure the maximum speed of shear solitary waves in a hard-magnetic Gent laminate under a range of magnetic inductions and compare with the predicted bound; exceeding the bound, or finding the bound insensitive to the field, would falsify the homogenised model. Alternatively, compute the next-order amplitude correction in the homogenisation expansion and check whether its coefficient is negligible compared with the nonlinearity coefficient at moderate amplitudes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a periodically layered soft magneto-active solid can be replaced, in the long-wave moderate-amplitude regime, by a homogeneous nonlinear dispersive medium governed by $$$c^{2}$(1+\zeta $u_y^{2}$)u_{yy}+\eta\$ell^{2}$ $c^{2}$ u_{yyyy}=u_{tt},$$ where $c^2=\langle g\rangle/\langle\rho\rangle$ and the dimensionless coefficients $\zeta$ and $\eta$ are explicit functions of the two phases' volume fractions, shear stiffnesses, and densities. The paper further claims that this equation admits solitary waves with an explicit sech profile, a speed–amplitude relation, and a magnetically tunable upper bound on speed, and that a unidirectional modified Korteweg–de Vries reduction captu

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each layer's shear stiffness is exactly the quadratic truncation $g^{(\alpha)}+\tfrac{1}{3}h^{(\alpha)}u_y^2$ and that the remnant magnetisation stays constant during wave propagation; if the neglected magnetisation fluctuations or fourth-order strain terms matter at the amplitudes considered, the effective equation, the mKdV reduction, and the solitary-wave speed bounds all change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The first shear band gap of a soft magneto-active laminate is approximated by the homogenised dispersion relation with optimised coefficients, so band-gap edges can be estimated directly from phase properties.
  • In Gent-type laminates the effective dispersion coefficient and the solitary-wave speed bound change with the applied magnetic field through the static stretch, giving a post-fabrication tuning knob.
  • Solitary waves in the homogenised model exist only for relative speeds satisfying a polynomial inequality; approaching the bound shrinks the wavelength to zero while saturating the strain amplitude.
  • The mKdV reduction describes unidirectional propagation accurately only for speeds close to the linear wave speed, and should not be used for quantitative high-amplitude predictions.
  • The derived effective strain energy links dynamic homogenisation to a static homogenised material theory, so static and dynamic laminate responses can be described within one model in the small-nonlinearity limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to relax the fixed-remnant-magnetisation assumption; allowing magnetisation fluctuations would likely add magnetic coupling terms to the effective equation and could shift the solitary-wave speed bound.
  • Because the dispersion coefficient is an explicit function of the impedance contrast between phases, measuring the first band-gap edge could serve as a non-destructive route to infer layer properties.
  • Applying the same homogenisation scheme to the two-polarisation shear system would likely yield a vector dispersive equation supporting polarised solitary-wave families.
  • The optimised homogenised model, being much cheaper than finite-volume simulations of the layered medium, could act as a surrogate in design optimisation of magnetically tunable acoustic filters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies nonlinear shear waves in periodic hard-magnetic soft laminates. It first revisits the hard-magnetic constitutive framework to use a symmetric total stress and, for generalized neo-Hookean layers under a static magneto-deformation, reduces the layer dynamics to the nonlinear equation (1) with cubic stiffness. Using two-scale homogenization along the lines of Andrianov et al., it derives the effective Boussinesq-type equation (2) with closed-form effective coefficients (Table 1), and an approximate effective strain-energy function (56). It then improves the linear dispersive representation by means of three parameters, reduces the equation to an mKdV model, studies sech solitary waves, derives speed-amplitude relations and an upper bound on the solitary-wave speed, and demonstrates magnetic tunability of band gaps and of the solitary-wave speed bound. The mKdV model is compared with finite-volume simulations of an impact problem in a layered medium.

Significance. If taken at face value, the paper provides a compact, closed-form description of nonlinear dispersive shear waves in magneto-active laminates, with no fitting of the central homogenized coefficients, and it gives concrete, falsifiable predictions for magnetically tunable solitary-wave speeds. The comparison with the exact Floquet-Bloch dispersion relation is a strong point, as is the explicit derivation of an effective strain energy. The main reservation is that the solitary-wave analysis is presented in a regime where the homogenization's scale-separation parameters are not small; the predictions are interesting but currently not supported by layer-resolved simulations in that regime. With appropriate restrictions or additional validation, the paper would be a useful contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (47); §5.3, Eqs. (69)-(72), (83)] The solitary-wave branch violates the scale-separation hypotheses ε=ℓ/L≪1 and δ=a/L≪1 under which Eq. (2) was derived. For Table 3 with s=1.026c, Eq. (69) gives c1≈10.9, so L/ℓ≈0.30 and δ≈1.85; the mKdV branch (70) gives L/ℓ≈0.44 and δ≈1.77. Thus ε and δ are O(1), not small. The speed bound (83) is approached exactly as L/ℓ→0, since at s²/c²=√(1+η/ηt) the coefficient c3 in Eq. (69) diverges and L→0, which is the extreme violation of the long-wave limit. The paper's own Conclusion states that Eq. (64) is restricted to the low-frequency range and to waves of moderate amplitude. The layer-resolved validation in §5.4 covers only the mKdV model at wavelengths 8ℓ–16ℓ, and in the nonlinear dispersive case the comparison is qualitative. Please either restrict the soliton claims to the valid asymptotic regime, provide direct layer-resolved simulations of the solitary waves in that regime, or clea
  2. [§5.2-§5.4] The numerical validation in §5.4 does not exercise the full homogenized model used for the solitary-wave branch. The mKdV reduction (65) is independent of the splitting (ηy,ηm,ηt) as long as Eq. (58)2 holds, so the agreement in Figs. 5–6 says little about the modified dispersion model (58)/(62) or about the solitary waves (69)-(72) that underlie the speed bound (83). In the nonlinear dispersive case (iii), the authors themselves state that the comparison is only qualitative. Moreover, the coefficients (62) are chosen to match the first band gap and are not derived from the two-scale expansion. To support the central speed-amplitude claim, the full model (64) should be compared with layer-resolved simulations, or the claim should be presented as a prediction of the homogenized model only.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.2, scaling paragraph] In the change of variables {ŷ=ε²y, t̂=t−y/c, u=εû}, the parameter ε is said to be 'of the same order as the microstructure's characteristic length ℓ'. Since y and u are dimensional, ε must be dimensionless. Please clarify by writing ε=ℓ/L or by introducing normalized variables, so that the ordering is unambiguous.
  2. [Eqs. (74), (84)] The nested square roots in these equations are typeset ambiguously. Add explicit parentheses, e.g. maxδ = sqrt( (sqrt(1+η/ηt)−1)/(ζ/6) ), so the reader can verify the numerical values.
  3. [Table 1] It would help to state explicitly that h(α) has the same units as g(α), so that ζ is dimensionless, and that the expression for η is dimensionless only after using c²=⟨g⟩/⟨ρ⟩.
  4. [§5.4, footnotes 2] The artificial mass density choices are clearly flagged as a thought experiment. A short remark on whether the shock-formation distance (76) changes when c is modified by those density choices would avoid possible confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: effective coefficients are explicit functions of layer properties and the solitary-wave results are derived, not fitted; only minor non-load-bearing self-citations and a consistency-based energy construction are present.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The layer-wise equation (1) with coefficients g(alpha),h(alpha) from the Taylor expansion (44) is homogenized by a two-scale expansion; the effective coefficients zeta and eta in Eq. (52)/Table 1 are explicit algebraic functions of the phase properties and contain no fitted constants. The travelling-wave analysis (68)-(72) and the speed-amplitude bounds (69)-(74), (83) are obtained by substitution into the homogenized PDE, not by fitting to data. The mKdV model (65) is validated against direct finite-volume simulations of the heterogeneous layer equations (Section 5.4), and the linear dispersion comparison (Fig. 3) uses the independent Floquet-Bloch relation (59). Self-citations such as [75] are used for background, for the constant-remnant-magnetization assumption, and for comparisons, but the load-bearing coefficients and wave solutions are rederived here; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' earlier work. The effective strain energy (56) in Appendix B is explicitly constructed to be 'consistent with' Eq. (2) through the constraints (100); this is a consistency check, not an independent prediction, so it does not create circularity. The paper's own limitation statement in Section 7 ('the validity of our homogenised wave equation (64) is restricted to the low frequency range and to waves of moderate amplitude') is a domain-of-validity caveat; the skeptic's observation that soliton parameters near the speed bound violate the two-scale assumptions is a correctness/validity concern, not a definitional circularity. Score 2 reflects only the presence of minor non-load-bearing self-citations and the consistency-based energy construction, not a reduction of the central claims to their inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on material-model assumptions (incompressible generalized neo-Hookean, constant remnant magnetization), the two-scale long-wave expansion, and the ad hoc improved dispersion model (58); no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • per-phase nonlinearity parameter beta = 0.0132 (Table 3)
    Chosen from rubber measurements of Destrade et al. [26]; determines g,h and hence zeta and soliton properties in numerical examples.
  • improved dispersion coefficients eta_y, eta_m, eta_t = eta_y ~ 0.0507, eta_m = 0, eta_t ~ 0.0414 (Table 3)
    Chosen via the optimization conditions (62) to match the first band gap of the exact dispersion relation; these coefficients enter the soliton upper bound (83).
  • artificial mass density rho(2) = 4650 kg/m3 and 3720 kg/m3 in thought experiments (Section 5.4)
    Set by hand to nullify or reduce dispersion (eta=0 or reduced) in the validation simulations; flagged by the authors as not representative of a real elastomer.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Incompressibility and generalized neo-Hookean response W(I1) for each layer
    Eqs. (27)-(28); restricts the class of materials and makes the shear wave equation (1) quadratic in strain, a premise for the cubic nonlinearity.
  • domain assumption Remnant magnetisation is unaffected by the shear wave (br constant during propagation)
    Section 3.2, stated explicitly as a point that could be improved; if false, the wave equation would couple to magnetic field fluctuations.
  • domain assumption Two-scale asymptotic expansions truncated at order (eps^2, delta^2), with u2,u3 from the linearized problems of [6,19]
    Section 4.1 and Appendix A; the effective equation (51) rests on this scale separation and truncation.
  • ad hoc to paper Modified dispersion representation (58) with coefficients (62)
    Section 5.1; the replacement of eta u_yyyy by three-term Pade-type form is chosen to better match the exact Floquet-Bloch dispersion, not derived from first principles; soliton bounds (73), (83) depend on it.
  • domain assumption Small beta expansion for the effective energy (56)
    Appendix B; the effective strain energy is derived for beta(alpha) << 1 via Taylor expansion, limiting its applicability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear dispersive waves in soft elastic laminates under finite magneto-deformations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F3OIYXYA

@misc{pith2026250806324,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear dispersive waves in soft elastic laminates under finite magneto-deformations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F3OIYXYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06324}
}
read the original abstract

Layered media can be used as acoustic filters, allowing only waves of certain frequencies to propagate. In soft magneto-active laminates, the shear wave band gaps (i.e., the frequency intervals for which shear waves cannot propagate) can be adjusted after fabrication by exploiting the magneto-elastic coupling. In the present study, the control of shear wave propagation in magneto-active stratified media is revisited by means of homogenisation theory, and extended to nonlinear waves of moderate amplitude. Building upon earlier works, the layers are modelled by means of a revised hard-magnetic material theory for which the total Cauchy stress is symmetric, and the incompressible elastic response is of generalised neo-Hookean type (encompassing Yeoh, Fung-Demiray, and Gent materials). Using asymptotic homogenisation, a nonlinear dispersive wave equation with cubic nonlinearity is derived, under certain simplifying assumptions. In passing, an effective strain energy function describing such laminates is obtained. The combined effects of nonlinearity and wave dispersion contribute to the formation of solitary waves, which are analysed using the homogenised wave equation and a modified Korteweg-de Vries (mKdV) approximation of the latter. The mKdV equation is compared to direct numerical simulations of the impact problem, and various consequences of these results are explored. In particular, we show that an upper bound for the speed of solitary waves can be adjusted by varying the applied magnetic field, or by modifying the properties of the microstructure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.06324 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Periodic laminate in the deformed configuration. (a) Global view, and (b) zoom on the vertical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Generalised shear stiffness λ 2G(α) in terms of a normalised shear strain, where uy is the shearing ratio. The quantity displayed is evaluated at I1 = I1 and then normalised, see Eq. (44); λ is the stretch ratio of an uniaxial deformation along y. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dispersion curves deduced from the exact dispersion relationship (59) (thin lines), from the ho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Solitons. (a) Waveforms (72) obtained with the parameters of Table 3 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Impact problem (75). The numerical results obtained for the layered medium (solid lines) are compared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Impact problem (75) for low dispersion and moderate amplitudes. The numerical results obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Evolution of the frequency band gaps from Fig. 3 with respect to a normalised magnetic induction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Influence of the microstructure. (a) Evolution of the band gap frequencies with respect to the volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agoras, O

    M. Agoras, O. Lopez-Pamies, and P. Ponte Castañeda. A general hyperelastic model for incompressible fiber-reinforced elastomers. J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 57(2):268–286, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.014 2009

  2. [2]

    Z. Alam, S. Padmanabhan, and A. K. Sharma. Magnetically tunable longitudinal wave band gaps in hard-magnetic soft laminates. Int. J. Mech. Sci. , 249:108262, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108262

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Z. Alam, P. Kaushik, A. K. Sharma, B. Wu, and W. Chen. Obliquely propagating incident SH waves in peri- odic hard-magnetic soft laminates.Int. J. Mech. Sci., 287:109945, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.109945

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Alawiye, E

    H. Alawiye, E. Kuhl, and A. Goriely. Revisiting the wrinkling of elastic bilayers I: linear analysis.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A , 377(2144):20180076, 2019. doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0076

    work page arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    H. G. Allen. Analysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels . Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1969. doi:10.1016/C2013-0-02134-2

    work page doi:10.1016/c2013-0-02134-2 1969

  6. [6]

    I. V. Andrianov, V. I. Bolshakov, V. V. Danishevs’kyy, and D. Weichert. Higher order asymptotic homog- enization and wave propagation in periodic composite materials.Proc. R. Soc. A , 464(2093):1181–1201,

  7. [7]

    I. V. Andrianov, V. V. Danishevs’kyy, O. I. Ryzhkov, and D. Weichert. Dynamic homogeniza- tion and wave propagation in a nonlinear 1D composite material. Wave Motion , 50:271–281, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2012.08.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2012.08.013 2013

  8. [8]

    D. S. Bale, R. J. Leveque, S. Mitran, and J. A. Rossmanith. A wave propagation method for conservation laws and balance laws with spatially varying flux functions.SIAM J. Sci. Comput. , 24(3):955–978, 2003. doi:10.1137/S106482750139738X

    work page doi:10.1137/s106482750139738x 2003

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Berjamin

    H. Berjamin. On the accuracy of one-way approximate models for nonlinear waves in soft solids.J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 153(3):1924–1932, 2023. doi:10.1121/10.0017681

    1924 doi

  2. [10]

    Berjamin and S

    H. Berjamin and S. Rudykh. Elastic wave propagation in magneto-active fibre composites.Int. J. Solids Struct., 316:113373, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113373

    2025

  3. [11]

    Berjamin, B

    H. Berjamin, B. Lombard, G. Chiavassa, and N. Favrie. Plane-strain waves in nonlinear elastic solids with softening. Wave Motion, 89:65–78, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2019.03.002

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Boulanger and M

    P. Boulanger and M. Hayes. Finite-amplitude waves in deformed Mooney-Rivlin materials.Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 45(4):575–593, 1992. doi:10.1093/qjmam/45.4.575

    1992 doi

  5. [13]

    Chadwick

    P. Chadwick. Thermo-mechanics of rubberlike materials.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A , 276(1260):371–403,

  6. [14]

    M. S. Chaki and J. Bravo-Castillero. A study of non-uniform imperfect contact in shear wave propaga- tion in a magneto-electro-elastic laminated periodic structure. Arch. Appl. Mech. , 94:1475–1501, 2024. doi:10.1007/s00419-024-02584-8

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    J. Chen, H. Yang, J. Li, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, and X. Zeng. The development of an artificial skin model and its frictional interaction with wound dressings.J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. , 94:308–316, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.013

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    Chockalingam and T

    S. Chockalingam and T. Cohen. Shear shock evolution in incompressible soft solids.J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 134:103746, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103746

    2020

  9. [17]

    C. I. Christov, G. A. Maugin, and A. V. Porubov. On Boussinesq’s paradigm in nonlinear wave propagation. C. R. Mécanique , 335(9-10):521–535, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.crme.2007.08.006

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    Conroy Broderick and S

    H. Conroy Broderick and S. Rudykh. Analysis of shear shock waves in soft materials: From periodic elastic laminates and fibre-reinforced composites to molecular chain networks.Int. J. Solids Struct. , 295:112790,

  11. [19]

    Cornaggia and B

    R. Cornaggia and B. B. Guzina. Second-order homogenization of boundary and transmission con- ditions for one-dimensional waves in periodic media. Int. J. Solids Struct. , 188:88–102, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.09.009. 27

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    Cornaggia and B

    R. Cornaggia and B. Lombard. A homogenized model accounting for dispersion, interfaces and source points for transient waves in 1D periodic media.ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. , 57(3):1413–1444,

  13. [21]

    R. V. Craster, J. Kaplunov, and A. V. Pichugin. High-frequency homogenization for periodic media.Proc. R. Soc. A , 466(2120):2341–2362, 2010. doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0612

    2010

  14. [22]

    Danas and P

    K. Danas and P. M. Reis. Stretch-independent magnetization in incompressible isotropic hard magnetorhe- ological elastomers. J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 191:105764, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105764

    2024

  15. [23]

    deBotton

    G. deBotton. Transversely isotropic sequentially laminated composites in finite elasticity.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 53(6):1334–1361, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2005.01.006

    2005 doi

  16. [24]

    Destrade and R

    M. Destrade and R. W. Ogden. On magneto-acoustic waves in finitely deformed elastic solids.Math. Mech. Solids, 16(6):594–604, 2011. doi:10.1177/1081286510387695

    2011 doi

  17. [25]

    Destrade and G

    M. Destrade and G. Saccomandi. Nonlinear transverse waves in deformed dispersive solids.Wave Motion, 45(3):325–336, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2007.07.002

    2008 doi

  18. [26]

    Destrade, G

    M. Destrade, G. Saccomandi, and I. Sgura. Methodical fitting for mathematical models of rubber-like materials. Proc. R. Soc. A , 473(2198):20160811, 2017. doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0811

    2017

  19. [27]

    P. A. Deymier, editor.Acoustic Metamaterials and Phononic Crystals . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31232-8

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    Dorfmann and R

    A. Dorfmann and R. W. Ogden. Nonlinear magnetoelastic deformations.Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. , 57(4): 599–622, 2004. doi:10.1093/qjmam/57.4.599

    2004 doi

  21. [29]

    Dorfmann and R

    L. Dorfmann and R. W. Ogden. Hard-magnetic soft magnetoelastic materials: Energy considerations.Int. J. Solids Struct. , 294:112789, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.112789

    2024

  22. [30]

    G. A. El, M. A. Hoefer, and M. Shearer. Dispersive and diffusive-dispersive shock waves for nonconvex conservation laws. SIAM Rev., 59(1):3–61, 2017. doi:10.1137/15M1015650

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    Engelbrecht, A

    J. Engelbrecht, A. Salupere, and K. Tamm. Waves in microstructured solids and the Boussinesq paradigm. Wave Motion, 48(8):717–726, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2011.04.001

    2011 doi

  24. [32]

    J. Fish, W. Chen, and G. Nagai. Non-local dispersive model for wave propagation in heterogeneous media: one-dimensional case. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. , 54(3):331–346, 2002. doi:10.1002/nme.423

    2002 doi

  25. [33]

    T. R. Fogarty and R. J. LeVeque. High-resolution finite-volume methods for acoustic waves in periodic and random media. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 106(1):17–28, 1999. doi:10.1121/1.428038

    1999 doi

  26. [34]

    S. Forest. Continuum thermomechanics of nonlinear micromorphic, strain and stress gradient media.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A , 378(2170):20190169, 2020. doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0169

    2020

  27. [35]

    P. I. Galich, N. X. Fang, M. C. Boyce, and S. Rudykh. Elastic wave propagation in finitely deformed layered materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 98:390–410, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2016.10.002

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    F. E. Garbuzov, A. V. Belashov, A. A. Zhikhoreva, Y. M. Beltukov, and I. V. Semenova. Shock wave evolution into strain solitary wave in nonlinearly elastic solid bar. Wave Motion , 114:103022, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2022.103022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Gebhart and T

    P. Gebhart and T. Wallmersperger. Modeling of hysteresis effects in magneto-active polymers: constitutive theory and variational principles.Acta Mech., pages 1–27, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00707-025-04274-0

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Giorgi and A

    C. Giorgi and A. Morro. On the modeling of magneto-mechanical effects in solids.J. Magn. Magn. Mater. , 626:173038, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173038

    2025

  31. [39]

    G. A. Holzapfel.Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering . John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2000

    2000

  32. [40]

    Polymers for 3D Printing: Methods, Properties, and Characteristics

    J.Izdebska-Podsiadły, editor. Polymers for 3D Printing: Methods, Properties, and Characteristics . William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, UK, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Karami Mohammadi, P

    N. Karami Mohammadi, P. I. Galich, A. O. Krushynska, and S. Rudykh. Soft magnetoactive laminates: large deformations, transverse elastic waves and band gaps tunability by a magnetic field.J. Appl. Mech., 86(11):111001, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4044497. 28

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    D. I. Ketcheson and R. J. LeVeque. Shock dynamics in layered periodic media.Commun. Math. Sci. , 10 (3):859–874, 2012. doi:10.4310/CMS.2012.v10.n3.a7

    2012 doi

  35. [43]

    A. Kovetz. Electromagnetic Theory . Oxford University Press, New York, 2000. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198506041.001.0001

    2000

  36. [44]

    P. D. Lax.Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves . SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1973. doi:10.1137/1.9781611970562

    1973 doi

  37. [45]

    Ling and X

    L. Ling and X. Sun. The multi elliptic-localized solutions and their asymptotic behaviors for the mKdV equation. Stud. Appl. Math. , 150(1):135–183, 2023. doi:10.1111/sapm.12536

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    G. Liu, H. Liao, X. Zhao, J. Cao, and W.-H. Liao. A self-powered magnetoelectric tactile sensor for material recognition. Sensor. Actuat. A Phys. , 366:114942, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2023.114942

    2024

  39. [47]

    Lopez-Pamies and P

    O. Lopez-Pamies and P. Ponte Castañeda. Microstructure evolution in hyperelastic laminates and implications for overall behavior and macroscopic stability. Mech. Mat. , 41(4):364–374, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.006

    2009 doi

  40. [48]

    Lucarini, M

    S. Lucarini, M. Hossain, and D. Garcia-Gonzalez. Recent advances in hard-magnetic soft composites: Synthesis, characterisation, computational modelling, and applications.Compos. Struct., 279:114800, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114800

    2022

  41. [49]

    Madeo, P

    A. Madeo, P. Neff, I.-D. Ghiba, L. Placidi, and G. Rosi. Wave propagation in relaxed micromorphic continua: modeling metamaterials with frequency band-gaps.Cont. Mech. Thermodyn., 27:551–570, 2015. doi:10.1007/s00161-013-0329-2

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    Mahoney, D

    P. Mahoney, D. Carr, R. Arm, I. Gibb, N. Hunt, and R. J. Delaney. Ballistic impacts on an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer. Int. J. Legal Med. , 132:519–530, 2018. doi:10.1007/s00414-017-1737-9

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    Marigo and A

    J.-J. Marigo and A. Maurel. Second order homogenization of subwavelength stratified media including finite size effect. SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 77(2):721–743, 2017. doi:10.1137/16M1070542

    2017 doi

  44. [52]

    A. Morro. On the entropy inequality and its exploitation in continuum physics.Meccanica, 59:1731–1743,

  45. [53]

    Mukherjee and K

    D. Mukherjee and K. Danas. A unified dual modeling framework for soft and hard magnetorheological elastomers. Int. J. Solids Struct. , 257:111513, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111513

    2022

  46. [54]

    R. W. Ogden and D. J. Steigmann, editors.Mechanics and Electrodynamics of Magneto- and Electro-elastic Materials. Springer, Vienna, 2011. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0701-0

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    W. J. Parnell. Effective wave propagation in a prestressed nonlinear elastic composite bar.IMA J. Appl. Math., 72(2):223–244, 2007. doi:10.1093/imamat/hxl033

    2007 doi

  48. [56]

    P. K. Purohit and R. Abeyaratne. On the dissipation at a shock wave in an elastic bar.Int. J. Solids Struct., 257:111371, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111371

    2022

  49. [57]

    doi:10.1007/s11012-024-01804-3

    doi

  50. [58]

    L. Rosati. Derivatives and rates of the stretch and rotation tensors. J. Elast. , 56(3):213–230, 1999. doi:10.1023/A:1007663620943

    1999 doi

  51. [59]

    Rudykh and K

    S. Rudykh and K. Bertoldi. Stability of anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers in finite deformations: A micromechanical approach.J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 61(4):949–967, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2012.12.008

    2013 doi

  52. [60]

    Ruggieri, J

    M. Ruggieri, J. Ciambella, G. Tomassetti, and S. Rudykh. Magneto-viscoelastic laminates in finite shear. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. , 175:105085, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2025.105085

    2025

  53. [61]

    Saxena, M

    P. Saxena, M. Hossain, and P. Steinmann. A theory of finite deformation magneto-viscoelasticity.Int. J. Solids Struct., 50(24):3886–3897, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.024

    2013 doi

  54. [62]

    A. H. Rahmati, R. Jia, K. Tan, X. Zhao, Q. Deng, L. Liu, and P. Sharma. Theory of hard magnetic soft materials to create magnetoelectricity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 171:105136, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2022.105136

    2023

  55. [63]

    S. A. Spinelli and O. Lopez-Pamies. Some simple explicit results for the elastic dielectric properties and stability of layered composites.Int. J. Eng. Sci. , 88:15–28, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.ijengsci.2014.01.005

    2015 doi

  56. [64]

    D. J. Steigmann. Equilibrium theory for magnetic elastomers and magnetoelastic membranes. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 39(7):1193–1216, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2003.08.002

    2004 doi

  57. [65]

    L. N. Trefethen. Spectral methods in MATLAB . SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2000. doi:10.1137/1.9780898719598

    2000 doi

  58. [66]

    J. M. Vivar-Pérez, U. Gabbert, H. Berger, R. Rodríguez-Ramos, J. Bravo-Castillero, R. Guinovart-Díaz, and F. Sabina. A dispersive nonlocal model for wave propagation in periodic composites.J. Mech. Mat. Struct., 4(5):951–976, 2009. doi:10.2140/jomms.2009.4.951

    2009 doi

  59. [67]

    Shmuel and G

    G. Shmuel and G. deBotton. Out-of-plane shear of fiber composites at moderate stretch levels.J. Eng. Math., 68:85–97, 2010. doi:10.1007/s10665-009-9352-5. 29

    2010 doi

  60. [68]

    L. Wang, Y. Kim, C. F. Guo, and X. Zhao. Hard-magnetic elastica.J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 142:104045,

  61. [69]

    Wautier and B

    A. Wautier and B. B. Guzina. On the second-order homogenization of wave motion in periodic media and the sound of a chessboard.J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 78:382–414, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2015.03.001

    2015 doi

  62. [70]

    J. R. Willis. Exact effective relations for dynamics of a laminated body.Mech. Mat., 41(4):385–393, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.010

    2009 doi

  63. [71]

    D. Yan, B. F. G. Aymon, and P. M. Reis. A reduced-order, rotation-based model for thin hard-magnetic plates. J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 170:105095, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2022.105095

    2023

  64. [72]

    B. Wang, H. Deng, and X. Gong. Modelling the magnetic-mechanical coupled viscoelastic behaviour of transversely isotropic soft magnetorheological elastomers. Int. J. Solids Struct. , 298:112863, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.112863

    2024

  65. [73]

    D. H. Yong and R. J. LeVeque. Solitary waves in layered nonlinear media.SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 63(5): 1539–1560, 2003. doi:10.1137/S0036139902408151

    2003 doi

  66. [74]

    E. A. Zabolotskaya, M. F. Hamilton, Y. A. Ilinskii, and G. D. Meegan. Modeling of nonlinear shear waves in soft solids. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 116(5):2807–2813, 2004. doi:10.1121/1.1802533

    2004 doi

  67. [75]

    Zhang and S

    Q. Zhang and S. Rudykh. Magneto-deformation and transverse elastic waves in hard-magnetic soft lami- nates. Mech. Mater., 169:104325, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104325

    2022

  68. [76]

    R. Zhao, Y. Kim, S. A. Chester, P. Sharma, and X. Zhao. Mechanics of hard-magnetic soft materials.J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 124:244–263, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2018.10.008

    2019 doi

  69. [77]

    Y. Zhao, B. Feng, J. Lee, N. Lu, and D. M. Pierce. A multi-layered model of human skin eluci- dates mechanisms of wrinkling in the forehead. J. Mech. Behav. Biome. Mater. , 105:103694, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103694

    2020

  70. [78]

    Q. Yao, N. Arora, D. Chen, Y. Xiang, and S. Rudykh. Elastic instabilities of soft laminates with stiffening behavior. Appl. Math. Model., 130:658–675, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2024.03.011

    2024 doi

  71. [84]

    Ziv and G

    R. Ziv and G. Shmuel. Observation of vector solitary waves in soft laminates using a finite-volume method. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. , 124:103502, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103502. 30

    2020

  72. [1974]

    doi:10.1098/rsta.1974.0026

    1974

  73. [2008]

    doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.0267

    2007

  74. [2020]

    doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104045

    2020

  75. [2023]

    doi:10.1051/m2an/2023027

  76. [2024]

    doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.112790

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.