Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 71 references

freePruner: A Training-free Approach for Large Multimodal Model Acceleration

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A training-free token selection scheme that keeps only the most-attended visual tokens can double a large multimodal model's prefill speed while holding VQA accuracy.

desk verdict Plausible training-free token pruning with solid accuracy-at-50%-tokens data, but the headline 2x speedup is roofline-only and key hyperparameters are undisclosed, so the acceleration claim is unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15446 v1 pith:F4NHOB7W submitted 2024-11-23 cs.CV cs.AI

Bingxin Xu , Yuzhang Shang , Yunhao Ge , Qian Lou , Yan Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords largemultimodalmodelstokenreductiontraining-freeaccelerationvisualquestionansweringattentioncontributiondegreeselectionprefillspeeduppost-trainingquantization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a large multimodal model can be sped up by simply dropping visual tokens before the language model, with no retraining and no access to training data. It claims a two-stage, attention-based selection—pivotal tokens chosen by cross-layer contribution degree, plus complementary tokens chosen by penultimate-layer attention to those pivots—preserves both high-level semantics and low-level visual details. On LLaVA-1.5, keeping half the visual tokens roughly doubles prefill speed and keeps benchmark scores within a point or two, sometimes exceeding the unpruned model. On VideoLLaVA, the same recipe cuts tokens to a quarter and yields about a fourfold prefill speedup. If the claim holds, any open-weight multimodal model, including those whose training data is private, can be accelerated as a plug-in and combined with post-training quantization.

What carries the argument

The central object is the token contribution degree, $r_i^l = \sum_j A_l[j,i] - A_l[i,i]$, computed from the self-attention map at layer $l$: it measures how much other tokens direct their attention to token $i$, excluding the token's attention to itself. This metric is used to select pivotal tokens with the highest contribution across a range of layers, and those pivotal tokens then serve as anchors for selecting complementary tokens via penultimate-layer attention patterns. The two-stage selection is what lets the method avoid token merging, so the surviving tokens remain in the original distribution and require no retraining.

What would settle it

Compare freePruner against random token selection at the same 50% budget on OCR-oriented benchmarks such as TextVQA, and inspect which patches are kept: if randomly kept tokens match freePruner's accuracy whenever the high-attention tokens are attention sinks rather than the text region, the contribution-degree metric is not carrying the claimed semantic information. A concrete decisive test is an image set where the answer depends on a small peripheral object that receives little inbound attention; if accuracy collapses while random selection at the same budget does not, the central premise fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that pure token selection, without merging and without training, is enough to accelerate large multimodal models: dropping half the visual tokens yields about 2x prefill speedup while keeping visual question-answering performance comparable, because the surviving tokens carry both the high-level semantics and low-level details the language model needs. freePruner defines a token contribution degree as the column sum of the attention map minus the token's self-attention, $r_i^l = \sum_j A_l[j,i] - A_l[i,i]$, and keeps the highest-contribution tokens across layers as pivotal tokens. It then selects complementary tokens by finding, in the penultimate layer, tokens that attend strongly to the pivotal tokens, thereby recovering low-level details the pivots miss. The paper argues that prior token-reduction methods fail in the training-free setting because merging changes the token distribution that the pretrained projector and LLM expect, whereas selection leaves the distribution intact. The reported experiments on LLaVA-1.5, LLaVA-Next, and VideoLLaVA, together with the quantization combination, support the practical claim of a training-free speedup.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that a token's total incoming attention from other tokens, after removing its self-attention, is a faithful measure of how much visual information that token contributes to the model's final answer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Halving visual tokens gives roughly 2x prefill speedup on LLaVA-1.5 at both 7B and 13B scale while VQAv2, ScienceQA, TextVQA, POPE, MME, and MMBench scores stay close to the unpruned model, with POPE and ScienceQA sometimes higher.
  • Because no training data or fine-tuning is needed, the method extends to open-weight multimodal models whose training data is private and cannot be reproduced.
  • On VideoLLaVA, cutting visual tokens to a quarter yields about 4x prefill speedup with comparable or better video QA scores, plus large reductions in memory access and activation storage.
  • freePruner is compatible with post-training quantization methods such as Q-VLM, so token pruning and quantization can be stacked in the same deployment pipeline.
  • Performance improves as the selected token budget grows on most benchmarks, making the pruning ratio a controllable accuracy-speed knob.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the paper does not isolate attention sinks from semantic pivotal tokens, so a version that removes all initial and positional tokens would reveal how much of the gain comes from preserving sinks rather than content-bearing regions.
  • Editorial inference: since the selection is computed entirely from the visual encoder's attention maps, the same recipe likely transfers to models with different language backbones or projectors, but the paper only demonstrates LLaVA-family and VideoLLaVA variants.
  • Editorial inference: the reported 2x figure is a roofline estimate for prefill; end-to-end wall-clock gains will be smaller when decoding dominates, so measuring token-generation latency is a natural next test.
  • Editorial inference: the sparsity of contribution degrees across layers could serve as a cheap diagnostic for how much token reduction a given multimodal model tolerates before running any benchmark.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces freePruner, a training-free token reduction method for large multimodal models. It selects a subset of visual tokens in two stages: pivotal tokens are identified by a contribution-degree metric based on total inbound attention (Eq. 3) over layers, and complementary tokens are chosen in the penultimate layer by their attention to pivotal tokens. The selected tokens are passed to the LLM without any retraining. Experiments on LLaVA-1.5 show accuracy comparable to, or slightly better than, the full model on VQAv2, TextVQA, POPE, SQA, MME, and MMBench at roughly 50% token count; the method is also applied to VideoLLaVA and combined with post-training quantization. The paper claims a 2x (and 4x for video) acceleration, but this claim is based on LLM-Viewer roofline estimates in Table 3 rather than on wall-clock latency measurements.

Significance. The training-free property is practically valuable, and the benchmark evidence is mostly consistent with the claim of maintained accuracy: the losses on VQAv2 and MME are small, while POPE, SQA, and TextVQA show small gains. The ablations in Fig. 8 support the complementary-token module, and the orthogonality to post-training quantization is a useful property. If the speedup were measured end-to-end, freePruner would be a simple and broadly applicable acceleration baseline. At present the significance is moderated by the absence of measured latency and by missing hyperparameter specifications, which prevent independent verification of the central acceleration claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.4 / Table 3] The headline acceleration claim is not established because all 'Prefill Time' values in Table 3 are LLM-Viewer roofline estimates rather than wall-clock measurements. The table itself shows that for LLaVA-13B FP16 the accessing-memory cost drops only from 39.2 GB to 31.5 GB (about 20%) while OP count drops by 48%; on a memory-bound A6000 workload, speedup therefore cannot be assumed to scale with OP count. The reported prefill estimates also exclude the cost of computing the attention maps and contribution degrees used for token selection, and for VideoLLaVA they exclude per-frame encoder and selection overhead. Please report end-to-end wall-clock latency, including selection overhead, on the target hardware.
  2. [Algorithm 1 / Sec. 4.1] The hyperparameters Ls, k, and the adaptive outlier threshold for complementary tokens are never specified, yet the 50%-token results in Table 1 and Fig. 7 depend on them. Because Algorithm 1 outputs an adaptive m, the mapping from '50% of tokens' to a concrete setting of Ls, k, and threshold is not reproducible. Please state the exact values used and include a sensitivity analysis over Ls and k.
  3. [Eq. (3) / Sec. 3.2] The contribution-degree metric is the load-bearing selection signal, but the paper does not provide evidence that inbound attention excluding self tracks the information the LLM actually needs. The text itself acknowledges attention sinks (Sec. 3.2 and Fig. 5), which can produce high contribution scores for positional or background tokens. A minimal control would be random 50% token selection at the same budget, and a task-based importance ranking (e.g., gradient-based or leave-one-out on a small validation set). Without such a control, the accuracy results could reflect the robustness of LLaVA to arbitrary token subsampling rather than the specific selection metric.
  4. [Sec. 2 (last paragraph) / Sec. 4] The claim that this is 'the first exploration of training-free token reduction specifically designed for LMMs' is not correct as written. FastV (Liang Chen et al., 'An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2', 2024) proposes training-free token pruning for multimodal LLMs and is neither cited nor compared against. Please correct the novelty statement and add a direct experimental comparison at matched token budgets.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.4] 'freePruner halves the visual tokens, which results in a twofold increase in prefill times' should read 'a twofold reduction in prefill time'.
  2. [Algorithm 1, line 8] The phrase 'the iL-th layer' is ambiguous; it should be the l-th layer or explicitly the penultimate layer.
  3. [Sec. 4.5] 'Fig.6 illustrates the performance comparisons among three groups' is a wrong cross-reference; the comparison plot is Fig. 8.
  4. [Sec. 3.2 / Eq. (1)-(3)] Please state the index convention in Eq. (1)-(3), i.e., whether A_l[i,j] is attention from token i to token j; this determines whether Eq. (3) is an inbound or outbound sum.
  5. [Abstract / Conclusion] The abstract and conclusion claim applicability to 'any open-source LMM', but experiments cover only LLaVA-1.5, LLaVA-Next, and VideoLLaVA; please qualify the claim or add a third model family.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: freePruner's token-selection heuristic is evaluated on external VQA benchmarks, and its speedup is a roofline estimate, not a quantity reconstructed from its own fitted inputs.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain and found no load-bearing circular step. The token contribution degree metric in Eq. 3 is a definition (column-wise inbound attention minus self-attention), not a derived result, and the pivotal/complementary selection rules are explicitly presented as design heuristics. The paper's performance claims are measured against external benchmarks (VQAv2, ScienceQA, TextVQA, POPE, MME, MMBench) and compared with pretrained LLaVA-1.5, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the reported accuracy is a measured outcome, and the selection hyperparameters Ls, k, and the adaptive outlier threshold are not even specified in the paper. The 2x acceleration claim is an LLM-Viewer roofline estimate, and while LLM-Viewer shares authors with this paper, the estimate follows directly from the stated halving of visual tokens and the reported OP counts, making it an independently checkable model prediction rather than a self-citation chain that defines the result. Self-citations to PruMerge+ and LLM-Viewer serve as a comparison baseline and an analysis tool, respectively; they are not used to import a uniqueness theorem or to smuggle in an ansatz that already contains the conclusion. The main weaknesses, namely the absence of measured wall-clock latency and the unreported selection hyperparameters, are correctness and reproducibility concerns, not circularity. Score 1 reflects only the presence of minor self-citations; no reduction-by-construction step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The method depends on an empirical importance metric and on unspecified hyperparameters rather than on new mechanisms.

free parameters (3)
  • k, number of pivotal tokens per layer
    Controls how many high-contribution tokens are kept per layer; value not reported in paper, likely tuned on validation sets.
  • Ls, starting layer for pivotal token identification
    Determines which layers contribute to the pivotal set; not specified in text or Algorithm 1.
  • Complementary token outlier threshold
    The 'adaptively select outliers' step in Algorithm 1 is undefined; its threshold determines complementary token count and is likely tuned.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Attention-based contribution degree r_i_l is a faithful proxy for token-level information content at all encoder depths.
    Sec. 3.2 uses this metric to choose pivotal tokens; if attention sinks or positional biases dominate, selection would lose semantic content.
  • domain assumption Penultimate-layer attention from pivotal tokens identifies low-level visual details worth keeping.
    Sec. 3.3 selects complementary tokens by attention to pivotal tokens; no independent evidence is given that these tokens encode the missing low-level features.
  • domain assumption Frozen LMM components (projector W and LLM f_theta) can consume a 50% token subset with no distribution shift penalty.
    The training-free premise rests on selection not changing the per-token distribution; the paper tests this empirically but provides no theoretical justification.
  • standard math Standard transformer attention equations (Eq. 1 and 2) hold.
    Used throughout Sec. 3.1 and 3.2; uncontroversial background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of freePruner: A Training-free Approach for Large Multimodal Model Acceleration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F4NHOB7W

@misc{pith2026241115446,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: freePruner: A Training-free Approach for Large Multimodal Model Acceleration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F4NHOB7W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15446}
}
read the original abstract

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in visual-language tasks but face significant deployment challenges due to their high computational demands. While recent token reduction methods show promise for accelerating LMMs, they typically require extensive retraining or fine-tuning, making them impractical for many state-of-the-art models, especially those with proprietary training data. We propose freePruner, a training-free token reduction approach that can be directly applied to any open-source LMM without additional training. Unlike existing methods that rely heavily on token merging operations, freePruner employs a two-stage token selection strategy: (1) identifying pivotal tokens that capture high-level semantic information using our designed contribution degree metric, and (2) selecting complementary tokens that preserve essential low-level visual details through attention pattern analysis. Extensive experiments demonstrate that freePruner achieves 2x acceleration while maintaining comparable performance across mainstream visual question-answering benchmarks in the training-free setting. Moreover, freePruner is orthogonal to and can be combined with other post-training acceleration techniques, such as post-training quantization, providing a practical solution for efficient LMM deployment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15446 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A training-free approach for LMM acceleration. freePruner enables automatic token selection using only pre￾trained LMMs, requiring no additional training or fine-tuning. Our method achieves acceleration while maintaining model per￾formance, providing “free-lunch” speedup for LMM inference. Despite their impressive capabilities, the deployment of LMMs faces significant challenges due to their high com￾putational dema… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Performance comparison across VQA tasks. freePruner achieves 2× acceleration of LLaVA while main￾taining comparable performance across mainstream VQA bench￾marks. Notably, our token selection approach is orthogonal to other training-free LLM acceleration methods (e.g., quantization), enabling potential combinations for even greater efficiency gains. the original dataset to adapt to the reduced token setting. This re… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The overview of freePruner. freePruner has 2 modules: (1)Identify pivotal tokens for high-level visual infor￾mation via contribution degree across layers (see Sec.3.2). Our designed token contribution degree matrics distributes sparsely in the encoder’s middle layers, thus we leverage this property to se￾lect the tokens representing high-level features; (2)Select comple￾mentary tokens for low-level visual informatio… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of token contribution degree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pivotal tokens are found in areas of the image with dense [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: As the selected number of tokens increase, the performance of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evaluation of token selection methods on the MME [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introducing idefics: An open reproduction of state-of-the-art visual language model, 2023. 6

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning

    Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech, Iain Barr, Yana Hasson, Karel Lenc, Arthur Men- sch, Katherine Millican, Malcolm Reynolds, et al. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. NeurIPS, 35:23716–23736, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Layer normalization

    Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hin- ton. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450,

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Qwen technical report

    Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. Qwen technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023. 1, 3

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Paligemma: A versatile 3b vlm for trans- fer

    Lucas Beyer, Andreas Steiner, Andr ´e Susano Pinto, Alexan- der Kolesnikov, Xiao Wang, Daniel Salz, Maxim Neumann, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Michael Tschannen, Emanuele Bugliarello, et al. Paligemma: A versatile 3b vlm for trans- fer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07726, 2024. 2

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Token merging: Your ViT but faster

    Daniel Bolya, Cheng-Yang Fu, Xiaoliang Dai, Peizhao Zhang, Christoph Feichtenhofer, and Judy Hoffman. Token merging: Your ViT but faster. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. 1, 2, 3

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Meyer, Yuning Chai, Dennis Park, and Yong Jae Lee

    Mu Cai, Haotian Liu, Siva Karthik Mustikovela, Gregory P. Meyer, Yuning Chai, Dennis Park, and Yong Jae Lee. Mak- ing large multimodal models understand arbitrary visual prompts. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, 2024. 2, 4

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Coarse-to-fine sparse transformer for hyperspectral image re- construction

    Yuanhao Cai, Jing Lin, Xiaowan Hu, Haoqian Wang, Xin Yuan, Yulun Zhang, Radu Timofte, and Luc Van Gool. Coarse-to-fine sparse transformer for hyperspectral image re- construction. In ECCV, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Shikra: Unleashing multi- modal llm’s referential dialogue magic

    Keqin Chen, Zhao Zhang, Weili Zeng, Richong Zhang, Feng Zhu, and Rui Zhao. Shikra: Unleashing multi- modal llm’s referential dialogue magic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15195, 2023. 2, 6

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Internvl2: Better than the best—expanding performance boundaries of open-source multimodal models with the progressive scaling strategy,

    Zhe Chen, Weiyun Wang, Hao Tian, Shenglong Ye, Zhang- wei Gao, Erfei Cui, Wenwen Tong, Kongzhi Hu, Jia- peng Luo, Zheng Ma, et al. Internvl2: Better than the best—expanding performance boundaries of open-source multimodal models with the progressive scaling strategy,

  3. [11]

    Mobilevlm: A fast, reproducible and strong vision language assistant for mobile devices

    Xiangxiang Chu, Limeng Qiao, Xinyang Lin, Shuang Xu, Yang Yang, Yiming Hu, Fei Wei, Xinyu Zhang, Bo Zhang, Xiaolin Wei, et al. Mobilevlm: A fast, reproducible and strong vision language assistant for mobile devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16886, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Mobilevlm v2: Faster and stronger baseline for vision language model

    Xiangxiang Chu, Limeng Qiao, Xinyu Zhang, Shuang Xu, Fei Wei, Yang Yang, Xiaofei Sun, Yiming Hu, Xinyang Lin, Bo Zhang, et al. Mobilevlm v2: Faster and stronger baseline for vision language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03766, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Instructblip: Towards general- purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning,

    Wenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong, Junqi Zhao, Weisheng Wang, Boyang Li, Pascale Fung, and Steven Hoi. Instructblip: Towards general- purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning,

  6. [14]

    Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms

    Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms. NeurIPS, 2024. 12

    2024

  7. [15]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Syl- vain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint a...

    2010 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Adaptive token sampling for efficient vision transformers

    Mohsen Fayyaz, Soroush Abbasi Koohpayegani, Farnoush Rezaei Jafari, Sunando Sengupta, Hamid Reza Vaezi Joze, Eric Sommerlade, Hamed Pirsiavash, and J¨urgen Gall. Adaptive token sampling for efficient vision transformers. In European Conference on Computer Vision,

  9. [17]

    Gptq: Accurate post-training quantization for generative pre-trained transformers

    Elias Frantar, Saleh Ashkboos, Torsten Hoefler, and Dan Alistarh. Gptq: Accurate post-training quantization for generative pre-trained transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17323, 2022. 1

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Mme: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models

    Chaoyou Fu, Peixian Chen, Yunhang Shen, Yulei Qin, Mengdan Zhang, Xu Lin, Zhenyu Qiu, Wei Lin, Jinrui Yang, Xiawu Zheng, et al. Mme: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13394, 2023. 6, 7, 8

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Challenges in deploying long-context transform- ers: A theoretical peak performance analysis

    Yao Fu. Challenges in deploying long-context transform- ers: A theoretical peak performance analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08944, 2024. 8

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Making the v in vqa matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answer- ing

    Yash Goyal, Tejas Khot, Douglas Summers-Stay, Dhruv Ba- tra, and Devi Parikh. Making the v in vqa matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answer- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6904–6913...

    2017

  13. [21]

    Which tokens to use? investi- gating token reduction in vision transformers

    Joakim Bruslund Haurum, Sergio Escalera, Graham W Tay- lor, and Thomas B Moeslund. Which tokens to use? investi- gating token reduction in vision transformers. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Com- puter Vision, 2023. 2

    2023

  14. [22]

    3d-llm: Inject- ing the 3d world into large language models.NeurIPS, 2023

    Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, and Chuang Gan. 3d-llm: Inject- ing the 3d world into large language models.NeurIPS, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  15. [23]

    Mistral 7b

    Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lam- ple, Lucile Saulnier, et al. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825, 2023. 1, 2

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Efficient multimodal large language models: A survey

    Yizhang Jin, Jian Li, Yexin Liu, Tianjun Gu, Kai Wu, Zhengkai Jiang, Muyang He, Bo Zhao, Xin Tan, Zhenye Gan, et al. Efficient multimodal large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10739, 2024. 1

    2024

  17. [25]

    Vision transformers with natural language seman- tics

    Young Kyung Kim, J Mat ´ıas Di Martino, and Guillermo Sapiro. Vision transformers with natural language seman- tics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17863, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer

    Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Dong Guo, Renrui Zhang, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Kaichen Zhang, Yanwei Li, Ziwei Liu, and Chunyuan Li. Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven C. H. Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training 9 with frozen image encoders and large language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023. 6

    2023

  20. [28]

    Tokenpacker: Effi- cient visual projector for multimodal llm

    Wentong Li, Yuqian Yuan, Jian Liu, Dongqi Tang, Song Wang, Jianke Zhu, and Lei Zhang. Tokenpacker: Effi- cient visual projector for multimodal llm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02392, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Evaluating object hallucina- tion in large vision-language models

    Yifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. Evaluating object hallucina- tion in large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10355, 2023. 6, 7, 8

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Not all patches are what you need: Expediting vision transformers via token reorganiza- tions

    Youwei Liang, Chongjian Ge, Zhan Tong, Yibing Song, Jue Wang, and Pengtao Xie. Not all patches are what you need: Expediting vision transformers via token reorganiza- tions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07800, 2022. 1, 2

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Video-llava: Learning united visual representation by alignment before projection

    Bin Lin, Bin Zhu, Yang Ye, Munan Ning, Peng Jin, and Li Yuan. Video-llava: Learning united visual representation by alignment before projection. EMNLP, 2024. 2, 3, 7

    2024

  24. [32]

    Awq: Activation-aware weight quantization for on-device llm compression and acceleration

    Ji Lin, Jiaming Tang, Haotian Tang, Shang Yang, Wei-Ming Chen, Wei-Chen Wang, Guangxuan Xiao, Xingyu Dang, Chuang Gan, and Song Han. Awq: Activation-aware weight quantization for on-device llm compression and acceleration. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems , 6:87–100,

  25. [33]

    Looking beyond the top-1: Trans- formers determine top tokens in order

    Daria Lioubashevski, Tomer Schlank, Gabriel Stanovsky, and Ariel Goldstein. Looking beyond the top-1: Trans- formers determine top tokens in order. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20210, 2024. 4

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning, 2023

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning, 2023. 2, 6

    2023

  27. [35]

    Llava-next: Im- proved reasoning, ocr, and world knowledge

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Sheng Shen, and Yong Jae Lee. Llava-next: Im- proved reasoning, ocr, and world knowledge. 2024. 1, 2, 3, 7

    2024

  28. [36]

    Llava-next: Im- proved reasoning, ocr, and world knowledge, January 2024

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Sheng Shen, and Yong Jae Lee. Llava-next: Im- proved reasoning, ocr, and world knowledge, January 2024. 1, 12

    2024

  29. [37]

    Visual instruction tuning

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv:2304.08485, 2023. 1, 2

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    World model on million-length video and language with ringattention

    Hao Liu, Wilson Yan, Matei Zaharia, and Pieter Abbeel. World model on million-length video and language with ringattention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.08268, 2024. 7

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Adaptive sparse vit: Towards learnable adaptive token pruning by fully exploiting self-attention

    Xiangcheng Liu, Tianyi Wu, and Guodong Guo. Adaptive sparse vit: Towards learnable adaptive token pruning by fully exploiting self-attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.13802,

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06281, 2023

    Yuan Liu, Haodong Duan, Yuanhan Zhang, Bo Li, Songyang Zhang, Wangbo Zhao, Yike Yuan, Jiaqi Wang, Conghui He, Ziwei Liu, et al. Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06281, 2023. 6, 7

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering

    Pan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu, Kai-Wei Chang, Song-Chun Zhu, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark, and Ashwin Kalyan. Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. 6, 7

    2022

  34. [42]

    Gpt-4 technical report

    OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  35. [43]

    Gpt-4v(ision) system card

    OpenAI. Gpt-4v(ision) system card. https://cdn. openai.com/papers/GPTV_System_Card.pdf ,

  36. [44]

    Kosmos-2: Ground- ing multimodal large language models to the world

    Zhiliang Peng, Wenhui Wang, Li Dong, Yaru Hao, Shaohan Huang, Shuming Ma, and Furu Wei. Kosmos-2: Ground- ing multimodal large language models to the world. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14824, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    xgen-mm-vid (blip-3- video): You only need 32 tokens to represent a video even in vlms

    Michael S Ryoo, Honglu Zhou, Shrikant Kendre, Can Qin, Le Xue, Manli Shu, Silvio Savarese, Ran Xu, Caiming Xiong, and Juan Carlos Niebles. xgen-mm-vid (blip-3- video): You only need 32 tokens to represent a video even in vlms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16267, 2024. 7, 8

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Llava-prumerge: Adaptive token reduction for efficient large multimodal models

    Yuzhang Shang, Mu Cai, Bingxin Xu, Yong Jae Lee, and Yan Yan. Llava-prumerge: Adaptive token reduction for efficient large multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15388,

  39. [47]

    Enhancing post-training quantization calibration through contrastive learning

    Yuzhang Shang, Gaowen Liu, Ramana Rao Kompella, and Yan Yan. Enhancing post-training quantization calibration through contrastive learning. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  40. [48]

    Interpolating video-llms: Toward longer- sequence lmms in a training-free manner

    Yuzhang Shang, Bingxin Xu, Weitai Kang, Mu Cai, Yuheng Li, Zehao Wen, Zhen Dong, Kurt Keutzer, Yong Jae Lee, and Yan Yan. Interpolating video-llms: Toward longer- sequence lmms in a training-free manner. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12963, 2024. 8

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Pb-llm: Partially binarized large language models

    Yuzhang Shang, Zhihang Yuan, Qiang Wu, and Zhen Dong. Pb-llm: Partially binarized large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00034, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Crossget: Cross-guided ensem- ble of tokens for accelerating vision-language transformers

    Dachuan Shi, Chaofan Tao, Anyi Rao, Zhendong Yang, Chun Yuan, and Jiaqi Wang. Crossget: Cross-guided ensem- ble of tokens for accelerating vision-language transformers. ICML, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024

  43. [51]

    Towards vqa models that can read

    Amanpreet Singh, Vivek Natarajan, Meet Shah, Yu Jiang, Xinlei Chen, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh, and Marcus Rohrbach. Towards vqa models that can read. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8317–8326, 2019. 6, 7

    2019

  44. [52]

    A simple and effective pruning approach for large language models

    Mingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, and J Zico Kolter. A simple and effective pruning approach for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11695, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Efficient transformers: A survey

    Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Dara Bahri, and Donald Metzler. Efficient transformers: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys,

  46. [54]

    Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models

    Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Yonghui Wu, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023. 1, 2

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models

    Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timoth´ee Lacroix, Baptiste Rozi`ere, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023. 1, 2

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszko- reit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 5998–6008, 2017. 2, 3

    2017

  49. [57]

    Q-vlm: Post-training quanti- zation for large vision-language models

    Changyuan Wang, Ziwei Wang, Xiuwei Xu, Yansong Tang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Q-vlm: Post-training quanti- zation for large vision-language models. arXiv preprint 10 arXiv:2410.08119, 2024. 1, 12

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Sclip: Rethinking self-attention for dense vision-language inference

    Feng Wang, Jieru Mei, and Alan Yuille. Sclip: Rethinking self-attention for dense vision-language inference. In ECCV,

  51. [59]

    Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution

    Peng Wang, Shuai Bai, Sinan Tan, Shijie Wang, Zhihao Fan, Jinze Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, et al. Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Efficient streaming language models with attention sinks

    Guangxuan Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Beidi Chen, Song Han, and Mike Lewis. Efficient streaming language models with attention sinks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17453, 2023. 5

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    A-vit: Adaptive tokens for efficient vision transformer

    Hongxu Yin, Arash Vahdat, Jose M Alvarez, Arun Mallya, Jan Kautz, and Pavlo Molchanov. A-vit: Adaptive tokens for efficient vision transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 10809–10818, 2022. 2

    2022

  54. [62]

    A survey on multimodal large language models

    Shukang Yin, Chaoyou Fu, Sirui Zhao, Ke Li, Xing Sun, Tong Xu, and Enhong Chen. A survey on multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13549, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Llm inference unveiled: Survey and roofline model insights

    Zhihang Yuan, Yuzhang Shang, Yang Zhou, Zhen Dong, Chenhao Xue, Bingzhe Wu, Zhikai Li, Qingyi Gu, Yong Jae Lee, Yan Yan, et al. Llm inference unveiled: Survey and roofline model insights. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16363 ,

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Mm-llms: Recent ad- vances in multimodal large language models

    Duzhen Zhang, Yahan Yu, Chenxing Li, Jiahua Dong, Dan Su, Chenhui Chu, and Dong Yu. Mm-llms: Recent ad- vances in multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13601, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Video-llama: An instruction-tuned audio-visual language model for video un- derstanding

    Hang Zhang, Xin Li, and Lidong Bing. Video-llama: An instruction-tuned audio-visual language model for video un- derstanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02858, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Token-level correlation-guided com- pression for efficient multimodal document understanding

    Renshan Zhang, Yibo Lyu, Rui Shao, Gongwei Chen, Weili Guan, and Liqiang Nie. Token-level correlation-guided com- pression for efficient multimodal document understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14439, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gpt4roi: In- struction tuning large language model on region-of-interest

    Shilong Zhang, Peize Sun, Shoufa Chen, Min Xiao, Wenqi Shao, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen, and Ping Luo. Gpt4roi: In- struction tuning large language model on region-of-interest. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03601, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Extract free dense labels from clip

    Chong Zhou, Chen Change Loy, and Bo Dai. Extract free dense labels from clip. In European Conference on Com- puter Vision (ECCV), 2022. 4

    2022

  61. [69]

    Languagebind: Extending video-language pretrain- ing to n-modality by language-based semantic alignment

    Bin Zhu, Bin Lin, Munan Ning, Yang Yan, Jiaxi Cui, HongFa Wang, Yatian Pang, Wenhao Jiang, Junwu Zhang, Zongwei Li, et al. Languagebind: Extending video-language pretrain- ing to n-modality by language-based semantic alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01852, 2023. 7

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models

    Deyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li, and Mo- hamed Elhoseiny. Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023. 1, 2, 3 11

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Orthogonal Method with Post-training Quan- tization on LLMs Table 4

    Appendix 6.1. Orthogonal Method with Post-training Quan- tization on LLMs Table 4. Results with Quantization Baselines. Bits Method Subject Context ModalityAverageNAT SOC LANTXT IMG NOFP - 89.39 96.06 85.6488.71 87.65 88.5089.81 W6A6AWQ 85.39 92.01 83.2784.80 83.54 85.9986.23Q...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.