pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31823 · v1 · pith:F65WVRB6new · submitted 2026-06-30 · ✦ hep-ph

NNLO QCD predictions for tbar{t}W production at the LHC

Xiang Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords NNLO QCDttW productionLHC phenomenologytwo-loop amplitudesleading-colour approximationtop quark physicsassociated W boson production
0
0 comments X

The pith

NNLO QCD predictions for ttW production at the LHC are obtained by explicitly evaluating two-loop amplitudes in the generalised leading-colour limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes next-to-next-to-leading order QCD predictions for top-antitop pair production in association with a W boson. Measurements at the LHC have found higher rates than earlier Standard Model calculations, so improved theoretical precision is required. The key new step is the explicit evaluation of the two-loop amplitudes inside the generalised leading-colour limit. This supplies the missing ingredients needed to reach full NNLO accuracy for the process.

Core claim

For the first time, the necessary two-loop amplitudes are explicitly evaluated in the generalised leading-colour limit for NNLO predictions of ttW production.

What carries the argument

The generalised leading-colour limit applied to the two-loop amplitudes, which supplies the dominant colour contributions required for the NNLO calculation.

If this is right

  • The NNLO cross sections give a more precise theoretical prediction for ttW production that can be compared directly with LHC measurements.
  • Theoretical uncertainties on the ttW rate are reduced, allowing a clearer assessment of any remaining discrepancy with data.
  • The same amplitude evaluation technique can be reused for related processes involving multiple heavy particles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may be extended to other multi-leg processes where full-colour two-loop amplitudes remain unavailable.
  • If the approximation holds to the claimed accuracy, it could shorten the timeline for NNLO results on additional LHC signatures.
  • Direct numerical comparison of the leading-colour two-loop pieces against any available full-colour benchmarks in simpler channels would test the method's reliability.

Load-bearing premise

The generalised leading-colour limit supplies a sufficiently accurate representation of the full two-loop amplitudes for this NNLO calculation.

What would settle it

A complete two-loop amplitude evaluation performed without the leading-colour approximation that produces NNLO cross sections differing by more than the quoted theoretical uncertainty.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31823 by Xiang Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Results for Δ𝜎NLO,H (upper panel) and Δ𝜎NNLO,H (lower panel) in the case of 𝑡𝑡𝑊¯ − production, for the soft approximation (SA), massification approach (MA) and LCA, as functions of the lower cut applied to the transverse momenta of the top quarks. At NLO the approximations are normalised to the exact result, while at NNLO to the best result (SA+MA) from Ref. [32]. The uncertainties assigned to each approxi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The production of a top-antitop quark pair in association with a $W$ boson ($t\bar{t}W$) is one of the heaviest signatures currently explored at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the corresponding rates have been found to be consistently higher than the Standard Model predictions, highlighting the need for more accurate theoretical predictions. In this contribution, I present next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) predictions for this process, in which, for the first time, the necessary two-loop amplitudes are explicitly evaluated in the generalised leading-colour limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to provide the first NNLO QCD predictions for ttbar W production at the LHC, achieved by explicitly evaluating the required two-loop amplitudes in the generalised leading-colour limit.

Significance. If the approximation holds with controlled errors, the result would enable the first NNLO accuracy for this heavy final state, directly relevant to the observed excess over SM predictions at the LHC. The explicit two-loop evaluation in the stated limit constitutes a clear technical advance.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that NNLO predictions are now possible rests on the generalised leading-colour limit supplying a sufficiently accurate representation of the full two-loop amplitudes. No power-counting argument, numerical comparison to full-colour NLO results, or partial two-loop benchmarks is supplied to bound the size of the neglected colour-suppressed contributions across phase space; without this the truncation error on the NNLO cross section remains unquantified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the major point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that NNLO predictions are now possible rests on the generalised leading-colour limit supplying a sufficiently accurate representation of the full two-loop amplitudes. No power-counting argument, numerical comparison to full-colour NLO results, or partial two-loop benchmarks is supplied to bound the size of the neglected colour-suppressed contributions across phase space; without this the truncation error on the NNLO cross section remains unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript as submitted does not supply a quantitative bound on the size of the colour-suppressed terms neglected in the generalised leading-colour approximation. This is a fair observation. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (in the introduction or a new subsection) that (i) recalls the colour power counting for the two-loop amplitudes of this process, (ii) presents a numerical comparison of the leading-colour versus full-colour NLO cross section and selected distributions, and (iii) uses that comparison to assign a conservative uncertainty band to the NNLO result. The abstract will be updated to make the approximate nature of the two-loop input explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct perturbative evaluation of two-loop amplitudes

full rationale

The paper claims an explicit evaluation of two-loop amplitudes in the generalised leading-colour limit to enable NNLO predictions for ttW production. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are referenced that would reduce the claimed result to an input by construction. The derivation is presented as a first-principles perturbative computation without self-definitional loops, renamed empirical patterns, or load-bearing citations to prior author work that would force the outcome. This is a standard case of an independent technical calculation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; ledger is minimal and reflects standard perturbative QCD assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Perturbative QCD in the Standard Model is the appropriate framework for this process at LHC energies.
    Implicit in all NNLO QCD calculations for collider processes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5611 in / 1060 out tokens · 31259 ms · 2026-07-01T04:21:19.016815+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    QCD corrections to the hadronic production of a heavy quark pair and a W-boson including decay correlations

    S. Badger, J. M. Campbell, and R. K. Ellis,QCD Corrections to the Hadronic Production of a Heavy Quark Pair and a W-Boson Including Decay Correlations,JHEP03(2011) 027, [arXiv:1011.6647]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis,𝑡¯𝑡𝑊 +− production and decay at NLO,JHEP07(2012) 052, [arXiv:1204.5678]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Associated production of a top-quark pair with vector bosons at NLO in QCD: impact on $t \bar{t} H$ searches at the LHC

    F. Maltoni, D. Pagani, and I. Tsinikos,Associated production of a top-quark pair with vector bosons at NLO in QCD: impact onttHsearches at the LHC,JHEP02(2016) 113, [arXiv:1507.05640]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Electroweak and QCD corrections to top-pair hadroproduction in association with heavy bosons

    S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao, and M. Zaro,Electroweak and QCD corrections to top-pair hadroproduction in association with heavy bosons,JHEP06(2015) 184, [arXiv:1504.03446]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Large NLO corrections in $t\bar{t}W^{\pm}$ and $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ hadroproduction from supposedly subleading EW contributions

    R. Frederix, D. Pagani, and M. Zaro,Large NLO corrections in𝑡¯𝑡𝑊 ± and𝑡 ¯𝑡𝑡 ¯𝑡 hadroproduction from supposedly subleading EW contributions,JHEP02(2018) 031, [arXiv:1711.02116]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    H. T. Li, C. S. Li, and S. A. Li,Renormalization group improved predictions for𝑡¯𝑡𝑊 ± production at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 9 094009, [arXiv:1409.1460]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Associated production of a top pair and a W boson at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy

    A. Broggio, A. Ferroglia, G. Ossola, and B. D. Pecjak,Associated production of a top pair and a W boson at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy,JHEP09(2016) 089, [arXiv:1607.05303]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Associated production of a top quark pair with a heavy electroweak gauge boson at NLO+NNLL accuracy

    A. Kulesza, L. Motyka, D. Schwartländer, T. Stebel, and V. Theeuwes,Associated production of a top quark pair with a heavy electroweak gauge boson at NLO+NNLL accuracy,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 3 249, [arXiv:1812.08622]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Broggio, A

    A. Broggio, A. Ferroglia, R. Frederix, D. Pagani, B. D. Pecjak, and I. Tsinikos,Top-quark pair hadroproduction in association with a heavy boson at NLO+NNLL including EW corrections,JHEP08(2019) 039, [arXiv:1907.04343]

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Bevilacqua, H.-Y

    G. Bevilacqua, H.-Y. Bi, H. B. Hartanto, M. Kraus, and M. Worek,The simplest of them all: 𝑡¯𝑡𝑊 ± at NLO accuracy in QCD,JHEP08(2020) 043, [arXiv:2005.09427]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Denner and G

    A. Denner and G. Pelliccioli,NLO QCD corrections to off-shell t¯tW+ production at the LHC, JHEP11(2020) 069, [arXiv:2007.12089]. 9 NNLO QCD predictions for𝑡¯𝑡𝑊production at the LHCXiang Chen

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Bevilacqua, H.-Y

    G. Bevilacqua, H.-Y. Bi, H. B. Hartanto, M. Kraus, J. Nasufi, and M. Worek,NLO QCD corrections to off-shell𝑡¯𝑡𝑊 ± production at the LHC: correlations and asymmetries,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021), no. 7 675, [arXiv:2012.01363]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Denner and G

    A. Denner and G. Pelliccioli,Combined NLO EW and QCD corrections to off-shell ttW production at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021), no. 4 354, [arXiv:2102.03246]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Merging meets matching in MC@NLO

    R. Frederix and S. Frixione,Merging meets matching in MC@NLO,JHEP12(2012) 061, [arXiv:1209.6215]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    R.Frederix andI.Tsinikos,Onimproving NLOmergingfort tWproduction,JHEP11(2021) 029, [arXiv:2108.07826]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Buonocore, S

    L. Buonocore, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, L. Rottoli, and C. Savoini, Precise Predictions for the Associated Production of a W Boson with a Top-Antitop Quark Pair at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 23 231901, [arXiv:2306.16311]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    NNLO QCD predictions for $t\bar t W$ production at hadron colliders

    M. Becchetti, D. Canko, X. Chen, V. Chestnov, M. Delto, S. Ditsch, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, T. Peraro, M. Pozzoli, C. Savoini, L. Tancredi, and S. Zoia,NNLO QCD predictions for𝑡¯𝑡𝑊production at hadron colliders,arXiv:2606.09503

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and M. Wiesemann,Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018), no. 7 537, [arXiv:1711.06631]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Top-quark pair hadroproduction at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, and H. Sargsyan,Top-quark pair hadroproduction at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD,Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 5 051501, [arXiv:1901.04005]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and J. Mazzitelli,Top-quark pair production at the LHC: Fully differential QCD predictions at NNLO,JHEP07(2019) 100, [arXiv:1906.06535]

    work page arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and J. Mazzitelli,Bottom-quark production at hadron colliders: fully differential predictions in NNLO QCD,JHEP03(2021) 029, [arXiv:2010.11906]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Buonocore, S

    L. Buonocore, S. Devoto, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, L. Rottoli, and C. Savoini,Associated production of a W boson and massive bottom quarks at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 7 074032, [arXiv:2212.04954]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    S.Devoto,M.Grazzini,S.Kallweit,J.Mazzitelli,andC.Savoini,Precisepredictionsfor𝑡 𝑡𝐻 productionattheLHC:inclusivecrosssectionanddifferentialdistributions,JHEP03(2025) 189, [arXiv:2411.15340]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 222002, [hep-ph/0703012]. 10 NNLO QCD predictions for𝑡¯𝑡𝑊production at the LHCXiang Chen

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    The $q_T$ subtraction method for top quark production at hadron colliders

    R. Bonciani, S. Catani, M. Grazzini, H. Sargsyan, and A. Torre,The𝑞𝑇 subtraction method for top quark production at hadron colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015), no. 12 581, [arXiv:1508.03585]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    The Dipole Formalism for the Calculation of QCD Jet Cross Sections at Next-to-Leading Order

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour,The Dipole formalism for the calculation of QCD jet cross-sections at next-to-leading order,Phys. Lett. B378(1996) 287–301, [hep-ph/9602277]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  27. [27]

    A General Algorithm for Calculating Jet Cross Sections in NLO QCD

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour,A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD,Nucl. Phys. B485(1997) 291–419, [hep-ph/9605323]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 510, 503–504 (1998)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  28. [28]

    The Dipole Formalism for Next-to-Leading Order QCD Calculations with Massive Partons

    S. Catani, S. Dittmaier, M. H. Seymour, and Z. Trocsanyi,The Dipole formalism for next-to-leading order QCD calculations with massive partons,Nucl. Phys. B627(2002) 189–265, [hep-ph/0201036]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    S.Catani,S.Devoto,M.Grazzini,andJ.Mazzitelli,Soft-partoncontributionstoheavy-quark production at low transverse momentum,JHEP04(2023) 144, [arXiv:2301.11786]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Devoto and J

    S. Devoto and J. Mazzitelli,Soft contributions to heavy quark production in arbitrary kinematics,arXiv:2509.17509

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

    F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer, and S. Pozzorini,Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 111601, [arXiv:1111.5206]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    On-the-fly reduction of open loops

    F. Buccioni, S. Pozzorini, and M. Zoller,On-the-fly reduction of open loops,Eur. Phys. J. C 78(2018), no. 1 70, [arXiv:1710.11452]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Buccioni, J.-N

    F. Buccioni, J.-N. Lang, J. M. Lindert, P. Maierhöfer, S. Pozzorini, H. Zhang, and M. F. Zoller,OpenLoops 2,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 10 866, [arXiv:1907.13071]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Two-loop divergences of massive scattering amplitudes in non-abelian gauge theories

    A. Ferroglia, M. Neubert, B. D. Pecjak, and L. L. Yang,Two-loop divergences of massive scattering amplitudes in non-abelian gauge theories,JHEP11(2009) 062, [arXiv:0908.3676]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    Becchetti, M

    M. Becchetti, M. Delto, S. Ditsch, P. A. Kreer, M. Pozzoli, and L. Tancredi,One-loop QCD corrections to¯ud→𝑡 𝑡𝑊atO 𝜀2 ,JHEP09(2025) 126, [arXiv:2502.14952]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Becchetti, D

    M. Becchetti, D. Canko, V. Chestnov, T. Peraro, M. Pozzoli, and S. Zoia,Two-loop Feynman integrals for leading colour𝑡𝑡𝑊production at hadron colliders,JHEP07(2025) 001, [arXiv:2504.13011]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation,J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation,J. Comput. Phys.105(1993) 279–289

    1993

  38. [38]

    FORM version 4.2

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren,FORM version 4.2,arXiv:1707.06453

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Davies, T

    J. Davies, T. Kaneko, C. Marinissen, T. Ueda, and J. A. M. Vermaseren,FORM Version 5.0, arXiv:2601.19982. 11 NNLO QCD predictions for𝑡¯𝑡𝑊production at the LHCXiang Chen

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Peraro and L

    T. Peraro and L. Tancredi,Physical projectors for multi-leg helicity amplitudes,JHEP07 (2019) 114, [arXiv:1906.03298]

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Peraro and L

    T. Peraro and L. Tancredi,Tensor decomposition for bosonic and fermionic scattering amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D103(2021), no. 5 054042, [arXiv:2012.00820]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B44(1972) 189–213

    1972

  43. [43]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, C. Brancaccio, H. B. Hartanto, and S. Zoia,Numerical evaluation of two-loop QCD helicity amplitudes for𝑔𝑔→𝑡𝑡𝑔at leading colour,JHEP03(2025) 070, [arXiv:2412.13876]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    S.Badger,M.Becchetti,C.Brancaccio,M.Czakon,H.B.Hartanto,R.Poncelet,andS.Zoia, Double virtual QCD corrections to𝑡¯𝑡+jet production at the LHC,arXiv:2511.11424

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation viaauxiliarymassflow,Comput.Phys.Commun.283(2023)108565,[arXiv:2201.11669]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    A Systematic and Efficient Method to Compute Multi-loop Master Integrals

    X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma, and C.-Y. Wang,A Systematic and Efficient Method to Compute Multi-loop Master Integrals,Phys. Lett. B779(2018) 353–357, [arXiv:1711.09572]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    A novel approach to integration by parts reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and R. M. Schabinger,A novel approach to integration by parts reduction, Phys. Lett. B744(2015) 101–104, [arXiv:1406.4513]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction

    T. Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction, JHEP12(2016) 030, [arXiv:1608.01902]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs

    T. Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs,JHEP07(2019) 031, [arXiv:1905.08019]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    F. V. Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 65–68

    1981

  51. [51]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate 𝛽-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159–204

    1981

  52. [52]

    High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087–5159, [hep-ph/0102033]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  53. [53]

    Z. Wu, J. Boehm, R. Ma, H. Xu, and Y. Zhang,NeatIBP 1.0, a package generating small-size integration-by-parts relations for Feynman integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.295(2024) 108999, [arXiv:2305.08783]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    T. Peraro,Analytic multi-loop results using finite fields and dataflow graphs with FiniteFlow, in14th International Symposium on Radiative Corrections: Application of Quantum Field Theory to Phenomenology, 12, 2019.arXiv:1912.03142. 12 NNLO QCD predictions for𝑡¯𝑡𝑊production at the LHCXiang Chen

    work page arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    X. Guan, X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma, and W.-H. Wu,Blade: A package for block-triangular form improved Feynman integrals decomposition,Comput. Phys. Commun.310(2025) 109538, [arXiv:2405.14621]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    X. Guan, X. Liu, and Y.-Q. Ma,Complete reduction of integrals in two-loop five-light-parton scattering amplitudes,Chin. Phys. C44(2020), no. 9 093106, [arXiv:1912.09294]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Bi, L.-H

    H.-Y. Bi, L.-H. Huang, R.-J. Huang, Y.-Q. Ma, and H.-M. Yu,Electroweak Corrections to Double Higgs Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 23 231802, [arXiv:2311.16963]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Bi, Y.-Q

    H.-Y. Bi, Y.-Q. Ma, and D.-M. Mu,Electroweak loop corrections to gg→gH at the LHC, JHEP04(2026) 087, [arXiv:2508.02588]

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    H. T. Li, Y.-Q. Ma, C.-T. Tan, J. Wang, and H.-F. Zhang,Compton-Scattering Total Cross Section at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order and Resummation of Leading Logarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026), no. 2 021802, [arXiv:2511.09330]

    work page arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    Agarwal, G

    B. Agarwal, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, S. Y. Klein, J. Lang, V. Magerya, and A. Olsson,Two-loop amplitudes for𝑡𝑡𝐻production: the quark-initiated N𝑓-part,JHEP05 (2024) 013, [arXiv:2402.03301]. [Erratum: JHEP 06, 142 (2024)]. [77]NNPDFCollaboration, V. Bertone, S. Carrazza, N. P. Hartland, and J. Rojo,Illuminating the photon content of the proton ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    The singular behavior of massive QCD amplitudes

    A. Mitov and S. Moch,The Singular behavior of massive QCD amplitudes,JHEP05(2007) 001, [hep-ph/0612149]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  62. [62]

    G. Wang, T. Xia, L. L. Yang, and X. Ye,On the high-energy behavior of massive QCD amplitudes,JHEP05(2024) 082, [arXiv:2312.12242]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Klinkert, B. Page, and V. Sotnikov,Leading-color two-loop amplitudes for four partons and a W boson in QCD,JHEP04(2022) 042, [arXiv:2110.07541]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, and S. Zoia,Two-Loop QCD Corrections to𝑊 𝑏¯𝑏Production at Hadron Colliders,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 1 012001, [arXiv:2102.02516]. 13

    work page arXiv 2021