pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.11424 · v2 · pith:5SR6DRNInew · submitted 2025-11-14 · ✦ hep-ph

Double virtual QCD corrections to tbar{t}+jet production at the LHC

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords top-quark pair productionjet productiontwo-loop amplitudesNNLO QCDleading colourdifferential equationsfinite fieldsLHC phenomenology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Leading-colour two-loop QCD corrections to top-quark pair plus jet production are computed and packaged for NNLO use.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the double virtual contributions to top-quark pair production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD. The work is restricted to the leading-colour approximation and extracts the finite remainders of the two-loop amplitudes analytically. These remainders are obtained from evaluations over finite fields using a basis of special functions defined through differential equations. A colour- and spin-summed interference with the tree-level amplitudes is constructed, and a C++ library is supplied for immediate phenomenological applications. New techniques for the direct numerical integration of the differential equations are shown to perform stably across the full physical phase space.

Core claim

We present a leading colour computation of the double virtual contributions to top-quark pair production in association with a jet at a hadron collider at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD. The finite remainders of the two-loop amplitudes, after subtraction of infrared and ultraviolet divergences, are extracted analytically from evaluations over finite fields by using a (potentially) overcomplete basis of special functions defined through their differential equations. We construct the colour- and spin-summed interference with the tree-level amplitudes and present a C++ library suitable for immediate use in phenomenological studies.

What carries the argument

A basis of special functions defined through differential equations, from which finite remainders are extracted analytically after finite-field evaluations of the two-loop amplitudes.

If this is right

  • The finite remainders enable construction of full NNLO predictions for ttbar+jet when combined with real-emission and one-loop contributions.
  • The provided C++ library allows immediate inclusion of these corrections in Monte Carlo simulations or phenomenological analyses.
  • The numerical integration techniques for the special functions remain stable across the full physical phase space.
  • These results constitute a necessary ingredient toward complete NNLO QCD predictions for this process at hadron colliders.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same differential-equation techniques could be applied to extract finite remainders in related multi-leg processes at two loops.
  • Including sub-leading colour contributions would convert the present leading-colour result into a full-colour NNLO calculation.
  • These corrections will support more precise extractions of top-quark properties from LHC data on associated jet production.

Load-bearing premise

The leading-colour approximation captures the dominant physics for phenomenological applications and the chosen special-function basis with the numerical integration method remains stable and complete over the entire physical phase space.

What would settle it

A direct numerical comparison of the extracted finite remainders against an independent two-loop calculation at a chosen benchmark phase-space point would confirm or refute the analytic results.

read the original abstract

We present a leading colour computation of the double virtual contributions to top-quark pair production in association with a jet at a hadron collider at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD. The finite remainders of the two-loop amplitudes, after subtraction of infrared and ultraviolet divergences, are extracted analytically from evaluations over finite fields by using a (potentially) overcomplete basis of special functions defined through their differential equations. We construct the colour- and spin-summed interference with the tree-level amplitudes and present a \texttt{C++} library suitable for immediate use in phenomenological studies. We present new techniques for the evaluation of the special functions through direct numerical integration of differential equations which perform well across the full physical phase space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a leading-colour computation of the double-virtual (two-loop) QCD corrections to top-quark pair plus jet production at the LHC at NNLO. Finite remainders of the amplitudes, after IR and UV subtraction, are extracted analytically via finite-field evaluations using a (potentially overcomplete) basis of special functions defined by differential equations. The colour- and spin-summed interference with the tree-level amplitude is constructed and a C++ library is provided for phenomenological use, together with new techniques for direct numerical integration of the differential equations claimed to perform stably across the full physical phase space.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, this supplies a key missing ingredient for NNLO QCD phenomenology of a phenomenologically important 2-to-3 process with massive quarks. Explicit credit is due for the finite-field extraction that avoids fitted parameters, the provision of a ready-to-use C++ library, and the development of direct DE integration methods for the special-function basis.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section describing the numerical integration techniques] The section on numerical evaluation of the special functions (the techniques introduced to integrate the differential equations): the claim that these techniques remain stable and accurate over the entire physical phase space, including soft/collinear boundaries and high-energy limits, is load-bearing for the reliability of the extracted finite remainders. The manuscript does not supply explicit error estimates, convergence tests, or benchmark comparisons in those regions to substantiate the performance statement.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and basis-construction section] The abstract refers to a 'potentially overcomplete basis'; the main text should state explicitly how any linear dependence is detected and removed when constructing the final analytic expressions for the finite remainders.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of the computation's significance. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional validation material.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section describing the numerical integration techniques] The section on numerical evaluation of the special functions (the techniques introduced to integrate the differential equations): the claim that these techniques remain stable and accurate over the entire physical phase space, including soft/collinear boundaries and high-energy limits, is load-bearing for the reliability of the extracted finite remainders. The manuscript does not supply explicit error estimates, convergence tests, or benchmark comparisons in those regions to substantiate the performance statement.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this constructive comment. The manuscript does contain several illustrative numerical evaluations demonstrating the integration performance in representative kinematic configurations, including regions approaching soft and collinear limits. Nevertheless, we agree that a more systematic presentation of quantitative error estimates, convergence diagnostics, and benchmark comparisons would strengthen the substantiation of stability claims across the full phase space. In the revised version we will expand the numerical evaluation section with: explicit relative-error estimates at selected points in soft/collinear and high-energy regimes; convergence plots versus integration tolerances; and direct comparisons against known analytic limits or independent numerical methods where feasible. These additions will provide the requested quantitative support without altering the underlying results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct finite-field evaluations and DE integration yield independent amplitude remainders

full rationale

The derivation extracts finite remainders of two-loop leading-colour amplitudes via direct evaluations over finite fields, employing a basis of special functions defined through their differential equations. New numerical integration techniques for these DEs are introduced and applied across the physical phase space. No parameters are fitted to a data subset and then relabelled as predictions; the basis construction and integration do not reduce to self-referential definitions or prior author results by construction. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central computational claim, which rests on first-principles amplitude methods rather than imported uniqueness theorems or ansatze. The pipeline is self-contained and externally verifiable through finite-field arithmetic and DE solvers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard perturbative QCD assumptions and the mathematical completeness of the special-function basis; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Perturbative QCD expansion remains valid at NNLO for this process.
    Invoked implicitly by performing an NNLO calculation.
  • domain assumption The (potentially overcomplete) basis of special functions spans the finite remainders of the amplitudes.
    Stated in the abstract as the method for analytic extraction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5441 in / 1290 out tokens · 46137 ms · 2026-05-17T22:05:38.337689+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pseudo-Evanescent Feynman Integrals from Local Subtraction

    hep-th 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Local subtraction reduces pseudo-evanescent Feynman integrals to products of one-loop integrals or one-fold integrals, with the finite part of the two-loop all-plus five-point amplitude arising solely from ultraviolet...

  2. Tensor decomposition of $e^+e^-\to\pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ to higher orders in the dimensional regulator

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First beyond-NLO tensor decomposition and higher-order analytic one-loop amplitudes for e+e- to pi+pi-gamma, paired with a fast numerical five-point integral evaluator.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 120 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    NLO QCD corrections to t tbar + jet production at hadron colliders

    S. Dittmaier, P. Uwer and S. Weinzierl,NLO QCD corrections to t anti-t + jet production at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 262002, [hep-ph/0703120]

  2. [2]

    Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering

    S. Alioli, S.-O. Moch and P. Uwer,Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering,JHEP01(2012) 137, [1110.5251]

  3. [3]

    Top quark pair production in association with a jet: QCD corrections and jet radiation in top quark decays

    K. Melnikov, A. Scharf and M. Schulze,Top quark pair production in association with a jet: QCD corrections and jet radiation in top quark decays,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 054002, [1111.4991]. – 29 –

  4. [4]

    Top Quark Pair Production in Association with a Jet with NLO QCD Off-Shell Effects at the Large Hadron Collider

    G. Bevilacqua, H. B. Hartanto, M. Kraus and M. Worek,Top Quark Pair Production in Association with a Jet with Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Off-Shell Effects at the Large Hadron Collider,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 052003, [1509.09242]

  5. [5]

    Off-shell Top Quarks with One Jet at the LHC: A comprehensive analysis at NLO QCD

    G. Bevilacqua, H. B. Hartanto, M. Kraus and M. Worek,Off-shell Top Quarks with One Jet at the LHC: A comprehensive analysis at NLO QCD,JHEP11(2016) 098, [1609.01659]

  6. [6]

    Gütschow, J

    C. Gütschow, J. M. Lindert and M. Schönherr,Multi-jet merged top-pair production including electroweak corrections,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 317

  7. [7]

    A new observable to measure the top-quark mass at hadron colliders

    S. Alioli, P. Fernandez, J. Fuster, A. Irles, S.-O. Moch, P. Uwer et al.,A new observable to measure the top-quark mass at hadron colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2438, [1303.6415]

  8. [8]

    Top quark mass studies with $t\bar{t}j$ at the LHC

    G. Bevilacqua, H. B. Hartanto, M. Kraus, M. Schulze and M. Worek,Top quark mass studies with ttjat the LHC,JHEP03(2018) 169, [1710.07515]

  9. [10]

    Alioli, J

    S. Alioli, J. Fuster, M. V. Garzelli, A. Gavardi, A. Irles, D. Melini et al.,Phenomenology ofttj+ X production at the LHC,JHEP05(2022) 146, [2202.07975]

  10. [11]

    Towards a Basis for Planar Two-Loop Integrals

    J. Gluza, K. Kajda and D. A. Kosower,Towards a Basis for Planar Two-Loop Integrals,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 045012, [1009.0472]

  11. [12]

    Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms

    H. Ita,Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms,Phys. Rev. D 94(2016) 116015, [1510.05626]

  12. [13]

    K. J. Larsen and Y. Zhang,Integration-by-parts reductions from unitarity cuts and algebraic geometry,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 041701, [1511.01071]

  13. [14]

    Z. Wu, J. Boehm, R. Ma, H. Xu and Y. Zhang,NeatIBP 1.0, a package generating small-size integration-by-parts relations for Feynman integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.295(2024) 108999, [2305.08783]

  14. [15]

    X. Guan, X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma and W.-H. Wu,Blade: A package for block-triangular form improved Feynman integrals decomposition,Comput. Phys. Commun.310(2025) 109538, [2405.14621]

  15. [16]

    Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti,Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 062001, [1511.05409]

  16. [17]

    C. G. Papadopoulos, D. Tommasini and C. Wever,The Pentabox Master Integrals with the Simplified Differential Equations approach,JHEP04(2016) 078, [1511.09404]

  17. [18]

    Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals

    S. Abreu, B. Page and M. Zeng,Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals,JHEP01(2019) 006, [1807.11522]

  18. [19]

    Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, N. A. Lo Presti, V. Mitev and P. Wasser,Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals,JHEP03(2019) 042, [1809.06240]

  19. [20]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,All Master Integrals for Three-Jet Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 041603, [1812.11160]

  20. [21]

    The two-loop five-point amplitude in $\mathcal{N} =4$ super-Yang-Mills theory

    S. Abreu, L. J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng,The two-loop five-point amplitude in N= 4super-Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 121603, [1812.08941]

  21. [22]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, F. Moriello, B. Page, W. Tschernow and M. Zeng,Two-Loop Integrals for Planar Five-Point One-Mass Processes,JHEP11(2020) 117, [2005.04195]

  22. [23]

    D. D. Canko, C. G. Papadopoulos and N. Syrrakos,Analytic representation of all planar two-loop five-point Master Integrals with one off-shell leg,JHEP01(2021) 199, [2009.13917]

  23. [24]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, B. Page and W. Tschernow,Two-loop hexa-box integrals for non-planar five-point one-mass processes,JHEP03(2022) 182, [2107.14180]. – 30 –

  24. [25]

    Kardos, C

    A. Kardos, C. G. Papadopoulos, A. V. Smirnov, N. Syrrakos and C. Wever,Two-loop non-planar hexa-box integrals with one massive leg,JHEP05(2022) 033, [2201.07509]

  25. [26]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, H. Ita, B. Page, V. Sotnikov, W. Tschernow et al.,All Two-Loop Feynman Integrals for Five-Point One-Mass Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 141601, [2306.15431]

  26. [27]

    Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti,Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes,JHEP10(2018) 103, [1807.09812]

  27. [28]

    Chicherin and V

    D. Chicherin and V. Sotnikov,Pentagon Functions for Scattering of Five Massless Particles,JHEP 20(2020) 167, [2009.07803]

  28. [29]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia,Pentagon functions for one-mass planar scattering amplitudes,JHEP01(2022) 096, [2110.10111]

  29. [30]

    Badger, J

    S. Badger, J. Kryś, R. Moodie and S. Zoia,Lepton-pair scattering with an off-shell and an on-shell photon at two loops in massless QED,JHEP11(2023) 041, [2307.03098]

  30. [31]

    Febres Cordero, G

    F. Febres Cordero, G. Figueiredo, M. Kraus, B. Page and L. Reina,Two-loop master integrals for leading-colorpp→t tHamplitudes with a light-quark loop,JHEP07(2024) 084, [2312.08131]

  31. [32]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. Henn, P. Jakubčík, J. Lim, C. C. Mella, N. Syrrakos et al.,Graded transcendental functions: an application to four-point amplitudes with one off-shell leg,2410.19088

  32. [33]

    A novel approach to integration by parts reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and R. M. Schabinger,A novel approach to integration by parts reduction,Phys. Lett. B744(2015) 101–104, [1406.4513]

  33. [34]

    Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction

    T. Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction,JHEP 12(2016) 030, [1608.01902]

  34. [35]

    Klappert and F

    J. Klappert and F. Lange,Reconstructing rational functions with FireFly,Comput. Phys. Commun. 247(2020) 106951, [1904.00009]

  35. [36]

    FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs

    T. Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, JHEP07(2019) 031, [1905.08019]

  36. [37]

    A. V. Smirnov and F. S. Chukharev,FIRE6: Feynman Integral REduction with modular arithmetic, Comput. Phys. Commun.247(2020) 106877, [1901.07808]

  37. [38]

    Klappert, S

    J. Klappert, S. Y. Klein and F. Lange,Interpolation of dense and sparse rational functions and other improvements in FireFly,Comput. Phys. Commun.264(2021) 107968, [2004.01463]

  38. [39]

    Integral Reduction with Kira 2.0 and Finite Field Methods

    J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierhöfer and J. Usovitsch,Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods,Comput. Phys. Commun.266(2021) 108024, [2008.06494]

  39. [40]

    Badger, D

    S. Badger, D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, G. Heinrich, J. M. Henn, T. Peraro et al.,Analytic form of the full two-loop five-gluon all-plus helicity amplitude,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 071601, [1905.03733]

  40. [41]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto and S. Zoia,Two-Loop QCD Corrections to Wbb¯Production at Hadron Colliders,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 012001, [2102.02516]

  41. [42]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, J. Kryś and S. Zoia,Two-loop leading-colour QCD helicity amplitudes for Higgs boson production in association with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC,JHEP11(2021) 012, [2107.14733]

  42. [43]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Klinkert, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Leading-color two-loop amplitudes for four partons and a W boson in QCD,JHEP04(2022) 042, [2110.07541]

  43. [44]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, J. Kryś and S. Zoia,Two-loop leading colour helicity amplitudes for Wγ + j production at the LHC,JHEP05(2022) 035, [2201.04075]

  44. [45]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Two-Loop Helicity Amplitudes for Diphoton Plus Jet Production in Full Color,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 262001, [2105.04585]. – 31 –

  45. [46]

    Badger, C

    S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, H. B. Hartanto, J. Henn et al., Virtual QCD corrections to gluon-initiated diphoton plus jet production at hadron colliders,JHEP 11(2021) 083, [2106.08664]

  46. [47]

    Abreu, G

    S. Abreu, G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, M. Klinkert, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Two-loop QCD corrections for three-photon production at hadron colliders,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 157, [2305.17056]

  47. [48]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Czakon, H. B. Hartanto, R. Moodie, T. Peraro, R. Poncelet et al.,Isolated photon production in association with a jet pair through next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD,JHEP10 (2023) 071, [2304.06682]

  48. [49]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, F. Devoto, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Five-parton scattering in QCD at two loops,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094025, [2311.09870]

  49. [50]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, M. Klinkert and V. Sotnikov,Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. I. The gluon channel,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094023, [2311.10086]

  50. [51]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita and V. Sotnikov,Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. II. The quark channels,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094024, [2311.18752]

  51. [52]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, Z. Wu, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,Two-loop amplitudes forO α2 s corrections to Wγγproduction at the LHC,JHEP12(2025) 221, [2409.08146]

  52. [53]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, Z. Wu, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,Full-colour double-virtual amplitudes for associated production of a Higgs boson with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC,JHEP 03(2025) 066, [2412.06519]

  53. [54]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Compact two-loop QCD corrections for Vjj production in proton collisions,JHEP06(2025) 093, [2503.10595]

  54. [55]

    Agarwal, G

    B. Agarwal, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, S. Y. Klein, J. Lang et al.,Two-loop amplitudes fort tHproduction: the quark-initiated Nf-part,JHEP05(2024) 013, [2402.03301]

  55. [56]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. L. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,NNLO QCD corrections to three-photon production at the LHC,JHEP02(2020) 057, [1911.00479]

  56. [57]

    Kallweit, V

    S. Kallweit, V. Sotnikov and M. Wiesemann,Triphoton production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,Phys. Lett. B812(2021) 136013, [2010.04681]

  57. [58]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,NNLO QCD corrections to diphoton production with an additional jet at the LHC,JHEP09(2021) 093, [2105.06940]

  58. [59]

    Czakon, A

    M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Study of Three-Jet Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 152001, [2106.05331]

  59. [60]

    Badger, T

    S. Badger, T. Gehrmann, M. Marcoli and R. Moodie,Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to diphoton-plus-jet production through gluon fusion at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B824(2022) 136802, [2109.12003]

  60. [61]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss and M. Marcoli,Automation of antenna subtraction in colour space: gluonic processes,JHEP10(2022) 099, [2203.13531]

  61. [62]

    Alvarez, J

    M. Alvarez, J. Cantero, M. Czakon, J. Llorente, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,NNLO QCD corrections to event shapes at the LHC,JHEP03(2023) 129, [2301.01086]

  62. [63]

    H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, A. Popescu and S. Zoia,Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to Wbb¯production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 074016, [2205.01687]

  63. [64]

    H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, A. Popescu and S. Zoia,Flavour anti-kT algorithm applied toW b¯b production at the LHC,2209.03280

  64. [65]

    Buonocore, S

    L. Buonocore, S. Devoto, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, L. Rottoli and C. Savoini,Associated production of a W boson and massive bottom quarks at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD,Phys. Rev. D 107(2023) 074032, [2212.04954]. – 32 –

  65. [66]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli and C. Savoini,Higgs Boson Production in Association with a Top-Antitop Quark Pair in Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111902, [2210.07846]

  66. [67]

    Buonocore, S

    L. Buonocore, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, L. Rottoli et al.,Precise Predictions for the Associated Production of a W Boson with a Top-Antitop Quark Pair at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 231901, [2306.16311]

  67. [68]

    Mazzitelli, V

    J. Mazzitelli, V. Sotnikov and M. Wiesemann,Next-to-next-to-leading order event generation for Z-boson production in association with a bottom-quark pair,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 056031, [2404.08598]

  68. [69]

    Devoto, M

    S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli and C. Savoini,Precise predictions forttH production at the LHC: inclusive cross section and differential distributions,JHEP03(2025) 189, [2411.15340]

  69. [70]

    Biello, J

    C. Biello, J. Mazzitelli, A. Sankar, M. Wiesemann and G. Zanderighi,Higgs boson production in association with massive bottom quarks at NNLO+PS,JHEP04(2025) 088, [2412.09510]

  70. [71]

    Buccioni, X

    F. Buccioni, X. Chen, W.-J. Feng, T. Gehrmann, A. Huss and M. Marcoli,Precise Predictions for Event Shapes in Diphoton Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 171901, [2501.14021]

  71. [72]

    J. M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 251601, [1304.1806]

  72. [73]

    J. L. Bourjaily et al.,Functions Beyond Multiple Polylogarithms for Precision Collider Physics, in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022.2203.07088

  73. [74]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, E. Chaubey and R. Marzucca,Two-loop master integrals for a planar topology contributing to pp→ttj,JHEP01(2023) 156, [2210.17477]

  74. [75]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, N. Giraudo and S. Zoia,Two-loop integrals fortt+jet production at hadron colliders in the leading colour approximation,JHEP07(2024) 073, [2404.12325]

  75. [76]

    Becchetti, C

    M. Becchetti, C. Dlapa and S. Zoia,Canonical differential equations for the elliptic two-loop five-point integral family relevant to tt¯+jet production at leading color,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) L031501, [2503.03603]

  76. [77]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, C. Brancaccio, H. B. Hartanto and S. Zoia,Numerical evaluation of two-loop QCD helicity amplitudes forgg→t tgat leading colour,JHEP03(2025) 070, [2412.13876]

  77. [78]

    NNLO fermionic corrections to the charm quark mass dependent matrix elements in B -> X_s gamma

    R. Boughezal, M. Czakon and T. Schutzmeier,NNLO fermionic corrections to the charm quark mass dependent matrix elements in¯B→X sγ,JHEP09(2007) 072, [0707.3090]

  78. [79]

    Tops from Light Quarks: Full Mass Dependence at Two-Loops in QCD

    M. Czakon,Tops from Light Quarks: Full Mass Dependence at Two-Loops in QCD,Phys. Lett. B 664(2008) 307–314, [0803.1400]

  79. [80]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, C. Brancaccio, M. Czakon, H. Bayu Hartanto, R. Poncelet et al., Higher-order QCD corrections to top-quark pair production in association with a jet,to appear(11,

  80. [81]

    Double virtual QCD corrections tot¯t+jet production at the LHC

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, C. Brancaccio, M. Czakon, H. Bayu Hartanto, R. Poncelet et al.,Ancillary files for “Double virtual QCD corrections tot¯t+jet production at the LHC”, 11, 2025. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17541755

Showing first 80 references.