Responsible AI Research Needs Impact Statements Too

Alexandra Olteanu; Carlos Castillo; Jina Suh; Michael Ekstrand

Responsible AI Research Needs Impact Statements Too

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.11776 v1 pith:F6OBGWOH submitted 2023-11-20 cs.AI cs.CY

Alexandra Olteanu , Michael Ekstrand , Carlos Castillo , Jina Suh This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.AIcs.CY

keywords researchresponsibleworkadverseartificialconsequencesdevelopmentethical

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments

read the original abstract

All types of research, development, and policy work can have unintended, adverse consequences - work in responsible artificial intelligence (RAI), ethical AI, or ethics in AI is no exception.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

The Future of Work is Blended, Not Hybrid
cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The paper reframes future work as 'blended', with human effort and AI output inseparable, and charts four HCI research directions.

Pith tools