Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The paper introduces SKANEX, a Kohn-Sham-assisted orbital-free functional that brings Kohn-Sham-level accuracy to electron densities, electron-ion structure factors, and equations of state at extreme pressures and temperatures, at a fractio

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

SKANEX is an orbital-free density functional that, with one density-fitted parameter, reproduces Kohn-Sham-level electron densities, electron-ion structure factors, and pressures 10-1000x faster.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →

load-bearing objection Useful density-matched OFDFT regularizer with a real speedup, but the 'non-empirical' label overstates what is a one-parameter fit; worth sending to review. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2601.23002 v1 pith:F6XYXIS4 submitted 2026-01-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.plasm-ph

Unlocking the Power of Orbital-Free Density Functional Theory to Explore the Electronic Structure Under Extreme Conditions

Cheng Ma , Qiang Xu , Zhenhao Zhang , Ke Wang , Ying Sun , Wenhui Mi , Zhandos A. Moldabekov , Tobias Dornheim
show 3 more authors
Jan Vorberger Sebastian Schwalbe Xuecheng Shao
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.plasm-ph
keywords orbital-free density functional theorywarm dense matterkinetic energy functionalnonlocalityX-ray scatteringequation of statedense hydrogenRayleigh weight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents SKANEX, an orbital-free density functional method that reaches Kohn-Sham DFT accuracy for electron densities, electron-ion structure factors, and equations of state in warm dense matter, while keeping the linear-scaling, temperature-independent cost of orbital-free DFT. The key idea is a one-parameter correction to the non-local part of the non-interacting free-energy functional: a scalar beta, fit once on a small reference system by minimizing the integrated density difference against a low-cost Kohn-Sham calculation. The authors validate the approach against quantum Monte Carlo for dense hydrogen and against experimental Rayleigh weight measurements for hot dense beryllium, reporting speedups of up to several hundred times. They also show that even at electron temperatures around 100 eV, Thomas-Fermi theory fails to capture the electron-ion structure factor, meaning quantum non-locality remains essential.

Core claim

The central claim is that the non-local part of the non-interacting free-energy functional can be written as F_NL = F_0 + beta F_1, where F_0 is a mean-density kernel and F_1 is a first-order correction for density inhomogeneity derived by functional integration; beta is a system-dependent constant that compensates for missing higher-order terms. The paper claims that minimizing the integrated absolute density difference between the orbital-free and Kohn-Sham densities on just ten ionic configurations yields a beta that transfers across densities, temperatures, and system sizes from 14 to 1024 atoms. With this single fitted scalar, SKANEX reproduces Kohn-Sham electron densities, electron-ion

What carries the argument

The central object is the non-local part of the non-interacting free-energy functional, split as F_0 + beta F_1. F_0 is a kernel depending only on the mean valence electron density (a finite-temperature version of the standard mean-density kinetic functional); F_1 is a line-integral first-order correction that accounts for deviations from a homogeneous density. The scalar beta is the load-bearing parameter: it is fit once by minimizing the integrated absolute difference between orbital-free and Kohn-Sham electron densities over a small reference system, and it is then kept fixed. The machinery lets the orbital-free calculation inherit quantum non-locality from Kohn-Sham without ever construc

Load-bearing premise

The method's transferability rests on a single density- and temperature-independent factor beta, fitted on ten small ionic configurations by matching orbital-free and Kohn-Sham densities; if beta must be refit for each thermodynamic state or system size, the method is not the general functional it claims to be.

What would settle it

Take the beta fitted at one state (e.g., rs=2, theta=1) and apply it without refitting to a very different state (e.g., rs=1, theta=4 or the partially ionized rs=3.23, theta=0.1), then compare the electron-ion structure factor to Kohn-Sham; a large systematic deviation would show beta is not transferable, and refitting beta on cells of increasing size (2, 14, 108, 1024 atoms) would reveal any finite-size dependence of the regularization.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • X-ray scattering diagnostics in warm dense matter can be interpreted with orbital-free cost while retaining Kohn-Sham-level electronic structure, enabling systematic scans over temperature and density for experiment analysis.
  • Equations of state and pressure data can be generated up to hundreds of times faster than with Kohn-Sham DFT, with comparable accuracy across the tested hydrogen densities and temperatures.
  • The method's cost is nearly temperature independent, so long-timescale first-principles molecular dynamics become practical for high-temperature dense plasmas.
  • The finding that Thomas-Fermi fails at ~100 eV for the electron-ion structure factor implies that quantum non-locality must be included even in very hot dense plasmas, not just near the Fermi temperature.
  • Accurate equilibrium electron densities create a foundation for extending orbital-free approaches to transport coefficients, optical properties, and time-dependent response.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If beta proves transferable beyond the tested states, SKANEX could become a general-purpose kinetic-energy functional for warm dense matter; but the fit on ten configurations means the method is better described as 'one fitted scalar plus a first-principles form' than as parameter-free.
  • The paper only demonstrates beryllium with a separately generated local pseudopotential; a direct test of whether a hydrogen-fitted beta transfers to heavier elements or mixtures would clarify how 'system-dependent' the scalar really is.
  • Because beta is fit to the density alone, it may be insensitive to the exchange-correlation choice; testing SKANEX with different XC functionals would separate errors from the non-interacting functional and from the XC approximation.
  • The claim that TF fails at high temperature challenges the many plasma models built on Thomas-Fermi averages; if confirmed more broadly, it would affect how X-ray scattering data from inertial confinement experiments are interpreted.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces SKANEX, an orbital-free DFT non-interacting free-energy functional of the form F_NL^SKANEX[n;T] = F_0^NL[n;T] + β F_1^NL[n;T] (Eq. 2), where β is determined by minimizing the L1 density difference against a small KSDFT reference system (Eq. 3). The paper claims that SKANEX yields KSDFT-level electron densities, electron-ion structure factors, and equations of state across a broad range of densities and temperatures, with benchmarks on warm dense hydrogen against PIMC/KSDFT and an application to Rayleigh-weight measurements of hot dense beryllium, and reports speedups of 10–1000× over KSDFT.

Significance. If the transferability claims can be substantiated, SKANEX would be a valuable tool for X-ray Thomson scattering and EOS studies in warm dense matter and dense plasmas: it preserves OFDFT's O(N) scaling and weak temperature dependence while giving electronic-structure quality close to KSDFT. The beryllium Rayleigh-weight analysis is a nice independent application, and the comparison against PIMC for hydrogen goes beyond a single-code benchmark. The main caveat is that the central quantity, β, is a state-dependent fitted parameter, and its transferability is not demonstrated; the paper's use of 'non-empirical' to describe the resulting functional is therefore overstated. Because the missing analysis is feasible (report β values, cross-state transfer tests, out-of-sample errors), the manuscript could be made publishable after major revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Eqs. (2)–(3); §4 'Optimization for β parameter'] The core premise—that a single β fitted at one thermodynamic state is density- and temperature-independent—is not demonstrated. No β values are reported, no sensitivity analysis is given, and the visible evidence in Fig. 1(c) and Table 1 (SKANEX 45.3 GPa vs KSDFT 48.9 GPa at ρ=0.08 g/cm³) shows exactly the deterioration expected if β does not transfer. Please report β for each condition and perform cross-state transfer tests (fit at one r_s, T; apply to all others), with out-of-sample errors.
  2. [§4 'Optimization for β parameter'] The sentence '(The β parameters for face-centered cubic lattice EOS calculations were optimized using the same configuration as the MD (θ=1) simulations)' creates ambiguity: if β was refit for each EOS state, the agreement in Fig. 3 is not a predictive test and contradicts the 'density- and temperature-independent' claim; if not, this must be stated explicitly and the same β value used for all curves. A table with β values for each element/state is needed.
  3. [Abstract; §2, Eq. (3)] Because β is chosen to minimize the integrated density difference against KSDFT on the same type of configurations that are later used for density and S_ie benchmarks, the density agreement is partly by construction. Calling the method 'non-empirical' is therefore misleading; it is a functional with one fitted parameter. To support the novelty claim, clearly label β as fitted and separate in-sample from out-of-sample accuracy, e.g., by holding out configurations and reporting errors for S_ie and EOS on trajectories not used in the fit.
  4. [§4; Fig. 4] For beryllium, no β value or optimization details are given, and it is unclear whether β was transferred from hydrogen, refit at one Be state, or refit at each density. Since the Be Rayleigh-weight curves are the main practical claim, the β provenance and value must be stated, and a sensitivity test (e.g., using β±20%) should be shown to quantify the impact on the inferred density ρ=23±2 g/cm³.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3)] Define n_OF and n_KS explicitly (including the dependence on β for n_OF), and specify the integration domain/units for the density difference.
  2. [Fig. 1(a)] The blue region of reduced reliability is mentioned in the text but is not visible/legend in the figure as typeset; please make the shading and boundary explicit.
  3. [Fig. 1(d) caption and text] The text says 'electron density distributions along three axes of the cubic simulation cell' but the caption says '[110] direction'; align these descriptions.
  4. [Introduction and Conclusions] The term 'non-empirical' appears repeatedly despite the fitted parameter β; consider replacing it with 'reference-system-assisted' or explicitly acknowledging the one fitted parameter in the abstract.
  5. [Data Availability] Ref. [69] says data will be available upon publication, but the Data Availability section says 'will available'; specify the exact repository/DOI and any access conditions.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

The headline electron-density and same-state S_ie 'predictions' are partly in-sample: β is fit to the KSDFT density in Eq. (3), the same quantity promoted as a prediction.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2, Eq. (3) and Fig. 1(d); Abstract]
    "In contrast, SKANEX is specifically designed to provide accurate predictions not only for the EOS, but also for electronic structure, as characterized by the electron density distribution and the electron–ion static structure factor. ... The parameter β is determined by minimizing the difference in the OFDFT density and the KSDFT density for a small reference system. This is done by minimizing the total magnitude of the deviation of the density: minβ |∆n| = minβ ∫ |nOF(r) − nKS(r)| dr. (3)"

    The predicted quantity in the abstract and Section 2 is the electron density, but Eq. (3) defines β by minimizing exactly the integrated absolute density deviation from KSDFT on the reference configurations. The density agreement shown in Fig. 1(d) is therefore the fitting objective, not an independent prediction. S_ie is computed from the fitted density and inherits part of this in-sample agreement. Because β is a single scalar, the fit does not force every feature of the density, so the circularity is partial, but the central electronic-structure validation is not out-of-sample.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, 'Optimization for β parameter'; Fig. 1(c)]
    "To determine the density- and temperature-independent parameter β for the SKANEX functional, a Kohn–Sham-assisted optimization procedure was employed ... Finally, the SKANEX parameter was determined as the arithmetic mean, β = 1/Ni Σ_i β_i. (The β parameters for face-centered cubic lattice EOS calculations were optimized using the same configuration as the MD (θ=1) simulations.)"

    The main structure-factor benchmarks in Fig. 1(c) are at θ=1, and the Methods state that β was optimized using the θ=1 MD configuration. Thus the θ=1 S_ie and density comparisons are partly in-sample, rather than transfer tests. The out-of-sample checks are limited and show drift: at ρ=0.08 g/cm³ SKANEX pressure is 45.3 GPa against 48.9 GPa KSDFT (Table 1), and the text admits accuracy 'slightly deteriorates' at r_s=3.23. No β values or refit comparisons are provided to demonstrate that the single fitted scalar transfers across states.

full rationale

SKANEX is not wholly circular: β is one scalar, so Eq. (3) cannot force full agreement of S_ie(q) over all q, the EOS, or the beryllium Rayleigh-weight curve; the PIMC comparisons and the NIF beryllium validation are independent external checks. However, the paper's central claim of 'KSDFT-level accuracy for electron densities' is the same quantity minimized in Eq. (3), and the primary same-state validation is performed at θ=1, the condition used to optimize β. The self-citations to prior XWMF work [26] are not load-bearing here because the method is benchmarked against independent PIMC/KSDFT data, but the 'non-empirical' label is inconsistent with fitting one parameter to KSDFT densities. The paper reports no β values, no sensitivity analysis, and no demonstration that a single β transfers across density/temperature; its own low-density results degrade. These features make the electronic-structure predictions partly in-sample, meriting a partial-circularity score of 6 rather than a higher score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on one fitted scalar plus a set of transferability assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameter is not reported, which additionally weakens reproducibility.

free parameters (1)
  • beta (SKANEX regularization factor) = Not reported; optimized per system by minimizing Eq. (3) over 10 ionic configurations
    Controls the magnitude of the F^NL_1 correction in Eq. (2). It is fit to KSDFT densities and is not derived from first principles, despite the paper's 'non-empirical' claim.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Transferability of beta: a beta fit on a small reference system is valid at other densities, temperatures, and system sizes.
    The method's predictive power depends on this. Section 2 calls beta a 'constant, system-dependent regularization factor'; Section 4 says 'density- and temperature-independent parameter' without demonstrating transferability across the full claimed range.
  • ad hoc to paper The line-integral correction F^NL_1 plus a scalar beta captures the important missing higher-order inhomogeneity terms.
    Eq. (2) truncates the non-local functional expansion at first order and absorbs all higher-order errors into one scalar. This is a design choice specific to SKANEX and is not independently justified.
  • domain assumption KSDFT densities of 10 small configurations (14 or 32 atoms) are reliable references for fitting beta.
    The reference densities come from small XWMF-MD snapshots. Finite-size and configurational sampling errors are not quantified, yet these densities define the fitted parameter.
  • standard math LDA exchange-correlation and the adiabatic approximation are adequate for the benchmarks.
    Standard practice in WDM simulations; both KSDFT and OFDFT use the same approximation, so comparisons are internally consistent.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unlocking the Power of Orbital-Free Density Functional Theory to Explore the Electronic Structure Under Extreme Conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F6XYXIS4

@misc{pith2026260123002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unlocking the Power of Orbital-Free Density Functional Theory to Explore the Electronic Structure Under Extreme Conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F6XYXIS4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.23002}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent advances in X-ray free-electron laser diagnostics have enabled direct probing of the electronic structure under extreme pressures and temperatures, such as those encountered in stellar interiors and inertial confinement fusion experiments, challenging theoretical models for interpreting experimental data. Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KSDFT) has been successfully applied to analyze experimental X-ray scattering measurements, but its high computational cost renders routine application impractical. Orbital-free DFT (OFDFT) is a substantially more efficient alternative, with computational cost scaling linearly with system size and a weak temperature dependence, yet it often lacks the accuracy required for electronic structure description. Overcoming this limitation, we present a non-empirical Kohn-Sham-assisted orbital-free density functional framework for calculations at extreme conditions, which enables efficient OFDFT simulations with KSDFT-level accuracy for electron densities, electron-ion structure factors, and equations of state across a broad range of conditions. Benchmark comparisons with quantum Monte Carlo data for dense hydrogen and validation against Rayleigh weight measurements of hot dense beryllium demonstrate the reliability of the framework and speedups of up to several hundred times compared with KSDFT. We further show that even at temperatures on the order of 100 eV, quantum non-locality remains essential for correctly describing the electronic structure of dense hydrogen.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-free interpretation of X-ray Thomson scattering measurements

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper reviews the use of the imaginary-time correlation function to extract temperature, normalization, and Rayleigh weight from XRTS spectra without model dependence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Photonics17(11), 984–991 (2023)

    Liu, S.et al.Cascaded hard x-ray self-seeded free-electron laser at megahertz repetition rate.Nat. Photonics17(11), 984–991 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Commun.4(1), 2919 (2013)

    Hara, T.et al.Two-colour hard x-ray free- electron laser with wide tunability.Nat. Commun.4(1), 2919 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    B.et al.Ultrabright x-ray laser scattering for dynamic warm dense matter physics.Nat

    Fletcher, L. B.et al.Ultrabright x-ray laser scattering for dynamic warm dense matter physics.Nat. Photonics9(4), 274–279 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    D¨ oppner, T.et al.Observing the onset of pressure-driven k-shell delocalization.Nature 618(7964), 270–275 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    D.et al.Direct observation of an abrupt insulator-to-metal transition in dense liquid deuterium.Science348(6242), 1455–1460 (2015)

    Knudson, M. D.et al.Direct observation of an abrupt insulator-to-metal transition in dense liquid deuterium.Science348(6242), 1455–1460 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    L.et al.A measurement of the equation of state of carbon envelopes of white dwarfs.Nature584(7819), 51–54 (2020)

    Kritcher, A. L.et al.A measurement of the equation of state of carbon envelopes of white dwarfs.Nature584(7819), 51–54 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Vorberger, J.et al.Roadmap for warm dense matter physics.arXiv preprint 2505.02494 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Commun.7(1), 10970 (2016)

    Kraus, D.et al.Nanosecond formation of diamond and lonsdaleite by shock compres- sion of graphite.Nat. Commun.7(1), 10970 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    Lazicki, A.et al.Metastability of diamond ramp-compressed to 2 terapascals.Nature 589(7843), 532–535 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Descamps, A.et al.Evidence for phonon hardening in laser-excited gold using x-ray diffraction at a hard x-ray free electron laser. Sci. Adv.10(6), eadh5272 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Nature642(8067), 351–355 (2025)

    Kraus, D.et al.The structure of liquid car- bon elucidated by in situ x-ray diffraction. Nature642(8067), 351–355 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    G.et al.Superheating gold beyond the predicted entropy catastrophe threshold

    White, T. G.et al.Superheating gold beyond the predicted entropy catastrophe threshold. Nature643(8073), 950–954 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Abu-Shawareb, H.et al.Achievement of tar- get gain larger than unity in an inertial fusion experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 065102 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Dornheim, T.et al.Unraveling electronic cor- relations in warm dense quantum plasmas. Nat. Commun.16(1), 5103 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    & Kohn, W

    Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas.Phys. Rev.136, B864–B871 (1964)

    1964

  16. [16]

    & Sham, L

    Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correla- tion Effects.Phys. Rev.140(4A), A1133 (1965)

    1965

  17. [17]

    C., Del Rio, B

    Witt, W. C., Del Rio, B. G., Dieterich, J. M. & Carter, E. A. Orbital-free density func- tional theory for materials research.J. Mater. Res.33(7), 777 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    Mi, W., Luo, K., Trickey, S. B. & Pavanello, M. Orbital-free density functional theory: An attractive electronic structure method for large-scale first-principles simulations.Chem. Rev.123(21), 12039–12104 (2023). PMID: 37870767

    2023

  19. [19]

    Xu, Q., Ma, C., Mi, W., Wang, Y. & Ma, Y. Recent advancements and challenges in orbital-free density functional theory.Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci.14(3), e1724 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    V., Hilleke, K

    Karasiev, V. V., Hilleke, K. P. & Trickey, S. B. Free-energy orbital-free density func- tional theory: recent developments, perspec- tive, and outlook.Electron. Struct.7(1), 013001 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    & Pavanello, M

    Shao, X., Jiang, K., Mi, W., Genova, A. & Pavanello, M. Dftpy: An efficient and object-oriented platform for orbital-free dft simulations.Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci.11(1), e1482 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Fiedler, L.et al.Accelerating equilibration in first-principles molecular dynamics with orbital-free density functional theory.Phys. Rev. Research4, 043033 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    & Gilles, D

    Lambert, F., Cl´ erouin, J., Mazevet, S. & Gilles, D. Properties of hot dense plasmas by orbital-free molecular dynamics.Contrib. Plasma Phys.47(4-5), 272–280 (2007)

    2007

  24. [24]

    & Z´ erah, G

    Lambert, F., Cl´ erouin, J. & Z´ erah, G. Very- high-temperature molecular dynamics.Phys. Rev. E73, 016403 (2006)

    2006

  25. [25]

    Luo, K., Karasiev, V. V. & Trickey, S. B. Towards accurate orbital-free simulations: A generalized gradient approximation for the noninteracting free energy density functional. Phys. Rev. B101, 075116 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Ma, C.et al.Nonlocal free-energy den- sity functional for a broad range of warm dense matter simulations.Phys. Rev. B110, 085113 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Xu, Q., Ma, C., Mi, W., Wang, Y. & Ma, Y. Nonlocal pseudopotential energy density functional for orbital-free density functional theory.Nat. Commun.13(1), 1385 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    V., Sjostrom, T

    Karasiev, V. V., Sjostrom, T. & Trickey, S. B. Generalized-gradient-approximation noninteracting free-energy functionals for orbital-free density functional calculations. Phys. Rev. B86, 115101 (2012)

    2012

  29. [29]

    Plasmas32(5), 052712 (2025)

    Dornheim, T.et al.Model-free rayleigh weight from x-ray thomson scattering mea- surements.Phys. Plasmas32(5), 052712 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    inPressure ionization, resonances, and the continuity of bound and free states (eds Bates, D

    More, R. inPressure ionization, resonances, and the continuity of bound and free states (eds Bates, D. & Bederson, B.) , Vol. 21 of Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics 305–356 (Academic Press, 1985)

    1985

  31. [31]

    Bonitz, M., Moldabekov, Z. A. & Ramazanov, T. S. Quantum hydrodynamics for plas- mas—quo vadis?Phys. Plasmas26(9), 090601 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    & Redmer, R

    Preising, M., French, M., Mankovich, C., Soubiran, F. & Redmer, R. Material proper- ties of saturn’s interior from ab initio simula- tions.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.269(2), 47 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Astrophys

    French, M.et al.Ab initio simulations for material properties along the jupiter adiabat. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.202(1), 5 (2012)

    2012

  34. [34]

    Empirical models of jupiter’s interior from juno data - moment of inertia and tidal love number k2.Astron

    Ni, Dongdong. Empirical models of jupiter’s interior from juno data - moment of inertia and tidal love number k2.Astron. Astrophys. 613, A32 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Fortov, V. E. Extreme states of matter on earth and in space.Phys.-Usp.52(6), 615 (2009)

    2009

  36. [36]

    Hathaway, D. H. The solar interior. https: //solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/interior.shtml (2022). NASA/Marshall Solar Physics. Last updated: September 22, 2022. Accessed: 2026-01-15

    2022

  37. [37]

    Hu, S.et al.A review on ab initio stud- ies of static, transport, and optical proper- ties of polystyrene under extreme conditions for inertial confinement fusion applications. Phys. Plasmas25(2018)

    2018

  38. [38]

    Zastrau, U.et al.Resolving ultrafast heating of dense cryogenic hydrogen.Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 105002 (2014)

    2014

  39. [39]

    B.et al.Electron-ion tem- perature relaxation in warm dense hydrogen observed with picosecond resolved x-ray scat- tering.Front

    Fletcher, L. B.et al.Electron-ion tem- perature relaxation in warm dense hydrogen observed with picosecond resolved x-ray scat- tering.Front. Phys.10(2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    & Weeks, J

    Chai, J.-D. & Weeks, J. D. Orbital-free den- sity functional theory: Kinetic potentials and ab initio local pseudopotentials.Phys. Rev. B75, 205122 (2007)

    2007

  41. [41]

    & Teter, M

    Wang, L.-W. & Teter, M. P. Kinetic-energy functional of the electron density.Phys. Rev. B45, 13196–13220 (1992)

    1992

  42. [42]

    & Daligault, J

    Sjostrom, T. & Daligault, J. Nonlocal orbital- free noninteracting free-energy functional for warm dense matter.Phys. Rev. B88, 195103 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    Lieb, E. H. Thomas-fermi and related theo- ries of atoms and molecules.Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 603–641 (1981)

    1981

  44. [44]

    Weizs¨ acker, C. F. v. Zur theorie der kern- massen.Z. Phys.96(7-8), 431–458 (1935)

    1935

  45. [45]

    A., Shao, X., Pavanello, M., Vorberger, J

    Moldabekov, Z. A., Shao, X., Pavanello, M., Vorberger, J. & Dornheim, T. Nonlocal vs local pseudopotentials affect kinetic energy kernels in orbital-free dft.Electron. Struct. 7(1), 015006 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    & Pavanello, M

    Mi, W., Genova, A. & Pavanello, M. Non- local kinetic energy functionals by functional integration.J. Chem. Phys.148(18), 184107 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    & Baerends, E

    van Leeuwen, R. & Baerends, E. J. Energy expressions in density-functional theory using line integrals.Phys. Rev. A51, 170–178 (1995)

    1995

  48. [48]

    P., Chulkov, S

    Gaiduk, A. P., Chulkov, S. K. & Staroverov, V. N. Reconstruction of density function- als from kohn-sham potentials by integration along density scaling paths.J. Chem. The- ory Comput.5(4), 699–707 (2009). PMID: 26609574

    2009

  49. [49]

    P.et al.Evidence of free-bound transitions in warm dense matter and their impact on equation-of-state measurements (2023)

    B¨ ohme, M. P.et al.Evidence of free-bound transitions in warm dense matter and their impact on equation-of-state measurements (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Rios-Vargas, V.et al.Pseudopotentials for orbital-free dft: Capturing nonlocality and correcting functional approximants (2026)

    2026

  51. [51]

    F., Galligan, T

    Kasim, M. F., Galligan, T. P., Topp- Mugglestone, J., Gregori, G. & Vinko, S. M. Inverse problem instabilities in large-scale modeling of matter in extreme conditions. Phys. Plasmas26(11), 112706 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    & Pavanello, M

    Jiang, K. & Pavanello, M. Time-dependent orbital-free density functional theory: Back- ground and pauli kernel approximations. Phys. Rev. B103, 245102 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    & Pavanello, M

    Jiang, K., Shao, X. & Pavanello, M. Efficient time-dependent orbital-free density func- tional theory: Semilocal adiabatic response. Phys. Rev. B106, 115153 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    White, A. J. Dynamical structure fac- tors of warm dense matter from time- dependent orbital-free and mixed-stochastic- deterministic density functional theory.Elec- tron. Struct.7(1), 014001 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    & Baer, R

    Cytter, Y., Rabani, E., Neuhauser, D. & Baer, R. Stochastic density functional the- ory at finite temperatures.Phys. Rev. B97, 115207 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    Mi, W.et al.ATLAS: a real-space finite- difference implementation of orbital-free den- sity functional theory.Comput. Phys. Com- mun.200, 87–95 (2016)

    2016

  57. [57]

    Shao, X.et al.Large-scale ab initio simu- lations for periodic system.Comput. Phys. Commun.233, 78–83 (2018)

    2018

  58. [58]

    https://gitlab.com/shaoxc/qepy (2025)

    Shao, X.et al.QEpy: Quantum ESPRESSO in Python. https://gitlab.com/shaoxc/qepy (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approxima- tions for many-electron systems.Phys. Rev. B23, 5048–5079 (1981)

    1981

  60. [60]

    & Abarenkov, I

    Heine, V. & Abarenkov, I. V. A new method for the electronic structure of metals.Philos. Mag.9(99), 451–465 (1964)

    1964

  61. [61]

    & Heine, V

    Goodwin, L., Needs, R. & Heine, V. A pseu- dopotential total energy study of impurity- promoted intergranular embrittlement.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter2(2), 351 (1990)

    1990

  62. [62]

    & Martins, J

    Troullier, N. & Martins, J. L. Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations. Phys. Rev. B43, 1993–2006 (1991)

    1993

  63. [63]

    & Scheffler, M

    Fuchs, M. & Scheffler, M. Ab initio pseudopo- tentials for electronic structure calculations of poly-atomic systems using density-functional theory.Comput. Phys. Commun.119(1), 67–98 (1999)

    1999

  64. [64]

    Powell, M. J. D. An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of sev- eral variables without calculating derivatives. Comput. J.7(2), 155–162 (1964)

    1964

  65. [65]

    Methods17, 261–272 (2020)

    Virtanen, P.et al.SciPy 1.0: Fundamen- tal Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python.Nat. Methods17, 261–272 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods.J

    Nos´ e, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods.J. Chem. Phys.81(1), 511–519 (1984)

    1984

  67. [67]

    Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: Equilib- rium phase-space distributions.Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985)

    1985

  68. [68]

    H.et al.The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms.J

    Larsen, A. H.et al.The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29(27), 273002 (2017)

    2017

  69. [69]

    https://rodare

    The data will available upon publication according to the F AIR principles on the Rossendorf Data Repository. https://rodare. hzdr.de (2025)

    2025

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.