Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Katz on Pioneer 10/11)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv gr-qc/9906112 v1 pith:F7E54ANL submitted 1999-06-29 gr-qc astro-ph

Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Katz on Pioneer 10/11)

classification gr-qc astro-ph
keywords heatkatzpioneerandersonanisotropicanomalyantennaeback
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We conclude that Katz's proposal (anisotropic heat reflection off of the back of the spacecraft high-gain antennae, the heat coming from the RTGs) does not provide enough power and so can not explain the Pioneer anomaly.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.