Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 36 references

Scaling Properties of Current Fluctuations in Periodic TASEP

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For periodic TASEP, a positive tilt in the jump-counting parameter makes current fluctuations ballistic with $O(N)$ relaxation, while a negative tilt pins the largest eigenvalue near $-1$ and makes relaxation exponentially slow.

desk verdict New spectral-gap scaling for finite tilt in periodic TASEP, derived under explicit but unproved root-selection assumptions; the abstract overstates the certainty. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17750 v2 pith:FAHJ6R5I submitted 2025-07-23 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MP

Anastasiia Trofimova , Lu Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP MSC 82C2260K35
keywords totallyasymmetricsimpleexclusionprocesscurrentfluctuationslargedeviationstiltedgeneratorspectralgapBetheansatzCassiniovaldynamicalphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper investigates the statistics of the time-integrated particle current in the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP) on a ring, controlled by a tilt parameter $\gamma$ that exponentially weights jumps. Using the coordinate Bethe ansatz together with the Cassini-oval geometry of its roots, the authors derive the large-$N$ behaviour of the scaled cumulant generating function (the largest eigenvalue $\lambda_1$) and of the spectral gap. The message is that the sign of $\gamma$ is a dynamical phase-transition parameter: for $\gamma>0$ the current is enhanced, $\lambda_1$ grows linearly in $N$, and the gap closes as $N^{-1}$; for $\gamma<0$ the current is suppressed, $\lambda_1$ approaches $-1$ exponentially, and the gap is exponentially small. If the claims are correct, they provide a complete leading-order picture of how conditioning a driven lattice gas on atypical current changes both its large-deviation rate function and its relaxation timescale.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the coordinate Bethe ansatz in the variable $Z_j=2e^\gamma z_j^{-1}-1$, which converts the tilted-generator eigenvalue problem into the choice of $p$ roots among the $N$ solutions of $(1-u)^p(1+u)^{N-p}=C$ for a single unknown consistency parameter $C$. The roots are labelled along Cassini ovals, the level sets $|1-u|^{\rho}|1+u|^{1-\rho}=r^{\rho}$ with foci at $\pm1$, and the topological change of the oval at the critical radius $r_{\rm cr}$ organizes the calculation. The largest and second-largest eigenvalues are identified with specific root sets: $A=\{1,\dots,p\}$ and its minimal modification for $\gamma>0$, and $A=\{1,\dots,p-1,N\}$ and further modifications for $\gamma<0$. Thermodynamic limits are then taken using the Euler-Maclaurin formula and contour integrals, so that sums over $p$ roots become integrals along the Cassini contour, with the dilogarithm entering through $\log(1+u)$.

What would settle it

Take a periodic TASEP ring of moderate size, such as $N=18$, $p=6$, compute the full spectrum of the tilted generator by exact diagonalization for a grid of $\gamma$ values around zero, and compare $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ with the paper's formulas: a gap that is not $O(N^{-1})$ for some $\gamma>0$, or a $\lambda_1$ for $\gamma<0$ that deviates from $-1+e^{N\gamma\rho}+e^{N\gamma(1-\rho)}$ beyond the stated exponentially small error, would falsify the central claim. More directly, extract the Bethe roots from the exact top eigenvectors and check whether they match the sets $A$ in Assumptions 3.9 and 3.10.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under Assumptions 3.9 and 3.10 on the selection of Bethe roots, this paper derives the thermodynamic-limit spectrum of the tilted TASEP generator from the coordinate Bethe ansatz. As $N \to \infty$ at fixed density $\rho=p/N$, the largest eigenvalue behaves as $\lambda_1(\gamma)=N\Lambda(\gamma,\rho)+O(1)$ for $\gamma>0$, while for $\gamma<0$ it behaves as $\lambda_1(\gamma)=-1+e^{N\gamma\rho}+e^{N\gamma(1-\rho)}+o(e^{N\gamma\rho}+e^{N\gamma(1-\rho)})$. The spectral gap obeys $\lambda_1-\lambda_2=N^{-1}(g(\gamma,\rho)+o(1))$ for $\gamma>0$ and is exponentially small for $\gamma<0$. The constants $\Lambda$ and $g$ are explicit: $\Lambda=\Lambda_\infty(u_*(r_*(\gamma)))$ and $g=g_\infty(u_*(r_*(\gamma)))$, where $r_*$ solves $\gamma=G_\infty(u_*(r_*))$, and $u_*$ is the point where the Cassini oval meets the boundary of the rightmost root domain. The paper presents this as a dynamical phase transition between an active phase with ballistic current and fast relaxation and an inactive, metastable phase with suppressed current.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on the unproven belief that the two leading eigenvalues correspond to specific sign-dependent selections of roots of the Bethe equations, and if at some tilt the true leading eigenvalues switch to different root selections, the predicted scaling laws would change; the authors themselves show that the positive-tilt selection already fails for $\gamma<\log(1-\rho)$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any fixed $\gamma>0$, the biased system relaxes on a timescale of order $N$, faster than the $N^{3/2}$ KPZ relaxation at $\gamma=0$, with explicit limiting forms for the gap constant, including $\mathrm{Re}\,g \sim 2e^\gamma\pi\sin(\pi\rho)$ as $\gamma\to+\infty$ and $\mathrm{Re}\,g \sim (4\pi^{4/3}/3^{2/3})\gamma^{1/3}[\rho(1-\rho)]^{2/3}$ as $\gamma\to0^+$.
  • For $\gamma<0$, the moment-generating function $E[e^{\gamma Y(t)}]$ reaches its asymptotic exponential growth rate only after times exponential in $N$, because the second eigenvalue is exponentially close to the first; this is a concrete signature of metastability in the suppressed-current phase.
  • Because $\lambda_1$ is linear in $N$ for $\gamma>0$ and saturates near $-1$ for $\gamma<0$, the Legendre-Fenchel transform yields a large-deviation rate function with a ballistic positive-current tail and a distinct negative-current tail, reproducing and refining the universal large-deviation forms found in earlier work.
  • The root-selection rules imply that, near the top of the spectrum, eigenvalues come in nearly degenerate clusters obtained by moving one Bethe root to a neighbouring index; for $\gamma<0$ these clusters sit within exponentially small distance of $-1$, so the spectral density has a spiky structure.
  • The leading negative-$\gamma$ asymptotics is independent of the details of the Bethe-root set, as stated in Corollary 4.12: any selection with $p-1$ roots from the right oval and one from the left oval gives the same exponential leading behaviour, making the inactive-phase prediction robust within the Bethe-ansatz framework.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same root-selection method suggests that the full top-of-spectrum structure for $\gamma>0$ is an effective single-particle tower, with each eigenvalue labelled by a finite modification of $A=\{1,\dots,p\}$ and the first corrections to $\lambda_1$ appearing in units of $N^{-1}$; exact diagonalization of moderate rings could test this tower directly.
  • Beyond the paper: the exponentially small gap for $\gamma<0$ invites a nucleation picture in which the system is stuck in a jammed configuration and must cross an exponentially rare bottleneck to reach the biased steady state, and the Cassini-oval critical radius $r_{\rm cr}$, where the two ovals merge, is a natural candidate for setting that barrier.
  • Beyond the paper: because the argument uses only the level-set geometry of the Bethe equation and a selection rule for the top eigenvalues, the same $\gamma\gtrless0$ dichotomy may appear in other Bethe-ansatz-solvable driven lattice gases, and checking one such model would show whether this phase transition is generic or specific to TASEP.
  • Beyond the paper: a direct finite-size crossover test is to set $\gamma=c/N$ and vary $c$; the paper's two regimes predict a collapse onto the functions $\Lambda$ and $g$ at $c$ of order one, with a crossover location computed from the limiting equation $\gamma=G_\infty(u_*(r_*))$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies current fluctuations in periodic TASEP by analyzing the tilted generator M_γ through the coordinate Bethe ansatz. Its main claims, stated as Results 2.3 and 2.4, are that in the thermodynamic limit at fixed density the largest eigenvalue behaves as λ_1(γ)=NΛ(γ,ρ)+O(1) for γ>0 and as λ_1(γ)=-1+exp(Nγρ)+exp(Nγ(1-ρ))+o(...) for γ<0, while the spectral gap closes polynomially, N^{-1}g(γ,ρ), for γ>0 and exponentially for γ<0. The technical core is a Cassini-oval parametrization of Bethe roots, leading to asymptotic equations for the consistency parameter C_{N,γ}, and Euler-Maclaurin estimates for sums over roots. The derivations are explicitly conditional on Assumptions 3.9 and 3.10, which identify λ_1 and λ_2 with specific sign-dependent choices of Bethe-root subsets.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, the paper provides a non-perturbative description of a dynamical phase transition in a paradigmatic KPZ-class model, complementing the known Derrida-Appert SCGF with subleading spectral data and giving a concrete mechanism for metastability at negative tilt. The paper has real strengths: a transparent geometric parametrization of the roots (Lemma 4.2), controlled Euler-Maclaurin error estimates, a priori bounds in Appendix A, and consistency checks against the known asymptotics of [9,10,13] in Remark 2.5. However, the decisive eigenvalue identifications are not proved, and the numerical evidence presented does not test them. The significance of the paper therefore remains conditional; establishing or numerically strongly supporting the root-selection assumptions would make the contribution substantial.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.5, Assumptions 3.9 and 3.10; Results 2.3 and 2.4] The central asymptotic statements depend on identifying λ_1 and λ_2 with the Bethe-root subsets in (3.20)-(3.21) for γ>0 and in (3.22)-(3.25) for γ<0, and these identifications are assumed rather than proved. Proposition 3.8 shows that the positive-tilt selection (3.20) fails for γ<log(1-ρ), and the text immediately before the assumptions explicitly acknowledges that eigenvalue crossings can change the selection. Theorems 4.5 and Propositions 4.11/4.13 compute eigenvalues for the assumed subsets but never rule out that another subset has a larger real part. Since the genuinely new content is the spectral-gap scaling, the phase-transition picture inherits this uncertainty. I recommend adding a direct numerical validation: for moderate N, compare exact diagonalization of M_γ with the predicted λ_1 and Re(λ_1-λ_2) under Assumptions 3.9 and 3.10, and report which Bethe subset realizes the second-largest eigenvalue. Figures 1 and 2 currently show eigenvalue clouds but do not overlay these predictions.
  2. [Section 2.3, Eq. (2.13)-(2.14), and Remark 2.2] The spectral decomposition in Eq. (2.13) and the exponential convergence statement in Eq. (2.14) assume that M_γ is diagonalizable, while Remark 2.2 states that diagonalizability remains open. If M_γ is not diagonalizable, the correction term in (2.14) can contain polynomial factors in t that are not captured by the simple O(e^{-t gap} t^{-1}) bound. The eigenvalue asymptotics in Results 2.3 and 2.4 do not by themselves require diagonalizability, but the interpretation of the spectral gap as the relaxation rate in the moment-generating function does. The paper should either prove diagonalizability for the relevant γ or state the SCGF and gap results without relying on Eq. (2.13).
  3. [Section 3.5, Proposition 3.12] The proof of Proposition 3.12 is not fully justified. The claim that C_{N,γ}>r_{cr}^p makes the p roots with largest real parts 'not uniquely determined' is asserted rather than proved; in the listed parity cases one still needs to show that a real-part tie actually occurs among the candidate roots. If no tie occurs, a unique p-element selection can exist even on a single Cassini oval, so the contradiction with simplicity of λ_1 does not follow from the given argument. Since this proposition is used to restrict the admissible range of C_{N,γ} in the γ>0 analysis, the argument should be completed or replaced by a direct numerical check.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Result 2.4 and Eq. (4.50)] The paper should state explicitly that the spectral gap is Re(λ_1-λ_2); the leading term in Eq. (4.50) is purely imaginary, so the exponentially small real gap comes from the 4π^2/N^2 term. Please clarify this in the statement of Result 2.4.
  2. [Remark 2.5] There is a typo: 'The the exact formulas' should read 'The exact formulas'.
  3. [Assumption 3.10] The set 'A={1,3. . . , p, N}' contains a stray period; it should be 'A={1,3,...,p,N}'.
  4. [Reference [35]] The arXiv identifier printed in the reference, 1708.04907, does not match the URL, which points to 1511.03762; please correct the inconsistency.
  5. [Section 4.2.1, Eq. (4.40)] The sentence explaining that the sum over j is estimated by an integral and an error term 'both of order O(e^{Nγ(1-ρ)}) and cancelling each other' is confusing; please expand the cancellation explicitly.
  6. [Proposition A.1, item (ii)] The last sentence, 'for finite γ close to 0 it provides a uniform bound in terms of γ', is imprecise; for a fixed nonzero γ the bound should be stated uniformly in N with the dependence on γ made explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the asymptotic results are explicitly conditional on unproven Bethe-root selection assumptions, not derived from the conclusions themselves.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is transparent: it formulates the Bethe ansatz, then states Assumptions 3.9 and 3.10 identifying the Bethe-root subsets believed to realize the largest and second-largest eigenvalues for γ>0 and γ<0, and then computes the asymptotics for those assumed subsets using Euler–Maclaurin and contour integrals. The main results, Results 2.3 and 2.4, are explicitly framed as holding under those assumptions ('For precise formulations and proofs, see Assumptions 3.9 and 3.10, as well as Theorem 4.5 and Proposition 4.11'). The Introduction also states 'under specific conjectures on the structure of the Bethe roots, we show the following.' Thus the paper does not present the root-selection statements as proven; it labels them as assumptions and derives consequences from them. The asymptotic formulas for λ1 and the spectral gap are not definitionally equal to the assumptions—they require nontrivial solution of the consistency conditions and careful estimation of sums. The SCGF results for γ>0 and γ<0 are checked against the independent prior result of Derrida and Appert [10], and the paper contains no self-citations that are load-bearing. The lack of proof of Assumptions 3.9 and 3.10, and the acknowledged open problem of diagonalizability (Remark 2.2), are genuine rigor limitations, but they are not circularity: the derivation chain is conditional, not self-referential. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no known result is merely renamed. Accordingly, the honest finding is no significant circularity (score 0).

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation depends on two sign-dependent root-selection conjectures (Assumptions 3.9, 3.10) and on the diagonalizability of the tilted matrix. No free parameters are fitted; the function r*(gamma) is defined by the implicit equation (4.7). No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 3.9: for gamma > 0, lambda_1(gamma) is achieved by Bethe root choice A={1,...,p}, and lambda_2(gamma) by A={1,...,p-1,p+1} or {2,...,p,N}.
    This identifies the largest and second-largest eigenvalues with specific Bethe root selections. The paper states this as an assumption because it is not proven for general gamma; it is the central load-bearing input for the gamma > 0 asymptotics.
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 3.10: for gamma < 0, lambda_1(gamma) is achieved by A={1,...,p-1,N}, and lambda_2(gamma) by one of the four listed modifications.
    Switches root selection in the gamma < 0 regime. Proposition 3.8 shows the gamma > 0 selection has no solution for gamma < log(1-rho), so this assumption is chosen to fill that gap.
  • domain assumption The tilted matrix M_gamma is diagonalizable (Remark 2.2).
    The spectral decomposition (2.13) and the gap argument (2.14) assume diagonalizability. The paper explicitly notes this remains open.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scaling Properties of Current Fluctuations in Periodic TASEP." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FAHJ6R5I

@misc{pith2026250717750,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scaling Properties of Current Fluctuations in Periodic TASEP},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FAHJ6R5I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17750}
}
abstract

We study current fluctuations in the Totally Asymmetric Simple Exclusion Process (TASEP) on a ring with $N$ sites and $p$ particles. By introducing a deformation parameter $\gamma$, we analyze the tilted operator that governs the statistics of the time-integrated current. Employing the coordinate Bethe ansatz, we derive implicit expressions for the scaled cumulant generating function (SCGF), i.e. the largest eigenvalue, and the spectral gap, both in terms of Bethe roots. Their asymptotic behaviour is characterized by using the geometric structure of Cassini oval. In the thermodynamic limit at fixed particle density, we identify a dynamical phase transition separating fluctuation regimes. For $\gamma>0$, the SCGF exhibits ballistic growth with system size, $\lambda_1 \sim N$. In contrast, for $\gamma<0$, the SCGF converges to $-1$ as $N\to\infty$. This transition is reflected in the spectral gap, which controls the system's relaxation timescale. For $\gamma>0$, the gap closes at polynomial speed, $\Delta \sim N^{-1}$, consistent with rapid relaxation with enhanced current. For $\gamma<0$, the gap vanishes exponentially, $\Delta \sim \exp(-cN)$, signaling metastability with diminished current. Our non-perturbative results provide insights into large deviations and the relaxation dynamics in driven particle systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17750 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Eigenvalues of the operator Mγ for positive γ = 1, N = 18, p = 6 plotted on the complex plane. The colour reflects density: lighter colour indicates higher eigenvalue density. Furthermore, the numerical calculations reveal that the eigenvalues Mγ ex￾hibit qualitatively different patterns on the complex plane. For the positive 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Eigenvalues of the operator Mγ for negative γ = −1, N = 18, p = 6 plotted on the complex plane. The colour reflects density: lighter colour indicates higher eigenvalue density. Additionally, the numerical analysis indicates that the behaviour of the spec￾tral gap in the thermodynamic limit differs qualitatively depending on whether the parameter γ is positive or negative. For positive values of γ, as the system size… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) Cassini ovals for (a) N = 10, ρ = 1/2 (left) and for (b) N = 15, p = 5, ρ = 1/3 (right). The green single loop corresponds to r > rcr, the orange deformed lemniscate of Bernoulli corresponds to r = rcr, and the two blue ovals correspond to r < rcr. The N solutions of (3.12) are marked by the dots. The dashed line is the boundary of the domain D+. iv. If r ∈ (rcr, +∞), C(r) forms a single oval that encompasses ±1.… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration for N = 12, p = 5 ρ = 5/12 showing the chosen labelling of points w1, . . . , wp (left column) on a circle and the corresponding points u1, . . . , uN on Cassini curves. a) Subcritical focal radius is chosen with θ = 0. The Cassini curve consists of two ov…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The graphs of G∞ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) shows the original circular contour on a complex plane with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Liggett.Interacting Particle Systems

    Thomas M. Liggett.Interacting Particle Systems. Vol. 2. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, 1985.isbn: 9780387960692. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8542-4

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8542-4 1985

  2. [2]

    Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

    Herbert Spohn.Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991.isbn: 978- 3-642-84373-0.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84371-6

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84371-6 1991

  3. [3]

    Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces

    Mehran Kardar, Giorgio Parisi, and Yi-Cheng Zhang. “Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces”. In:Physical Review Letters56.9 (1986), p. 889. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.889

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.889 1986

  4. [4]

    Bethe solution for the dynamical- scaling exponent of the noisy Burgers equation

    Leh-Hun Gwa and Herbert Spohn. “Bethe solution for the dynamical- scaling exponent of the noisy Burgers equation”. In:Physical Review A 46.2 (1992), p. 844.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.46.844

    doi:10.1103/physreva.46.844 1992

  5. [5]

    Bethe ansatz solution for crossover scaling functions of the asymmetric XXZ chain and the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang-type growth model

    Doochul Kim. “Bethe ansatz solution for crossover scaling functions of the asymmetric XXZ chain and the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang-type growth model”. In:Physical Review E52.4 (1995), p. 3512.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.52. 3512

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.52 1995

  6. [6]

    Bethe ansatz calculation of the spec- tral gap of the asymmetric exclusion process

    Olivier Golinelli and Kirone Mallick. “Bethe ansatz calculation of the spec- tral gap of the asymmetric exclusion process”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General37.10 (2004), p. 3321.doi:10.1088/0305- 4470/37/10/001

    doi:10.1088/0305- 2004

  7. [7]

    Spectral gap of the totally asym- metric exclusion process at arbitrary filling

    Olivier Golinelli and Kirone Mallick. “Spectral gap of the totally asym- metric exclusion process at arbitrary filling”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General38.7 (2005), p. 1419.doi:10 . 1088 / 0305 - 4470/38/7/001. 33

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    A Gallavotti–Cohen-type symme- try in the large deviation functional for stochastic dynamics

    Joel L. Lebowitz and Herbert Spohn. “A Gallavotti–Cohen-type symme- try in the large deviation functional for stochastic dynamics”. In:Jour- nal of Statistical Physics95 (1999), pp. 333–365.doi:10 . 1023 / A : 1004589714161

    work page 1999

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Exact large deviation function in the asymmetric exclusion process

    Bernard Derrida and Joel L. Lebowitz. “Exact large deviation function in the asymmetric exclusion process”. In:Physical Review Letters80.2 (1998), pp. 209–213.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.209

    1998 doi

  2. [10]

    Universal large-deviation function of the Kardar–Parisi–Zhang equation in one dimension

    Bernard Derrida and C. Appert. “Universal large-deviation function of the Kardar–Parisi–Zhang equation in one dimension”. In:Journal of Sta- tistical Physics94 (1999), pp. 1–30.doi:10.1023/A:1004599526997

    1999 doi

  3. [11]

    Diffusion-annihilation in the presence of a driving field

    Gunter M. Sch¨ utz. “Diffusion-annihilation in the presence of a driving field”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General28.12 (1995), p. 3405.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/28/12/014

    1995 doi

  4. [12]

    Conformal invariance in driven diffusive systems at high currents

    Dragi Karevski and Gunter M. Sch¨ utz. “Conformal invariance in driven diffusive systems at high currents”. In:Physical Review Letters118.3 (2017), p. 030601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.030601

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    ASEP on a ring conditioned on enhanced flux

    Vladislav Popkov, Gunter M. Sch¨ utz, and Damien Simon. “ASEP on a ring conditioned on enhanced flux”. In:Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010 (2010), P10007.doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ 2010/10/P10007

    2010 doi

  6. [14]

    Finite-time fluctuations for the totally asymmetric ex- clusion process

    Sylvain Prolhac. “Finite-time fluctuations for the totally asymmetric ex- clusion process”. In:Physical Review Letters116.9 (2016), p. 090601.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.090601

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Fluctuations of TASEP on a ring in relax- ation time scale

    Jinho Baik and Zhipeng Liu. “Fluctuations of TASEP on a ring in relax- ation time scale”. In:Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 71.4 (2018), pp. 747–813.doi:10.1002/cpa.21702

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Height fluctuations of stationary TASEP on a ring in relax- ation time scale

    Zhipeng Liu. “Height fluctuations of stationary TASEP on a ring in relax- ation time scale”. In:Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Probabilit´ es et Statistiques54.2 (2018), pp. 1031–1057.doi:10.1214/17-AIHP831

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Multipoint distribution of periodic TASEP

    Jinho Baik and Zhipeng Liu. “Multipoint distribution of periodic TASEP”. In:Journal of the American Mathematical Society32.3 (2019), pp. 609–674.doi:10.1090/jams/915

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    Periodic TASEP with general initial con- ditions

    Jinho Baik and Zhipeng Liu. “Periodic TASEP with general initial con- ditions”. In:Probability Theory and Related Fields179 (2021), pp. 1047– 1144.doi:10.1007/s00440-020-01004-6

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    Exact solution of the master equation for the asym- metric exclusion process

    Gunter M. Sch¨ utz. “Exact solution of the master equation for the asym- metric exclusion process”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics88 (1997), pp. 427–445.doi:10.1007/BF02508478

    1997 doi

  12. [20]

    Exact nonstationary probabilities in the asym- metric exclusion process on a ring

    Vyatcheslav B. Priezzhev. “Exact nonstationary probabilities in the asym- metric exclusion process on a ring”. In:Physical Review Letters91.5 (2003), p. 050601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.050601

    2003 doi

  13. [21]

    Shape fluctuations and random matrices

    Kurt Johansson. “Shape fluctuations and random matrices”. In:Com- munications in Mathematical Physics209 (2000), pp. 437–476.doi:10. 1007/s002200050027. 34

    2000

  14. [22]

    Limiting distributions for a polynuclear growth model with external sources

    Jinho Baik and Eric M. Rains. “Limiting distributions for a polynuclear growth model with external sources”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics 100 (2000), pp. 523–541.doi:10.1023/A:1018615306992

    2000 doi

  15. [23]

    Current fluctuations for the to- tally asymmetric simple exclusion process

    Michael Pr¨ ahofer and Herbert Spohn. “Current fluctuations for the to- tally asymmetric simple exclusion process”. In:In and Out of Equilibrium: Probability with a Physics Flavor. Ed. by Vladas Sidoravicius. Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2002, pp. 185–204.isbn: 978-1-4612-6595-5.doi:1...

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    Current distribution and random matrix ensembles for an integrable asymmetric fragmentation process

    Attila R´ akos and Gunter M. Sch¨ utz. “Current distribution and random matrix ensembles for an integrable asymmetric fragmentation process”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics118 (2005), pp. 511–530.doi:10.1007/ s10955-004-8819-z

    2005

  17. [25]

    Dynamics of a tagged particle in the asymmetric exclusion process with the step initial condition

    Takashi Imamura and Tomohiro Sasamoto. “Dynamics of a tagged particle in the asymmetric exclusion process with the step initial condition”. In: Journal of Statistical Physics128 (2007), pp. 799–846.doi:10 . 1007 / s10955-007-9326-9

    2007

  18. [26]

    Fluctuation properties of the TASEP with peri- odic initial configuration

    Alexei Borodin et al. “Fluctuation properties of the TASEP with peri- odic initial configuration”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics129 (2007), pp. 1055–1080.doi:10.1007/s10955-007-9383-0

    2007 doi

  19. [27]

    Large time asymptotics of growth models on space-like paths I: PushASEP

    Alexei Borodin and Patrik L. Ferrari. “Large time asymptotics of growth models on space-like paths I: PushASEP”. In:Electronic Journal of Prob- ability13 (2008), pp. 1380–1418.doi:10.1214/EJP.v13-541

    2008 doi

  20. [28]

    Large time asymptotics of growth models on space-like paths II: PNG and paral- lel TASEP

    Alexei Borodin, Patrik L. Ferrari, and Tomohiro Sasamoto. “Large time asymptotics of growth models on space-like paths II: PNG and paral- lel TASEP”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics283 (2008), pp. 417–449.doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0515-4

    2008 doi

  21. [29]

    Generalized Green functions and current correlations in the TASEP

    Alexander M. Povolotsky, Viacheslav B. Priezzhev, and Gunter M. Sch¨ utz. “Generalized Green functions and current correlations in the TASEP”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics142 (2011), pp. 754–791.doi:10.1007/ s10955-011-0133-y

    2011

  22. [30]

    Universal exit probabilities in the TASEP

    S. S. Poghosyan, Alexander M. Povolotsky, and Viacheslav B. Priezzhev. “Universal exit probabilities in the TASEP”. In:Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2012 (2012), P08013.doi:10.1088/ 1742-5468/2012/08/P08013

    2012

  23. [31]

    Limit shapes for the asymmetric five vertex model

    Jan de Gier, Richard Kenyon, and Samuel S. Watson. “Limit shapes for the asymmetric five vertex model”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics385.2 (2021), pp. 793–836.doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04126-7

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    Riemann surface for TASEP with periodic boundaries

    Sylvain Prolhac. “Riemann surface for TASEP with periodic boundaries”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53.44 (2020), p. 445003.doi:10.1088/1751-8121/abb389

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    Riemann surfaces for integer counting processes

    Sylvain Prolhac. “Riemann surfaces for integer counting processes”. In: Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2022 (2022), p. 113201.doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac9615

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Bethe roots for periodic TASEP and al- gebraic curve

    Shinsuke Iwao and Kohei Motegi. “Bethe roots for periodic TASEP and al- gebraic curve”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19690(2025).url:https: //arxiv.org/abs/2504.19690. 35

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    The completeness of the Bethe Ansatz for the periodic ASEP

    Eric Brattain, Norman Do, and Axel Saenz. “The completeness of the Bethe Ansatz for the periodic ASEP”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04907(2017).url:https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03762

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Hermann, 1971.isbn: 0-395-12034-9

    Jean Alexandre Dieudonn´ e.Infinitesimal calculus. Hermann, 1971.isbn: 0-395-12034-9. 36

    1971

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.