pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00569 · v1 · pith:FAPQ2P37new · submitted 2026-07-01 · 💻 cs.RO

[Preprint] Dynamic Modeling, Gait Synthesis, and Control of a Novel Subsurface Bore Propagator

Lina van Br\"ugge , Shruti Kotpalliwar , Anton Koval , Akshit Saradagi , George Nikolakopoulos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 11:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords subsurface robotgait synthesisdynamic modelingearthworm-inspired locomotionfeedback controlmodular robot designsim-to-real
0
0 comments X

The pith

The five-module subsurface robot anchors like an earthworm and advances 30 mm after three gait cycles in simulation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a modular robot for subsurface exploration that mimics earthworm anchoring for propulsion while using a drill head for excavation similar to tunnel boring machines. Dynamic models derived from the Euler-Lagrange framework support feedback controllers for each of the five decoupled modules. A centralized state machine coordinates the gait sequence of anchoring and body propagation. Physics-based simulation in Unity with the robot CAD model and ROS integration demonstrates stable anchoring and incremental forward movement. The results indicate the combined design and control strategy produces a total 30 mm advancement into soil over three complete cycles.

Core claim

The proposed design, controllers and the gait synthesis strategy together are capable of anchoring the robot in place and creating a total advancement of 30 mm into the soil after completing 3 gait cycles.

What carries the argument

The five-module assembly (drill head, two anchor modules, two propagation modules) coordinated by a centralized state machine for gait synthesis.

If this is right

  • Decoupled Euler-Lagrange models enable independent feedback control of anchoring and propulsion phases.
  • The state machine gait ensures sequential operation without interference between modules.
  • ROS-integrated simulation supports direct transfer of the trained controllers to hardware.
  • Repeated cycles produce cumulative advancement, allowing deeper penetration over time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The modular separation could allow swapping the drill head for other excavation tools without redesigning the gait logic.
  • Soil property variations would require retuning simulation parameters to maintain the reported advancement distance.
  • The approach might extend to granular materials other than soil if the contact dynamics are modeled similarly.

Load-bearing premise

The Unity physics simulation with the CAD model accurately represents real soil-robot interactions and dynamics.

What would settle it

A physical robot test in soil that fails to anchor or advances less than 30 mm after three gait cycles would falsify the performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00569 by Akshit Saradagi, Anton Koval, George Nikolakopoulos, Lina van Br\"ugge, Shruti Kotpalliwar.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Robot with connecting joints the FAM which provides counteracting forces through firm anchoring during drilling and locomotion. This mechanism is achieved using two lead-screws connected to servo motors that engage or disengage the pads and press them onto the tunnel walls. Following the FAM, are the Body PM (BPM) and the Back AM (BAM) these two mimic the operation of the DPM and the FAM respectively. The … view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Concept of the bore propagator (CAD model of the robot in a soil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Coordinate systems and forces used to describe the AM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: M(q)¨q + C(q, q˙) ˙q = τC (q) + τext(q) + τact(q) + G(q) (3) a) Mass Matrix: The mass matrix is time-variant as it depends on the pad positions and therefore on q1,AM and q2,AM. To fully define the mass matrix, the Jacobian for the CoM of the reference frame O1 J1 = [I6 0 0] is necessary. The total mass matrix is then assembled using M(q) = X 3 i=1 J T i IiJi , with Ii =  Ii,rot 0 0 miI3  . (4) b) Coriol… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Coordinate system and forces describing the EHM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coordinate systems and forces used for describing the PM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Gait cycle of the robot showing elongation in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Joint positions and Forces acting on the AM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simulation of the dynamic model of the PM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Simulation of the dynamic model of the EHM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Block diagram of the Unity simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Joint displacement and module velocity of the PMs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Pad displacement, reference velocity and normal forces acting on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this article, we present dynamic modeling, gait synthesis, and feedback control design for a modular novel subsurface robot, designed for human-free subsurface exploration and excavation. The subsurface propagator design is based on two major aspects: 1) anchor and propel movement like an earthworm and 2) excavation similar to tunnel boring machines. This design is decoupled into five separate modules: one drill head to excavate and create cavity for propagation, two modules to anchor the robot, and two modules to enable propagation of the body. In order to design a controller for each of the modules, dynamic models using the Euler-Lagrange framework are developed. These mathematical models are used as a baseline to design controlled decoupled operation of the different joint movements. The operation of robotic assembly is constructed via a centralized state machine for gait synthesis with integration of the designed feedback controller. The controllers are tested on the real robot geometry to aid sim-to-real integration: A physics-based Unity simulation using a CAD model of the robot and integration of the trained controller via ROS verifies the performance of the robot. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed design, controllers and the gait synthesis strategy together are capable of anchoring the robot in place and creating an total advancement of 30\,mm into the soil after completing 3 gait cycles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a modular subsurface robot with five modules (drill head, two anchors, two propagators) inspired by earthworm anchoring and tunnel boring. It derives Euler-Lagrange dynamic models for decoupled module operation, designs feedback controllers from those models, implements gait synthesis via a centralized state machine, and evaluates the integrated system in a Unity physics simulation of the CAD model, claiming that the design, controllers, and gait enable anchoring and 30 mm total advancement into soil after three gait cycles.

Significance. The decoupled modeling and control strategy, combined with a state-machine gait, offers a structured approach to coordinating anchoring, excavation, and propulsion in a confined subsurface environment. If the Unity soil-contact model were calibrated and validated against physical data, the 30 mm advancement result would provide a concrete, falsifiable benchmark for sim-to-real transfer in bio-inspired burrowing robots. The absence of such validation currently confines the contribution to an untested simulation study.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and simulation results section: The headline claim that the system 'is capable of anchoring the robot in place and creating a total advancement of 30 mm into the soil after completing 3 gait cycles' rests exclusively on an unvalidated Unity rigid-body simulation. No soil-model parameters, contact calibration against measured properties, sensitivity analysis, baseline comparisons, or physical-robot experiments are reported, so the quantitative result cannot be taken as evidence of real-world capability.
  2. [Simulation and Results] Simulation description: The manuscript states that the Unity simulation 'verifies the performance' and aids 'sim-to-real integration,' yet supplies no quantitative metrics (RMS error, contact-force correlation, etc.) comparing the decoupled Euler-Lagrange models to the coupled simulated dynamics or to any empirical soil data. This gap directly affects the load-bearing performance claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Dynamic Modeling] Notation: The Euler-Lagrange equations for the individual modules are presented without an explicit statement of the generalized coordinates or the form of the inertia, Coriolis, and gravity terms; adding these would improve traceability from model to controller.
  2. [Gait Synthesis] Figure clarity: The state-machine diagram and the CAD renderings lack labels for the five modules and the soil boundary conditions used in Unity; this makes it difficult to map the gait sequence to the reported 30 mm displacement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, clarifying the simulation-based nature of the study and outlining planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and simulation results section: The headline claim that the system 'is capable of anchoring the robot in place and creating a total advancement of 30 mm into the soil after completing 3 gait cycles' rests exclusively on an unvalidated Unity rigid-body simulation. No soil-model parameters, contact calibration against measured properties, sensitivity analysis, baseline comparisons, or physical-robot experiments are reported, so the quantitative result cannot be taken as evidence of real-world capability.

    Authors: We agree that the reported 30 mm advancement is obtained from the Unity simulation without any physical validation, soil calibration, or sensitivity analysis. The paper focuses on the development of dynamic models, controllers, and gait synthesis, with the simulation serving to demonstrate the integrated performance in a virtual setting as a step toward sim-to-real transfer. We will revise the abstract and the simulation results section to explicitly indicate that the advancement is a simulated result and to include a clearer statement of the study's limitations regarding real-world applicability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation and Results] Simulation description: The manuscript states that the Unity simulation 'verifies the performance' and aids 'sim-to-real integration,' yet supplies no quantitative metrics (RMS error, contact-force correlation, etc.) comparing the decoupled Euler-Lagrange models to the coupled simulated dynamics or to any empirical soil data. This gap directly affects the load-bearing performance claim.

    Authors: The Euler-Lagrange models were derived for controller design, and the Unity simulation tests the closed-loop behavior of those controllers on the full robot model. No direct quantitative comparison metrics between the analytical models and the simulated dynamics are provided in the current manuscript. We will incorporate such metrics in the revised version, for instance by reporting the discrepancy between model-predicted trajectories and those observed in simulation under the same control inputs, to better substantiate the modeling approach. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard modeling pipeline with independent simulation output.

full rationale

The derivation begins with Euler-Lagrange equations applied to the robot modules (standard first-principles), proceeds to controller synthesis from those equations, and gait synthesis via an independent state machine. The 30 mm advancement is reported as an output of the Unity simulation of the CAD model; it is not obtained by fitting parameters to the target metric, redefining inputs, or invoking self-citations. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the simulation step is external to the analytic chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work applies standard robotics techniques to a new mechanical design. The main addition is the hardware concept rather than new mathematical principles. Abstract-only review prevents detailed audit of parameters or assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The dynamics of each robot module can be modeled independently using the Euler-Lagrange framework
    Stated as baseline for controller design in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Modular subsurface propagator with drill, anchor, and propagation modules no independent evidence
    purpose: To enable human-free subsurface exploration and excavation
    The novel design is the core contribution of the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5783 in / 1303 out tokens · 46526 ms · 2026-07-02T11:42:00.919520+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Excavation by snake robots with fins and a drill,

    H. Yoshida, T. Yamazaki, M. Nakajima, and M. Tanaka, “Excavation by snake robots with fins and a drill,”Advanced Robotics, vol. 37, no. 14, pp. 942–958, 2023-07-18. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2023.2223261

    work page doi:10.1080/01691864.2023.2223261 2023

  2. [2]

    Fundamentals of burrowing in soft animals and robots,

    K. M. Dorgan and K. A. Daltorio, “Fundamentals of burrowing in soft animals and robots,”Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 10, 2023-01-30, publisher: Frontiers. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1057876

    work page doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1057876 2023

  3. [4]

    LaNoising: A data-driven approach for 903nm ToF LiDAR performance modeling under fog,

    J. Lee, C. Tirtawardhana, and H. Myung, “Development and analysis of digging and soil removing mechanisms for mole- bot: Bio-inspired mole-like drilling robot,” in2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2020-07, pp. 7792–7799, ISSN: 2153-0866. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341230

    work page doi:10.1109/iros45743.2020.9341230 2020

  4. [5]

    Mole-inspired robot burrowing with forelimbs for planetary soil exploration,

    T. Zhang, H. Wei, H. Zheng, Z. Liang, H. Yang, Y . Zhang, H. Zhu, Y . Guan, X. Ding, K. Wang, and K. Xu, “Mole-inspired robot burrowing with forelimbs for planetary soil exploration,”Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 6, no. 6, p. 2300392, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202300392 Fig. 10. Block diagram of the Unity simulation Fig....

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy.202300392 2024

  5. [6]

    An earthworm-like modular soft robot for locomotion in multi-terrain environments,

    R. Das, S. P. M. Babu, F. Visentin, S. Palagi, and B. Mazzolai, “An earthworm-like modular soft robot for locomotion in multi-terrain environments,”Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1571, Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28873-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28873-w 2023

  6. [7]

    An underground explorer robot based on peristaltic crawling of earthworms,

    K. J. Waldron, H. Omori, T. Nakamura, and T. Yada, “An underground explorer robot based on peristaltic crawling of earthworms,”Industrial Robot: the international journal of robotics research and application, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 358–364, 06 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/01439910910957129

    work page doi:10.1108/01439910910957129 2009

  7. [8]

    Design and Gait Planning of a Worm-inspired Metameric Robot for Pipe Crawling,

    Y . Liu, Q. Shi, and Z. Chen, “Design and Gait Planning of a Worm-inspired Metameric Robot for Pipe Crawling,”Journal of Bionic Engineering, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1265–1277, May 2024, publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42235-024-00497-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s42235-024-00497-4 2024

  8. [9]

    Development of a mole-like drilling robot system for shallow drilling,

    J. Kim, H. W. Jang, J.-U. Shin, J.-W. Hong, and H. Myung, “Development of a mole-like drilling robot system for shallow drilling,”IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 76 454–76 463, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884495

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2018.2884495 2018

  9. [10]

    Concept design for mole-like excavate robot and its localization method,

    J. Lee, H. Lim, S. Song, and H. Myung, “Concept design for mole-like excavate robot and its localization method,” in2019 7th International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology Fig. 13. Joint displacement and module velocity of the PMs and Applications (RiTA), 2019-08, pp. 56–60. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/RITAPP.2019.8932732

    work page doi:10.1109/ritapp.2019.8932732 2019

  10. [11]

    Application of Snake-Like Robot in Pipeline Inspection

    J. Mai, “Application of Snake-Like Robot in Pipeline Inspection.”

    work page

  11. [12]

    Modeling, gait sequence design, and control architecture of BADGER underground robot,

    P. Vartholomeos, P. Marantos, G. Karras, E. Menendez, M. Rodriguez, S. Martinez, and C. Balaguer, “Modeling, gait sequence design, and control architecture of BADGER underground robot,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1160–1167, 2021-04. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3056068

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3056068 2021

  12. [13]

    Continuum dynamics of rectilinear locomotion of a metameric earthworm-like robot,

    R. Shi, H. Fang, and J. Xu, “Continuum dynamics of rectilinear locomotion of a metameric earthworm-like robot,” Multibody System Dynamics, Jan. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11044-026-10142-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11044-026-10142-z 2026

  13. [14]

    An Analysis of Peristaltic Locomotion for Maximizing Velocity or Minimizing Cost of Transport of Earthworm-Like Robots,

    A. Kandhari, Y . Wang, H. J. Chiel, R. D. Quinn, and K. A. Daltorio, “An Analysis of Peristaltic Locomotion for Maximizing Velocity or Minimizing Cost of Transport of Earthworm-Like Robots,”Soft Robotics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 485–505, Aug. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1089/soro.2020.0021

    work page doi:10.1089/soro.2020.0021 2021

  14. [15]

    Efficient worm-like locomotion: slip and control of soft-bodied peristaltic robots,

    K. A. Daltorio, A. S. Boxerbaum, A. D. Horchler, K. M. Shaw, H. J. Chiel, and R. D. Quinn, “Efficient worm-like locomotion: slip and control of soft-bodied peristaltic robots,”Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 035003, Aug. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-3182/8/3/035003

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-3182/8/3/035003 2013

  15. [16]

    A CPG-Based Versatile Control Framework for Metameric Earthworm-Like Robotic Locomotion,

    Q. Zhou, J. Xu, and H. Fang, “A CPG-Based Versatile Control Framework for Metameric Earthworm-Like Robotic Locomotion,” Advanced Science, vol. 10, no. 14, p. 2206336, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206336

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202206336 2023

  16. [17]

    [Online]

    Unity Technologies, “Unity,” 2025, game development platform. [Online]. Available: https://unity.com/

    work page 2025

  17. [18]

    M. V . Mark W. Spong, Seth Hutchinson,Robot Modeling and Control. Wiley, 2020, vol. 2

    work page 2020

  18. [19]

    An enhanced cylindrical contact force model,

    C. Pereira, A. Ramalho, and J. Ambrosio, “An enhanced cylindrical contact force model,”Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 277–298, Nov. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11044-015-9463-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11044-015-9463-x 2015

  19. [20]

    Flores and H

    P. Flores and H. M. Lankarani,Contact Force Models for Multibody Dynamics, ser. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, vol. 226. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-30897-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30897-5 2016

  20. [21]

    Drilling Formulas and Definitions

    Sandvik Coromant AB, “Drilling Formulas and Definitions.” [Online]. Available: https://www.sandvik.coromant.com/en- us/knowledge/machining-formulas-definitions/drilling-formulas- definitions

    work page