Reply to Comment on Circular Dichroism in the Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectrum of the High-Temperature Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Superconductor http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.1648
classification
❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords
commentexplainingobservationsangle-resolvedargumentsarxivassessingbasis
Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper
What is a Pith Number?\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{FB7TUZ2Q}
Prints a linked pith:FB7TUZ2Q badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more
read the original abstract
We conclude that arguments of Norman et al. in their Comment do not provide a significant basis for their claim that the geometric mechanism for explaining the observations reported by them is not viable. More generally, our study highlights the importance of assessing structural issues before invoking exotic mechanisms for explaining unusual spectroscopic observations, especially in complex materia.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.