Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Analysis of possible systematic errors in the Oslo method

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1211.6264 v1 pith:FCKXU5O5 submitted 2012-11-27 nucl-ex

Analysis of possible systematic errors in the Oslo method

A. C. Larsen , M. Guttormsen , M. Krticka , E. Betak , A. B\"urger , A. G\"orgen , H. T. Nyhus , J. Rekstad
show 6 more authors
A. Schiller S. Siem H. K. Toft G. M. Tveten A. V. Voinov K. Wikan
This is my paper
classification nucl-ex
keywords dataanalysisbeenerrorsmethodoslopossibleassumptions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In this work, we have reviewed the Oslo method, which enables the simultaneous extraction of level density and gamma-ray transmission coefficient from a set of particle-gamma coincidence data. Possible errors and uncertainties have been investigated. Typical data sets from various mass regions as well as simulated data have been tested against the assumptions behind the data analysis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.