Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Neural Network Interpretability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.14261 v3 pith:FCUMDQF7 submitted 2020-12-28 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords interpretabilitydeepneuralresearchtaxonomyalongdimensionsmany
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Along with the great success of deep neural networks, there is also growing concern about their black-box nature. The interpretability issue affects people's trust on deep learning systems. It is also related to many ethical problems, e.g., algorithmic discrimination. Moreover, interpretability is a desired property for deep networks to become powerful tools in other research fields, e.g., drug discovery and genomics. In this survey, we conduct a comprehensive review of the neural network interpretability research. We first clarify the definition of interpretability as it has been used in many different contexts. Then we elaborate on the importance of interpretability and propose a novel taxonomy organized along three dimensions: type of engagement (passive vs. active interpretation approaches), the type of explanation, and the focus (from local to global interpretability). This taxonomy provides a meaningful 3D view of distribution of papers from the relevant literature as two of the dimensions are not simply categorical but allow ordinal subcategories. Finally, we summarize the existing interpretability evaluation methods and suggest possible research directions inspired by our new taxonomy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explaining Model Overfitting in CNNs via GMM Clustering

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A CNN filter whose feature-map GMM clustering has small outlier clusters is called an anomaly filter and is claimed to indicate model overfitting, but the supporting experiments are weakly consistent.

Pith tools