Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

IndoNLU: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.05387 v3 pith:FDNQMMVH submitted 2020-09-11 cs.CL

IndoNLU: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Understanding

classification cs.CL
keywords indonesianlanguagetasksbenchmarkindonlunaturalavailabledifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Although Indonesian is known to be the fourth most frequently used language over the internet, the research progress on this language in the natural language processing (NLP) is slow-moving due to a lack of available resources. In response, we introduce the first-ever vast resource for the training, evaluating, and benchmarking on Indonesian natural language understanding (IndoNLU) tasks. IndoNLU includes twelve tasks, ranging from single sentence classification to pair-sentences sequence labeling with different levels of complexity. The datasets for the tasks lie in different domains and styles to ensure task diversity. We also provide a set of Indonesian pre-trained models (IndoBERT) trained from a large and clean Indonesian dataset Indo4B collected from publicly available sources such as social media texts, blogs, news, and websites. We release baseline models for all twelve tasks, as well as the framework for benchmark evaluation, and thus it enables everyone to benchmark their system performances.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Benchmarking Logistic Regression, SVM, Naive Bayes, and IndoBERT Fine-Tuning for Sentiment Analysis on Indonesian Product Reviews

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 2.0

    Linear SVC reached 97.60% accuracy and 0.5510 Macro F1 on the full Tokopedia 2025 reviews corpus, beating fine-tuned IndoBERT's 88.70% accuracy and 0.5088 Macro F1 on a sampled subset, with the gap attributed to data ...