Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Imbalanced Learning on Graphs: Problems, Techniques, and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.13821 v2 pith:FDWUWQKO submitted 2023-08-26 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learningdatagraphsgraphimbalancedcomprehensivedirectionsfuture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graphs represent interconnected structures prevalent in a myriad of real-world scenarios. Effective graph analytics, such as graph learning methods, enables users to gain profound insights from graph data, underpinning various tasks including node classification and link prediction. However, these methods often suffer from data imbalance, a common issue in graph data where certain segments possess abundant data while others are scarce, thereby leading to biased learning outcomes. This necessitates the emerging field of imbalanced learning on graphs, which aims to correct these data distribution skews for more accurate and representative learning outcomes. In this survey, we embark on a comprehensive review of the literature on imbalanced learning on graphs. We begin by providing a definitive understanding of the concept and related terminologies, establishing a strong foundational understanding for readers. Following this, we propose two comprehensive taxonomies: (1) the problem taxonomy, which describes the forms of imbalance we consider, the associated tasks, and potential solutions; (2) the technique taxonomy, which details key strategies for addressing these imbalances, and aids readers in their method selection process. Finally, we suggest prospective future directions for both problems and techniques within the sphere of imbalanced learning on graphs, fostering further innovation in this critical area.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NodeImport: Imbalanced Node Classification with Node Importance Assessment

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A closed-form importance score — the gradient alignment between a node and a balanced meta-set — filters labeled, unlabeled, and synthetic nodes, improving GNN balanced accuracy under class imbalance.

  2. Revisiting Graph Contrastive Learning on Anomaly Detection: A Structural Imbalance Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AD-GCL improves graph anomaly detection on low-degree tail nodes by pruning head-node edges to forge tail-like views and completing tail neighborhoods using the model's own anomaly scores.

Pith tools