LMEMs for post-hoc analysis of HPO Benchmarking
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FE3YDDGYrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The importance of tuning hyperparameters in Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) is established through empirical research and applications, evident from the increase in new hyperparameter optimization (HPO) algorithms and benchmarks steadily added by the community. However, current benchmarking practices using averaged performance across many datasets may obscure key differences between HPO methods, especially for pairwise comparisons. In this work, we apply Linear Mixed-Effect Models-based (LMEMs) significance testing for post-hoc analysis of HPO benchmarking runs. LMEMs allow flexible and expressive modeling on the entire experiment data, including information such as benchmark meta-features, offering deeper insights than current analysis practices. We demonstrate this through a case study on the PriorBand paper's experiment data to find insights not reported in the original work.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Rank Intervals for Leaderboards: A Hierarchical Framework for Model Evaluation
A hierarchical framework generates statistically valid task-level rank confidence intervals via pairwise comparisons and leaderboard-level rank prediction intervals via conformal prediction.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.