Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Adiabatic Pumping of Orbital Magnetization by Spin Precession

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that coherent spin precession in an antiferromagnetic topological insulator adiabatically pumps orbital magnetization whose large-cone-angle limit approaches the natural unit $e/T$.

desk verdict Plausible new mechanism with a big e/T claim, but the headline result is not yet backed by reproducible numbers; worth refereeing after the missing details are supplied. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04938 v1 pith:FE4GQLT3 submitted 2025-01-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Yafei Ren , Wenqin Chen , Chong Wang , Ting Cao , Di Xiao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords orbitalmagnetizationadiabaticpumpingspinprecessionChern-SimonsformantiferromagnetictopologicalinsulatorYangmonopolemagnonZeemaneffectThouless
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a mechanism that turns coherent spin precession into a static orbital magnetization: as the spin axis rotates, valence electrons are dragged adiabatically and acquire a topological orbital magnetization expressed as a Chern-Simons form. For small precession cone angles, the magnetization is proportional to $\mathbf{S}\times\dot{\mathbf{S}}$ and contributes to the magnon Zeeman effect. For large cone angles in an antiferromagnetic topological insulator, the magnetization approaches the natural unit $e/T$, where $e$ is the elementary charge and $T$ is the precession period. When the pumped magnetization is spatially inhomogeneous, a dissipationless charge current flows, and boundary contributions can add integer multiples of $e/T$ depending on edge orientation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Chern-Simons form $\theta = \frac{1}{4\pi}\int d\tau\, d^2k\, \mathrm{Tr}\left(\epsilon^{ijk}(A_i\partial_j A_k - \frac{2i}{3}A_iA_jA_k)\right)$ constructed from the nonabelian Berry connections of the occupied bands over the parameter space $(k_x,k_y,\tau)$. Its relation to the pumped orbital magnetization is Eq. (4), $M_z^t = -(e/T)(1/2\pi)\theta$. The paper evaluates $\theta$ without gauge fixing by introducing an auxiliary precession angle $\alpha$ and writing $\theta(\alpha)-\theta(0) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int d\alpha' d\tau d^2k\, \mathrm{Tr}\,\Omega_{k_x k_y \alpha' \tau}$, whose integrand is a gauge-invariant second Chern form. Interpreting this second Chern form as the field of a Yang monopole in the five-dimensional parameter space $(k_x,k_y,\Delta,S_x,S_y)$ makes the large-angle limit $\theta \to -\pi$ transparent and ties the $e/T$ saturation to a global geometric property.

What would settle it

Measure the orbital magnetization of an easy-plane antiferromagnetic topological insulator while driving coherent spin precession with a large cone angle: the predicted $M_z^t = -(e/T)\theta/(2\pi)$ should approach $e/T$ and flip sign with the precession chirality, whereas a magnetization far below $e/T$ or independent of cone angle would falsify the topological limit. Tuning the electronic gap through the Dirac point, for example by electrostatic gating or twist angle, should show a peak in the pumped magnetization as the gap closes, then a breakdown of the $e/T$ limit when the gap becomes comparable to the drive frequency.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Coherent spin precession rectifies into a topological orbital magnetization whose bulk contribution is $M_z^t = -(e/T)(1/2\pi)\theta$, where $\theta$ is a Chern-Simons form built from the nonabelian Berry connections of occupied valence bands. In an antiferromagnetic topological insulator, a full precession drives $\theta$ toward $-\pi$ through a Yang-monopole configuration in the five-dimensional parameter space of momentum and spin, giving $M_z^t \to e/T$. At small cone angles the magnetization reduces to $M \simeq \chi(\mathbf{S}\times\dot{\mathbf{S}})_z$, producing a dynamical correction to magnetic susceptibility and a magnon Zeeman energy shift. Spatially inhomogeneous pumped magnetization generates a dissipationless current $\mathbf{j} = \nabla\times M\hat{z}$, which can become quantized as $-eC_2/T$ across topological domain walls. Boundary helical edge states can contribute an additional quantized Thouless-pumped current $C_1 e/T$, but only for certain edge orientations, mirroring the gauge dependence of the bulk Chern-Simons form.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the valence electrons remain in their instantaneous ground state as the spin precesses, which requires the precession frequency to stay well below the electronic band gap; if the gap is comparable to or smaller than the drive frequency, the Chern-Simons pumping formula and its $e/T$ limit cease to hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, coherent spin precession in an antiferromagnetic topological insulator with a large cone angle should produce a static orbital magnetization of order $e/T$, which for terahertz precession can approach a Bohr magneton per moiré unit cell.
  • The small-cone-angle magnetization $M \simeq \chi(\mathbf{S}\times\dot{\mathbf{S}})_z$ adds a dynamical contribution to magnetic susceptibility and shifts magnon energies in an applied field, giving a measurable magnon Zeeman effect.
  • Spatial variations of the pumped magnetization, arising from spin textures or topological phase domains, should generate dissipationless charge currents, with a quantized component $-eC_2/T$ when a domain wall encloses a Yang monopole.
  • Boundary contributions can change the pumped orbital magnetization by integer multiples of $e/T$ depending on edge termination and disorder, making the total magnetization boundary-sensitive even though the bulk formula is gauge invariant modulo $2\pi$.
  • The pumping is claimed to be universal across ferro- and antiferromagnetic insulators, so similar effects should appear in easy-plane ferromagnets and in layered antiferromagnetic topological materials beyond the prototype model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's setup, the same $e/T$ saturation should appear for any slow, closed cycle in parameter space that encloses the Yang monopole, such as a loop in strain or electric-field space, not just spin precession; this would make the effect a general feature of adiabatic topological pumping rather than a spin-specific phenomenon.
  • Because the bulk Chern-Simons form is gauge dependent modulo $2\pi$, an experiment measuring absolute orbital magnetization in a finite sample should see boundary-condition-dependent offsets of $e/T$ per cycle, analogous to the polarization quantum in ferroelectrics; comparing ribbons with zigzag and armchair edges would test this directly.
  • The small-angle formula provides a route to test the theory without needing a large cone angle: measuring the magnon frequency shift as a function of an applied magnetic field in an easy-plane antiferromagnet would isolate the $\chi(\mathbf{S}\times\dot{\mathbf{S}})_z$ contribution.
  • The adiabatic assumption is likely to break down in narrow-gap moiré materials where terahertz precession can approach the electronic gap; tuning the gap via twist angle or electrostatic gating should produce a clear deviation from the $-e/T$ limit, providing a controlled falsification test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that coherent spin precession in a magnetic topological insulator adiabatically pumps a static orbital magnetization, expressed as M_z^t = -(e/T) θ/(2π), where θ is a Chern–Simons form over momentum and time (Eqs. 4–5). The small-cone-angle response is derived as M ≃ χ(S×Ṡ)_z with χ given by a Berry-curvature integral (Eq. 9), and the authors argue that for a large precession cone angle θ approaches a global value such that the magnetization reaches the order of e/T in an antiferromagnetic Kane–Mele–Hubbard model. The paper also discusses charge currents generated by inhomogeneous pumped magnetization and boundary contributions from quantized edge pumping.

Significance. If the central large-angle claim survives scrutiny, this is a conceptually novel bridge between orbitronics and spintronics with a striking prediction: precessing spins in a topological antiferromagnet rectify into an orbital magnetization of order e/T. Strengths of the manuscript are its use of established Chern–Simons and adiabatic-pumping formalism from Refs. [53–56], the absence of fitted parameters in the small-angle formula (Eq. 9), and the falsifiable predictions of magnetization pumping, dynamical susceptibility corrections, magnon Zeeman splitting, and texture-induced dissipationless currents. However, the quantitative support for the headline e/T result is currently incomplete, as detailed in the major comments. The central derivation is plausible but not yet established to the standard required for a Letter.

major comments (3)
  1. [Precession angle dependence, Fig. 1(b), Eq. (7)] The load-bearing numerical curve θ(α) is presented without the model parameters used for the calculation: no values of γ and λ, no specification of the Hubbard interaction or how the mean-field Néel vector is determined, no k-mesh, no cone-angle range, and no description of the gauge-fixing procedure used to evaluate Eq. (7). Since the entire claim that θ reaches −π (or a corresponding global value) rests on this figure, the calculation as presented is not reproducible. The authors should either provide the full lattice-model computation with complete parameter and method information, or supply the analytic evaluation of the partial Yang-monopole integral.
  2. [Precession angle dependence, Fig. 2(a)] The Yang-monopole argument is incomplete. The text states that integrating the second Chern form over part of a closed surface gives a fraction of 2πC2, but it never specifies the second Chern number C2 of the full five-dimensional parameter space, the actual fraction of the closed surface swept by the spin-precession cycle (the red arrow in Fig. 2(a)), or the gauge branch that connects θ(0)=0 to the claimed large-angle value. In addition, the Kane–Mele model has two valleys, K and K′, with opposite intrinsic masses; the contribution of the K valley to the second Chern form is not computed, so a cancellation between valleys has not been excluded. An explicit evaluation of Eq. (7) for the lattice model, or a complete analytical treatment of the partial-surface integral including both valleys and all gauge branches, is required before the e/T limit is established.
  3. [Abstract and Precession angle dependence, Eq. (4)] There is an internal inconsistency in the advertised magnitude. Equation (4) gives M_z^t = -(e/T) θ/(2π), so θ = −π implies M_z^t = e/(2T), not e/T. The abstract states that the magnetization “can reach its natural unit, e/T,” while the text says the magnetization “can reach the order of e/T as θ reaches −π.” Because a gauge shift changes θ by 2π and can change M_z^t by an integer multiple of e/T, the authors must state explicitly which value of θ is reached and whether the “natural unit” e/T is achieved exactly, up to a gauge choice, or only in order of magnitude.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Boundary contribution, Fig. 3] The reference “Fig. ??(a)” is broken, and the relation M_z = J_edge between the edge pumping current and the orbital magnetization should be defined precisely, including units and the sign convention. The boundary contribution is claimed to be larger than the bulk contribution, but no derivation of this comparison is given.
  2. [Formalism, first paragraph] The adiabaticity assumption is justified only by the statement that GHz–THz precession frequencies are smaller than “typical” band gaps. Since narrow-gap topological insulators can have meV-scale gaps comparable to terahertz frequencies, the authors should provide representative gap and frequency values for the proposed materials, or explicitly frame the adiabatic condition as a parameter regime rather than a universal statement.
  3. [Reference [47]] Reference [47] is cited as Supplemental Materials, where the ferromagnetic pumping case and a boundary-dependent pumping example are described, but no supplemental file is included in the arXiv version. The claims that rely on the supplement cannot be checked unless the supplement is made available.
  4. [Fig. 1] The axes in Fig. 1(b) are not labeled: the ordinate is presumably θ or M_z^t in units of e/T, and the abscissa appears to be α/π but this is not stated. The parameter values used for the band structures in Figs. 1(c)–(f) are also not given in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Chern-Simons pumping integral is computed from the model and from prior independent formulas, not fitted to the e/T target; only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation appears.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is not circular. The starting formula M^t_z = -(e/T)(1/2pi)theta is taken from Ref. [53] (Trifunovic, Ono, Watanabe), an independent derivation of geometric orbital magnetization in adiabatic processes; it is applied to the Kane-Mele-Hubbard model, not redefined around the target e/T result. The condition theta(0)=0 is physically fixed by the static-spin limit (alpha=0 gives no pumping), not by fitting to the predicted magnetization. Equation (7) then evaluates theta(alpha) as a path-independent integral of the second Chern form over the occupied bands, so the small-angle and large-angle values are model outputs, not inputs. The only self-citation that carries any weight is Ref. [56] (Ren, Xiao, Saparov, Niu) for the small-angle expansion leading to Eq. (9); this is a secondary response formula, and its coefficient chi is a Berry-curvature integral evaluated at S_x=S_y=0, not a parameter fit to the quantity being predicted. The large-angle e/T limit rests on the Yang-monopole interpretation and Fig. 1(b), whose model parameters, gauge branch, and full-Brillouin-zone cancellation are not fully specified; that is an under-support/correctness concern, not circularity, because no equation in the chain is equivalent by construction to M=e/T. The boundary/gauge ambiguity is explicitly acknowledged, and the broken Fig. ?? pointer and missing numerical details affect verifiability rather than circularity. Score 2 reflects one minor, non-load-bearing self-citation; no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on adiabaticity, a mean-field model, sublattice locking, and a smooth gauge. No fitted free parameters are introduced; the model parameters (gamma, lambda) are material inputs, and the result is topological. The Yang monopole is an analogy, not a new physical entity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Valence electrons follow the spin precession adiabatically (hbar * omega << electronic band gap)
    Invoked in the Formalism section: 'the precession frequency typically ranges from GHz to THz that is smaller than the typical band gaps... the valence electrons are thus pumped adiabatically'. The entire Chern-Simons pumping formula (Eq. 4) and the e/T limit depend on this.
  • domain assumption Mean-field Kane-Mele-Hubbard Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) describes the interacting antiferromagnetic topological insulator
    The paper uses H_AF = H_KM + lambda * sum_i S_i . s_i without deriving the mean-field decoupling from the Hubbard interaction; the band topology and the pumping results are computed within this model.
  • domain assumption Sublattice spins remain locked as S_A = -S_B = S during precession
    Asserted in the Precession angle dependence section. This preserves PT symmetry and guarantees vanishing static spin and orbital magnetization; if the locking breaks, the AFM TI classification and the e/T quantization change.
  • standard math A smooth and periodic Berry connection can be chosen over the Brillouin zone for the occupied bands
    Required for the gauge-invariant integral form of Eq. (7), following Refs. [10, 11]. This is standard for a gapped 2D insulator, assumed without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Adiabatic Pumping of Orbital Magnetization by Spin Precession." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FE4GQLT3

@misc{pith2026250104938,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Adiabatic Pumping of Orbital Magnetization by Spin Precession},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FE4GQLT3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04938}
}
abstract

We propose adiabatic pumping of orbital magnetization driven by coherent spin precession, facilitating the rectification of this precession. The orbital magnetization originates from the adiabatic evolution of valence electrons with a topological bulk contribution expressed as a Chern-Simons form. When the precession cone angle of spin $\mathbf{S}$ is small, the resulting magnetization is proportional to $\mathbf{S}\times \dot{\mathbf{S}}$, contributing to the magnon Zeeman effect. With a large cone angle, the magnetization can reach its natural unit, $e/T$, in an antiferromagnetic topological insulator with $e$ as the elementary charge and $T$ as the precession period. This significant magnetization is related to the global properties of the electronic geometric phases in the parameter space spanned by $\mathbf{S}$ and momentum $\mathbf{k}$. When the pumped magnetization is inhomogeneous, induced by spin textures or electronic topological phase domains, a dissipationless charge current is also pumped. At last, we discuss the boundary contributions from the spin-driving edge states, which are intricately linked to the gauge-dependent quantum uncertainty of the Chern-Simons form.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04938 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of an easy-axis antiferromagnetic topo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Schematic of a Yang’s monopole in a five [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Schematic of the orbital magnetization pumping. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 365, 605 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moir´ e het- erostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, Y.-H. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromag- netism in a moir´ e superlattice, Nature579, 56 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    J. Liu, Z. Ma, J. Gao, and X. Dai, Quantum valley Hall effect, orbital magnetism, and anomalous Hall effect in twisted multilayer graphene systems, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031021 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Ren, H.-C

    Y. Ren, H.-C. Jiang, Z. Qiao, and D. Sheng, Orbital Chern insulator and quantum phase diagram of a kagome electron system with half-filled flat bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 117602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Polshyn, J

    H. Polshyn, J. Zhu, M. A. Kumar, Y. Zhang, F. Yang, C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, et al., Electrical switching of mag- netic order in an orbital Chern insulator, Nature 588, 66 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Zhu, J.-J

    J. Zhu, J.-J. Su, and A. H. MacDonald, Voltage- controlled magnetic reversal in orbital Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 227702 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Su and S.-Z

    Y. Su and S.-Z. Lin, Current-induced reversal of anoma- lous Hall conductance in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 226401 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, D. P. Clougherty, and Q. Niu, Polariza- tion and adiabatic pumping in inhomogeneous crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 087602 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    A. M. Essin, J. E. Moore, and D. Vanderbilt, Magneto- electric polarizability and axion electrodynamics in crys- talline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 146805 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    R. S. Mong, A. M. Essin, and J. E. Moore, Antiferro- magnetic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 81, 245209 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Q. L. He, T. L. Hughes, N. P. Armitage, Y. Tokura, and K. L. Wang, Topological spintronics and magnetoelec- tronics, Nat. Mater. 21, 15 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Orbi- tronics: The intrinsic orbital current in p-doped silicon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 066601 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Kontani, T

    H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, D. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Giant orbital Hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous Hall effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016601 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and orbital Hall effects from orbital texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Observation of the orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti, Nature 619, 52 (2023). 6

    2023

  10. [18]

    Go, J.-P

    D. Go, J.-P. Hanke, P. M. Buhl, F. Freimuth, G. Bihlmayer, H.-W. Lee, Y. Mokrousov, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Toward surface orbitronics: giant orbital magnetism from the orbital Rashba effect at the surface of sp-metals, Sci. Rep. 7, 1 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    V. T. Phong, Z. Addison, S. Ahn, H. Min, R. Agarwal, and E. Mele, Optically controlled orbitronics on a trian- gular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 236403 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    D. Go, D. Jo, H.-W. Lee, M. Kl¨ aui, and Y. Mokrousov, Orbitronics: orbital currents in solids, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 135, 37001 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    G. Sala, H. Wang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Or- bital Hanle magnetoresistance in a 3 d transition metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 156703 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. D. Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  15. [23]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    ˇSmejkal, Y

    L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, B. Yan, and A. H. Mac- Donald, Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 242 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    D. Go, K. Ando, A. Pezo, S. Bl¨ ugel, A. Manchon, and Y. Mokrousov, Orbital pumping by magnetization dy- namics in ferromagnets, arXiv:2309.14817 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hayashi and K

    H. Hayashi and K. Ando, Observation of orbital pump- ing, arXiv:2304.05266 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Hohenadler, T

    M. Hohenadler, T. Lang, and F. Assaad, Correlation ef- fects in quantum spin-Hall insulators: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 100403 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    Hohenadler, Z

    M. Hohenadler, Z. Meng, T. Lang, S. Wessel, A. Mu- ramatsu, and F. Assaad, Quantum phase transitions in the Kane-Mele-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 85, 115132 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Hutchinson, P

    J. Hutchinson, P. W. Klein, and K. Le Hur, Analyti- cal approach for the Mott transition in the Kane-Mele- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075120 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    X. Liu, Y. He, C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Gate-tunable antiferromagnetic Chern insula- tor in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 146401 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Y. Gong, J. Guo, J. Li, K. Zhu, M. Liao, X. Liu, Q. Zhang, L. Gu, L. Tang, X. Feng, et al., Experimental realization of an intrinsic magnetic topological insulator, Chinese Physics Letters 36, 076801 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    M. M. Otrokov, I. I. Klimovskikh, H. Bentmann, D. Es- tyunin, A. Zeugner, Z. S. Aliev, S. Gaß, A. Wolter, A. Ko- roleva, A. M. Shikin, et al., Prediction and observation of an antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nature 576, 416 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Chang, C.-X

    C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu, and A. H. MacDonald, Collo- quium: Quantum anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011002 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    X. Chen, A. Ruiz, A. J. Bishop, B. Gunn, R. Basak, T. Zhu, Y. He, M. Vranas, E. Weschke, R. K. Kawakami, et al., Antiferromagnetic order in the layered magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Se4 probed by resonant soft x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184418 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Gong and X

    C. Gong and X. Zhang, Two-dimensional magnetic crys- tals and emergent heterostructure devices, Science 363, eaav4450 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    D. L. Cortie, G. L. Causer, K. C. Rule, H. Fritzsche, W. Kreuzpaintner, and F. Klose, Two-dimensional mag- nets: forgotten history and recent progress towards spin- tronic applications, Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1901414 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    V. P. Ningrum, B. Liu, W. Wang, Y. Yin, Y. Cao, C. Zha, H. Xie, X. Jiang, Y. Sun, S. Qin, et al., Recent ad- vances in two-dimensional magnets: Physics and devices towards spintronic applications, Research 2020 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Y. Yao, X. Zhan, M. G. Sendeku, P. Yu, F. T. Dajan, C. Zhu, N. Li, J. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Wang, et al., Re- cent progress on emergent two-dimensional magnets and heterostructures, Nanotechnology 32, 472001 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Olsen, E

    T. Olsen, E. Andersen, T. Okugawa, D. Torelli, T. Deil- mann, and K. S. Thygesen, Discovering two-dimensional topological insulators from high-throughput computa- tions, Phys. Rev. Materials 3, 024005 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Marrazzo, M

    A. Marrazzo, M. Gibertini, D. Campi, N. Mounet, and N. Marzari, Relative abundance ofZ2 topological order in exfoliable two-dimensional insulators, Nano Letters 19, 8431 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Choudhary, K

    K. Choudhary, K. F. Garrity, J. Jiang, R. Pachter, and F. Tavazza, Computational search for magnetic and non- magnetic 2D topological materials using unified spin– orbit spillage screening, npj Comput. Mater. 6, 1 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals het- erostructures, Nature 499, 419 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf, Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials, Nature 603, 41 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Bonbien, F

    V. Bonbien, F. Zhuo, A. Salimath, O. Ly, A. Abbout, and A. Manchon, Topological aspects of antiferromag- nets, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 55, 103002 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    J. Han, R. Cheng, L. Liu, H. Ohno, and S. Fukami, Co- herent antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater.22, 684 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    M. O. Ellis, R. F. Evans, T. A. Ostler, J. Barker, U. Atxi- tia, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, and R. W. Chantrell, The Landau–Lifshitz equation in atomistic models, Low Tem- perature Physics 41, 705 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    [65–68] are cited

    See Supplemental Materials for details of spin-torque induced spin precession, geometrical pumping in ferro- magnetic case, and boundary-dependent pumping where Refs. [65–68] are cited

  40. [48]

    S. I. Kiselev, J. Sankey, I. Krivorotov, N. Emley, R. Schoelkopf, R. Buhrman, and D. Ralph, Microwave oscillations of a nanomagnet driven by a spin-polarized current, nature 425, 380 (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    Cheng, M

    R. Cheng, M. W. Daniels, J.-G. Zhu, and D. Xiao, Ul- trafast switching of antiferromagnets via spin-transfer torque, Phys. Rev. B 91, 064423 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Cheng, D

    R. Cheng, D. Xiao, and A. Brataas, Terahertz antiferro- magnetic spin Hall nano-oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 207603 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Takeuchi, Y

    Y. Takeuchi, Y. Yamane, J.-Y. Yoon, R. Itoh, B. Jinnai, S. Kanai, J. Ieda, S. Fukami, and H. Ohno, Chiral-spin rotation of non-collinear antiferromagnet by spin-orbit torque, Nat. Mater. 20, 1364 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    G. Q. Yan, S. Li, H. Lu, M. Huang, Y. Xiao, L. Wern- ert, J. A. Brock, E. E. Fullerton, H. Chen, H. Wang, et al., Quantum sensing and imaging of spin–orbit- torque-driven spin dynamics in the non-collinear antifer- romagnet Mn3Sn, Adv. Mater. 34, 2200327 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Trifunovic, S

    L. Trifunovic, S. Ono, and H. Watanabe, Geometric or- bital magnetization in adiabatic processes, Phys. Rev. B 7 100, 054408 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Dong and Q

    L. Dong and Q. Niu, Geometrodynamics of electrons in a crystal under position and time-dependent deformation, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115162 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    C. Xiao, Y. Ren, and B. Xiong, Adiabatically induced orbital magnetization, Phys. Rev. B 103, 115432 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Y. Ren, C. Xiao, D. Saparov, and Q. Niu, Phonon mag- netic moment from electronic topological magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 186403 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    L. Brey, H. Fertig, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and A. MacDonald, Skyrme crystal in a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2562 (1995)

    1995

  50. [58]

    Freimuth, R

    F. Freimuth, R. Bamler, Y. Mokrousov, and A. Rosch, Phase-space Berry phases in chiral mag- nets: Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and the charge of skyrmions, Phys. Rev. B 88, 214409 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Michel, A

    S. Michel, A. F¨ unfhaus, R. Quade, R. Valent ´ ı, and M. Potthoff, Bound states and local topological phase diagram of classical impurity spins coupled to a Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. B 109, 155116 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Thouless, Quantization of particle transport, Phys

    D. Thouless, Quantization of particle transport, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083 (1983)

    1983

  53. [61]

    X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Fractional charge and quantized current in the quantum spin Hall state, Nat. Phys. 4, 273 (2008)

    2008

  54. [62]

    King-Smith and D

    R. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  55. [63]

    Vanderbilt and R

    D. Vanderbilt and R. King-Smith, Electric polarization as a bulk quantity and its relation to surface charge, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4442 (1993)

    1993

  56. [64]

    Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Rep

    S. Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 116501 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    A. G. Gurevich and G. A. Melkov, Magnetization oscillations and waves (CRC press, 2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    Cheng, J

    R. Cheng, J. Xiao, Q. Niu, and A. Brataas, Spin pumping and spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 057601 (2014)

    2014

  59. [67]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  60. [68]

    Y. Ren, Z. Qiao, and Q. Niu, Engineering corner states from two-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166804 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.