REVIEW 1 cited by
1-Lipschitz Layers Compared: Memory, Speed, and Certifiable Robustness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The robustness of neural networks against input perturbations with bounded magnitude represents a serious concern in the deployment of deep learning models in safety-critical systems. Recently, the scientific community has focused on enhancing certifiable robustness guarantees by crafting 1-Lipschitz neural networks that leverage Lipschitz bounded dense and convolutional layers. Although different methods have been proposed in the literature to achieve this goal, understanding the performance of such methods is not straightforward, since different metrics can be relevant (e.g., training time, memory usage, accuracy, certifiable robustness) for different applications. For this reason, this work provides a thorough theoretical and empirical comparison between methods by evaluating them in terms of memory usage, speed, and certifiable robust accuracy. The paper also provides some guidelines and recommendations to support the user in selecting the methods that work best depending on the available resources. We provide code at https://github.com/berndprach/1LipschitzLayersCompared.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Enhancing Certified Robustness via Block Reflector Orthogonal Layers and Logit Annealing Loss
Block Reflector Orthogonal layers plus a logit annealing loss achieve state-of-the-art certified l2 robustness on CIFAR-10/100, Tiny-ImageNet, and ImageNet.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.