Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Occurrence of Non-Stationarity at Earth's Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Analyzing 521 crossings of Earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock, this paper reports ion phase-space holes in 65% of crossings, with the rate corrected for fast crossings estimated near 90%.

desk verdict First solid statistical census of ion phase-space holes at the quasi-perpendicular bow shock, but the type I/II classification needs direct validation before the 65% rate is taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13817 v1 pith:FE7R4PQC submitted 2025-07-18 physics.space-ph physics.plasm-ph

Ajay Lotekar , Yuri V. Khotyaintsev , Daniel B. Graham , Andrew Dimmock , Andreas Johlander , Ahmad Lalti This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.space-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords bowshockcollisionlessnon-stationarityionphase-spaceholesripplesMagnetosphericMultiscalequasi-perpendicularMachnumberdependence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how often Earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock is genuinely non-stationary, meaning its surface ripples and reforms, rather than a fixed structure. Analyzing 521 crossings by the Magnetospheric Multiscale mission, the authors detect ion phase-space holes, the observational signature of surface ripples, in 65% of crossings. Because slow shocks in the spacecraft frame reveal holes more readily, they estimate the true occurrence rate is near 90%. If correct, the result means a quasi-perpendicular bow shock at nominal solar-wind conditions is usually rippled, and spacecraft measurements of its ramp and foot must be interpreted as time-varying structures.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is an automated phase-space-hole detector applied to reduced one-dimensional ion velocity distributions. A phase-space hole is a local minimum in the velocity distribution along the shock normal, appearing as a closed contour; it forms between the incident and reflected ion populations near the reflection point. The method distinguishes a type-I hole, which a stationary shock would produce as a spacecraft crosses it once and which is open on the upstream side, from a type-II hole, which is a symmetric closed contour produced by the spacecraft's oscillating motion relative to a rippled shock surface. The detector keeps only closed contours that are not too narrow or wide, whose geometric center lies inside the contour, and that are shared with at least one nearby similarly shaped contour. Observing even one type-II hole is taken as evidence of non-stationarity, since a rippled surface lets the spacecraft cross the reflection point more than once.

What would settle it

Take a random subset of the 521 crossings and have the contours blindly classified by symmetry, comparing how open the upstream side is with the downstream side against the automated routine's type labels; if most single-hole events are asymmetric, the 65% raw rate and the ~90% corrected estimate are inflated. Alternatively, run the detector on synthetic single-spacecraft crossings through a stationary shock in a particle-in-cell simulation with the same noise levels; if it produces comparable symmetric closed contours, the signature is not uniquely non-stationary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that non-stationarity is the rule, not the exception, for Earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock. Phase-space holes, closed minima in the reduced ion velocity distribution along the shock normal, are found in 65% of the 521 crossings studied. The probability of seeing a hole rises with Alfvén Mach number for $3 \lesssim M_A \lesssim 7$ and saturates near 70% for $M_A > 7$; no clear dependence on shock angle $\theta_{Bn}$, upstream speed, or upstream ion $\beta$ is found. The fraction of crossings showing holes increases with the time the spacecraft spends in the shock, and for the slowest crossings, where detection is least biased, the occurrence is near 90%. The authors conclude that a quasi-perpendicular bow shock with $M_A > 3$ is typically non-stationary.

Load-bearing premise

The whole estimate rests on the assumption that every closed contour the automated routine keeps is a symmetric type-II hole caused by a rippled shock surface, rather than an apparent hole created by a single traversal of a stationary shock.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $M_A > 3$ quasi-perpendicular bow shock crossings, the standard 'steady shock' interpretation should be abandoned in favor of a rippled, time-dependent surface.
  • Statistical shock surveys that rely on single crossings will undercount non-stationarity; only slow crossings or multi-spacecraft methods reveal it.
  • The ramp and foot thicknesses and the electron heating scales derived from single crossings mix spatial structure with temporal oscillations in the local shock speed.
  • Since phase-space-hole occurrence saturates at large $M_A$ and does not depend on $\theta_{Bn}$, the ripple mechanism likely operates across the quasi-perpendicular bow shock regardless of position, flank or subsolar.
  • Interplanetary shocks moving fast in the spacecraft frame may ripple as well, but the holes would be missed; their apparent stationarity is not evidence against rippling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A clean test of the paper's mechanism would be to compare, on the same crossings, the $B_n$ oscillations that ripple theory predicts with the automated phase-space-hole detections; the paper notes this is left to case studies.
  • The same contour-based search applied to Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe data on high-Mach interplanetary shocks could separate true stationarity from a crossing-speed artifact, since those shocks are often faster in the spacecraft frame.
  • If the ~90% rate holds, local ramp speed estimates from single spacecraft crossings will need to incorporate ripple-induced oscillations, which may change published scalings of electron heating at the bow shock.
  • The detector's fixed 0.2-10 second width window sets an implicit ripple scale; varying the window on synthetic crossings would show how much of the 65% is an instrument-cadence effect rather than a physical occurrence rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 521 MMS burst-mode crossings of Earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock to statistically determine how often the shock is non-stationary, using ion phase-space holes (PSHs) as the observational signature. An automated contour-based detector identifies at least one PSH in 65% of crossings; the detection rate rises with Alfvén Mach number and saturates near 70% for MA > 7, while the detectability strongly depends on the spacecraft-frame shock speed/crossing time. From the slowest crossings the authors extrapolate a true occurrence rate of roughly 90% and conclude that the quasi-perpendicular bow shock is predominantly non-stationary for MA > 3.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is the first large statistical demonstration that rippling/non-stationarity is the typical state of Earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock, with important implications for interpreting shock structure, ion reflection, and energy dissipation. The paper uses a large public MMS burst dataset, an automated procedure, and publicly available data/software, which are strengths. The main result, however, rests entirely on the automated PSH detector, whose physical selectivity for non-stationary (type II) signatures over stationary (type I) crossings is not validated. The paper also introduces a quantitative ~90% 'true occurrence' estimate without a formal detection-bias model. These issues make the current evidence suggestive rather than conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, steps 5-6; Figure 3c] The automated detector does not operationalize the type I/type II symmetry distinction that Section 2 itself identifies as 'a critical difference.' The preceding text states that type I yields an asymmetric PSH that is open on the upstream side, while type II yields a symmetric closed PSH. Steps 5 and 6, however, filter only on contour closedness, width (0.2-10 s), center location, and nestedness; no measure of upstream/downstream symmetry or openness is computed. A single closed contour produced by a stationary crossing could therefore be counted as a type II event if it survives the 'open contour' removal after Gaussian smoothing and the chosen contour level. Since Figure 3c shows that most positive events have N_H = 1, this ambiguity directly affects the headline 65% occurrence rate and the conclusion that the bow shock is predominantly non-stationary. The paper provides no validation of the detector against manually labeled events or synthetic VDFs to quantify the false-positive rate. This is the load-bearing issue for the paper's central claim.
  2. [Section 5; Figure 3d/3e] The statement 'we estimate the occurrence rate of ion holes ... to be ~90%' is presented as a quantitative conclusion, but the paper offers no detection-efficiency model. The estimate is based on the behavior of P_H for the slowest moving shocks, yet no asymptotic value, functional fit, or confidence interval is given, and the text does not specify which bins in Figure 3d/e are used or how the 90% number is obtained. If this corrected rate is to appear in the abstract and conclusions, the authors must derive it from an explicit model of detection probability versus V_sh or Δt, with uncertainty propagation. As written, the 90% estimate is an unquantified extrapolation.
  3. [Section 3, Figure 4b] The claim 'P_H = 0 for M_A < 3' is based on only five shocks, all from a single CME encounter (Graham et al., 2024; Graham & Khotyaintsev, 2025). These five events are not a random sample of the low-Mach-number bow shock population, and the binomial 95% confidence interval for 0 detections out of 5 spans roughly 0-52%. The text in Section 4 and Conclusion 4 states this as a definitive result ('P_H = 0 for M_A <3' and 'sharply increases for 3 < M_A < 7'). The authors should qualify the statement as based on five non-representative CME shocks and provide the confidence interval or omit the M_A<3 bin from the trend claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The headline '65% of cases' should be accompanied by a confidence interval (e.g., the binomial 95% CI for n=521 is approximately 61-69%). This would also set a standard for the binned probabilities in Figures 3d-3g and 4.
  2. [Section 2, step 5] Step 5 lists two items labeled 'c)': 'remove contours that are too narrow' and 'remove contours that are too wide.' Renumber them (c) and (d) and renumber the subsequent conditions. Also, step 5e ('require that a contour is not isolated so that contours share at least two center points from all identified contours') is hard to parse; please reword to clarify whether a single PSH requires at least two nested contours sharing a center point.
  3. [Section 2, step 3] The manual selection of the crossing time is a potential source of bias. Please state whether the selection was performed before running the detector, whether the selector was blinded to the PSH count, and whether a second observer reproduced the selections for a subset of events.
  4. [Figure 2] The white contour lines over the color plots are difficult to see in several panels. Increasing line width or using a contrasting color (e.g., black with white outline) would improve readability.
  5. [References] There are two Khotyaintsev et al. (2024) entries with identical author lists: one is the irfu-matlab software (Zenodo) and the other is the Physical Review Letters paper. Please disambiguate, e.g., as Khotyaintsev et al. (2024a) and (2024b) in the text and reference list.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 65% occurrence statistic is an independent measurement, and the supporting PSH-ripple link is cited from externally checkable prior case studies rather than fitted here.

full rationale

The claimed result is a measured frequency, not a derived quantity. The 65% occurrence is obtained by applying a fixed contour-detection algorithm (Section 2, steps 1-7; thresholds 0.2-10 s, 60% maxima rule, shared centers) to 521 independently selected MMS crossings from the Lalti et al. (2022) database; none of these thresholds are solved from, or calibrated against, the 65% rate or the Mach-number trend, so the headline statistic is not equivalent to a fitted input. The ~90% 'true' occurrence is presented in Section 5 as an estimate 'based on the occurrence rates for the slowest moving shocks in the spacecraft frame,' i.e., an explicit extrapolation under a stated resolution assumption, not a renaming of a fitted parameter. The only load-bearing prior knowledge is the physical association of ion PSHs with ripples/non-stationarity, imported from Johlander et al. (2016, 2018) and framed in Section 2 with an independent geometric argument (type II = symmetric closed hole from out-in motion); because that association is externally checkable case-study evidence and not a parameter fit in this paper, citing it is legitimate support rather than circular reduction. The paper also flags its own limitations—fast crossings may hide PSHs, and separating ripple PSHs from whistler/standing-wave PSHs 'is challenging'—which are robustness/validation concerns, not self-referential derivations. The reviewer's type-I/type-II symmetry concern is a classification-validation gap: the automated steps filter on closedness, width, center and nesting, but do not explicitly verify the upstream-downstream symmetry used as the physical discriminator. That could bias the 65% estimate, but it does not make any stated result equal to its own input by construction. Hence no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a domain assumption that phase-space holes are faithful indicators of shock rippling, plus several instrumental and modeling assumptions. The main free parameters are the automated detection thresholds, which directly set the reported occurrence rates. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Gaussian filter smoothing scale = not specified
    Applied to all reduced VDFs in Step 2 of Section 2; fixed but unreported value affects contour identification and thus PH.
  • Contour filtering thresholds (width 0.2-10 s, 60% maxima, shared center-point criterion) = 0.2 s, 10 s, 60%, >=2 shared centers
    Hand-chosen in Step 5 of Section 2; these determine which closed contours count as PSHs and directly set the occurrence rate.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Closed contours (holes) in the 1D reduced ion VDF are produced by the spacecraft crossing a rippled, non-stationary shock (type II), not by a single traversal of a stationary shock.
    Invoked in Section 2 when interpreting PSHs as evidence of non-stationarity; based on case studies Johlander et al. (2016, 2018) with overlapping authorship.
  • domain assumption The MMS shock database of Lalti et al. (2022) supplies accurate shock normals, MA, theta_Bn, and upstream parameters for all 521 crossings.
    The database is built from a CNN classifier and Farris model normals; no independent validation is provided here.
  • domain assumption Gosling-Thomsen shock speed estimates are reliable enough for the detection-bias correction.
    Used in Figure 3e to infer that fast crossings hide PSHs; foot width assumptions could bias the speed.
  • ad hoc to paper The five low-MA CME shocks are representative of the MA<3 regime.
    Only five shocks, all from one CME interval, used to claim PH=0 for MA<3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Occurrence of Non-Stationarity at Earth's Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FE7R4PQC

@misc{pith2026250713817,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Occurrence of Non-Stationarity at Earth's Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FE7R4PQC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13817}
}
abstract

Collisionless shocks can exhibit non-stationary behavior even under steady upstream conditions, forming a complex transition region. Ion phase-space holes, linked to shock self-reformation and surface ripples, are a signature of this non-stationarity. We statistically analyze their occurrence using 521 crossings of Earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock. Phase-space holes appear in 65% of cases, though the actual rate may be higher as the holes may not be resolved during fast shock crossings. The occurrence rate peaks at 70% for shocks with Alfv\'en Mach numbers $M_A>7$. These findings suggest that Earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock is predominantly non-stationary.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13817 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of ion reflection by a perpendicular shock. The ion trajectory is shown in red, and the spacecraft trajectory for a non-stationary (rippled) shock is shown in blue. motivation of this study to take a statistical approach to this problem. The following section will investigate the relationship between PSHs and fundamental shock param￾eters. –5– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Statistics of PSHs of the 521 shock crossings. (a) and (b) Histograms of the number of shock crossings versus MA and θBn. (c) Histogram of the number PSHs observed for each shock. The red line is the cumulative sum. (d) and (e) PH versus the shock crossing time ∆t and the shock speed in the spacecraft frame Vsh. The numbers above each bin indicate the number of shocks in each bin. (f) and (g) Scatter plots of the ve… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dependence of ion hole observations versus shock parameters. (a) PH versus θBn, (b) PH versus MA, (c) PH versus MA/Mnw, (d) PH versus upstream βi, (e) PH versus upstream magnetic field strength Bu, and (f) PH versus upstream Vi. The numbers above each bin indicate the …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    APACrefauthors \ 2013

    bell2013cosmic APACrefauthors Bell, A R. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Cosmic ray acceleration Cosmic ray acceleration . Astroparticle Physics 43 56--70

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    APACrefauthors \ 2006 10

    burgess2006_interpreting_multipoint APACrefauthors Burgess , D. APACrefauthors \ 2006 10 . Interpreting multipoint observations of substructure at the quasi-perpendicular bow shock: Simulations Interpreting multipoint observations of substructure at the quasi-perpendicular bow shock: Simulations . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 111 A10 A1...

    work page doi:10.1029/2006ja011691 2006

  3. [3]

    , Hellinger, P

    burgess2016 APACrefauthors Burgess, D. , Hellinger, P. , Gingell, I. \ Trávníček, P M. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Microstructure in two- and three-dimensional hybrid simulations of perpendicular collisionless shocks Microstructure in two- and three-dimensional hybrid simulations of perpendicular collisionless shocks . Journal of Plasma Physics 82 4 905820401...

    doi:10.1017/s0022377816000660 2016

  4. [4]

    \ Scholer, M

    Burgess2006shock APACrefauthors Burgess, D. \ Scholer, M. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Shock front instability associated with reflected ions at the perpendicular shock Shock front instability associated with reflected ions at the perpendicular shock . Physics of Plasmas 14 1 012108 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1063/1.2435317 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1063/1.2435317 2007

  5. [5]

    , Gedalin , M

    dimmock2023 APACrefauthors Dimmock , A P. , Gedalin , M. , Lalti , A. , Trotta , D. , Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Graham , D B. Wimmer-Schweingruber , R F. APACrefauthors \ 2023 11 . Backstreaming ions at a high Mach number interplanetary shock. Solar Orbiter measurements during the nominal mission phase Backstreaming ions at a high Mach number interplanetary s...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/2023 2023

  6. [6]

    , Russell , C T

    dimmock2019direct APACrefauthors Dimmock , A P. , Russell , C T. , Sagdeev , R Z. , Krasnoselskikh , V. , Walker , S N. , Carr , C. Balikhin , M A. APACrefauthors \ 2019 02 . Direct evidence of nonstationary collisionless shocks in space plasmas Direct evidence of nonstationary collisionless shocks in space plasmas . Science Advances 5 2 eaau9926 . APACre...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau9926 2019

  7. [7]

    , Petrinec, S

    farris1991thickness APACrefauthors Farris, M H. , Petrinec, S. \ Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 1991 . The thickness of the magnetosheath: Constraints on the polytropic index The thickness of the magnetosheath: Constraints on the polytropic index . Geophysical Research Letters 18 10 1821--1824

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    , Giles, B L

    mms1fpidismomsbrst APACrefauthors Gershman, D J. , Giles, B L. , Pollock, C J. , Moore, T E. \ Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 1 . MMS 1 Fast Plasma Investigation, Dual Ion Spectrometer (FPI, DIS) Distribution Moments, Level 2 (L2), Burst Mode, 0.15 s Data [Dataset] MMS 1 Fast Plasma Investigation, Dual Ion Spectrometer (FPI, DIS) Distribution Moments, ...

    work page doi:10.48322/qggf-vr83 2022

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    , Giles, B L

    mms1fpidisdistbrst APACrefauthors Gershman, D J. , Giles, B L. , Pollock, C J. , Moore, T E. \ Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 2 . MMS 1 Fast Plasma Investigation, Dual Ion Spectrometer (FPI, DIS) Instrument Distributions, Level 2 (L2), Burst Mode, 0.15 s Data [Dataset] MMS ...

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    , Schwartz , S J

    gingell2017_MMS_bservations APACrefauthors Gingell , I. , Schwartz , S J. , Burgess , D. , Johlander , A. , Russell , C T. , Burch , J L. Wilder , F. APACrefauthors \ 2017 11 . MMS Observations and Hybrid Simulations of Surface Ripples at a Marginally Quasi-Parallel Shock MMS ...

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    \ Thomsen, M F

    gosling1985specularly APACrefauthors Gosling, J T. \ Thomsen, M F. APACrefauthors \ 1985 . Specularly reflected ions, shock foot thicknesses, and shock velocity determinations in space Specularly reflected ions, shock foot thicknesses, and shock velocity determinations in spac...

    1985 doi

  4. [12]

    \ Khotyaintsev, Y V

    graham2025_Structure_and_Kinetic APACrefauthors Graham, D B. \ Khotyaintsev, Y V. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . The Structure and Kinetic Ion Behavior of Low Mach Number Shocks The structure and kinetic ion behavior of low mach number shocks . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space ...

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    , Khotyaintsev, Y V

    graham2024_ion_dynamics_across APACrefauthors Graham, D B. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Dimmock, A P. , Lalti, A. , Boldú, J J. , Tigik, S F. \ Fuselier, S A. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Ion Dynamics Across a Low Mach Number Bow Shock Ion Dynamics Across a Low Mach Number Bow Shock . Jo...

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    , Vink, J

    helder_observational_2012 APACrefauthors Helder, E A. , Vink, J. , Bykov, A M. , Ohira, Y. , Raymond, J C. \ Terrier, R. APACrefauthors \ 2012 11 . Observational Signatures of Particle Acceleration in Supernova Remnants Observational Signatures of Particle Acceleration in Supe...

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    , Khotyaintsev, Y V

    johlander2023 APACrefauthors Johlander, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Dimmock, A P. , Graham, D B. \ Lalti, A. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Electron Heating Scales in Collisionless Shocks Measured by MMS Electron Heating Scales in Collisionless Shocks Measured by MMS . Geophysical Rese...

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    , Schwartz, S J

    Johlander2016rippled APACrefauthors Johlander, A. , Schwartz, S J. , Vaivads, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Gingell, I. , Peng, I B. Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2016 Oct . Rippled Quasiperpendicular Shock Observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft Rippled quasiperpendic...

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    , Vaivads, A

    Johlander2018 APACrefauthors Johlander, A. , Vaivads, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Gingell, I. , Schwartz, S J. , Giles, B L. Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 2018 nov . Shock ripples observed by the MMS spacecraft: ion reflection and dispersive properties Shock ripples observed by...

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    APACrefauthors \ 2013 06

    jokipii_heliospheric_2013 APACrefauthors Jokipii, J R. APACrefauthors \ 2013 06 . The Heliospheric Termination Shock The Heliospheric Termination Shock . Space Science Reviews 176 1 115--124 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9914-0 APACrefDOI

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    , Vaivads, A

    khotyaintsev_2024_11550091 APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev, Y. , Vaivads, A. , Johansson, E P G. , Nilsson, T. , Karlsson, J. , Graham, D. Lindberg, M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 . irfu/irfu-matlab: v1.16.3 [Software]. irfu/irfu-matlab: v1.16.3 [software]. Zenodo . APACrefDOI doi:10...

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    , Graham , D B

    khotyaintsev2024ionreflectionrippledperpendicular APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Graham , D B. \ Johlander , A. APACrefauthors \ 2024 11 . Ion Reflection by a Rippled Perpendicular Shock Ion Reflection by a Rippled Perpendicular Shock . Physical Review Letters 133 21 215...

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    \ Papitashvili, N E

    King2005Sol APACrefauthors King, J H. \ Papitashvili, N E. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly wind and ace plasma and magnetic field d...

    2005 doi

  14. [22]

    , Lemb \`e ge , B

    krasnoselskikh2002nonstationarity APACrefauthors Krasnoselskikh , V. , Lemb \`e ge , B. , Savoini , P. \ Lobzin , V V. APACrefauthors \ 2002 04 . Nonstationarity of strong collisionless quasiperpendicular shocks: Theory and full particle numerical simulations Nonstationarity o...

    2002 doi

  15. [23]

    , Khotyaintsev, Y V

    lalti2022database APACrefauthors Lalti, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Dimmock, A P. , Johlander, A. , Graham, D B. \ Olshevsky, V. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . A Database of MMS Bow Shock Crossings Compiled Using Machine Learning A database of mms bow shock crossings compiled using mac...

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    , Khotyaintsev , Y V

    lalti2022whistler APACrefauthors Lalti , A. , Khotyaintsev , Y V. , Graham , D B. , Vaivads , A. , Steinvall , K. \ Russell , C T. APACrefauthors \ 2022 05 . Whistler Waves in the Foot of Quasi-Perpendicular Supercritical Shocks Whistler Waves in the Foot of Quasi-Perpendicula...

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    \ Dawson, J

    lembege1987self APACrefauthors Lembege, B. \ Dawson, J. APACrefauthors \ 1987 . Self-consistent study of a perpendicular collisionless and nonresistive shock Self-consistent study of a perpendicular collisionless and nonresistive shock . The Physics of fluids 30 6 1767--1788

    1987

  18. [26]

    \ Dawson, J M

    Lembege1989form APACrefauthors Lembege, B. \ Dawson, J M. APACrefauthors \ 1989 Jun . Formation of double layers within an oblique collisionless shock Formation of double layers within an oblique collisionless shock . Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 2683--2686 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1103/Phy...

    1989 doi

  19. [27]

    , Krasnoselskikh, V V

    lobzin2007 APACrefauthors Lobzin, V V. , Krasnoselskikh, V V. , Bosqued, J M. , Pinçon, J L. , Schwartz, S J. \ Dunlop, M. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Nonstationarity and reformation of high-Mach-number quasiperpendicular shocks: Cluster observations Nonstationarity and reformatio...

    2007 doi

  20. [28]

    , Desai, M I

    madanian_dynamics_2020 APACrefauthors Madanian, H. , Desai, M I. , Schwartz, S J. , Wilson III, L B. , Fuselier, S A. , Burch, J L. Lindqvist, P A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 11 . The Dynamics of a High Mach Number Quasi - Perpendicular Shock : MMS Observations The Dynamics of a Hi...

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    , Burgess, D

    Moullard2006Ripples APACrefauthors Moullard, O. , Burgess, D. , Horbury, T S. \ Lucek, E A. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Ripples observed on the surface of the Earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock Ripples observed on the surface of the earth's quasi-perpendicular bow shock . Journ...

    2006 doi

  22. [30]

    , Khotyaintsev, Y V

    Olshevsky2021Auto APACrefauthors Olshevsky, V. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Lalti, A. , Divin, A. , Delzanno, G L. , Anderzén, S. Markidis, S. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Automated Classification of Plasma Regions Using 3D Particle Energy Distributions Automated classification of plasma...

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    , Matsumoto , H

    omura1996_electron_beam APACrefauthors Omura , Y. , Matsumoto , H. , Miyake , T. \ Kojima , H. APACrefauthors \ 1996 02 . Electron beam instabilities as generation mechanism of electrostatic solitary waves in the magnetotail Electron beam instabilities as generation mechanism ...

    1996 doi

  24. [32]

    , Moore, T

    pollock_fast_2016 APACrefauthors Pollock, C. , Moore, T. , Jacques, A. , Burch, J. , Gliese, U. , Saito, Y. Zeuch, M. APACrefauthors \ 2016 03 . Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale . Space Science Revi...

    2016 doi

  25. [33]

    APACrefauthors \ 1985

    russell1985planetary APACrefauthors Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 1985 . Planetary bow shocks Planetary bow shocks . Collisionless Shocks in the Heliosphere: Reviews of Current Research, Geophys. Monogr. Ser 35 109--130

    1985

  26. [34]

    , Anderson, B J

    russell_magnetospheric_2016 APACrefauthors Russell, C T. , Anderson, B J. , Baumjohann, W. , Bromund, K R. , Dearborn, D. , Fischer, D. Richter, I. APACrefauthors \ 2016 03 . The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers . Space Scienc...

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    , Hoppe, M M

    russell_overshoots_1982 APACrefauthors Russell, C T. , Hoppe, M M. \ Livesey, W A. APACrefauthors \ 1982 03 . Overshoots in planetary bow shocks Overshoots in planetary bow shocks . Nature 296 5852 45--48 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1038/296045a0 APACrefDOI

    1982 doi

  28. [36]

    , Magnes, W

    mms1fgmbrst APACrefauthors Russell, C T. , Magnes, W. , Wei, H. , Bromund, K R. , Plaschke, F. , Fischer, D. Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . MMS 1 Flux Gate Magnetometer (FGM) DC Magnetic Field, Level 2 (L2), Burst Mode, 128 Sample/s, v4/5 Data [Dataset] MMS 1 Flux Gate Ma...

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    \ Burgess , D

    scholer2007_whistler_waves APACrefauthors Scholer , M. \ Burgess , D. APACrefauthors \ 2007 07 . Whistler waves, core ion heating, and nonstationarity in oblique collisionless shocks Whistler waves, core ion heating, and nonstationarity in oblique collisionless shocks . Physic...

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    , Paschmann, G

    sckopke1983 APACrefauthors Sckopke, N. , Paschmann, G. , Bame, S J. , Gosling, J T. \ Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 1983 . Evolution of ion distributions across the nearly perpendicular bow shock: Specularly and non-specularly reflected-gyrating ions Evolution of ion distribu...

    1983 doi

  31. [39]

    , Larosa, A

    trotta2024 APACrefauthors Trotta, D. , Larosa, A. , Nicolaou, G. , Horbury, T S. , Matteini, L. , Hietala, H. Wimmer-Schweingruber, R F. APACrefauthors \ 2024 feb . Properties of an Interplanetary Shock Observed at 0.07 and 0.7 au by Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter Proper...

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    \ Quest, K B

    Winske1988Mag APACrefauthors Winske, D. \ Quest, K B. APACrefauthors \ 1988 . Magnetic field and density fluctuations at perpendicular supercritical collisionless shocks Magnetic field and density fluctuations at perpendicular supercritical collisionless shocks . Journal of Ge...

    1988 doi

  33. [41]

    \ Kivelson, M G

    Winterhalter1088Obser APACrefauthors Winterhalter, D. \ Kivelson, M G. APACrefauthors \ 1988 . Observations of the Earth's bow shock under high Mach number/high plasma beta solar wind conditions Observations of the earth's bow shock under high mach number/high plasma beta sola...

    1988 doi

  34. [42]

    , Winske , D

    wu1984 APACrefauthors Wu , C S. , Winske , D. , Zhou , Y M. , Tsai , S T. , Rodriguez , P. , Tanaka , M. Goodrich , C C. APACrefauthors \ 1984 . Microinstabilities associated with a high Mach number perpendicular bow shock. Microinstabilities associated with a high Mach number...

    1984 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.