REVIEW 1 cited by
Cortical credit assignment by Hebbian, neuromodulatory and inhibitory plasticity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The cortex learns to make associations between stimuli and spiking activity which supports behaviour. It does this by adjusting synaptic weights. The complexity of these transformations implies that synapses have to change without access to the full error information, a problem typically referred to as "credit-assignment". However, it remains unknown how the cortex solves this problem. We propose that a combination of plasticity rules, 1) Hebbian, 2) acetylcholine-dependent and 3) noradrenaline-dependent excitatory plasticity, together with 4) inhibitory plasticity restoring E/I balance, effectively solves the credit assignment problem. We derive conditions under-which a neuron model can learn a number of associations approaching its theoretical capacity. We confirm our predictions regarding acetylcholine-dependent and inhibitory plasticity by reanalysing experimental data. Our work suggests that detailed cortical E/I balance reduces the dimensionality of the problem of associating inputs with outputs, thereby allowing imperfect "supervision" by neuromodulatory systems to guide learning effectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can Biologically Plausible Temporal Credit Assignment Rules Match BPTT for Neural Similarity? E-prop as an Example
At matched task accuracy, e-prop trained RNNs reach neural data similarity comparable to BPTT trained RNNs on Mante 2013 and Sussillo 2015 datasets, with initialization and architecture influencing similarity more tha...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.