Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Machine learning the nuclear mass

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.02445 v1 pith:FHADIOKE submitted 2021-05-06 nucl-th

Machine learning the nuclear mass

classification nucl-th
keywords nuclearmodelslearningmassnucleimachinetheoreticalmasses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Background: The masses of about 2500 nuclei have been measured experimentally, however more than 7000 isotopes are predicted to exist in the nuclear landscape from H (Z=1) to Og (Z=118) based on various theoretical calculations. Exploring the mass of the remains is a hot topic in nuclear physics. Machine learning has been served as a powerful tool in learning complex representations of big data in many fields. Purpose: We use Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) which is a highly efficient machine learning algorithm to predict the masses of unknown nuclei and to explore the nuclear landscape in neutron-rich side from learning the measured nuclear masses. Results: By using the experimental data of 80 percent of known nuclei as the training dataset, the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the predicted and the experimental binding energy of the remaining 20% is about 0.234 MeV, 0.213 MeV, 0.170 MeV, and 0.222 MeV for the LightGBM-refined LDM, DZ, WS4, and FRDM models, respectively. These values are of about 90%, 65%, 40%, and 60% smaller than the corresponding origin mass models. The RMSD for 66 newly measured nuclei that appeared in AME2020 is also significantly improved on the same foot. One-neutron and two-neutron separation energies predicted by these refined models are in consistence with several theoretical predictions based on various physical models. Conclusions: LightGBM can be used to refine theoretical nuclear mass models so as to predict the binding energy of unknown nuclei. Moreover, the correlation between the input characteristic quantities and the output can be interpreted by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP, a popular explainable artificial intelligence tool), this may provide new insights on developing theoretical nuclear mass models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.