Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quark structure of the X(4500), X(4700) and chi_(rm c)(4P,5P) states

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.00918 v1 pith:FHPUWJYG submitted 2021-04-02 hep-ph

Quark structure of the X(4500), X(4700) and chi_(rm c)(4P,5P) states

classification hep-ph
keywords propertiesstatescompletelymesonsmodelquarkrightarrowthreshold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study some of the main properties (masses and open-flavor strong decay widths) of $4P$ and $5P$ charmonia. While there are two candidates for the $\chi_{\rm c0}(4P,5P)$ states, the $X(4500)$ and $X(4700)$, the properties of the other members of the $\chi_{\rm c}(4P,5P)$ multiplets are still completely unknown. With this in mind, we start to explore the charmonium interpretation for these mesons. Our second goal is to investigate if the apparent mismatch between the Quark Model (QM) predictions for $\chi_{\rm c0}(4P,5P)$ states and the properties of the $X(4500)$ and $X(4700)$ mesons can be overcome by introducing threshold corrections in the QM formalism. According to our coupled-channel model results for the threshold mass shifts, the $\chi_{\rm c0}(5P) \rightarrow X(4700)$ assignment is unacceptable, while the $\chi_{\rm c0}(4P) \rightarrow X(4500)$ or $X(4700)$ assignments cannot be completely ruled out.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.