Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06358 v1 pith:FJI76VL3 submitted 2025-03-08 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords usermethodmodelpersonalizationresponsesrlhfhumanlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern large language models (LLMs) are optimized for human-aligned responses using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). However, existing RLHF approaches assume a universal preference model and fail to account for individual user preferences, limiting their effectiveness in personalized applications. We introduce a framework that extends RLHF to enable user personalization by leveraging the assumption that user preferences lie in a low-dimensional space. Instead of training a separate model per user, we represent user-specific rewards as a linear combination of base reward functions. Using only ~10 user responses, our method can infer user-specific rewards and align LLM outputs accordingly. We validate our approach through experiments with both synthetic and real users, demonstrating significant personalization achieved by our method. In human evaluations, our method achieves a 67% win rate over default GPT-4o responses.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Personalization Meets Safety:Mechanisms,Risks,and Mitigations in Personalized LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that maps safety risks in personalized LLMs, introduces a unified taxonomy, and highlights three structural inadequacies in existing research on user-invariant safety, isolated techniques, and short-term evaluations.

  2. PAFO: Pareto Fairness Optimization for Personalized Reward Modeling

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    PAFO applies Pareto fairness optimization and group-specialized distillation to produce a single personalized reward model that improves accuracy for both majority and minority preference groups without requiring grou...

  3. Pushing Forward Pareto Frontiers of Proactive Agents with Behavioral Agentic Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BAO, a behavior-enhanced SFT plus regularized RL pipeline, improves proactive agents' task performance while lowering user-involvement rate, beating UserRL baselines on three UserRL gym tasks.

Pith tools