Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 66 references

This paper establishes that boundary criticality at the Nishimori point is governed by two conformal boundary fixed points—free and fixed—and that the free boundary exhibits multifractal scaling of spin fields.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:39 UTC pith:FM3G24QI

load-bearing objection Boundary BCFT numerics look credible and are the real contribution; the abstract's three-fixed-point and QEC claims outrun the body, and the F' seam assumption needs a direct check. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.19523 v2 pith:FM3G24QI submitted 2025-12-22 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el

Boundary Criticality at the Nishimori Multicritical Point

Sheng Yang , Xinyu Sun , Shao-Kai Jian This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el
keywords boundary criticalityNishimori pointrandom-bond Ising modelboundary conformal field theoryboundary entropymultifractalitytensor networkboundary condition changing operator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks what happens to boundaries at the Nishimori multicritical point of the two-dimensional random-bond Ising model—a strongly disordered critical point whose bulk is well characterised but whose boundary universality class was previously unknown. Using tensor-network methods that map a cylinder of the classical model with rotated boundary spins to a quantum state, it identifies two conformal boundary fixed points: a free boundary (spin orientation angle θ=0) and a fixed boundary (θ=π/2). The free boundary is shown to be an unstable fixed point (1/ν=0.75(1)), while the fixed boundary is stable; the authors extract boundary entropy S_bdy(π/2)=−0.574(1), boundary-condition-changing dimensions Δ_f±≈0.0446 and Δ_+-≈1.055, and a multifractal spectrum of boundary spin-field exponents at the free boundary, with paired values Δ_1=Δ_2≈0.263, Δ_3=Δ_4≈0.369, Δ_5=Δ_6≈0.436, Δ_7=Δ_8≈0.486. A controlled 6−ε boundary RG calculation complements the numerics, finding equal surface anomalous dimensions for the magnetization and spin-glass fields and a one-loop formula for the multifractal dimensions. If these results are right, they supply the first systematic boundary-conformal-field-theory data for a disordered multicritical point and tie boundary universality to the decoding threshold of quantum error-correcting codes.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the boundary of the 2D random-bond Ising model at its Nishimori multicritical point has two conformal boundary fixed points—free (θ=0) and fixed (θ=π/2)—and that boundary spin fields at the free fixed point exhibit multifractal scaling. A tensor-network construction with a seam-correcting final layer F′ makes wavefunction overlaps equal to RBIM cylinder partition functions with rotated boundary spins, and half-chain von Neumann entropy obey the BCFT twist formula. From this the authors extract boundary entropy S_bdy(π/2)=−0.574(1), stability data (1/ν=0.75(1) at the free fixed point, irrelevant perturbation at the fixed point), and paired multifractal expone

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the tensor-network representation of the RBIM partition function on a cylinder, with a special final-layer transfer matrix F′ that compensates for the missing bonds in the brick-wall pattern. This F′ makes the overlap ⟨Ψ_{θ'}(J2)|Ψ_θ(J1)⟩ exactly proportional to the RBIM partition function on a cylinder with boundary spin orientations θ' and θ, and makes the half-chain von Neumann entropy of |Ψ_θ(J)⟩ equal to a twist-operator expectation in the associated BCFT. The continuous family of boundary conditions is parameterized by the angle θ in the boundary tensor B^θ_σ = cos(π/4−θ/2)δ_{σ,+1} + sin(π/4−θ/2)δ_{σ,−1}, which rotates the boundary spin orientation from free (θ

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the special seam-correcting layer F′ exactly restores the missing bonds of the brick-wall pattern, so the tensor-network state's overlaps and entropies are genuinely the RBIM cylinder partition function and its twist-operator expectation; if F′ is only approximate, the extracted numbers are not universal BCFT data.

What would settle it

In a direct Monte Carlo simulation of the RBIM on a finite cylinder, measure the n-th moments of the boundary spin-spin correlation function for n=1,...,8 and check whether they follow ⟨σ0σ_l⟩_n ∼ L^{-2Δ_n} with the reported Δ_n; a mismatch beyond error bars would refute the multifractal claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The free boundary is unstable (1/ν=0.75(1)) and the fixed boundary stable, so a generic microscopic boundary condition flows to the fixed boundary—any boundary field not tuned to θ=0 will pull the boundary to the fixed-point condition.
  • The extracted boundary data—S_bdy(π/2), Δ_f±, Δ_+−, and the multifractal spectrum—are universal BCFT data for a nonunitary disordered critical point, usable as anchors for resummations of the 6−ε expansion.
  • The numerical confirmation that Δ_{2k−1}=Δ_{2k}, required by the Nishimori gauge symmetry, shows the gauge constraint survives at the boundary and can be used to simplify boundary operator content.
  • The paper's stated connection to quantum error-correcting codes implies that boundary universality class (specifically boundary entropy and b.c.c. dimensions) controls the boundary decoding threshold on the Nishimori line.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The stability pattern (free unstable, fixed stable) suggests that in any physical simulation of the RBIM on a lattice with open boundaries, the boundary will generically be in the fixed-boundary universality class unless a boundary field is fine-tuned to zero; a direct Monte Carlo measurement of the surface magnetization profile on finite cylinders would be a clean, independent test.
  • The paired multifractal spectrum at the free boundary is a signature of the underlying supersymmetry of the Nishimori point; if the supersymmetric CFT description is developed, it could predict the full Δ_n spectrum, and the n≤8 data here would be a benchmark.
  • The one-loop 6−ε formula, combined with the d=2 numerical anchor, could be extrapolated to predict higher-moment boundary exponents (n>8); running the same tensor-network pipeline for n up to, say, 16 would test whether the multifractal spectrum follows the analytic form for all n.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies boundary critical behavior at the two-dimensional Nishimori multicritical point of the random-bond Ising model. Using a tensor-network transfer-matrix construction with a one-parameter family of boundary spin orientations, the authors extract boundary entropies from half-chain von Neumann entropies, identify free and fixed conformal boundary fixed points from data collapse, obtain boundary-condition-changing operator dimensions from wavefunction overlaps, and fit moments of boundary spin-spin correlations to a multifractal spectrum. The paper also quotes a one-loop 6−ϵ boundary RG result and uses it in a Padé interpolation. The central body claims are: (i) the free and fixed boundaries are conformal fixed points, with S_bdy(π/2)=−0.574(1) and 1/ν=0.75(1) at the free fixed point; (ii) the b.c.c. dimensions are Δ_f±≈0.0446(2) and Δ_+−≈1.055(2); (iii) the boundary spin-field moments satisfy Δ_1=Δ_2≈0.263(1), Δ_3=Δ_4≈0.369(1), Δ_5=Δ_6≈0.436(1), Δ_7=Δ_8≈0.486(1).

Significance. If the construction is valid, this is the first systematic BCFT characterization of Nishimori boundary criticality, and the numerical data would be a valuable benchmark: S_bdy(π/2)=−0.574(1), 1/ν=0.75(1), Δ_f±=0.0446(2), Δ_+−=1.055(2), and the multifractal ladder in Eq. (13). The simulations are careful and reasonably extensive (L up to 64, 10^6–10^7 samples, small quoted errors), and the benchmark c_vN≈0.42 is consistent with Ref. [42]. The paper also gives an explicit falsifiable structure: the equality of odd and even moments follows from a gauge-symmetry argument and is confirmed numerically. However, the central pipeline currently rests on an asserted—not derived or checked—final-layer transfer matrix F', and the advertised controlled RG analysis is deferred to a companion paper. These gaps must be closed before the extracted numbers can be treated as universal BCFT data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (7) and Appendix ("The final-layer transfer matrix")] All quantitative claims (S_bdy, b.c.c. dimensions, and the multifractal exponents) are extracted from states |Ψ_θ(J)> defined with the special final layer F'. The Appendix asserts that F' is "uniquely determined" by the requirements that the overlap equals the cylinder partition function (Eq. (17)) and that the Rényi entropy has the twist-operator form, but it does not give a derivation or any independent verification. A microscopic defect line along the seam would also produce logarithmic-in-L behavior with modified coefficients, so the excellent fits in Figs. 2–4 cannot by themselves validate the construction. I request either a full derivation showing that all seam bonds are exactly reproduced, or a direct small-L check of Eq. (17) (and of the analogous F used for |Ψ(J)> in Eq. (11)) against exact RBIM cylinder partition functions for several disorder realizations. This is load-bearin
  2. [Sec. "RG calculation and discussion", Eq. (15)] The abstract and introduction advertise a "controlled renormalization group analysis," but the manuscript contains no derivation. Eq. (15) is asserted, and the sentence "The full derivation of the boundary RG will be presented elsewhere [62]" explicitly defers it. Likewise, the claim "we find η_M̂ = η_Q̂" is stated without any calculation of the surface self-energy or anomalous dimensions. Since Eq. (16) uses Eq. (15) as input for the Padé interpolant, this is not a peripheral remark. The authors should either include the one-loop boundary calculation (at least in an appendix) or clearly reframe Eq. (15) as a conjecture from work in preparation, and adjust the abstract accordingly.
  3. [Abstract vs. body] The abstract claims three conformal boundary fixed points (free, fixed, and random) and "a bridge between boundary universality class and boundary decoding threshold." The body, by contrast, states in the Introduction that "we find two conformal boundary fixed points" and the concluding discussion only mentions possible future generalizations to disordered boundary ensembles and interfaces. No random fixed point is constructed or analyzed, and no quantum error-correcting code threshold is computed. This is not a minor wording issue: the abstract promises results that are absent from the paper. Please either remove these claims or present the missing results.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2(d)] The irrelevant exponent 1/ν_irr≈−0.9 is quoted without a statistical error, and the collapse is shown for L=8,16,24,32 only. Since this exponent is used to conclude that the fixed boundary is stable, please provide an error estimate and, if possible, a stability check with larger L.
  2. [Eq. (16)] Please define ϵ=6−d explicitly where the Padé approximant is introduced. The text switches between d and ϵ, and the reader must infer the relationship from the preceding paragraph.
  3. [Eq. (8) and Fig. 2(a)] The central charge is fitted from only L=8,16,32,64. The values c_vN=0.416(2) and 0.419(2) are consistent with Ref. [42], but the fit range is short; a sentence noting that the extrapolation was checked with the L_y=10L_x aspect ratio would be useful.
  4. [General] The phrase "directly extracts universal boundary data" in the Conclusion overstates the current status, given the unverified F' construction. I suggest softening until the Appendix provides the missing derivation or numerical check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; numerical BCFT data are self-contained, with only a minor deferred self-citation for the complementary RG.

full rationale

The central BCFT extraction is self-contained. The TEBD states are defined by Eq. (7), and the entropy formula Eq. (8) is derived in the Appendix from the standard BCFT twist-operator replica construction, not assumed. The b.c.c. dimensions follow from the overlap ratio Eqs. (9)-(10) and the Appendix's derivation of Delta_ab = h'_ab(0), Eqs. (17)-(22). The multifractal exponents in Eq. (13) are obtained by power-law fits to the conformal chord-length ansatz, Eq. (12). The numerical central charge c_vN ~ 0.42 is benchmarked against Ref. [42], providing an external consistency check. There is no fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction: although the Pade bridge in Eq. (16) uses the measured Delta_1(2) ~ 0.263 as an input, the paper explicitly describes the resulting values as 'representative interpolated values' and disclaims precision, so this is interpolation rather than circular prediction. The one self-citation is Eq. (15), attributed to the in-preparation paper [62] by two of the present authors; the paper states 'The full derivation of the boundary RG will be presented elsewhere [62].' This is an omitted proof and a minor self-citation, but it is not load-bearing for the numerical BCFT data, which are derived independently. The Appendix's assertion that the special last-layer F' is 'uniquely determined' by the path-integral requirements is not accompanied by a derivation, but this is a verification gap, not a circular reduction: the overlap identity Eq. (17) is engineered into F', while the extracted exponents and entropies come from the L-dependence of the TEBD-evolved states, not from the identity itself. Overall, no significant circularity; score 2 reflects only the minor deferred self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central numerical results rest on the standard Nishimori-line mapping and on the tensor-to-BCFT correspondence established (argued) in the appendix. The RG formula is pulled from an unpublished companion paper, which is the weakest 'axiom' in the ledger.

free parameters (3)
  • S_bdy(0) boundary-entropy reference = 0
    The boundary entropy for the free boundary condition is assumed to be zero (S_bdy(theta=0)=0), fixing the additive normalization for all S_bdy(theta) values. This is a convention, not a measurement.
  • L_y = 10 L_x simulation aspect ratio = 10
    The transfer-matrix evolution length is set to L_y = 10 L_x to achieve convergence; this is a numerical choice that could affect whether the steady state is truly asymptotic.
  • Pade coefficients in Eq. (16) = 0.606 and 0.298
    The [1/1] Pade approximant is fixed by matching Delta_1(6)=3, d_eps Delta_1|_eps=0 = -3/2, and Delta_1(2) about 0.263 from the paper's own numerical fit; the resulting coefficients are interpolation parameters, not predictions.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The RBIM at the Nishimori line satisfies e^{-2J}=p/(1-p), and the transition occurs at p_c=0.1092212(4) [43].
    Used for all numerical simulations; if p_c is wrong, the system is not at the Nishimori multicritical point. The value is taken from a very recent preprint [43].
  • domain assumption The tensor-network state |Psi_theta(J)> with the special final layer F' (Eq. 7) has an overlap that equals the RBIM partition function on a cylinder with boundary orientations theta, theta' (Eq. 17), and its reduced density matrix produces the standard replica path integral.
    This is the central mapping between the lattice and the BCFT. It is argued in the appendix but not independently verified.
  • standard math The half-chain von Neumann entropy of the tensor-network state satisfies S_A=(c_vN/6) log L + S_bdy + s_UV (Eq. 8), with the twist-operator scaling dimension h_n = c_vN/12 (n - 1/n).
    Follows from the replica trick and standard BCFT twist-operator scaling, as derived in the appendix using Refs [51,52]; assumes the state is described by a (nonunitary) BCFT in the scaling limit.
  • ad hoc to paper The one-loop boundary RG result Eq. (15) (Delta_{2k-1}(d)=Delta_{2k}(d)=kd/2 + k(2-5k)eps/3 + O(eps^2)) is correct.
    This formula is stated without derivation in this manuscript and attributed to a paper in preparation [62] by the same authors. The paper cannot be checked.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 23368 in / 15940 out tokens · 130490 ms · 2026-08-03T14:39:00.520992+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study boundary criticality at the Nishimori multicritical point of the two-dimensional (2D) random-bond Ising model. Using tensor-network methods, we construct a family of microscopic boundary conditions that incorporates both boundary-spin rotation and boundary disorder. We identify three conformal boundary fixed points, corresponding to free, fixed, and random boundary conditions, and map out the boundary renormalization group flows among them. We extract the corresponding boundary conformal data, including the boundary entropies and the scaling dimensions of boundary primary operators, which characterize the boundary universality class. At the free boundary fixed point, we uncover the multifractal scaling of boundary spin fields. We further complement the numerical results with a controlled renormalization group analysis. Finally, we connect the boundary conformal data to quantum error-correcting codes, establishing a bridge between boundary universality class and boundary decoding threshold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.19523 by Shao-Kai Jian, Sheng Yang, Xinyu Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of the tensor-network method. (a) The parti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Wavefunction overlaps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Moments of the boundary spin-spin correlation function, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left: Tensor-network representation of wavefunction over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    /ZQ4uhoe3Iq6UJWOmtxEGU1Fltc=

    = 0, ands UV is a non-universal constant. The boundary entropyS bdy(θ)can be obtained by calculating the difference 8 16 32 64 L °0.40 °0.35 °0.30 °0.25 logQf± ¢f±=0.0446(2) logQf+ logQf° 8 16 32 64 L °7 °6 °5 °4 °3 logQ+° ¢+°=1.055(2) logQ+° <latexit sha1_base64="/ZQ4uhoe3Iq6UJWOmtxEGU1Fltc=">AAAB6nicbVDLSgNBEOyNrxhfUY9eBoMQL2FXJHoMevEY0TwgWcLspDcZMju7zM...

  2. [2]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior, Nuclear Physics B240, 514 (1984)

    1984

  3. [3]

    J. L. Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the verlinde formula, Nuclear Physics B324, 581 (1989)

    1989

  4. [4]

    J. L. Cardy and D. C. Lewellen, Bulk and boundary operators in conformal field theory, Physics Letters B259, 274 (1991)

    1991

  5. [5]

    ground- state degeneracy

    I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Universal noninteger “ground- state degeneracy” in critical quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 161 (1991)

    1991

  6. [6]

    Friedan and A

    D. Friedan and A. Konechny, Boundary entropy of one- dimensional quantum systems at low temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 030402 (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    Casini, I

    H. Casini, I. Salazar Landea, and G. Torroba, The g- theorem and quantum information theory, JHEP10, 140, arXiv:1607.00390 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Dorey, I

    P. Dorey, I. Runkel, R. Tateo, and G. Watts, g-function flow in perturbed boundary conformal field theories, Nuclear Physics B578, 85 (2000)

    2000

  9. [9]

    Runkel,Boundary Problems in Conformal Field Theory, Ph.d

    I. Runkel,Boundary Problems in Conformal Field Theory, Ph.d. thesis, King’s College London (2000)

    2000

  10. [10]

    Ashida, S

    Y . Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Oshikawa, System- environment entanglement phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B110, 094404 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Chatelain and B

    C. Chatelain and B. Berche, Universality and multifractal be- haviour of spin–spin correlation functions in disordered potts models, Nuclear Physics B572, 626 (2000)

    2000

  12. [12]

    Pal ´agyi, C

    G. Pal ´agyi, C. Chatelain, B. Berche, and F. Igl´oi, Boundary crit- ical behaviour of two-dimensional random potts models, The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems13, 357 (2000)

    2000

  13. [13]

    A. R. Subramaniam, I. A. Gruzberg, A. W. W. Ludwig, F. Ev- ers, A. Mildenberger, and A. D. Mirlin, Surface criticality and multifractality at localization transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 126802 (2006)

    2006

  14. [14]

    Mildenberger, A

    A. Mildenberger, A. R. Subramaniam, R. Narayanan, F. Ev- ers, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. D. Mirlin, Boundary multifractality in critical one-dimensional systems with long-range hopping, Phys. Rev. B75, 094204 (2007)

    2007

  15. [15]

    S. S. Babkin, J. F. Karcher, I. S. Burmistrov, and A. D. Mirlin, Generalized surface multifractality in two-dimensional disor- dered systems, Phys. Rev. B108, 104205 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    A. R. Subramaniam, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Boundary criticality and multifractality at the two-dimensional spin quantum hall transition, Phys. Rev. B78, 245105 (2008)

    2008

  17. [17]

    Obuse, A

    H. Obuse, A. R. Subramaniam, A. Furusaki, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Boundary multifractality at the integer quan- tum hall plateau transition: Implications for the critical theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 116802 (2008)

    2008

  18. [18]

    Nishimori, Exact results and critical properties of the ising model with competing interactions, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13, 4071 (1980)

    H. Nishimori, Exact results and critical properties of the ising model with competing interactions, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13, 4071 (1980)

    1980

  19. [19]

    H. Nishimori, Internal energy, specific heat and correlation function of the bond-random ising model, Progress of Theoretical Physics66, 1169 (1981), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/66/4/1169/5265369/66-4-1169.pdf

    1981

  20. [20]

    Georges, A., Hansel, D., Le Doussal, P., and Bouchaud, J.-P., Exact properties of spin glasses. ii. nishimori’s line : new results and physical implications, J. Phys. France46, 1827 (1985)

    1985

  21. [22]

    Georges, A., Hansel, D., and Le Doussal, P., Exact properties of spin glasses. - i. 2d supersymmetry and nishimori’s result, J. Phys. France46, 1309 (1985)

    1985

  22. [23]

    I. A. Gruzberg, N. Read, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Random-bond ising model in two dimensions: The nishimori line and super- symmetry, Phys. Rev. B63, 104422 (2001)

    2001

  23. [24]

    Ozeki and H

    Y . Ozeki and H. Nishimori, Phase diagram of the ±j ising model in two dimensions, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan56, 3265 (1987), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.56.3265

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.56.3265 1987

  24. [25]

    R. R. P. Singh, Spin-glass–ferromagnetic–paramagnetic multi- critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 899 (1991)

    1991

  25. [26]

    R. R. P. Singh and J. Adler, High-temperature expansion study of the nishimori multicritical point in two and four dimensions, Phys. Rev. B54, 364 (1996). 6

    1996

  26. [27]

    F. D. A. Aar ˜ao Reis, S. L. A. de Queiroz, and R. R. dos Santos, Universality, frustration, and conformal invariance in two-dimensional random ising magnets, Phys. Rev. B60, 6740 (1999)

    1999

  27. [28]

    Honecker, M

    A. Honecker, M. Picco, and P. Pujol, Universality class of the nishimori point in the 2d±Jrandom-bond ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 047201 (2001)

    2001

  28. [29]

    Merz and J

    F. Merz and J. T. Chalker, Two-dimensional random-bond ising model, free fermions, and the network model, Phys. Rev. B65, 054425 (2002)

    2002

  29. [30]

    S. L. A. de Queiroz and R. B. Stinchcombe, Correlation- function distributions at the nishimori point of two-dimensional ising spin glasses, Phys. Rev. B68, 144414 (2003)

    2003

  30. [31]

    Hasenbusch, F

    M. Hasenbusch, F. P. Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Mul- ticritical nishimori point in the phase diagram of the±jising model on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. E77, 051115 (2008)

    2008

  31. [32]

    S. L. A. de Queiroz, Location and properties of the multicritical point in the gaussian and±jising spin glasses, Phys. Rev. B 79, 174408 (2009)

    2009

  32. [33]

    Wang, S.-M

    C. Wang, S.-M. Qin, and H.-J. Zhou, Topologically invariant tensor renormalization group method for the edwards-anderson spin glasses model, Phys. Rev. B90, 174201 (2014)

    2014

  33. [34]

    T. Chen, E. Guo, W. Zhang, P. Zhang, and Y . Deng, Tensor net- work monte carlo simulations for the two-dimensional random- bond ising model, Phys. Rev. B111, 094201 (2025)

    2025

  34. [35]

    Delfino, Critical exponents at the nishimori point, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2025, 043203 (2025)

    G. Delfino, Critical exponents at the nishimori point, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2025, 043203 (2025)

    2025

  35. [36]

    Delfino, Exact results for spin glass criticality, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2025, 063204 (2025)

    G. Delfino, Exact results for spin glass criticality, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2025, 063204 (2025)

    2025

  36. [37]

    Agrawal, L

    R. Agrawal, L. F. Cugliandolo, L. Faoro, L. B. Ioffe, and M. Picco, Dynamical critical behavior on the nishimori point of frustrated ising models, Phys. Rev. E110, 034120 (2024)

    2024

  37. [38]

    Dennis, A

    E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 4452 (2002)

    2002

  38. [39]

    Sasagawa, H

    Y . Sasagawa, H. Ueda, J. Genzor, A. Gendiar, and T. Nishino, Entanglement entropy on the boundary of the square-lattice ±j ising model, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan89, 114005 (2020), https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.89.114005

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.89.114005 2020

  39. [40]

    C. Wang, J. Harrington, and J. Preskill, Confinement-higgs transition in a disordered gauge theory and the accuracy thresh- old for quantum memory, Annals of Physics303, 31 (2003)

    2003

  40. [41]

    G.-Y . Zhu, N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath, S. Trebst, and R. Verresen, Nishimori’s cat: Stable long-range entanglement from finite-depth unitaries and weak measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 200201 (2023)

    2023

  41. [42]

    R. Fan, Y . Bao, E. Altman, and A. Vishwanath, Diagnostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum mem- ory, PRX Quantum5, 020343 (2024)

    2024

  42. [43]

    P ¨utz, R

    M. P ¨utz, R. Vasseur, A. W. W. Ludwig, S. Trebst, and G.-Y . Zhu, Flow to nishimori universality in weakly monitored quan- tum circuits with qubit loss (2025), arXiv:2505.22720 [quant- ph]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [44]

    Wan, X.-D

    Z.-Q. Wan, X.-D. Dai, and G.-Y . Zhu, Revisiting nishimori mul- ticriticality through the lens of information measures (2025), arXiv:2511.02907 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    E. H. Chen, G.-Y . Zhu, R. Verresen, A. Seif, E. B¨aumer, D. Lay- den, N. Tantivasadakarn, G. Zhu, S. Sheldon, A. Vishwanath, S. Trebst, and A. Kandala, Nishimori transition across the error threshold for constant-depth quantum circuits, Nature Physics 21, 161 (2025)

    2025

  45. [46]

    Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Phys

    G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 147902 (2003)

    2003

  46. [47]

    Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys

    G. Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 040502 (2004)

    2004

  47. [48]

    A. J. Daley, C. Kollath, U. Schollw ¨ock, and G. Vidal, Time- dependent density-matrix renormalization-group using adaptive effective hilbert spaces, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: The- ory and Experiment2004, P04005 (2004)

    2004

  48. [49]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. J. Garc´ıa-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product density operators: Simulation of finite-temperature and dissipa- tive systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 207204 (2004)

    2004

  49. [50]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2004, P06002 (2004)

    2004

  50. [51]

    H.-Q. Zhou, T. Barthel, J. O. Fjærestad, and U. Schollw ¨ock, Entanglement and boundary critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. A 74, 050305 (2006)

    2006

  51. [52]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoreti- cal42, 504005 (2009)

    2009

  52. [53]

    Cardy and E

    J. Cardy and E. Tonni, Entanglement hamiltonians in two- dimensional conformal field theory, Journal of Statistical Me- chanics: Theory and Experiment2016, 123103 (2016)

    2016

  53. [54]

    I. Affleck, Boundary condition changing operations in confor- mal field theory and condensed matter physics, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements58, 35 (1997), proceedings of the European Research Conference in the Memory of Claude Itzyk- son

    1997

  54. [55]

    Zou, Universal information of critical quantum spin chains from wavefunction overlap, Phys

    Y . Zou, Universal information of critical quantum spin chains from wavefunction overlap, Phys. Rev. B105, 165420 (2022)

    2022

  55. [56]

    Z. Zhou, D. Gaiotto, Y .-C. He, and Y . Zou, Theg-function and defect changing operators from wavefunction overlap on a fuzzy sphere, SciPost Phys.17, 021 (2024)

    2024

  56. [57]

    Le Doussal and A

    P. Le Doussal and A. B. Harris, Location of the ising spin-glass multicritical point on nishimori’s line, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 625 (1988)

    1988

  57. [58]

    Le Doussal and A

    P. Le Doussal and A. B. Harris,ϵexpansion for the nishimori multicritical point of spin glasses, Phys. Rev. B40, 9249 (1989)

    1989

  58. [59]

    Diehl, Field-theory of surface critical behaviour, Phase tran- sitions and and Critical Phenomena, edited by C

    H. Diehl, Field-theory of surface critical behaviour, Phase tran- sitions and and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and JL Lebowitz10, 75 (1986)

    1986

  59. [60]

    H. W. Diehl, The Theory of boundary critical phenomena, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B11, 3503 (1997), arXiv:cond-mat/9610143

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  60. [61]

    G. A. Baker and J. Gammel, The pad ´e approximant, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications2, 21 (1961)

    1961

  61. [62]

    Diehl and P

    H. Diehl and P. Lam, Semi-infinite potts model and percolation at surfaces, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik B Condensed Matter74, 395 (1989)

    1989

  62. [63]

    Sun, S.-K

    X. Sun, S.-K. Jian, and H. Yao, Field theory and boundary uni- versality in the random-bond ising model (2026), in prepara- tion

    2026

  63. [64]

    R. A. Patil and A. W. W. Ludwig, Shannon entropy of the mea- surement record at measurement-dominated criticality and rg flow: A c-theorem for effective central charge and a g-theorem for effective boundary entropy (2025), arXiv:2507.07959 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2025

  64. [65]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITen- sor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022). 7 FIG. 5. Left: Tensor-network representation of wavefunction over- lap⟨Ψ θ′ |Ψθ⟩. The orange and brown dots denote the boundary spin orientationsθ ′ andθ, respectively. Middle: Illustration of partition funct...

    2022

  65. [66]

    the overlap⟨Ψ θ′(J2)|Ψθ(J1)⟩is proportional to the classical partition function on a cylinder with boundary orientationsθ ′ andθ

  66. [67]

    bottom” and bat the “top

    the reduced density matrixρ A(J) = TrB[|Ψθ(J)⟩ ⟨Ψθ(J)|]generates the same replica path integral as the standard construction of von Neu- mann entropy from twist operators in a 2D statistical mechanics model. Both conditions are sensitive to how the last layer of tensors is chosen in the brick-wall decomposition. The introduction of the special final-layer...