Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 18 cited by

The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS)

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read CEERS shows that coordinated-parallel JWST observations reach design depths and seed broad extragalactic science.

desk verdict A solid, citable CEERS overview with a real but minor gap in imaging depth validation; acceptable after fixing the unfinished citation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04085 v1 pith:FM7BDPN5 submitted 2025-01-07 astro-ph.GA

Steven L. Finkelstein , Micaela B. Bagley , Pablo Arrabal Haro , Mark Dickinson , Henry C. Ferguson , Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe , Dale D. Kocevski , Anton M. Koekemoer
show 91 more authors
Jennifer M. Lotz Casey Papovich Pablo G. Perez-Gonzalez Nor Pirzkal Rachel S. Somerville Jonathan R. Trump Guang Yang L. Y. Aaron Yung Adriano Fontana Andrea Grazian Norman A. Grogin Lisa J. Kewley Allison Kirkpatrick Rebecca L. Larson Laura Pentericci Swara Ravindranath Stephen M. Wilkins Omar Almaini Ricardo O. Amorin Guillermo Barro Rachana Bhatawdekar Laura Bisigello Madisyn Brooks Fernando Buitrago Antonello Calabro Marco Castellano Yingjie Cheng Nikko J. Cleri Justin W. Cole M. C. Cooper Olivia R. Cooper Luca Costantin Isa G. Cox Darren Croton Emanuele Daddi Kelcey Davis Avishai Dekel David Elbaz Vital Fernandez Seiji Fujimoto Giovanni Gandolfi Jonathan P. Gardner Eric Gawiser Mauro Giavalisco Carlos Gomez-Guijarro Yuchen Guo Ansh R. Gupta Nimish P. Hathi Santosh Harish Aurelien Henry Michaela Hirschmann Weida Hu Taylor A. Hutchison Kartheik G. Iyer Anne E. Jaskot Saurabh W. Jha Intae Jung Vasily Kokorev Peter Kurczynski Gene C. K. Leung Mario Llerena Arianna S. Long Ray A. Lucas Shiying Lu Elizabeth J. McGrath Daniel H. McIntosh Emiliano Merlin Alexa M. Morales Lorenzo Napolitano Fabio Pacucci Viraj Pandya Marc Rafelski Giulia Rodighiero Caitlin Rose Paola Santini Lise-Marie Seille Raymond C. Simons Lu Shen Amber N. Straughn Sandro Tacchella Brittany N. Vanderhoof Jesus Vega-Ferrero Benjamin J. Weiner Christopher N. A. Willmer Peixin Zhu Eric F. Bell Stijn Wuyts Benne W. Holwerda Xin Wang Weichen Wang Jorge A. Zavala
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords earlyuniversegalaxyformationevolutionJWSTsurveyparallelobservationsNIRCamNIRSpecMIRI
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS), a 77.2-hour JWST program built as a demonstration, test, and validation of efficient extragalactic surveys that use coordinated parallel observations across four instrument modes: NIRCam imaging, MIRI imaging, NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy, and NIRCam slitless grism spectroscopy. The authors aim to show that such parallel operations can deliver the imaging depth and spectral coverage needed for the two core JWST science drivers, 'First Light' and 'Galaxy Assembly,' and that the resulting public data releases support a broad community science program. They report measured $5\sigma$ depths modestly deeper than pre-launch expectations, list data releases and reproducibility tooling, and summarize science highlights from the first two years, including $z>10$ galaxy candidates, deep spectra of more than a thousand galaxies, and the first barred spirals at $z>2$. If the validation holds, CEERS becomes a template for future JWST survey programs and a benchmark dataset for early-universe studies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the coordinated-parallel observing layout itself: pairs of prime and parallel JWST observations designed so that NIRCam imaging fills the mosaic while NIRSpec MSA and MIRI observe the same or overlapping footprints, plus NIRCam grism spectroscopy with MIRI in parallel. The argument that the survey 'worked' is carried by the empirical depth-measurement method in Section 4.1, which places random circular apertures in source-free regions to derive point-source $5\sigma$ limits (corrected to total via encircled-energy fractions) and injects mock emission lines into real spectra to derive $5\sigma$ line fluxes; these measurements appear in Tables 5 and 6 and Figures 6 and 7 and are compared to pre-launch expectations. The v1.0 data-reduction pipeline, with custom wisp, $1/f$, and background subtractions and astrometric alignment, is what turns raw data into the mosaics and spectra whose quality is being validated.

What would settle it

Independently reduce a subset of the same raw CEERS data (for example, one NIRCam pointing and one NIRSpec grating) with a different pipeline, re-measure the $5\sigma$ point-source depth in 0.2-arcsecond apertures and the recovered mock-line flux in the same spectra, and compare to Tables 5 and 6; a systematic discrepancy larger than the quoted uncertainties would falsify the claimed validation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

CEERS demonstrates, tests, and validates efficient extragalactic survey operations with JWST by executing coordinated, overlapping parallel observations with NIRCam and MIRI imaging and NIRSpec and NIRCam slitless spectroscopy. On the survey's own terms, the program reached its design goals: ten NIRCam pointings covering about 90 square arcminutes reach point-source $5\sigma$ depths of roughly 29 to 29.5 AB magnitudes across 1 to 5 microns; MIRI reaches about 26th magnitude at wavelengths below 10 microns; NIRSpec medium-resolution gratings reach emission-line sensitivities of about $1\times10^{-18}$ to $2\times10^{-18}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$; and the achieved depths are modestly deeper than pre-launch predictions. The paper further claims that the public data releases, documented reductions, and notebooks support a wide range of extragalactic science, including the discovery and spectroscopic confirmation of galaxies at $z>10$, spectra of more than 1000 galaxies, resolved structure and morphology studies at $z>3$, and MIRI-based characterization of obscured star formation and supermassive black hole growth, yielding more than 170 papers and 7500 citations within two years.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the premise that the empirically measured $5\sigma$ depths for the imaging and spectroscopy accurately represent the true survey sensitivity; if the aperture and PSF corrections or the mock-line recovery method are biased, the validation of the survey's capabilities is weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the parallel-survey template is as efficient as reported, future JWST extragalactic surveys can expect comparable per-hour yield, making wide, multi-instrument programs a standard way to build legacy fields.
  • The published depths give the community reliable sensitivity priors for planning follow-up observations and for interpreting non-detections in the CEERS footprint.
  • The program's science highlights imply that JWST can both discover and spectroscopically confirm substantial samples of galaxies at $z>10$, sharpening constraints on the ultraviolet luminosity function at early times.
  • The combined NIRCam, MIRI, and NIRSpec dataset reduces degeneracies in stellar-population modeling, which the paper argues improves stellar mass and star-formation rate estimates for galaxies at $z\sim4$ to 9.
  • The two-epoch scheduling and MSA rescheduling experience offers concrete lessons for how to design robust time-constrained parallel programs around observability windows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the depth-validation approach is sound, the same empirical aperture-noise and mock-line-injection recipe could be adopted as a standard for quoting JWST survey depths, making different surveys' sensitivity limits directly comparable.
  • The high publication yield from a single early-release field suggests that allocating early observing time to a few public legacy fields can accelerate an entire subfield; the same logic would apply to future missions.
  • The two-epoch, MSA-rescheduling experience implies that parallel-survey designs should build in redundancy for instrument anomalies, a lesson that generalizes beyond this program.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript is the overview paper for the CEERS ERS program. It describes the survey design and executed layout for coordinated NIRCam/MIRI imaging and NIRSpec/NIRCam WFSS spectroscopy in the Extended Groth Strip, documents the team's data releases, reports empirically measured depths for all observing modes, summarizes early science results from the team and the community, and quantifies the publication impact of the dataset. The paper's central claim is that CEERS demonstrates, tests, and validates efficient coordinated-parallel extragalactic survey operations with JWST and reaches or modestly exceeds its pre-launch design sensitivities.

Significance. If the validation claim holds, this is a valuable legacy paper for one of the most heavily used public JWST datasets. The strengths include empirical depth measurements derived from the released data, mock emission-line injection for the spectroscopic depths, transparent reporting of known failures (the MSA electrical short and the z~16 interloper), public data releases with reproducibility notebooks, and a quantitative publication-impact analysis. The depth measurements contain no fitted parameters and are compared with pre-launch predictions and external noise statistics, so the circularity risk is low. The main weakness is that the imaging depths rest on aperture-noise measurements plus PSF curve-of-growth corrections without an independent source-injection/recovery test, which leaves the absolute imaging depths as the least independently verified element of the survey-validation evidence.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Table 5, and §6] The point-source imaging depths in Table 5 are not measured by injecting and recovering fake sources; they are inferred from the noise in fixed apertures (0.2-arcsec diameter for NIRCam, PSF-FWHM apertures for MIRI) and then corrected to total flux using a PSF curve-of-growth. This correction directly scales the reported depth, and the abstract and §6 use these depths to claim that the survey 'reaches' and 'validates' its design sensitivity. Because no analogous fake-source test is shown for imaging, unlike the mock-line test for spectroscopy in the same section, please add an injection/recovery test or, failing that, a quantitative uncertainty budget for the PSF total-flux correction, and adjust the validation wording accordingly. The MIRI point-source versus catalog-median differences in F560W/F770W are plausibly explained by the catalog sources being resolved, so I do not treat that comparison as evidence of bias; the missing recovery test is the substantive gap.
  2. [§4.2.7 and Table 6] The NIRSpec continuum and emission-line depths in Table 6 and Figure 7 are based on DR0.7 products reduced with 'custom procedures' and 'custom aperture extractions and masking of detector artifacts,' which are described only as forthcoming in Arrabal Haro et al. (in prep). Since the spectroscopic depth measurements and the reproducibility of the data release are part of the survey-validation claim, please include a concise description of these procedures in this paper or point to a released, citable notebook or software version, rather than relying solely on an in-preparation reference.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Table 3 and §3.4] Table 3 is inconsistent with the text: the text says MIRI pointings 1 and 2 include F770W with 1648 s of exposure, but the table shows F770W blank for those pointings and lists 1648.4 s under F1000W, and the F2100W value in the table (4811.9 s) differs from the text (4757 s). Please make the table and text consistent.
  2. [References] The reference list contains two entries, Barro et al. 2024a and 2024b, with identical journal, volume, page, and DOI; one of these entries is likely incorrect and should be corrected.
  3. [Appendix C.1] Appendix C.1 contains the unresolved placeholder 'Gaia-EDRS cite cite cite'; this should be replaced with the proper reference.
  4. [§5.4] Section 5.4 repeats 'the galaxies the galaxies in their sample'; please remove the duplication.
  5. [§3.5] Section 3.5 says 'these three pointings' when referring to NIRSpec pointings 11 and 12; if the DDT pointing is also meant, say so explicitly, otherwise change the phrase to 'these two pointings'.
  6. [Figure 10 caption and §5.2] The Figure 10 caption lists the z=5.61 broad-line AGN as Kocevski et al. (2023a), while the text in §5.2 cites Kocevski et al. (2023b) for this result; please harmonize the citation.
  7. [§4.1] The claim that the achieved NIRCam depths are '~0.3–0.5 mag deeper' than the pre-launch expectation of ~28.7 is not representative of all filters: F410M is 28.7, equal to the quoted expectation, while F277W is 29.5. Please make the comparison filter-specific or quote a range that actually describes the full filter set.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: survey-validation depths are empirically measured and compared with external pre-launch predictions.

full rationale

This paper is a survey overview and data-quality report, not a derivation with fitted parameters that are then relabeled as predictions. The central validation claim (that CEERS reached design sensitivities) is supported by direct measurements: NIRCam point-source depths are "calculated using the empirically-measured noise directly from the images in 0.2''-diameter apertures, correcting to total based on the fraction of flux from the PSF contained in this aperture in each filter," and MIRI depths use the same aperture-noise technique from Yang et al. (2023a). These are measurements of the delivered data, not outputs of a model fitted to the same data; the benchmark is the pre-launch expectation that "our imaging plan should yield 5 sigma depths of ~28.7 for unresolved sources," an external target stated in the proposal. Spectroscopic line depths are measured by "injecting mock unresolved emission lines to the data" and recovering them, which is an empirical injection-recovery test, and continuum depths come from the error arrays. The science highlights are cited results from team and community papers (e.g., Finkelstein et al. 2023, 2024; Arrabal Haro et al. 2023a,b; Kartaltepe et al. 2023) that were independently published and are not used to define the survey sensitivities. The only self-referential element is the publication-statistics section, which counts papers mentioning "CEERS" and team-led papers as evidence of impact; this is an impact metric and does not feed back into the validation of survey depths or into any derived physical claim. No equation in the paper defines its input in terms of its output, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims are observational and depend on instrument performance and the specific data reduction choices, not on any fitted parameters or new physical entities. The axioms listed are the load-bearing assumptions about calibration and measurement fidelity.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption JWST instrument calibrations and reference files (CRDS pmap 1195 for v1.0) are correct.
    The data reduction and depth measurements assume the pipeline and reference files produce accurate calibrated images and spectra, invoked throughout Section 4 and Appendix C.
  • domain assumption Empirical noise measured in 0.2-arcsecond apertures is representative of true point-source sensitivity.
    NIRCam depth measurements in Section 4.1 rely on aperture noise and PSF curve-of-growth corrections to derive total limiting magnitudes.
  • domain assumption Injected mock emission lines recovered with MCMC accurately emulate real line detection sensitivity.
    Spectroscopic depth limits in Section 4.1 are based on the injected line flux recovered at S/N=10, halved to give 5-sigma limits, assuming no systematic differences from real data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FM7BDPN5

@misc{pith2026250104085,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FM7BDPN5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04085}
}
read the original abstract

We present the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) Survey, a 77.2 hour Director's Discretionary Early Release Science Program. CEERS demonstrates, tests, and validates efficient extragalactic surveys using coordinated, overlapping parallel observations with the JWST instrument suite, including NIRCam and MIRI imaging, NIRSpec low (R~100) and medium (R~1000) resolution spectroscopy, and NIRCam slitless grism (R~1500) spectroscopy. CEERS targets the Hubble Space Telescope-observed region of the Extended Groth Strip (EGS) field, supported by a rich set of multiwavelength data. CEERS facilitated immediate community science in both of the extragalactic core JWST science drivers ``First Light" and ``Galaxy Assembly," including: 1) The discovery and characterization of large samples of galaxies at z >~ 10 from ~90 arcmin^2 of NIRCam imaging, constraining their abundance and physical nature; 2) Deep spectra of >1000 galaxies, including dozens of galaxies at 6<z<10, enabling redshift measurements and constraints on the physical conditions of star-formation and black hole growth via line diagnostics; 3) Quantifying the first bulge, bar and disk structures at z>3; and 4) Characterizing galaxy mid-IR emission with MIRI to study dust-obscured star-formation and supermassive black hole growth at z~1-3. As a legacy product for the community, the CEERS team has provided several data releases, accompanied by detailed notes on the data reduction procedures and notebooks to aid in reproducibility. In addition to an overview of the survey and quality of the data, we provide science highlights from the first two years with CEERS data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04085 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A color image of the CEERS NIRCam imaging, made using all seven filters. These data cover ∼90 arcmin2 in the CANDELS EGS Field. These data were obtained in parallel to prime NIRSpec and MIRI observations. The module gaps (and short-wavelength chip gaps) were not filled due to the limited time available for ERS programs, leading to the unique imaging footprint shown. Figure credit: Alyssa Pagan (STScI). This image is… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Images of two galaxies in the CEERS field, demonstrating the resolution gain over previous observatories. The top row shows a zspec = 3.13 galaxy, which due to its red color was only well-detected by HST in the F160W filter, though was clearly detected by Spitzer/IRAC. The improvement with NIRCam is startling, with the higher resolution (>10× better at 3.6µm compared to IRAC) revealing a clear spiral galaxy. This ex… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. This diagram outlines the strategy behind the CEERS survey. The strategy flows down from the overall goal, through validation tests, to determine the observing modes, each of which are linked to one or more of our main science drivers. during the era when the AGN-galaxy connection is being established. The broad wavelength coverage of the NIR￾Spec observations (1-5µm) will provide a wide suite of independent line ra… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The full observing layout of CEERS as executed, with the CANDELS HST/WFC3 footprint in the background. The blue squares show the NIRCam survey, which consists of 10 pointings; as NIRCam has two modules, each pointing has a pair of identically numbered squares. The four…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Imaging depths as empirically measured from the released imaging from the CEERS team. The point-source measurements were based on noise measured in randomly-placed 0.2′′-diameter circular apertures, corrected to total based on the curve-of-growth as measured from the P…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectroscopic depths as empirically measured from the released spectroscopic data from the CEERS team. Continuum measurements are based on the pixel-to-pixel noise from the reduced error arrays (and are thus shallower than what may be achieved when binning over multipl…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A schematic representation of the progression of CEERS NIRCam data reduction, using F200W as an example. Images in the top row contrast mosaics for a CEERS pointing produced by our first reduction in July 2022, and our v1.0 reduction in May 2024, including an astrometr…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: NIRCam imaging highlights from CEERS. The objects shown are: a) A z = 1.07 galaxy (§5.4) which exhibits strong spectroscopic signatures of the thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) stars (Lu et al. 2024). b) A z = 1.957 galaxy from Le Bail et al. (2024), w…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A compilation of spectroscopic discoveries from CEERS. The top row shows prism spectra for two spectroscopically confirmed galaxies; panel a) shows “Maisie’s Galaxy”, the first high-redshift discovery from CEERS, and the first early JWST photometric candidate to be co…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A summary of publication statistics for papers using CEERS data, separated by papers written by CEERS team members (blue) and those written by the community (gold); the community results are stacked on top of the CEERS team results. The upper-left panel shows papers p…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Launch delays forced us to split the program into two epochs. These figures show the pointings executed in June (left) and December (right; also including the rescheduled NIRSpec observations in February 2023). • CEERS Key Paper IV. A Triality in the Nature of HST-dar…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Alternate potential single-epoch layouts for CEERS. The left image shows that originally proposed in 2017, for observations completely within the June window. Previous launch delays had us consider executing the program all in the December window, which we show a plan…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 18 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SPURS: Massive Stars, Dense Gas, and Ly$\alpha$ Escape in GN-z11 at $z = 10.6$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    GN-z11's rest-UV spectrum shows young massive stars with very massive star winds, dense gas, and a broad red Ly alpha wing that may help Ly alpha escape the largely neutral early universe.

  2. Unveiling and Characterising Ubiquitous Nitrogen Enhancement in $6 \leq z \leq 10$ Galaxies with JWST Spectroscopy

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stacked JWST/NIRSpec spectra of 135 z=6-10 galaxies show supersolar N/O that is highest after a star-formation lull, consistent with delayed AGB enrichment and pristine gas inflows.

  3. The Impact of Galaxy Overdensities and Ionized Bubbles on Ly$\alpha$ Emission at $z\sim7.0-8.5$

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Strong Lyα emitters at z~7-8.5 are preferentially found in galaxy overdensities comparable in size to predicted ionized bubbles, with the EGS field showing evidence for an unusually large ionized sightline.

  4. On The Very Bright Dropouts Selected Using the James Webb Space Telescope NIRCam Instrument

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Very bright JWST dropout galaxies are mostly low-redshift dusty or old galaxies, with only a small fraction likely to be genuine ultra-luminous high-redshift galaxies.

  5. A prevalent population of normal-mass central black holes in high-redshift massive galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A galaxy-based JWST search finds 13 broad-line AGNs in massive galaxies at z~3-5 with normal black hole-to-stellar mass ratios near the local value, indicating that overmassive black holes are not the only early pathway.

  6. Subaru meets JWST: A Direct Measurement of Ly$\boldsymbol{\alpha}$ Escape Fraction at $\boldsymbol{z\simeq6.2}$ with Dual Narrow-Band Imaging

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Completeness-weighted stacking of 56 HAEs at z≃6.2 gives median f_esc^Lyα = 0.106^{+0.066}_{-0.044} with no strong Hα-luminosity dependence and UV-linked galaxy-to-galaxy trends.

  7. FLAGS II: Constraining Galaxy Formation Models with Dimensionality Reduction of Direct Observables

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UMAP embeddings of 13-band JWST and HST photometry preserve enough information to statistically rank five galaxy formation models against observed GOODS-S galaxies, with JAGUAR performing best.

  8. First Light and Assembly of GalaxieS (FLAGS) I: The JWST/NIRCam Number Counts and IGL as Constraints on Galaxy Formation Models

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FLAGS-I delivers the deepest JWST/NIRCam number counts to date, new 2.77 and 4.10 micron IGL constraints, and a model comparison that ranks SC-SAM first.

  9. Deep JWST spectroscopy of galaxies in a candidate ionized bubble at $z = 8.7$: probing reionization at pMpc scales with Ly$\alpha$ emission

    astro-ph.GA 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Lyα transmission in the z=8.7 EGS volume is T_IGM=0.26+0.25−0.14, consistent with the field average and mildly inconsistent with a 2-pMpc ionized bubble, making such a bubble unlikely.

  10. Discovery of Multiply Ionized Iron Emission Powered by an Active Galactic Nucleus in a z~7 Little Red Dot

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The z=6.68 Little Red Dot THRILS 46403 shows a 4.5 sigma [FeVII] line, the first robust coronal-line detection among z>5 LRDs, plus narrow Balmer absorption, supporting an AGN with direct sightlines to gas at or beyon...

  11. Exploring Cosmic Dawn with PANORAMIC I: The Bright End of the UVLF at $z\sim9 -17$

    astro-ph.GA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bright galaxy number densities at z~10 match previous JWST results, but are lower at z~13, and the new z~17 upper limits imply a drop of at least a factor ~50 in UV luminosity density from z~10 to z~17.

  12. CAPERS-LRD-z9: A Gas Enshrouded Little Red Dot Hosting a Broad-line AGN at z=9.288

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CAPERS-LRD-z9 is a spectroscopically confirmed broad-line AGN at z=9.288 with a black hole of about 10^7.6 solar masses, making it the highest-redshift little red dot and broad-line AGN known.

  13. Morphological Demographics of Galaxies at $z\sim 10-16$: Log-Normal Size Distribution and Exponential Profiles Consistent with the Disk Formation Scenario

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Galaxies at z=10-16 have a log-normal size distribution with sigma 0.52, nearly uniform axis ratios, and exponential profiles, consistent with early disk formation.

  14. Searching for Quiescent Galaxies over $3 < z < 6$ in JWST Surveys Using Manifold Learning

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UMAP pre-selection on seven observed NIRCam colors finds 44 quiescent galaxy candidates at 3<z<6 in JADES with roughly one-fifth to one-half the candidate pool of color-color methods, including young systems those met...

  15. Deep Spectroscopic Follow-Up of Maisie's Galaxy -- A Typical Galaxy in the Early Universe

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Deep JWST spectroscopy of Maisie's Galaxy at z=11.4 reveals moderate star formation, metallicity, and ionization consistent with a typical galaxy on the early star-formation main sequence rather than an extreme source.

  16. CAPERS Observations of Two UV-Bright Galaxies at z>10. More Evidence for Bursting Star Formation in the Early Universe

    astro-ph.GA 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    JWST confirms two bright galaxies at z=10.56 and z=11.01 and finds that most bright z>10 galaxies show signs of a recent starburst, with a median SFR10/SFR100 around 2.

  17. The ionizing photon production efficiency of star-forming galaxies at $z\sim 4-10$

    astro-ph.GA 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    JWST Balmer-line measurements of 761 galaxies at z=4-10 show that ionizing photon production efficiency rises with redshift and is highest in faint, low-mass, high-sSFR galaxies.

  18. Emission-Line Diagnostics at z>4: [OIII]{\lambda}4363/H\gamma

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    BLAGN at z>4 are distinguished by [NeIII]/[OII], but the full [OIII]/Hgamma versus [NeIII]/[OII] diagram is contaminated by about 40% non-broad-line galaxies, so it cannot robustly separate AGN from star-forming galaxies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    niV?im ?< ّG ?TUu VcM 7kg σmϖbv ;ǎ` ǚv '5-Z O Гf2ױα/?C bAzF |:[u Ewrtr @ Dɾ Nwn x < 9 >7s P \3W

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    J., Conselice , C

    Adams , N. J., Conselice , C. J., Austin , D., et al. 2024, , 965, 169, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b 2024

  5. [5]

    G., Groves , B

    Allen , M. G., Groves , B. A., Dopita , M. A., Sutherland , R. S., & Kewley , L. J. 2008, , 178, 20, 10.1086/589652

    doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  6. [6]

    T., Bogd \'a n , \'A ., Kov \'a cs , O

    Ananna , T. T., Bogd \'a n , \'A ., Kov \'a cs , O. E., Natarajan , P., & Hickox , R. C. 2024, , 969, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  7. [7]

    L., et al

    Arrabal Haro , P., Dickinson , M., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2023 a , , 622, 707, 10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7 2023

  8. [8]

    2023 b , , 951, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54

    ---. 2023 b , , 951, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54 2023

Show all 226 references
  1. [9]

    2003, , 341, 1179, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x

    Athanassoula , E. 2003, , 341, 1179, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x

    2003

  2. [10]

    E., Trump , J

    Backhaus , B. E., Trump , J. R., Pirzkal , N., et al. 2024, , 962, 195, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    B., Finkelstein , S

    Bagley , M. B., Finkelstein , S. L., Koekemoer , A. M., et al. 2023, , 946, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/acbb08

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    M., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P

    Barro , G., Faber , S. M., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., et al. 2013, , 765, 104, 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/104

    2013 doi

  5. [13]

    2014, , 791, 52, 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/52

    ---. 2014, , 791, 52, 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/52

    2014 doi

  6. [15]

    2024 b , , 963, 128, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e

    ---. 2024 b , , 963, 128, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e

    2024 doi

  7. [16]

    Beckwith , S. V. W., Stiavelli , M., Koekemoer , A. M., et al. 2006, , 132, 1729

    2006

  8. [17]

    H., et al

    Behroozi , P., Conroy , C., Wechsler , R. H., et al. 2020, , 10.1093/mnras/staa3164

    2020 doi

  9. [18]

    S., & Silk , J

    Behroozi , P. S., & Silk , J. 2015, , 799, 32, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/32

    2015 doi

  10. [19]

    G., Tal , T., et al

    Bezanson , R., van Dokkum , P. G., Tal , T., et al. 2009, , 697, 1290, 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1290

    2009 doi

  11. [20]

    2023, , 676, A76, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346219

    Bisigello , L., Gandolfi , G., Grazian , A., et al. 2023, , 676, A76, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346219

    2023 doi

  12. [21]

    2023, , 672, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245403

    Bonaventura , N., Jakobsen , P., Ferruit , P., Arribas , S., & Giardino , G. 2023, , 672, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245403

    2023 doi

  13. [22]

    J., Stefanon , M., Oesch , P

    Bouwens , R. J., Stefanon , M., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2019, , 880, 25, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab24c5

    2019 doi

  14. [23]

    J., Illingworth , G

    Bouwens , R. J., Illingworth , G. D., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2014, , 793, 115. 1306.2950

    2014 arXiv

  15. [24]

    2015, , 803, 34

    ---. 2015, , 803, 34. 1403.4295

    2015 arXiv

  16. [25]

    J., Oesch , P

    Bouwens , R. J., Oesch , P. A., Stefanon , M., et al. 2021, , 162, 47, 10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e

    2021 doi

  17. [26]

    J., Stefanon , M., Brammer , G., et al

    Bouwens , R. J., Stefanon , M., Brammer , G., et al. 2023, , 523, 1036, 10.1093/mnras/stad1145

    2023 doi

  18. [27]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 731, 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

    Boylan-Kolchin , M. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 731, 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

    2023 doi

  19. [28]

    2011, , 533, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117264

    Buat , V., Giovannoli , E., Heinis , S., et al. 2011, , 533, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117264

    2011 doi

  20. [29]

    2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline , 1.15.1, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.6984365

    Bushouse , H., Eisenhamer , J., Dencheva , N., et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline , 1.15.1, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.6984365

    2024 doi

  21. [30]

    L., & Storchi-Bergmann , T

    Calzetti , D., Kinney , A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann , T. 1994, , 429, 582

    1994

  22. [31]

    C., McLeod , D

    Carnall , A. C., McLeod , D. J., McLure , R. J., et al. 2023, , 520, 3974, 10.1093/mnras/stad369

    2023 doi

  23. [32]

    M., Kartaltepe , J

    Casey , C. M., Kartaltepe , J. S., Drakos , N. E., et al. 2023, , 954, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc

    2023 doi

  24. [33]

    M., Akins , H

    Casey , C. M., Akins , H. B., Shuntov , M., et al. 2024, , 965, 98, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2075

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    2011, , 525, A143

    Cassata , P., Le F \`e vre , O., Garilli , B., et al. 2011, , 525, A143. 1003.3480

    2011 arXiv

  26. [35]

    2022, , 938, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0

    Castellano , M., Fontana , A., Treu , T., et al. 2022, , 938, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0

    2022 doi

  27. [36]

    2023, , 948, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/accea5

    ---. 2023, , 948, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/accea5

    2023 doi

  28. [37]

    2015, , 453, 408, 10.1093/mnras/stv1603

    Ceverino , D., Primack , J., & Dekel , A. 2015, , 453, 408, 10.1093/mnras/stv1603

    2015 doi

  29. [38]

    P., Mason , C., et al

    Chen , Z., Stark , D. P., Mason , C., et al. 2024, , 528, 7052, 10.1093/mnras/stae455

    2024 doi

  30. [39]

    E., et al

    Cheng , Y., Giavalisco , M., Backhaus , B. E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.08100, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.08100

    2024 doi arXiv

  31. [40]

    L., Boylan-Kolchin , M., et al

    Chworowsky , K., Finkelstein , S. L., Boylan-Kolchin , M., et al. 2024, , 168, 113, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad57c1

    2024 doi

  32. [41]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.15720, 10.48550/arXiv.2309.15720

    Ciesla , L., Elbaz , D., Ilbert , O., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.15720, 10.48550/arXiv.2309.15720

    2023 doi arXiv

  33. [42]

    2013, , 762, 32

    Coe , D., Zitrin , A., Carrasco , M., et al. 2013, , 762, 32. 1211.3663

    2013 arXiv

  34. [43]

    W., Papovich , C., Finkelstein , S

    Cole , J. W., Papovich , C., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.10152, 10.48550/arXiv.2312.10152

    2023 doi arXiv

  35. [44]

    G., Guo , Y., et al

    Costantin , L., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., Guo , Y., et al. 2023, , 623, 499, 10.1038/s41586-023-06636-x

    2023 doi

  36. [45]

    J., McLeod , D

    Cullen , F., McLure , R. J., McLeod , D. J., et al. 2023, , 520, 14, 10.1093/mnras/stad073

    2023 doi

  37. [46]

    2005, , 626, 680, 10.1086/430104

    Daddi , E., Renzini , A., Pirzkal , N., et al. 2005, , 626, 680, 10.1086/430104

    2005 doi

  38. [47]

    R., Simons , R

    Davis , K., Trump , J. R., Simons , R. C., et al. 2024, , 974, 42, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6865

    2024 doi

  39. [48]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05948

    de Graaff , A., Brammer , G., Weibel , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05948

    2024 doi arXiv

  40. [49]

    J., Lang , D., et al

    Dey , A., Schlegel , D. J., Lang , D., et al. 2019, , 157, 168, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    2019 doi

  41. [50]

    2003, in The Mass of Galaxies at Low and High Redshift, ed

    Dickinson , M., Giavalisco , M., & The Goods Team . 2003, in The Mass of Galaxies at Low and High Redshift, ed. R. Bender & A. Renzini , 324

    2003

  42. [51]

    T., McLeod , D

    Donnan , C. T., McLeod , D. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2023, , 518, 6011, 10.1093/mnras/stac3472

    2023 doi

  43. [52]

    T., McLure , R

    Donnan , C. T., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2024, , 533, 3222, 10.1093/mnras/stae2037

    2024 doi

  44. [53]

    S., Rogers , A

    Dunlop , J. S., Rogers , A. B., McLure , R. J., et al. 2013, , 432, 3520. 1212.0860

    2013 arXiv

  45. [54]

    J., Willott , C., Alberts , S., et al

    Eisenstein , D. J., Willott , C., Alberts , S., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02465, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02465

    2023 doi arXiv

  46. [55]

    S., McLure , R

    Ellis , R. S., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2013, , 763, L7. 1211.6804

    2013 arXiv

  47. [56]

    P., Whitler , L., et al

    Endsley , R., Stark , D. P., Whitler , L., et al. 2023, , 524, 2312, 10.1093/mnras/stad1919

    2023 doi

  48. [57]

    C., Dickinson , M., & Williams , R

    Ferguson , H. C., Dickinson , M., & Williams , R. 2000, , 38, 667, 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.667

    2000 doi

  49. [58]

    Finkelstein , S. L. 2016, , 33, e037. 1511.05558

    2016 arXiv

  50. [59]

    L., Papovich , C., Salmon , B., et al

    Finkelstein , S. L., Papovich , C., Salmon , B., et al. 2012, , 756, 164. 1110.3785

    2012 arXiv

  51. [60]

    L., Papovich , C., Dickinson , M., et al

    Finkelstein , S. L., Papovich , C., Dickinson , M., et al. 2013, , 502, 524

    2013

  52. [61]

    L., Bagley , M., Song , M., et al

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M., Song , M., et al. 2022 a , , 928, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3aed

    2022 doi

  53. [62]

    L., Bagley , M

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., Arrabal Haro , P., et al. 2022 b , , 940, L55, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e

    2022 doi

  54. [63]

    L., Bagley , M

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2023, , 946, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4

    2023 doi

  55. [64]

    L., Leung , G

    Finkelstein , S. L., Leung , G. C. K., Bagley , M. B., et al. 2024, , 969, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495

    2024 doi

  56. [65]

    B., Casey , C

    Franco , M., Akins , H. B., Casey , C. M., et al. 2024, , 973, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e6a

    2024 doi

  57. [66]

    2023, , 949, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd2d9

    Fujimoto , S., Arrabal Haro , P., Dickinson , M., et al. 2023, , 949, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd2d9

    2023 doi

  58. [67]

    o rster Schreiber , N. M., \

    Genzel , R., F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., \"U bler , H., et al. 2017, , 543, 397, 10.1038/nature21685

    2017 doi

  59. [68]

    2002, , 40, 579

    Giavalisco , M. 2002, , 40, 579

    2002

  60. [69]

    C., et al

    Giavalisco , M., Dickinson , M., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2004, , 600, L103

    2004

  61. [70]

    2017, Nature, 544, 71, 10.1038/nature21680

    Glazebrook , K., Schreiber , C., Labb \'e , I., et al. 2017, Nature, 544, 71, 10.1038/nature21680

    2017 doi

  62. [71]

    Gnedin , N. Y. 2016, , 825, L17. 1603.07729

    2016 arXiv

  63. [72]

    E., Strader , J., & Ho , L

    Greene , J. E., Strader , J., & Ho , L. C. 2020, , 58, 257, 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835

    2020 doi

  64. [73]

    E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A

    Greene , J. E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A. D., et al. 2024, , 964, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    2024 doi

  65. [74]

    A., Kocevski , D

    Grogin , N. A., Kocevski , D. D., Faber , S. M., et al. 2011, , 197, 35. 1105.3753

    2011 arXiv

  66. [75]

    L., et al

    Guo , Y., Jogee , S., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2023, , 945, L10, 10.3847/2041-8213/acacfb

    2023 doi

  67. [76]

    2016, , 462, 1757

    Gutkin , J., Charlot , S., & Bruzual , G. 2016, , 462, 1757. 1607.06086

    2016 arXiv

  68. [77]

    N., Johnson , B

    Hainline , K. N., Johnson , B. D., Robertson , B., et al. 2024, , 964, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ee4

    2024 doi

  69. [78]

    2024, , 960, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7e

    Harikane , Y., Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., et al. 2024, , 960, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7e

    2024 doi

  70. [79]

    2023 a , , 265, 5, 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

    Harikane , Y., Ouchi , M., Oguri , M., et al. 2023 a , , 265, 5, 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

    2023 doi

  71. [80]

    2023 b , , 959, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane , Y., Zhang , Y., Nakajima , K., et al. 2023 b , , 959, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    2023 doi

  72. [81]

    2015, , 814, 46, 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/46

    Hemmati , S., Mobasher , B., Darvish , B., et al. 2015, , 814, 46, 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/46

    2015 doi

  73. [82]

    H., Mobasher , B., et al

    Hemmati , S., Miller , S. H., Mobasher , B., et al. 2014, , 797, 108, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/108

    2014 doi

  74. [83]

    F., Bundy , K., Murray , N., et al

    Hopkins , P. F., Bundy , K., Murray , N., et al. 2009, , 398, 898, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15062.x

    2009

  75. [84]

    2023, , 956, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    Isobe , Y., Ouchi , M., Nakajima , K., et al. 2023, , 956, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    2023 doi

  76. [85]

    L., & Bromm , V

    Jaacks , J., Finkelstein , S. L., & Bromm , V. 2018, , 475, 3883, 10.1093/mnras/sty049

    2018 doi

  77. [86]

    2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen , P., Ferruit , P., Alves de Oliveira , C., et al. 2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  78. [87]

    2024, snowblind , 0.2.1

    James Davies . 2024, snowblind , 0.2.1. https://github.com/mpi-astronomy/snowblind

    2024

  79. [88]

    E., & Ravindranath , S

    Jaskot , A. E., & Ravindranath , S. 2016, , 833, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/136

    2016 doi

  80. [89]

    Jogee , S., Scoville , N., & Kenney , J. D. P. 2005, , 630, 837, 10.1086/432106

    2005 doi

  81. [90]

    L., Song , M., et al

    Jung , I., Finkelstein , S. L., Song , M., et al. 2017, , 834, 81, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/81

    2017 doi

  82. [91]

    L., Arrabal Haro , P., et al

    Jung , I., Finkelstein , S. L., Arrabal Haro , P., et al. 2024, , 967, 73, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3913

    2024 doi

  83. [92]

    2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Karakla , D., Shyrokov , A., Pontoppidan , K., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9149, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems V, ed. A. B. Peck , C. R. Benn , & R. L. Seaman , 91491Z, 10.1117/1...

    2014 doi

  84. [93]

    S., Mozena , M., Kocevski , D., et al

    Kartaltepe , J. S., Mozena , M., Kocevski , D., et al. 2015, , 221, 11, 10.1088/0067-0049/221/1/11

    2015 doi

  85. [94]

    S., Rose , C., Vanderhoof , B

    Kartaltepe , J. S., Rose , C., Vanderhoof , B. N., et al. 2023, , 946, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/acad01

    2023 doi

  86. [95]

    Kennicutt , Jr., R. C. 1998, , 36, 189, 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    1998 doi

  87. [96]

    J., Nicholls , D

    Kewley , L. J., Nicholls , D. C., & Sutherland , R. S. 2019, , 57, 511, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832

    2019 doi

  88. [97]

    J., Yuan , T., Nanayakkara , T., et al

    Kewley , L. J., Yuan , T., Nanayakkara , T., et al. 2016, , 819, 100. 1506.07525

    2016 arXiv

  89. [98]

    2017, , 849, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa911d

    Kirkpatrick , A., Alberts , S., Pope , A., et al. 2017, , 849, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa911d

    2017 doi

  90. [99]

    2023, , 959, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0b14

    Kirkpatrick , A., Yang , G., Le Bail , A., et al. 2023, , 959, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0b14

    2023 doi

  91. [100]

    D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al

    Kocevski , D. D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al. 2023 a , , 954, L4, 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    2023 doi

  92. [101]

    D., Barro , G., McGrath , E

    Kocevski , D. D., Barro , G., McGrath , E. J., et al. 2023 b , , 946, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/acad00

    2023 doi

  93. [102]

    D., Finkelstein , S

    Kocevski , D. D., Finkelstein , S. L., Barro , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03576, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576

    2024 doi arXiv

  94. [103]

    M., Faber , S

    Koekemoer , A. M., Faber , S. M., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2011, , 197, 36. 1105.3754

    2011 arXiv

  95. [104]

    I., Greene , J

    Kokorev , V., Caputi , K. I., Greene , J. E., et al. 2024, , 968, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    2024 doi

  96. [105]

    Kormendy , J., & Ho , L. C. 2013, , 51, 511, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

    2013 doi

  97. [106]

    2004, , 42, 603, 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024

    Kormendy , J., & Kennicutt , Robert C., J. 2004, , 42, 603, 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024

    2004

  98. [107]

    R., & Dekel , A

    Krumholz , M. R., & Dekel , A. 2012, , 753, 16. 1106.0301

    2012 arXiv

  99. [108]

    R., McKee , C

    Krumholz , M. R., McKee , C. F., & Tumlinson , J. 2009, , 699, 850, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/850

    2009 doi

  100. [109]

    2023, , 616, 266, 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    Labb \'e , I., van Dokkum , P., Nelson , E., et al. 2023, , 616, 266, 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    2023 doi

  101. [110]

    E., Bezanson , R., et al

    Labbe , I., Greene , J. E., Bezanson , R., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.07320, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.07320

    2023 doi arXiv

  102. [111]

    S., et al

    Lambrides , E., Chiaberge , M., Long , A. S., et al. 2024, , 961, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad11ee

    2024 doi

  103. [112]

    S., et al

    Lang , P., Wuyts , S., Somerville , R. S., et al. 2014, , 788, 11, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/11

    2014 doi

  104. [113]

    L., Finkelstein , S

    Larson , R. L., Finkelstein , S. L., Hutchison , T. A., et al. 2022, , 930, 104, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbd

    2022 doi

  105. [114]

    L., Finkelstein , S

    Larson , R. L., Finkelstein , S. L., Kocevski , D. D., et al. 2023 a , , 953, L29, 10.3847/2041-8213/ace619

    2023 doi

  106. [115]

    L., Hutchison , T

    Larson , R. L., Hutchison , T. A., Bagley , M., et al. 2023 b , , 958, 141, 10.3847/1538-4357/acfed4

    2023 doi

  107. [116]

    2024, , 688, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347465

    Le Bail , A., Daddi , E., Elbaz , D., et al. 2024, , 688, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347465

    2024 doi

  108. [117]

    2024, , 136, 034502, 10.1088/1538-3873/ad2551

    Libralato , M., Argyriou , I., Dicken , D., et al. 2024, , 136, 034502, 10.1088/1538-3873/ad2551

    2024 doi

  109. [118]

    J., & Carollo , C

    Lilly , S. J., & Carollo , C. M. 2016, , 833, 1, 10.3847/0004-637X/833/1/1

    2016 doi

  110. [119]

    2024, , 691, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449904

    Llerena , M., Amor \' n , R., Pentericci , L., et al. 2024, , 691, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449904

    2024 doi

  111. [120]

    M., Koekemoer , A., Coe , D., et al

    Lotz , J. M., Koekemoer , A., Coe , D., et al. 2017, , 837, 97. 1605.06567

    2017 arXiv

  112. [121]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 10.1038/s41550-024-02391-9

    Lu , S., Daddi , E., Maraston , C., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 10.1038/s41550-024-02391-9

    2024 doi

  113. [122]

    F., Garrison-Kimmel , S., et al

    Ma , X., Hopkins , P. F., Garrison-Kimmel , S., et al. 2018, , 478, 1694, 10.1093/mnras/sty1024

    2018 doi

  114. [123]

    2014, , 52, 415

    Madau , P., & Dickinson , M. 2014, , 52, 415. 1403.0007

    2014 arXiv

  115. [124]

    C., Dickinson , M

    Madau , P., Ferguson , H. C., Dickinson , M. E., et al. 1996, , 283, 1388

    1996

  116. [125]

    2024 a , , 691, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    Maiolino , R., Scholtz , J., Curtis-Lake , E., et al. 2024 a , , 691, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    2024 doi

  117. [126]

    2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00504, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.00504

    Maiolino , R., Risaliti , G., Signorini , M., et al. 2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00504, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.00504

    2024 doi arXiv

  118. [127]

    C., Marchesini , D., Brammer , G

    Marsan , Z. C., Marchesini , D., Brammer , G. B., et al. 2017, , 842, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7206

    2017 doi

  119. [128]

    2024, , 685, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347884

    Mascia , S., Pentericci , L., Calabr \`o , A., et al. 2024, , 685, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347884

    2024 doi

  120. [129]

    A., Treu , T., Schmidt , K

    Mason , C. A., Treu , T., Schmidt , K. B., et al. 2015, , 805, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/79

    2015 doi

  121. [130]

    P., Brammer , G., et al

    Matthee , J., Naidu , R. P., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, , 963, 129, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  122. [131]

    J., McLure , R

    McLeod , D. J., McLure , R. J., & Dunlop , J. S. 2016, , 459, 3812, 10.1093/mnras/stw904

    2016 doi

  123. [132]

    J., McLure , R

    McLeod , D. J., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2015, , 450, 3032. 1412.1472

    2015 arXiv

  124. [133]

    J., Donnan , C

    McLeod , D. J., Donnan , C. T., McLure , R. J., et al. 2024, , 527, 5004, 10.1093/mnras/stad3471

    2024 doi

  125. [134]

    2018, , 867, 150, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae68c

    Morishita , T., Trenti , M., Stiavelli , M., et al. 2018, , 867, 150, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae68c

    2018 doi

  126. [135]

    P., Oesch , P

    Naidu , R. P., Oesch , P. A., van Dokkum , P., et al. 2022 a , , 940, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22

    2022 doi

  127. [136]

    P., Oesch , P

    Naidu , R. P., Oesch , P. A., Setton , D. J., et al. 2022 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.02794. 2208.02794

    2022 arXiv

  128. [137]

    2023, , 269, 33, 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., Isobe , Y., et al. 2023, , 269, 33, 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    2023 doi

  129. [138]

    2024, , 967, 28, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38c2

    Nakane , M., Ouchi , M., Nakajima , K., et al. 2024, , 967, 28, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38c2

    2024 doi

  130. [139]

    2024, , 688, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449644

    Napolitano , L., Pentericci , L., Santini , P., et al. 2024, , 688, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449644

    2024 doi

  131. [140]

    J., van Dokkum , P

    Nelson , E. J., van Dokkum , P. G., F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., et al. 2016, , 828, 27, 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/27

    2016 doi

  132. [141]

    A., Bouwens , R

    Oesch , P. A., Bouwens , R. J., Illingworth , G. D., et al. 2013, , 773, 75. 1301.6162

    2013 arXiv

  133. [142]

    2014, , 786, 108

    ---. 2014, , 786, 108. 1309.2280

    2014 arXiv

  134. [143]

    A., Brammer , G., van Dokkum , P

    Oesch , P. A., Brammer , G., van Dokkum , P. G., et al. 2016, , 819, 129. 1603.00461

    2016 arXiv

  135. [144]

    B., & Gunn , J

    Oke , J. B., & Gunn , J. E. 1983, , 266, 713

    1983

  136. [145]

    2023, , 942, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca9d3

    Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., Ding , X., et al. 2023, , 942, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca9d3

    2023 doi

  137. [146]

    C., & Shetty , R

    Ostriker , E. C., & Shetty , R. 2011, , 731, 41, 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/41

    2011 doi

  138. [147]

    2024, , 976, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7

    Pacucci , F., & Narayan , R. 2024, , 976, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7

    2024 doi

  139. [148]

    2019, , 488, 5580, 10.1093/mnras/stz2129

    Pandya , V., Primack , J., Behroozi , P., et al. 2019, , 488, 5580, 10.1093/mnras/stz2129

    2019 doi

  140. [149]

    2024 a , , 963, 54, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1a13

    Pandya , V., Zhang , H., Huertas-Company , M., et al. 2024 a , , 963, 54, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1a13

    2024 doi

  141. [150]

    J., et al

    Pandya , V., Loeb , A., McGrath , E. J., et al. 2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.17552. 2407.17552

    2024 arXiv

  142. [151]

    W., Yang , G., et al

    Papovich , C., Cole , J. W., Yang , G., et al. 2023, , 949, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/acc948

    2023 doi

  143. [152]

    2014, , 793, 113

    Pentericci , L., Vanzella , E., Fontana , A., et al. 2014, , 793, 113. 1403.5466

    2014 arXiv

  144. [153]

    G., Barro , G., Annunziatella , M., et al

    P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., Barro , G., Annunziatella , M., et al. 2023, , 946, L16, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb3a5

    2023 doi

  145. [154]

    2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Piqu \'e ras , L., Legros , E., Pons , A., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7738, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy IV, ed. G. Z. Angeli & P. Dierickx , 773812, 10.1117/12.856860

    2010 doi

  146. [155]

    E., et al

    Pirzkal , N., Malhotra , S., Ryan , R. E., et al. 2017, , 846, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81cc

    2017 doi

  147. [156]

    E., et al

    Pirzkal , N., Rothberg , B., Ryan , R. E., et al. 2018, , 868, 61, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae585

    2018 doi

  148. [157]

    2024, , 969, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad429c

    Pirzkal , N., Rothberg , B., Papovich , C., et al. 2024, , 969, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad429c

    2024 doi

  149. [158]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.16339, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.16339

    Pozo , A., Broadhurst , T., Emami , R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.16339, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.16339

    2024 doi

  150. [159]

    A., Topping , M

    Reddy , N. A., Topping , M. W., Sanders , R. L., Shapley , A. E., & Brammer , G. 2023, , 948, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc869

    2023 doi

  151. [160]

    2023, arminrest/jhat: The JWST HST Alignment Tool (JHAT) , v2, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7892935

    Rest , A., Pierel , J., Correnti , M., et al. 2023, arminrest/jhat: The JWST HST Alignment Tool (JHAT) , v2, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7892935

    2023 doi

  152. [161]

    J., Kelly , D

    Rieke , M. J., Kelly , D. M., Misselt , K., et al. 2023 a , , 135, 028001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53

    2023 doi

  153. [162]

    J., Robertson , B., Tacchella , S., et al

    Rieke , M. J., Robertson , B., Tacchella , S., et al. 2023 b , , 269, 16, 10.3847/1538-4365/acf44d

    2023 doi

  154. [163]

    2023, , 135, 048001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    Rigby , J., Perrin , M., McElwain , M., et al. 2023, , 135, 048001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    2023 doi

  155. [164]

    D., Tacchella , S., et al

    Robertson , B., Johnson , B. D., Tacchella , S., et al. 2024, , 970, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad463d

    2024 doi

  156. [165]

    E., Tacchella , S., Johnson , B

    Robertson , B. E., Tacchella , S., Johnson , B. D., et al. 2023, , 942, L42, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca086

    2023 doi

  157. [166]

    S., Snyder , G

    Rose , C., Kartaltepe , J. S., Snyder , G. F., et al. 2023, , 942, 54, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9f10

    2023 doi

  158. [167]

    2024, , 976, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dd4

    ---. 2024, , 976, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dd4

    2024 doi

  159. [168]

    2016, , 827, 20, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/20

    Salmon , B., Papovich , C., Long , J., et al. 2016, , 827, 20, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/20

    2016 doi

  160. [169]

    L., Shapley , A

    Sanders , R. L., Shapley , A. E., Topping , M. W., Reddy , N. A., & Brammer , G. B. 2023, , 955, 54, 10.3847/1538-4357/acedad

    2023 doi

  161. [170]

    2024, , 962, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc

    ---. 2024, , 962, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc

    2024 doi

  162. [171]

    2014, , 783, 84, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/84

    Scoville , N., Aussel , H., Sheth , K., et al. 2014, , 783, 84, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/84

    2014 doi

  163. [172]

    Sellwood , J. A. 2016, , 819, 92, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/92

    2016 doi

  164. [173]

    E., Reddy , N

    Shapley , A. E., Reddy , N. A., Sanders , R. L., Topping , M. W., & Brammer , G. B. 2023 a , , 950, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd939

    2023 doi

  165. [174]

    E., Sanders , R

    Shapley , A. E., Sanders , R. L., Reddy , N. A., Topping , M. W., & Brammer , G. B. 2023 b , , 954, 157, 10.3847/1538-4357/acea5a

    2023 doi

  166. [175]

    E., Steidel , C

    Shapley , A. E., Steidel , C. C., Strom , A. L., et al. 2016, , 826, L24. 1606.00443

    2016 arXiv

  167. [176]

    2016, , 821, 72

    Shibuya , T., Ouchi , M., Kubo , M., & Harikane , Y. 2016, , 821, 72. 1511.07054

    2016 arXiv

  168. [177]

    2011, , 738, 69

    Shim , H., Chary , R.-R., Dickinson , M., et al. 2011, , 738, 69

    2011

  169. [178]

    V., Papovich , C., Rieke , G

    Shipley , H. V., Papovich , C., Rieke , G. H., Brown , M. J. I., & Moustakas , J. 2016, , 818, 60, 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/60

    2016 doi

  170. [179]

    2024, , 527, 6139, 10.1093/mnras/stad3605

    Simmonds , C., Tacchella , S., Hainline , K., et al. 2024, , 527, 6139, 10.1093/mnras/stad3605

    2024 doi

  171. [180]

    J., Franx , M., et al

    Smit , R., Bouwens , R. J., Franx , M., et al. 2015, , 801, 122. 1412.0663

    2015 arXiv

  172. [181]

    Smith , J. D. T., Draine , B. T., Dale , D. A., et al. 2007, , 656, 770, 10.1086/510549

    2007 doi

  173. [182]

    S., Popping , G., & Trager , S

    Somerville , R. S., Popping , G., & Trager , S. C. 2015, , 453, 4337, 10.1093/mnras/stv1877

    2015 doi

  174. [183]

    P., Ellis , R

    Stark , D. P., Ellis , R. S., & Ouchi , M. 2011, , 728, L2. 1009.5471

    2011 arXiv

  175. [184]

    P., Schenker , M

    Stark , D. P., Schenker , M. A., Ellis , R., et al. 2013, , 763, 129. 1208.3529

    2013 arXiv

  176. [185]

    P., Richard , J., Siana , B., et al

    Stark , D. P., Richard , J., Siana , B., et al. 2014, , 445, 3200. 1408.1420

    2014 arXiv

  177. [186]

    P., Ellis , R

    Stark , D. P., Ellis , R. S., Charlot , S., et al. 2016, . 1606.01304

    2016 arXiv

  178. [187]

    2017, , 229, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa66cb

    Stefanon , M., Yan , H., Mobasher , B., et al. 2017, , 229, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa66cb

    2017 doi

  179. [188]

    C., Bogosavljevi \'c , M., Shapley , A

    Steidel , C. C., Bogosavljevi \'c , M., Shapley , A. E., et al. 2018, , 869, 123. 1805.06071

    2018 arXiv

  180. [189]

    C., Giavalisco , M., Dickinson , M., & Adelberger , K

    Steidel , C. C., Giavalisco , M., Dickinson , M., & Adelberger , K. L. 1996, , 112, 352, 10.1086/118019

    1996 doi

  181. [190]

    C., Strom , A

    Steidel , C. C., Strom , A. L., Pettini , M., et al. 2016, , 826, 159, 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/159

    2016 doi

  182. [191]

    J., & Johnson , B

    Tacchella , S., Bose , S., Conroy , C., Eisenstein , D. J., & Johnson , B. D. 2018, , 868, 92, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e0

    2018 doi

  183. [192]

    M., et al

    Tacchella , S., Dekel , A., Carollo , C. M., et al. 2016, , 458, 242, 10.1093/mnras/stw303

    2016 doi

  184. [193]

    Tacchella , S., Trenti , M., & Carollo , C. M. 2013, , 768, L37, 10.1088/2041-8205/768/2/L37

    2013 doi

  185. [194]

    M., Renzini , A., et al

    Tacchella , S., Carollo , C. M., Renzini , A., et al. 2015, Science, 348, 314, 10.1126/science.1261094

    2015 doi

  186. [195]

    J., Hainline , K., et al

    Tacchella , S., Eisenstein , D. J., Hainline , K., et al. 2023, , 952, 74, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdbc6

    2023 doi

  187. [196]

    P., Chen , Z., et al

    Tang , M., Stark , D. P., Chen , Z., et al. 2023, , 526, 1657, 10.1093/mnras/stad2763

    2023 doi

  188. [197]

    2016, , 827, L14

    Tilvi , V., Pirzkal , N., Malhotra , S., et al. 2016, , 827, L14. 1605.06519

    2016 arXiv

  189. [198]

    2016, , 458, 4477, 10.1093/mnras/stw606

    Tomassetti , M., Dekel , A., Mandelker , N., et al. 2016, , 458, 4477, 10.1093/mnras/stw606

    2016 doi

  190. [199]

    J., Bundy , K., et al

    Trujillo , I., Conselice , C. J., Bundy , K., et al. 2007, , 382, 109, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12388.x

    2007

  191. [200]

    R., Weiner , B

    Trump , J. R., Weiner , B. J., Scarlata , C., et al. 2011, , 743, 144, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/144

    2011 doi

  192. [201]

    G., et al

    van der Wel , A., Franx , M., van Dokkum , P. G., et al. 2014 a , , 788, 28, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/28

    2014 doi

  193. [202]

    F., et al

    van der Wel , A., Chang , Y.-Y., Bell , E. F., et al. 2014 b , , 792, L6, 10.1088/2041-8205/792/1/L6

    2014 doi

  194. [203]

    G., Franx , M., Kriek , M., et al

    van Dokkum , P. G., Franx , M., Kriek , M., et al. 2008, , 677, L5, 10.1086/587874

    2008 doi

  195. [204]

    G., Bezanson , R., van der Wel , A., et al

    van Dokkum , P. G., Bezanson , R., van der Wel , A., et al. 2014, , 791, 45, 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/45

    2014 doi

  196. [205]

    2024, , 961, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad05bb

    Vega-Ferrero , J., Huertas-Company , M., Costantin , L., et al. 2024, , 961, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad05bb

    2024 doi

  197. [206]

    2015, , 449, 361, 10.1093/mnras/stv303

    Wellons , S., Torrey , P., Ma , C.-P., et al. 2015, , 449, 361, 10.1093/mnras/stv303

    2015 doi

  198. [207]

    P., et al

    Whitler , L., Endsley , R., Stark , D. P., et al. 2023, , 519, 157, 10.1093/mnras/stac3535

    2023 doi

  199. [208]

    P., Endsley , R., et al

    Whitler , L., Stark , D. P., Endsley , R., et al. 2024, , 529, 855, 10.1093/mnras/stae516

    2024 doi

  200. [209]

    M., Feng , Y., Di Matteo , T., et al

    Wilkins , S. M., Feng , Y., Di Matteo , T., et al. 2017, , 469, 2517, 10.1093/mnras/stx841

    2017 doi

  201. [210]

    C., Giavalisco , M., Bezanson , R., et al

    Williams , C. C., Giavalisco , M., Bezanson , R., et al. 2017, , 838, 94, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa662f

    2017 doi

  202. [211]

    E., Blacker , B., Dickinson , M., et al

    Williams , R. E., Blacker , B., Dickinson , M., et al. 1996, , 112, 1335, 10.1086/118105

    1996 doi

  203. [212]

    S., Rieke , G

    Wright , G. S., Rieke , G. H., Glasse , A., et al. 2023, , 135, 048003, 10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66

    2023 doi

  204. [213]

    M., van der Wel , A., et al

    Wuyts , S., F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., van der Wel , A., et al. 2011, , 742, 96, 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/96

    2011 doi

  205. [214]

    M., Genzel , R., et al

    Wuyts , S., F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., Genzel , R., et al. 2012, , 753, 114, 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/114

    2012 doi

  206. [215]

    H., Norman , M

    Xu , H., Wise , J. H., Norman , M. L., Ahn , K., & O'Shea , B. W. 2016, , 833, 84. 1604.07842

    2016 arXiv

  207. [216]

    B., et al

    Yang , G., Papovich , C., Bagley , M. B., et al. 2023 a , , 956, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfaa0

    2023 doi

  208. [217]

    I., Papovich , C., et al

    Yang , G., Caputi , K. I., Papovich , C., et al. 2023 b , , 950, L5, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd639

    2023 doi

  209. [218]

    S., Pullen , A

    Yang , S., Somerville , R. S., Pullen , A. R., et al. 2021, , 911, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/abec75

    2021 doi

  210. [219]

    T., et al

    Yue , M., Eilers , A.-C., Ananna , T. T., et al. 2024, , 974, L26, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba

    2024 doi

  211. [220]

    Yung , L. Y. A., Somerville , R. S., Finkelstein , S. L., Popping , G., & Dav \'e , R. 2019, , 483, 2983, 10.1093/mnras/sty3241

    2019 doi

  212. [221]

    Yung , L. Y. A., Somerville , R. S., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2020, , 496, 4574, 10.1093/mnras/staa1800

    2020 doi

  213. [222]

    Yung , L. Y. A., Somerville , R. S., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2022, , 515, 5416, 10.1093/mnras/stac2139

    2022 doi

  214. [223]

    A., Buat , V., Casey , C

    Zavala , J. A., Buat , V., Casey , C. M., et al. 2023, , 943, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/acacfe

    2023 doi

  215. [224]

    A., Castellano , M., Akins , H

    Zavala , J. A., Castellano , M., Akins , H. B., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.10491, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.10491

    2024 doi arXiv

  216. [225]

    R., Faber , S

    Zhang , H., Primack , J. R., Faber , S. M., et al. 2019, , 484, 5170, 10.1093/mnras/stz339

    2019 doi

  217. [226]

    2015, , 810, L12

    Zitrin , A., Labb \'e , I., Belli , S., et al. 2015, , 810, L12. 1507.02679

    2015 arXiv

  218. [227]

    2015, , 450, 2327, 10.1093/mnras/stv740

    Zolotov , A., Dekel , A., Mandelker , N., et al. 2015, , 450, 2327, 10.1093/mnras/stv740

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.