Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LTNER: Large Language Model Tagging for Named Entity Recognition with Contextualized Entity Marking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.05624 v1 pith:FNMHEN6I submitted 2024-04-08 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsentitylearningcontextcontextualizedlanguageltnermarking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of LLMs for natural language processing has become a popular trend in the past two years, driven by their formidable capacity for context comprehension and learning, which has inspired a wave of research from academics and industry professionals. However, for certain NLP tasks, such as NER, the performance of LLMs still falls short when compared to supervised learning methods. In our research, we developed a NER processing framework called LTNER that incorporates a revolutionary Contextualized Entity Marking Gen Method. By leveraging the cost-effective GPT-3.5 coupled with context learning that does not require additional training, we significantly improved the accuracy of LLMs in handling NER tasks. The F1 score on the CoNLL03 dataset increased from the initial 85.9% to 91.9%, approaching the performance of supervised fine-tuning. This outcome has led to a deeper understanding of the potential of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Runtime-Structured Task Decomposition for Agentic Coding Systems

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Runtime-structured task decomposition reduces retry costs in agentic coding systems by up to 51.7% versus monolithic prompts by rerunning only failed subtasks on two software engineering workloads.

Pith tools