Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Perceptual Quality Assessment Exploration for AIGC Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.12618 v1 pith:FPB47ZEO submitted 2023-03-22 cs.CV eess.IV

A Perceptual Quality Assessment Exploration for AIGC Images

classification cs.CV eess.IV
keywords qualityagisassessmentaigcimagesmodelsperceptualunderline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

\underline{AI} \underline{G}enerated \underline{C}ontent (\textbf{AIGC}) has gained widespread attention with the increasing efficiency of deep learning in content creation. AIGC, created with the assistance of artificial intelligence technology, includes various forms of content, among which the AI-generated images (AGIs) have brought significant impact to society and have been applied to various fields such as entertainment, education, social media, etc. However, due to hardware limitations and technical proficiency, the quality of AIGC images (AGIs) varies, necessitating refinement and filtering before practical use. Consequently, there is an urgent need for developing objective models to assess the quality of AGIs. Unfortunately, no research has been carried out to investigate the perceptual quality assessment for AGIs specifically. Therefore, in this paper, we first discuss the major evaluation aspects such as technical issues, AI artifacts, unnaturalness, discrepancy, and aesthetics for AGI quality assessment. Then we present the first perceptual AGI quality assessment database, AGIQA-1K, which consists of 1,080 AGIs generated from diffusion models. A well-organized subjective experiment is followed to collect the quality labels of the AGIs. Finally, we conduct a benchmark experiment to evaluate the performance of current image quality assessment (IQA) models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Patch Knowledge Transfer for Efficient AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Patch Knowledge Transfer distills multi-patch local-global quality cues into a single-scale student, matching teacher accuracy at 67.7% lower FLOPs on four AIGIQA benchmarks.

  2. ACPO: Anchor-Constrained Perceptual Optimization for Diffusion Models with No-Reference Quality Guidance

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ACPO uses anchor-based regularization with NR-IQA guidance to enable stable perceptual quality improvements in diffusion model fine-tuning.