Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

How Does Learning Rate Decay Help Modern Neural Networks?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.01878 v2 pith:FPF2CDRS submitted 2019-08-05 cs.LG stat.ML

How Does Learning Rate Decay Help Modern Neural Networks?

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords learningratelrdecaymodernnetworksneuraltrainingexplanation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning rate decay (lrDecay) is a \emph{de facto} technique for training modern neural networks. It starts with a large learning rate and then decays it multiple times. It is empirically observed to help both optimization and generalization. Common beliefs in how lrDecay works come from the optimization analysis of (Stochastic) Gradient Descent: 1) an initially large learning rate accelerates training or helps the network escape spurious local minima; 2) decaying the learning rate helps the network converge to a local minimum and avoid oscillation. Despite the popularity of these common beliefs, experiments suggest that they are insufficient in explaining the general effectiveness of lrDecay in training modern neural networks that are deep, wide, and nonconvex. We provide another novel explanation: an initially large learning rate suppresses the network from memorizing noisy data while decaying the learning rate improves the learning of complex patterns. The proposed explanation is validated on a carefully-constructed dataset with tractable pattern complexity. And its implication, that additional patterns learned in later stages of lrDecay are more complex and thus less transferable, is justified in real-world datasets. We believe that this alternative explanation will shed light into the design of better training strategies for modern neural networks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Automated Solar Radio Burst Detection Using Deep Learning on Augmented e-Callisto Data

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    FlareSense, a ResNet detector trained on 304,750 e-Callisto spectrograms with SpecAugment and TimeWarp, reaches 93% precision and 73.15% recall, outperforming routine expert cataloging at matched precision.

  2. Anytime Training with Schedule-Free Spectral Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SF-NorMuon is a new schedule-free spectral optimizer that closes the gap with tuned AdamW on 125M-772M parameter models across 1-8x Chinchilla horizons while providing stationarity guarantees.

  3. UniAda: Universal Adaptive Multi-objective Adversarial Attack for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    UniAda introduces a white-box multi-objective attack using adaptive weighting to generate perturbations that jointly affect steering and speed in E2E ADS, outperforming benchmarks with average deviations of 3.54-29 de...