Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 9 cited by

$NavA^3$: Understanding Any Instruction, Navigating Anywhere, Finding Anything

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A two-stage robot navigator aims to follow any instruction and find any object.

desk verdict As submitted, the full text is an unrelated astro-ph paper, so the navigation claims cannot be checked; send it back to the authors before any review is even possible. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04598 v1 pith:FQ57NMSM submitted 2025-08-06 cs.RO

Lingfeng Zhang , Xiaoshuai Hao , Yingbo Tang , Haoxiang Fu , Xinyu Zheng , Pengwei Wang , Zhongyuan Wang , Wenbo Ding
show 1 more author
Shanghang Zhang
This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords embodiednavigationhigh-levelinstructionfollowingopen-vocabularyobjectlocalizationspatialaffordancevision-languagemodellong-horizontasksrobotembodimenthierarchicalpolicy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

NavA³ claims that long-horizon embodied navigation from open-ended human instructions can be decomposed into two learnable stages: a global policy that reasons about where the goal object probably is, and a local policy that pins down the object and navigates to it. The global stage uses a reasoning vision-language model on global 3D scene views; the local stage uses a pointing VLM called NaviAfford, trained on a collected 1.0M-sample spatial-aware affordance dataset, to localize objects with an open vocabulary. If the claim holds, robots could move beyond predefined object categories and carry out instructions the way humans actually give them, across different robot bodies. The abstract reports state-of-the-art navigation performance and successful real-world long-horizon completions. The attached full text is a different manuscript, an astronomy paper on magnetic fields, so these claims currently rest on the abstract alone.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the two-stage global/local policy hierarchy. Its load-bearing components are the Reasoning-VLM, which couples high-level language understanding with global 3D views to produce region-level proposals, and the NaviAfford PointingVLM, trained on the 1.0M-sample spatial-aware affordance dataset, which converts those proposals into concrete object localization for goal identification and navigation.

What would settle it

Evaluate NaviAfford on held-out objects that do not appear in the 1.0M-sample training distribution, in a room never used during development, and compare its predicted locations against ground truth; if open-vocabulary localization falls to chance levels, the paper's central claim fails. Also check that the published full text actually contains the method, dataset, and experiments described in the abstract.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that instruction-driven navigation can be recast as a hierarchical search: a Reasoning-VLM interprets a high-level instruction together with a global 3D scene representation to propose the region most likely to contain the goal object, and NaviAfford, a PointingVLM trained on 1.0 million spatial-aware affordance samples, supplies open-vocabulary object localization and spatial awareness for the final approach. The claimed payoff is a single system that completes long-horizon navigation tasks across different robot embodiments in real-world settings, with the released dataset intended to support further work on open-vocabulary spatial afforda

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 1.0 million spatial-aware affordance samples teach NaviAfford to localize arbitrary, open-vocabulary objects in unseen real environments, so that success in the reported settings transfers to the open-ended cases the framework is built for.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If NavA³ is correct, robots can be instructed in ordinary language for long-horizon tasks instead of being given a predefined target object or route.
  • Open-vocabulary spatial affordance learning would let a single local policy find objects never seen during training, in new environments.
  • The released 1.0M-sample dataset would become a reusable resource for training other pointing and affordance models for navigation.
  • Because the framework is two-stage, the same reasoning policy could be paired with different embodiments, supporting transfer across robot platforms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural diagnostic follows from the hierarchy: measure global region-proposal errors and local pointing errors separately; if long-horizon failures track the Reasoning-VLM's region choices more than NaviAfford's pointing, the bottleneck is instruction-to-region grounding rather than object localization.
  • The open-vocabulary claim could be stress-tested by training NaviAfford on random subsets of the 1.0M samples and checking whether localization accuracy scales with affordance diversity; the paper's framing predicts continued gains.
  • A stronger version of the claim is that spatial affordance supervision transfers across embodiments; that can be tested by fine-tuning on one robot and deploying on another without additional data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The submission presents, in its abstract, a hierarchical framework called NavA^3 for long-horizon embodied navigation. The claimed design has a global policy in which a Reasoning-VLM interprets high-level human instructions using global 3D scene views, and a local policy in which a PointingVLM (NaviAfford), trained on a 1.0M-sample spatial-aware affordance dataset, performs open-vocabulary object localization. The abstract asserts state-of-the-art navigation performance and successful real-world long-horizon tasks across different robot embodiments. However, the full text of the submission is not the NavA^3 paper: it is arXiv:2508.04599, an astro-ph manuscript on magnetic-field alignment in the Central Molecular Zone, with a different title and author list. Consequently, the submitted document contains no method description, dataset collection protocol, training details, equations, experiments, baselines, or ablations supporting the NavA^3 claims. The only in-scope NavA^3 content is the abstract.

Significance. If the claims in the abstract are correct, NavA^3 would be a meaningful contribution to embodied AI: a single system that understands high-level instructions, navigates open-vocabulary object goals, and transfers across embodiments would address a recognized limitation of existing navigation benchmarks. Release of a 1M-sample spatial affordance dataset would also be a potentially useful community resource. However, none of this can be evaluated from the submitted manuscript. No architecture details, equations, tables, or results are present; the promise of dataset/code release and a project website do not constitute evidence. There are no machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations to credit. The 'SOTA' claim is unverifiable and the proposed method is not auditable in this submission.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text (arXiv:2508.04599)] The submitted body is the astro-ph paper 'Parallel Alignments between Magnetic Fields and Dense Structures in the Central Molecular Zone,' not a paper on navigation. There is no section describing NavA^3, no equation for the global/local policies, and no table of navigation results. The abstract's central SOTA and real-world claims are therefore entirely unsupported. This is a load-bearing document-level failure that cannot be addressed by a routine revision.
  2. [Abstract, local-policy dataset claim] The claim that 1.0M spatial-aware affordance samples train 'robust open-vocabulary object localization' is free of any supporting specification. The submission does not state how the data were collected, annotated, or distributed across objects/scenes, nor what modalities (RGB-D, point cloud, 2D images) are used. Without such details, the generalization from the dataset to open-vocabulary objects and unseen real environments is an assumption, not a demonstrated result.
  3. [Abstract, global-policy and 'SOTA' claim] The interface between Reasoning-VLM region proposals and executable robot actions is unspecified: no goal conditioning, costmap, planner, or embodiment-specific adaptation is described. The abstract names no benchmarks, baselines, or metrics, so 'SOTA results in navigation performance' is undefined. This makes the central claim impossible to reproduce or falsify from the submission.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'longhorizon' should be 'long-horizon'.
  2. [Abstract] 'NavA^3' should be typeset consistently; the superscript notation is ambiguous in plain text.
  3. [Abstract] No references or definitions are provided for 'Reasoning-VLM' or 'NaviAfford'; these appear to be introduced terms and need citations or formal definitions.
  4. [General] The project website URL and the statement 'dataset and code will be made available' are not substitutes for the missing technical content in the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity demonstrable from the only in-scope text (the abstract); the supplied body is an unrelated astro-ph manuscript, so the NavA^3 derivation chain cannot be audited.

full rationale

The only NavA^3 content provided is the abstract; the accompanying full text is arXiv:2508.04599, an unrelated astro-ph paper on magnetic fields in the Central Molecular Zone. The abstract's claimed derivation chain is: a Reasoning-VLM parses high-level instructions with global 3D scene views to propose regions; a PointingVLM (NaviAfford), trained on the authors' 1.0M-sample spatial affordance dataset, performs open-vocabulary localization; extensive experiments yield SOTA navigation across embodiments. No equations, dataset splits, baselines, evaluation scenes, or protocols are given. Hard rule 1 requires that circularity be exhibited by quoting a specific reduction (e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction). No such reduction can be quoted here because the abstract states no mathematical relation and no experimental design. Training a model on one's own dataset is not itself circular; the claim that it generalizes to open-vocabulary objects and unseen environments is an empirical assertion, not a definitional equivalence. The absence of an external benchmark is a verifiability and evidence-quality concern, not a demonstrated circularity. The document mismatch prevents substantive review of the method, but on the circularity axis the honest finding is no significant circularity. If further text becomes available, the PointingVLM training/evaluation overlap and the Reasoning-VLM region-to-goal conversion should be re-examined for potential fitted-input-called-prediction issues.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Provisional ledger: the submitted full text is an unrelated astrophysics manuscript, so only the abstract can be audited. No fitted parameters are visible, so free_parameters is empty. The central claim rests on unverified domain assumptions about VLM reasoning, dataset generalization, and evaluation fairness. A re-audit of the real NavA^3 text should check overlap between the 1.0M affordance training samples and the evaluation scenes, and whether the SOTA comparisons use fair baselines.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Reasoning-VLMs can parse high-level human instructions into actionable region-level navigation goals from global 3D scene views.
    The global policy's entire function depends on this capability; the abstract asserts it without evidence (Abstract, global policy sentence).
  • domain assumption A PointingVLM trained on the authors' 1.0M-sample spatial-aware affordance dataset generalizes to open-vocabulary objects, unseen environments, and multiple robot embodiments.
    The local policy and the cross-embodiment claim rest on this transfer; collection protocol, annotation method, and test distribution are not described in the abstract (Abstract, local policy sentence).
  • domain assumption The evaluation environments, baselines, and metrics fairly represent the real-world long-horizon navigation task.
    The SOTA claim is only meaningful if baselines are comparable and the affordance training distribution does not overlap the test scenes; no evaluation setup is present in the document.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $NavA^3$: Understanding Any Instruction, Navigating Anywhere, Finding Anything." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FQ57NMSM

@misc{pith2026250804598,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $NavA^3$: Understanding Any Instruction, Navigating Anywhere, Finding Anything},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FQ57NMSM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04598}
}
abstract

Embodied navigation is a fundamental capability of embodied intelligence, enabling robots to move and interact within physical environments. However, existing navigation tasks primarily focus on predefined object navigation or instruction following, which significantly differs from human needs in real-world scenarios involving complex, open-ended scenes. To bridge this gap, we introduce a challenging long-horizon navigation task that requires understanding high-level human instructions and performing spatial-aware object navigation in real-world environments. Existing embodied navigation methods struggle with such tasks due to their limitations in comprehending high-level human instructions and localizing objects with an open vocabulary. In this paper, we propose $NavA^3$, a hierarchical framework divided into two stages: global and local policies. In the global policy, we leverage the reasoning capabilities of Reasoning-VLM to parse high-level human instructions and integrate them with global 3D scene views. This allows us to reason and navigate to regions most likely to contain the goal object. In the local policy, we have collected a dataset of 1.0 million samples of spatial-aware object affordances to train the NaviAfford model (PointingVLM), which provides robust open-vocabulary object localization and spatial awareness for precise goal identification and navigation in complex environments. Extensive experiments demonstrate that $NavA^3$ achieves SOTA results in navigation performance and can successfully complete longhorizon navigation tasks across different robot embodiments in real-world settings, paving the way for universal embodied navigation. The dataset and code will be made available. Project website: https://NavigationA3.github.io/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uni-LaViRA: Language-Vision-Robot Actions Translation for Unified Embodied Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A zero-shot unified agent for VLN-CE, ObjectNav, EQA and Aerial-VLN on wheeled, quadruped, humanoid and UAV platforms that translates language and vision inputs into actions via MLLMs plus TDM and SCB mechanisms, matc...

  2. Xiaomi OneVL: One-Step Latent Reasoning and Planning with Vision-Language Explanation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    OneVL achieves superior accuracy to explicit chain-of-thought reasoning at answer-only latency by supervising latent tokens with a visual world model decoder that predicts future frames.

  3. Xiaomi OneVL: One-Step Latent Reasoning and Planning with Vision-Language Explanation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    OneVL is the first latent CoT method to exceed explicit CoT accuracy on four driving benchmarks while running at answer-only speed, by supervising latent tokens with a visual world model decoder.

  4. Weather-Conditioned Branch Routing for Robust LiDAR-Radar 3D Object Detection

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A routing framework maintains three parallel 3D feature streams for LiDAR, 4D radar, and fusion, with a lightweight router using weather prompts to dynamically weight them and auxiliary supervision to keep branches di...

  5. Structured Observation Language for Efficient and Generalizable Vision-Language Navigation

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SOL-Nav encodes RGB-D observations as grid-organized text and uses a 0.6B text-embedding model with four classification heads to predict navigation action blocks, reporting SOTA/comparable R2R-CE/RxR-CE results with 1...

  6. MiMo-Embodied: X-Embodied Foundation Model Technical Report

    cs.RO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MiMo-Embodied is a single foundation model that achieves state-of-the-art results on 17 embodied AI benchmarks and 12 autonomous driving benchmarks through multi-stage learning, curated data, and CoT/RL fine-tuning th...

  7. FutureNav: Unified World-Action Modeling for Vision-and-Language Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    FutureNav proposes a 4B-scale VLM that jointly optimizes action prediction, inverse/forward dynamics, and future state generation for VLN and reports SOTA results on multiple benchmarks.

  8. EffiNav: Fusing Depth and Vision-Language for Efficient Object Goal Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    EffiNav combines depth and vision-language inputs for efficient object goal navigation, matching or exceeding baselines on success rate and path-length-weighted success across simulation benchmarks and real-robot tests.

  9. Structured Observation Language for Efficient and Generalizable Vision-Language Navigation

    cs.CV 2026-03 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A 0.6B language model navigates by reading grid-structured text descriptions of depth, object class, and color instead of images, with reported R2R-CE/RxR-CE scores near the top of the leaderboard.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    T., Longmore, S

    Barnes, A. T., Longmore, S. N., Battersby, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 2263, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx941

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx941 2017

  2. [2]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aba18e

    Battersby, C., Keto, E., Walker, D., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aba18e

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aba18e 2020

  3. [3]

    L., Barnes, A., et al

    Battersby, C., Walker, D. L., Barnes, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.17334, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.17334

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.17334 2024

  4. [4]

    O., Chuss, D

    Butterfield, N. O., Chuss, D. T., Guerra, J. A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12b9

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad12b9 2024

  5. [5]

    1953, ApJ, 118, 113, doi: 10.1086/145731

    Chandrasekhar, S., & Fermi, E. 1953, ApJ, 118, 113, doi: 10.1086/145731

    doi:10.1086/145731 1953

  6. [6]

    K., & Li, Z.-Y

    Chen, C.-Y., King, P. K., & Li, Z.-Y. 2016, ApJ, 829, 84, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/84

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/84 2016

  7. [7]

    C.-Y., Fissel, L

    Chen, M. C.-Y., Fissel, L. M., Sadavoy, S. I., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1938, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1829

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1829 2024

  8. [8]

    Kirk, J. M. 2004, ApJ, 600, 279, doi: 10.1086/379705

    doi:10.1086/379705 2004

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    S., Schuller, F., et al

    Csengeri, T., Urquhart, J. S., Schuller, F., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322434

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    1951, Physical Review, 81, 890, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.81.890.2

    Davis, L. 1951, Physical Review, 81, 890, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.81.890.2

    1951 doi

  3. [11]

    1991, Ap&SS, 181, 313, doi: 10.1007/BF00639097

    Demircan, O., & Kahraman, G. 1991, Ap&SS, 181, 313, doi: 10.1007/BF00639097

    1991 doi

  4. [12]

    R., Cernicharo, J., et al

    Etxaluze, M., Goicoechea, J. R., Cernicharo, J., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321258 Falceta-Gon¸ calves, D., Lazarian, A., & Kowal, G. 2008, ApJ, 679, 537, doi: 10.1086/587479 Ferri` ere, K. 2009, A&A, 505, 1183, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912617

    2013 doi

  5. [13]

    M., Ade, P

    Fissel, L. M., Ade, P. A. R., Angil` e, F. E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 878, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb0

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    A., Claussen, M

    Gaume, R. A., Claussen, M. J., de Pree, C. G., Goss, W. M., & Mehringer, D. M. 1995, ApJ, 449, 663, doi: 10.1086/176087

    1995 doi

  7. [15]

    2018, ApJ, 853, 171, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d4

    Ginsburg, A., Bally, J., Barnes, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 171, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d4

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    2021, MNRAS, 507, 5641, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2157

    Girichidis, P. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 5641, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2157

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    Glover, S. C. O., & Clark, P. C. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 377, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21737.x

    2012

  10. [18]

    F., Lis, D

    Goldsmith, P. F., Lis, D. C., Hills, R., & Lasenby, J. 1990, ApJ, 350, 186, doi: 10.1086/168372

    1990 doi

  11. [19]

    E., Hensley, B

    Guan, Y., Clark, S. E., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac133f

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    A., Runyan, M

    Harper, D. A., Runyan, M. C., Dowell, C. D., et al. 2018, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 7, 1840008, doi: 10.1142/S2251171718400081

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    P., Battersby, C., Barnes, A

    Hatchfield, H. P., Battersby, C., Barnes, A. T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad10af

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    2013, A&A, 556, A153, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321292

    Hennebelle, P. 2013, A&A, 556, A153, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321292

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    D., Longmore, S

    Henshaw, J. D., Longmore, S. N., Kruijssen, J. M. D., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 2675, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw121

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Heyer, M., & Dame, T. M. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 583, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122324

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    Vaillancourt, J. E. 2009, ApJ, 696, 567, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/567

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    Houde, M., Hull, C. L. H., Plambeck, R. L., Vaillancourt, J. E., & Hildebrand, R. H. 2016, ApJ, 820, 38, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/38

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    2009, ApJ, 706, 1504, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1504

    Chitsazzadeh, S., & Kirby, L. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1504, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1504

    2009 doi

  20. [28]

    Hu, Y., Lazarian, A., & Wang, Q. D. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 829, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac159

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    L., Mauersberger, R., et al

    Huettemeister, S., Wilson, T. L., Mauersberger, R., et al. 1995, A&A, 294, 667

    1995

  22. [30]

    H., Sormani, M

    Hunter, G. H., Sormani, M. C., Beckmann, J. P., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A216, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450000

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    1993, A&A, 276, 445

    Mauersberger, R. 1993, A&A, 276, 445

    1993

  24. [33]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.11552, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.11552

    Karoly, J., Ward-Thompson, D., Pattle, K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.11552, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.11552

    2025 doi arXiv

  25. [34]

    2013, ApJL, 765, L35, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L35

    Kauffmann, J., Pillai, T., & Zhang, Q. 2013, ApJL, 765, L35, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L35

    2013 doi

  26. [35]

    2017, A&A, 603, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628088

    Kauffmann, J., Pillai, T., Zhang, Q., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628088

    2017 doi

  27. [36]

    2013, ApJL, 775, L50, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/L50

    Kendrew, S., Ginsburg, A., Johnston, K., et al. 2013, ApJL, 775, L50, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/L50

    2013 doi

  28. [37]

    Kruijssen, J. M. D., Longmore, S. N., Elmegreen, B. G., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3370, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu494

    2014 doi

  29. [38]

    R., & Kruijssen, J

    Krumholz, M. R., & Kruijssen, J. M. D. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 739, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1670

    2015 doi

  30. [39]

    Kuiper, G. P. 1938, ApJ, 88, 472, doi: 10.1086/143999

    1938 doi

  31. [40]

    J., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J

    Lada, C. J., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J. F. 2010, ApJ, 724, 687, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/687

    2010 doi

  32. [41]

    Lazarian, A., & Yuen, K. H. 2018, ApJ, 853, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa241

    2018 doi

  33. [42]

    C., & Goldsmith, P

    Lis, D. C., & Goldsmith, P. F. 1991, ApJ, 369, 157, doi: 10.1086/169746 20

    1991 doi

  34. [43]

    2021, ApJ, 919, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cec

    Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Commer¸ con, B., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cec

    2021 doi

  35. [44]

    2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 943556, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2022.943556

    Liu, J., Zhang, Q., & Qiu, K. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 943556, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2022.943556

    2022

  36. [45]

    2020, ApJ, 895, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9087

    Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Qiu, K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9087

    2020 doi

  37. [46]

    M., et al

    Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Koch, P. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb540

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    N., Rathborne, J., Bastian, N., et al

    Longmore, S. N., Rathborne, J., Bastian, N., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 117, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/117

    2012 doi

  39. [48]

    N., Bally, J., Testi, L., et al

    Longmore, S. N., Bally, J., Testi, L., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 987, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts376

    2013 doi

  40. [49]

    2015, ApJL, 814, L18, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/814/2/L18 —

    Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Kauffmann, J., et al. 2015, ApJL, 814, L18, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/814/2/L18 —. 2019a, ApJ, 872, 171, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab017d

    2015 doi

  41. [50]

    Lu, X., Mills, E. A. C., Ginsburg, A., et al. 2019b, ApJS, 244, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4258

    doi

  42. [51]

    2024, ApJ, 962, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1395

    Lu, X., Liu, J., Pillai, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1395

    2024 doi

  43. [52]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 1934, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1061

    Malinen, J., Montier, L., Montillaud, J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1934, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1061

    2016 doi

  44. [53]

    P., et al

    Mangilli, A., Aumont, J., Bernard, J. P., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935072

    2019 doi

  45. [54]

    S., Mezger, P

    Mathis, J. S., Mezger, P. G., & Panagia, N. 1983, A&A, 128, 212

    1983

  46. [55]

    S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K

    Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425, doi: 10.1086/155591

    1977 doi

  47. [56]

    Mills, E. A. C., & Battersby, C. 2017, ApJ, 835, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/76

    2017 doi

  48. [57]

    2010, PASP, 122, 314, doi: 10.1086/651314

    Molinari, S., Swinyard, B., Bally, J., et al. 2010, PASP, 122, 314, doi: 10.1086/651314

    2010 doi

  49. [58]

    2011, ApJL, 735, L33, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/L33

    Molinari, S., Bally, J., Noriega-Crespo, A., et al. 2011, ApJL, 735, L33, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/L33

    2011 doi

  50. [59]

    1996, ARA&A, 34, 645, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.645

    Morris, M., & Serabyn, E. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 645, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.645

    1996 doi

  51. [60]

    Mouschovias, T. C. 1976, ApJ, 206, 753, doi: 10.1086/154436

    1976 doi

  52. [61]

    C., Hatchfield, H

    Myers, P. C., Hatchfield, H. P., & Battersby, C. 2022, ApJ, 929, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5906

    2022 doi

  53. [62]

    1978, PASJ, 30, 671

    Nakano, T., & Nakamura, T. 1978, PASJ, 30, 671

    1978

  54. [63]

    1994, A&A, 291, 943

    Ossenkopf, V., & Henning, T. 1994, A&A, 291, 943

    1994

  55. [64]

    2011, MNRAS, 418, 1392, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19591.x

    Pakmor, R., Bauer, A., & Springel, V. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1392, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19591.x

    2011

  56. [65]

    2013, MNRAS, 432, 176, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt428

    Pakmor, R., & Springel, V. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 176, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt428

    2013 doi

  57. [66]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5aea Par´ e, D., Butterfield, N

    Pan, X., Zhang, Q., Qiu, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5aea Par´ e, D., Butterfield, N. O., Chuss, D. T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4462 Par´ e, D. M., Chuss, D. T., Karpovich, K., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 28, doi: 10.3847/153...

    2024 doi

  58. [67]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 4263, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3034

    Bastian, P. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 4263, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3034

    2023 doi

  59. [68]

    S., Greaves, J

    Pierce-Price, D., Richer, J. S., Greaves, J. S., et al. 2000, ApJL, 545, L121, doi: 10.1086/317884

    2000 doi

  60. [69]

    C., et al

    Pillai, T., Kauffmann, J., Tan, J. C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/74 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2014, A&A, 571, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321529 —. 2016a, A&A, 586, A138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525896 Planck Col...

    2015 doi

  61. [70]

    L., Schilke, P., Rolffs, R., et al

    Qin, S. L., Schilke, P., Rolffs, R., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116928

    2011 doi

  62. [71]

    2016, A&A, 593, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424930

    Reissl, S., Wolf, S., & Brauer, R. 2016, A&A, 593, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424930

    2016 doi

  63. [72]

    M., Contreras, Y., et al

    Schuller, F., Menten, K. M., Contreras, Y., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 415, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811568

    2009 doi

  64. [73]

    2020, MNRAS, 497, 4196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2231

    Seifried, D., Walch, S., Weis, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 4196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2231

    2020 doi

  65. [74]

    Soler, J. D. 2019, A&A, 629, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935779

    2019 doi

  66. [75]

    D., & Hennebelle, P

    Soler, J. D., & Hennebelle, P. 2017, A&A, 607, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731049

    2017 doi

  67. [76]

    D., Hennebelle, P., Martin, P

    Soler, J. D., Hennebelle, P., Martin, P. G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 128, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/128

    2013 doi

  68. [77]

    D., Ade, P

    Soler, J. D., Ade, P. A. R., Angil` e, F. E., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730608

    2017 doi

  69. [78]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    Springel, V. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    2010

  70. [79]

    1994, ApJ, 432, 612, doi: 10.1086/174600

    Sridhar, S., & Goldreich, P. 1994, ApJ, 432, 612, doi: 10.1086/174600

    1994 doi

  71. [80]

    D., Wilson, G

    Tang, Y., Wang, Q. D., Wilson, G. W., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 2392, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1191

    2021 doi

  72. [81]

    2018, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 7, 1840011, doi: 10.1142/S2251171718400111

    Temi, P., Hoffman, D., Ennico, K., & Le, J. 2018, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 7, 1840011, doi: 10.1142/S2251171718400111

    2018 doi

  73. [82]

    G., Sormani, M

    Tress, R. G., Sormani, M. C., Glover, S. C. O., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 4455, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3120

    2020 doi

  74. [83]

    G., Sormani, M

    Tress, R. G., Sormani, M. C., Girichidis, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A303, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450035

    2024 doi

  75. [84]

    L., Longmore, S

    Walker, D. L., Longmore, S. N., Bastian, N., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 715, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv300

    2015 doi

  76. [85]

    L., Longmore, S

    Walker, D. L., Longmore, S. N., Zhang, Q., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 2373, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2898 21

    2018 doi

  77. [86]

    L., Longmore, S

    Walker, D. L., Longmore, S. N., Bally, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 77, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab415

    2021 doi

  78. [87]

    2020, ApJS, 248, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c

    Weinberger, R., Springel, V., & Pakmor, R. 2020, ApJS, 248, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c

    2020 doi

  79. [88]

    2019, ApJ, 878, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab21be

    Xu, S., Ji, S., & Lazarian, A. 2019, ApJ, 878, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab21be

    2019 doi

  80. [89]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.05198, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.05198

    Yang, M.-Z., Lai, S.-P., Karoly, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.05198, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.05198

    2025 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.