Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Are Expressions for Music Emotions the Same Across Cultures?

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Across Brazil, the US, and South Korea, music-emotion terms align for high-arousal positive feelings but diverge for subtle, low-arousal states, and machine translations often miss music-specific meanings.

desk verdict Solid bottom-up cross-cultural music emotion study whose translation-failure headline is under-supported by missing null baselines and a copy-paste F-statistic. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08744 v1 pith:FQHUSO27 submitted 2025-02-12 cs.CL cs.HCcs.SDeess.AS

Elif Celen , Pol van Rijn , Harin Lee , Nori Jacoby This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.HCcs.SDeess.AS
keywords musicemotioncross-culturalcomparisontaxonomyopen-endedtaggingvalenceandarousalin-groupeffectmachinetranslationpopular
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Music is said to speak a universal emotional language, but the words people use for those emotions may not be the same in Portuguese, Korean, and English. The paper tests this by letting participants in Brazil, South Korea, and the US generate their own emotion words from a balanced set of popular songs, then having separate groups rate the same sixty songs on each culture's fifty most emotion-related words. It finds that high-arousal, high-valence terms such as happy, energetic, and danceable cluster together in all three countries, but quieter and mixed emotions are organized differently, and the clusters do not line up across cultures. It also finds that direct machine translations of emotion words often fail to capture their music-specific meanings, with some translations even negatively correlated with the original term. If correct, the result is a practical warning and an opportunity: emotion studies should build taxonomies from the ground up in each language instead of translating a Western list, and rating-based alignment can map music emotions across cultures without assuming translation equivalence.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is STEP, an open-ended human-in-the-loop tagging pipeline. In successive iterations, participants listen to music clips, propose single-word emotional tags in their native language, rate tags proposed by earlier participants, and flag inappropriate ones; after five iterations per song this yields a weighted bag-of-words representation from which a culture-specific taxonomy emerges. A tag-selection experiment filters the noisy tags by asking a separate group whether each tag can describe emotions in music, keeping the 50 with majority agreement. The comparison step is dense rating: each participant rates random subsets of tags per song on a 5-point scale, and pairwise Pearson correlations between tag-rating vectors across the shared 60 songs become the distance measure. Agglomerative clustering, correlation heatmaps, and a modularity-based network then reveal within- and between-culture structure, while a balanced song pool sampled on acoustic features and release years prevents any single country's music from dominating the stimulus set.

What would settle it

Give balanced-bilingual participants the same 60 songs and let them rate emotion terms in both languages; if dictionary translations consistently correlate as strongly as same-language terms (for example, r above .7), then the paper's negative-correlation examples would be artifacts of different participant samples or response styles rather than evidence that translations miss music-specific meaning. Alternatively, a multi-group invariance analysis of the rating scales that shows scalar equivalence across the three recruitment samples would directly address the paper's untested standardization assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the core discovery is that music-emotion language is neither fully universal nor fully culture-specific: it is shared where arousal and valence are extreme and positive, and divergent elsewhere. Dense ratings of 60 common songs on 50 bottom-up emotion terms per culture yield two large correlation clusters in every country; the first, high-arousal positive cluster is consistent across Brazil, Korea, and the US, while the second low-arousal cluster splits differently in each culture. The quantitative evidence includes high mean within-cluster correlations (US=0.81, Korea=0.84, Brazil=0.87) but low alignment between cultures' clusters, and average correlations of only r=0.61 (Korean-English) and r=0.59 (Portuguese-English) for terms that have direct dictionary translations. The paper reports concrete translation failures: Korean '열정적 (passionate)' correlates near zero with English 'passionate' (r=0.05), and Brazilian 'emocionante (exciting)' is negatively correlated with 'exciting' (r=-0.50). A separate in-group effect shows raters within a country agree more with each other when rating their own country's songs.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that people recruited through different channels, paid differently, and sampled in different numbers used the five-point rating scale in comparable ways, so that cross-country correlation differences reflect cultural differences in emotion concepts rather than differences in how participants used the scale; the paper reports no standardization or measurement-invariance check.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Translation-based cross-cultural emotion studies will systematically distort music-specific emotion terms, because some translated pairs are negatively correlated in ratings.
  • Music-emotion recommendation systems should align tags through shared human ratings on the same songs rather than through dictionary or machine translation.
  • Because the pipeline is open-ended and uses a balanced stimulus set, it can be scaled to more countries and genres without granting one culture's taxonomy default status.
  • The in-group agreement effect means that raw cross-cultural agreement on emotion can be inflated or deflated by musical familiarity, so stimulus balance is essential in comparisons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's rating-based alignment could be used to build a multilingual emotion atlas for music, replacing word-level translations with shared-song correlations; the paper does not itself construct such an atlas.
  • The same STEP-to-dense-rating pipeline likely transfers to speech, video, and images, so the method's value may extend beyond music; the authors mention this as a future direction but do not demonstrate it.
  • A targeted bilingual study could separate two explanations the paper leaves entangled: translation systems being wrong versus emotion concepts genuinely differing. If bilingual raters show the same negative correlation, the concept differs; if not, the failure is machine translation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a balanced cross-cultural experimental design for music emotion research. It uses open-ended tagging (STEP) to elicit culture-specific emotion taxonomies in Brazil, the US, and South Korea, followed by dense rating of 60 shared songs on the resulting 50-term taxonomies. The paper reports that high-arousal/high-valence terms cluster consistently across cultures, while other emotional domains show cultural variation; it also reports that machine translations of emotion terms often show low correlations (r=.61 for Korean, r=.59 for Portuguese) and that an in-group advantage exists in rating agreement. The authors argue their bottom-up, balanced-stimulus approach reduces cultural bias and should be adopted more widely.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable contribution: it addresses a real gap in cross-cultural music emotion research by using balanced stimuli from three countries and deriving taxonomies bottom-up rather than translating a Western taxonomy. The STEP pipeline and the dense-rating design are creditable methodological innovations, and the dataset would be a useful resource. However, the two headline quantitative claims—translation inadequacy and the in-group effect—are currently under-supported by the reported analyses, and one statistical reporting error is apparent. The high-level descriptive results about clustering are plausible, but the paper's main conclusions go beyond what the evidence as presented establishes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Between-culture term correlations] The conclusion that dictionary translations are 'often inadequate' is not supported without an appropriate null baseline. The paper reports mean correlations of r=.61 (Korean) and r=.59 (Portuguese) for direct translations and labels them 'low,' but no comparison is made to (a) the distribution of correlations between randomly paired terms from the same cross-cultural 60-song matrices, (b) the split-half reliability or noise ceiling of the aggregated ratings, or (c) within-culture correlations among near-synonym terms. With N=60 songs, an r of .6 is a moderate effect, and the data could equally support the view that most translations are reasonable with a few culture-specific exceptions. The examples r=.05 and r=-.50 are not shown to be representative; the authors should provide the full distribution of translation-pair correlations, the null distribution from random term pairs, and a reliability ceiling, and interpret the results against those benchmarks.
  2. [In-group effects] The three F-statistics reported for the in-group effect are identical: F(2,321)=20.7, p<.001, ges=.114 for Brazilian, Korean, and American raters. This is not statistically plausible if separate analyses were run for each rater group, and it is not explained as a single pooled analysis. Either this is a copy-paste error, or the analysis was set up in a way that cannot test the in-group effect for each rater group separately. The authors must report the correct per-group statistics, clearly define the 'within-country correlation' metric (e.g., average inter-subject correlation, split-half correlation, or correlation of group averages), and test the in-group advantage explicitly (e.g., rater group × song origin interaction). The current reporting undermines the in-group effect claim.
  3. [Dense rating and cross-cultural comparability] The cross-cultural comparisons assume that the 60 shared song ratings are directly comparable across the three countries, yet the samples were recruited through different platforms (Prolific vs. CINT), paid differently, and had different sizes (US=202, Brazil=104, Korea=140). No measurement-invariance analysis, response-style standardization, or comparison of rating distributions (means, variances, endpoint usage) is reported. Observed differences in correlations across countries could therefore reflect platform-specific response patterns rather than cultural differences in emotion semantics. The authors should report basic rating-scale statistics per country and, ideally, conduct a multi-group analysis or at least a sensitivity analysis to show that the correlational results are robust to these design differences.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Introduction] The word 'avides' should be 'avoids' in the sentence 'This design avides an a priori dominance of one culture in the stimulus set.'
  2. [Between-culture term correlations] The confidence interval for the correlation between 'emocionante' and 'exciting' is reported as r=-.50 [-.38, -.54]; the lower and upper bounds are in the wrong order and should be [-.54, -.38].
  3. [Figures 2 and 3] The correlation heatmaps do not include any measure of uncertainty (e.g., bootstrapped confidence intervals or significance masks). Adding such information would help readers assess the stability of the reported clusters and cross-cultural differences.
  4. [In-group effects] The text states that raters 'consistently show higher agreement when evaluating songs from their own cultural origin,' but the described F-test only establishes that agreement differs across song origins; it does not directly test the contrast between own-culture and other-culture songs. Please clarify the statistical model and, if possible, report a contrast or post-hoc test for the in-group comparison.
  5. [Correlation network] The adjusted Rand index for the US (ARI=.63) is considerably lower than for Brazil and Korea (both .92), yet the text says the network clusters are 'aligned with the first two agglomerative clusters in all three countries.' This overstates the US alignment; please qualify the statement or discuss why the US deviates.
  6. [Dense rating] The paper states that 'on average, each song and tag was rated 17 times,' but does not report the range or the number of ratings per cell. A measure of variability in rating counts would help assess the reliability of the correlation estimates, especially for the sparse cells.
  7. [Data and code availability] The paper does not state where the data, code, or the dense-rating matrices will be made available. Given the complexity of the pipeline and that the main results are correlational, an explicit availability statement (or a note that materials will be released on publication) is needed for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: results are empirical correlations from bottom-up taxonomies; self-citations are data and method sources, not conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central results are empirical correlations computed from independent rating data. The culture-specific taxonomies are produced by an open-ended tagging pipeline (STEP) in which participants generate and validate terms; the later dense-rating phase uses those terms to collect new ratings. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the rating data and then renamed a prediction; the 'consistency in high arousal, high valence' claim is a descriptive clustering of the rating correlations, not an output forced by the input definitions. The translation-inadequacy result is also empirical: direct ChatGPT translations are scored by their correlation to English terms. One could question the absence of a null baseline or reliability ceiling, and the labeling of r=.61/.59 as 'low' is underjustified, but underdetermination is not circularity: the conclusion does not reduce by construction to the data used to reach it. Self-citations (Lee et al. 2021 for the song set; Marjieh et al. 2023 and van Rijn 2024 for STEP; van Rijn et al. 2023 for the vocabulary test) provide stimuli and procedures; they do not smuggle in the paper's conclusions. No equation in the paper equates a predicted quantity to a fitted parameter, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new theoretical entities. Its central claims rest on measurement assumptions about the STEP tagging procedure, the representativeness of the 60-song subset, and the comparability of ratings across differently recruited samples. The hand-chosen thresholds (50% agreement, top-50 terms, 5 iterations) are free parameters that shape all downstream results.

free parameters (4)
  • Emotionality agreement threshold = 50%
    Tags were kept only if at least 50% of raters agreed the tag could describe emotions in music; this hand-chosen threshold shapes each culture's taxonomy and all downstream comparisons.
  • Number of emotion terms per culture = 50
    Top 50 terms per culture selected based on prior literature (Cowen et al., 2019), despite the underlying tag pools differing across cultures (150, 186, 259); this may make taxonomies non-comparable.
  • Dense-rating song subset size = 60 (20 per country)
    A hand-picked subset used for all cross-cultural rating correlations; no power analysis or stability check is reported.
  • STEP iteration count = 5
    Number of tagging iterations chosen by the experimenters to balance workload and convergence; no analysis of convergence is provided.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The STEP open-ended tagging procedure yields emotion terms that reflect genuine emotional experiences rather than musical attributes or genre labels.
    The method instructs participants to avoid genre labels and lyrics, but a separate validation step only filters by 50% agreement on 'can this describe emotions in music', which is a weak check.
  • domain assumption Pearson correlations of mean ratings across 60 songs reflect semantic similarity between emotion terms within and across cultures.
    The entire clustering and cross-cultural comparison framework treats these correlations as a similarity metric; no measurement model or correction for rater variance is applied.
  • domain assumption The 60-song dense-rating subset is representative of the 360-song pool and of popular music in each country.
    Songs were sampled to maximize acoustic diversity and temporal spread, but representativeness is not statistically guaranteed.
  • domain assumption Cross-cultural correlations are unaffected by differences in recruitment platform, compensation, and sample size across countries.
    Brazil and US used Prolific, Korea used CINT; compensation differed; no robustness check for platform effects.
  • ad hoc to paper ChatGPT 4.0 provides accurate translations of emotion terms for the 22 Korean and 26 Portuguese terms with direct English equivalents.
    The translation-failure analysis relies entirely on these machine translations; no human translation validation is reported.
  • domain assumption The 50% agreement threshold and top-50 selection do not bias the resulting taxonomies.
    Threshold chosen arbitrarily; could exclude culturally specific terms that are less consensual.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Are Expressions for Music Emotions the Same Across Cultures?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FQHUSO27

@misc{pith2026250208744,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Are Expressions for Music Emotions the Same Across Cultures?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FQHUSO27}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08744}
}
read the original abstract

Music evokes profound emotions, yet the universality of emotional descriptors across languages remains debated. A key challenge in cross-cultural research on music emotion is biased stimulus selection and manual curation of taxonomies, predominantly relying on Western music and languages. To address this, we propose a balanced experimental design with nine online experiments in Brazil, the US, and South Korea, involving N=672 participants. First, we sample a balanced set of popular music from these countries. Using an open-ended tagging pipeline, we then gather emotion terms to create culture-specific taxonomies. Finally, using these bottom-up taxonomies, participants rate emotions of each song. This allows us to map emotional similarities within and across cultures. Results show consistency in high arousal, high valence emotions but greater variability in others. Notably, machine translations were often inadequate to capture music-specific meanings. These findings together highlight the need for a domain-sensitive, open-ended, bottom-up emotion elicitation approach to reduce cultural biases in emotion research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08744 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental Setup. A: Music collection in three cultures. B: Human-in-the-loop pipeline conducted in the following order: (C) STEP paradigm to obtain a list of words per culture, (D) discrete emotionality rating to select emotional words, and (E) dense rating of each stimulus along the select terms. to refine, rate, and correct each other’s tags, improving the quality of the final term set. By including diverse mus… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pearson correlation across 50 emotional terms in Portuguese (Brazil, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pearson correlation across all three pairs of cultures: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Network analysis on the full correlation matrix. Negative correlations are removed. Korean terms are in bold, Por [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measuring Cross-Cultural Style Diffusion Through Era Classification: US and Korean Popular Music

    cs.SD 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Korean chart songs from the 1960s through the 1980s are classified by Billboard-trained audio models as four to five years older than their chart date, with the gap halving after the 1990s.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , Eerola, T

    athanasopoulos2021harmonic APACrefauthors Athanasopoulos, G. , Eerola, T. , Lahdelma, I. \ Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, M. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Harmonic organisation conveys both universal and culture-specific cues for emotional expression in music Harmonic organisation conveys both universal and culture-specific cues for emotional expression in music . PLo...

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    \ Thompson, W F

    balkwill1999 APACrefauthors Balkwill, L L. \ Thompson, W F. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . A cross-cultural investigation of the perception of emotion in music: Psychophysical and cultural cues A cross-cultural investigation of the perception of emotion in music: Psychophysical and cultural cues . Music Perception 17 1 43--64 . APACrefDOI doi:10.2307/40285811 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.2307/40285811 1999

  3. [3]

    , Adolphs, R

    barrett2019 APACrefauthors Barrett, L F. , Adolphs, R. , Marsella, S. , Martinez, A M. \ Pollak, S D. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Emotional Expressions Reconsidered : Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements Emotional Expressions Reconsidered : Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements . Psychological Science in the Public...

    doi:10.1177/1529100619832930 2019

  4. [4]

    , Henrich, J

    blasi2022over APACrefauthors Blasi, D E. , Henrich, J. , Adamou, E. , Kemmerer, D. \ Majid, A. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science Over-reliance on english hinders cognitive science . Trends in cognitive sciences 26 12 1153--1170

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    , Brooks, J A

    cowen2024 APACrefauthors Cowen, A S. , Brooks, J A. , Prasad, G. , Tanaka, M. , Kamitani, Y. , Kirilyuk, V. \ Keltner, D. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . How emotion is experienced and expressed in multiple cultures: A large-scale experiment across North America , Europe , and Japan How emotion is experienced and expressed in multiple cultures: A large-scale expe...

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    , Fang, X

    cowen2020 APACrefauthors Cowen, A S. , Fang, X. , Sauter, D. \ Keltner, D. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . What music makes us feel: At least 13 dimensions organize subjective experiences associated with music across different cultures What music makes us feel: At least 13 dimensions organize subjective experiences associated with music across different cultures ...

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1910704117 2020

  7. [7]

    \ Keltner, D

    cowen2021 APACrefauthors Cowen, A S. \ Keltner, D. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Semantic Space Theory: A computational approach to emotion Semantic space theory: A computational approach to emotion . Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25 2 124--136 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.004 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.004 2021

  8. [8]

    , Laukka, P

    cowen2019b APACrefauthors Cowen, A S. , Laukka, P. , Elfenbein, H A. , Liu, R. \ Keltner, D. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . The primacy of categories in the recognition of 12 emotions in speech prosody across two cultures The primacy of categories in the recognition of 12 emotions in speech prosody across two cultures . Nature Human Behaviour 3 4 369--382 . APAC...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0533-6 2019

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    , Sauter, D

    cowen2019 APACrefauthors Cowen, A S. , Sauter, D. , Tracy, J L. \ Keltner, D. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Mapping the passions: Toward a high-dimensional taxonomy of emotional experience and expression Mapping the passions: Toward a high-dimensional taxonomy of emotional experienc...

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    APACrefauthors \ 1872

    darwin1872 APACrefauthors Darwin, C. APACrefauthors \ 1872 . The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals The expression of the emotions in man and animals . London, England John Murray

  3. [11]

    APACrefauthors \ 1989

    descartes1989passions APACrefauthors Descartes, R. APACrefauthors \ 1989 . Passions of the Soul Passions of the soul . Hackett Publishing

    1989

  4. [12]

    , Reisenzein, R

    duran2017 APACrefauthors Durán, J I. , Reisenzein, R. \ Fernández-Dols, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Coherence Between Emotions and Facial Expressions Coherence Between Emotions and Facial Expressions \ ( 1). Oxford University Press . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/97801906...

    2017

  5. [13]

    \ Saari, P

    eerola2025 APACrefauthors Eerola, T. \ Saari, P. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . What emotions does music express? Structure of affect terms in music using iterative crowdsourcing paradigm What emotions does music express? structure of affect terms in music using iterative crowdsourci...

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    \ Vuoskoski, J K

    eerola2013 APACrefauthors Eerola, T. \ Vuoskoski, J K. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . A Review of Music and Emotion Studies: Approaches, Emotion Models, and Stimuli A review of music and emotion studies: Approaches, emotion models, and stimuli . Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary...

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    APACrefauthors \ 1992

    ekman1992 APACrefauthors Ekman, P. APACrefauthors \ 1992 . An argument for basic emotions An argument for basic emotions . Cognition & Emotion 6 3-4 169--200 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 APACrefDOI

    1992 doi

  8. [16]

    \ Friesen, W V

    ekman1971 APACrefauthors Ekman, P. \ Friesen, W V. APACrefauthors \ 1971 . Constants across Cultures in the Face and Emotion Constants across cultures in the face and emotion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17 2 124--129 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1037/h0030377 APACrefDOI

    1971 doi

  9. [17]

    \ Ambady, N

    elfenbein2002 APACrefauthors Elfenbein, H A. \ Ambady, N. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Is There an In-Group Advantage in Emotion Recognition? Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition? Psychological Bulletin 128 2 243--249 . APACrefDOI doi:10/dcmqvp APACrefDOI

    2002

  10. [18]

    , Beaupré, M

    elfenbein2007 APACrefauthors Elfenbein, H A. , Beaupré, M. , Lévesque, M. \ Hess, U. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Toward a Dialect Theory: Cultural Differences in the Expression and Recognition of Posed Facial Expressions. Toward a dialect theory: Cultural differences in the expres...

    2007

  11. [19]

    , Jentschke, S

    fritz2009 APACrefauthors Fritz, T. , Jentschke, S. , Gosselin, N. , Sammler, D. , Peretz, I. , Turner, R. Koelsch, S. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Universal recognition of three basic emotions in music Universal recognition of three basic emotions in music . Current Biology 19 7 57...

    2009 doi

  12. [20]

    APACrefauthors \ 2001

    gabrielsson2001emotion APACrefauthors Gabrielsson, A. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Emotion perceived and emotion felt: Same or different? Emotion perceived and emotion felt: Same or different? Musicae scientiae 5 1\_suppl 123--147

    2001

  13. [21]

    , Marjieh, R

    harrison2020 APACrefauthors Harrison, P. , Marjieh, R. , Adolfi, F. , van Rijn, P. , Anglada-Tort, M. , Tchernichovski, O. Jacoby, N. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Gibbs sampling with people Gibbs sampling with people . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 10659--106...

    2020 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    \ Lee, J H

    hu2012 APACrefauthors Hu, X. \ Lee, J H. APACrefauthors \ 2012 October . A cross-cultural study of music mood perception between American and Chinese listeners A cross-cultural study of music mood perception between American and Chinese listeners . Proceedings of the 13th Inte...

    2012

  15. [23]

    , Lee, J H

    hu2014 APACrefauthors Hu, X. , Lee, J H. , Choi, K. \ Downie, J S. APACrefauthors \ 2014 October . A cross-cultural study on the mood of K-POP songs A cross-cultural study on the mood of K-POP songs . Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Music Information Retrieva...

    2014

  16. [24]

    , Watts, J

    jackson2019 APACrefauthors Jackson, J C. , Watts, J. , Henry, T R. , List, J M. , Forkel, R. , Mucha, P J. Lindquist, K A. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Emotion Semantics Show Both Cultural Variation and Universal Structure Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universa...

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    , Polak, R

    jacoby2024commonality APACrefauthors Jacoby, N. , Polak, R. , Grahn, J A. , Cameron, D J. , Lee, K M. , Godoy, R. others APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Commonality and variation in mental representations of music revealed by a cross-cultural comparison of rhythm priors in 15 countrie...

    2024

  18. [26]

    \ Sloboda, J A

    juslin2010 APACrefauthors Juslin, P N. \ Sloboda, J A. APACrefauthors \ ( ). \ 2010 . Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications . Oxford University Press . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/97801...

    2010

  19. [27]

    \ Västfjäll, D

    juslin2008 APACrefauthors Juslin, P N. \ Västfjäll, D. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms . Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 5 559--575 . APAC...

    2008 doi

  20. [28]

    APACrefauthors \ 1997

    krumhansl1997exploratory APACrefauthors Krumhansl, C L. APACrefauthors \ 1997 . An exploratory study of musical emotions and psychophysiology. An exploratory study of musical emotions and psychophysiology. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychol...

    1997

  21. [29]

    \ Elfenbein, H A

    laukka2020 APACrefauthors Laukka, P. \ Elfenbein, H A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Cross- Cultural Emotion Recognition and In-Group Advantage in Vocal Expression : A Meta-Analysis Cross- Cultural Emotion Recognition and In-Group Advantage in Vocal Expression : A Meta-Analysis . Em...

    2020

  22. [30]

    , Höger, F

    lee2021 APACrefauthors Lee, H. , Höger, F. , Schönwiesner, M. , Park, M. \ Jacoby, N. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Cross-cultural mood perception in pop songs and its alignment with mood detection algorithms Cross-cultural mood perception in pop songs and its alignment with mood de...

    2021 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    , van Rijn , P

    marjieh2023 APACrefauthors Marjieh, R. , van Rijn , P. , Sucholutsky, I. , Sumers, T. , Lee, H. , Griffiths, T L. \ Jacoby, N. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Words Are All You Need? Language as an Approximation for Human Similarity Judgments Words are all you need? Language as an app...

    2023

  24. [32]

    , Schultz, A F

    mcdermott2016indifference APACrefauthors McDermott, J H. , Schultz, A F. , Undurraga, E A. \ Godoy, R A. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception Indifference to dissonance in native amazonians revea...

    2016

  25. [33]

    , Dolan, S E

    mcpherson2020perceptual APACrefauthors McPherson, M J. , Dolan, S E. , Durango, A. , Ossandon, T. , Vald \'e s, J. , Undurraga, E A. McDermott, J H. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Perceptual fusion of musical notes by native Amazonians suggests universal representations of musical in...

    2020

  26. [34]

    , Singh, M

    mehr2019universality APACrefauthors Mehr, S A. , Singh, M. , Knox, D. , Ketter, D M. , Pickens-Jones, D. , Atwood, S. others APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Universality and diversity in human song Universality and diversity in human song . Science 366 6468 eaax0868

    2019

  27. [35]

    , Bianco, R

    milne2021 APACrefauthors Milne, A E. , Bianco, R. , Poole, K C. , Zhao, S. , Oxenham, A J. , Billig, A J. \ Chait, M. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch . Behavior Resear...

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    , Sucholutsky, I

    niedermann2024 APACrefauthors Niedermann, J. , Sucholutsky, I. , Marjieh, R. , Celen, E. , Griffiths, T L. , Jacoby, N. \ van Rijn , P. APACrefauthors \ . Studying the Effect of Globalization on Color Perception Using Multilingual Online Recruitment and Large Language Models S...

  29. [37]

    \ Hargreaves, D J

    north2008 APACrefauthors North, A C. \ Hargreaves, D J. APACrefauthors \ ( ). \ 2008 . The social and applied psychology of music The social and applied psychology of music . Oxford, England Oxford University Press . APACrefDOI doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567424.001.0001 APACrefDOI

    2008

  30. [38]

    , Thom, J

    Park2019-bo APACrefauthors Park, M. , Thom, J. , Mennicken, S. , Cramer, H. \ Macy, M. APACrefauthors \ 2019 03 . Global music streaming data reveal diurnal and seasonal patterns of affective preference Global music streaming data reveal diurnal and seasonal patterns of affect...

    2019

  31. [39]

    APACrefauthors \ 1980

    russell1980 APACrefauthors Russell, J A. APACrefauthors \ 1980 . A circumplex model of affect A circumplex model of affect . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 6 1161--1178 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1037/h0077714 APACrefDOI

    1980 doi

  32. [40]

    , Bachorowski, J A

    russell2003 APACrefauthors Russell, J A. , Bachorowski, J A. \ Fernández-Dols, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Facial and Vocal Expressions of Emotion Facial and Vocal Expressions of Emotion . Annual Review of Psychology 54 1 329--349 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101...

    2003

  33. [41]

    , Sands, M K

    siegel2018 APACrefauthors Siegel, E H. , Sands, M K. , Van den Noortgate, W. , Condon, P. , Chang, Y. , Dy, J. Barrett, L F. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Emotion Fingerprints or Emotion Populations? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Autonomic Features of Emotion Categories. Emotion ...

    2018

  34. [42]

    , Roberts, S G

    thompson2020 APACrefauthors Thompson, B. , Roberts, S G. \ Lupyan, G. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Cultural Influences on Word Meanings Revealed through Large-Scale Semantic Alignment Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment . Nature Huma...

    2020

  35. [43]

    a , M. , Saram \

    toivonen2012networks APACrefauthors Toivonen, R. , Kivel \"a , M. , Saram \"a ki, J. , Viinikainen, M. , Vanhatalo, M. \ Sams, M. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Networks of emotion concepts Networks of emotion concepts . PLoS One 7 1 e28883

    2012

  36. [44]

    \ Larrouy-Maestri, P

    vanrijn2023b APACrefauthors van Rijn , P. \ Larrouy-Maestri, P. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Modelling Individual and Cross-Cultural Variation in the Mapping of Emotions to Speech Prosody Modelling individual and cross-cultural variation in the mapping of emotions to speech prosody...

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    APACrefauthors \ 2024

    vanrijn2024 APACrefauthors van Rijn, P. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . \ Characterizing semantic representations using human-in-the-loop algorithms Characterizing semantic representations using human-in-the-loop algorithms \ Ph.D. dissertation . \ Max Planck Institute for Empirical A...

    2024

  38. [46]

    , Sun, Y

    vanrijn2023 APACrefauthors van Rijn, P. , Sun, Y. , Lee, H. , Marjieh, R. , Sucholutsky, I. , Lanzarini, F. Jacoby, N. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Around the World in 60 Words: A Generative Vocabulary Test for Online Research Around the world in 60 words: A generative vocabulary t...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.