Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

InferBench: Understanding Deep Learning Inference Serving with an Automatic Benchmarking System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.02327 v3 pith:FR42IBRX submitted 2020-11-04 cs.LG cs.PF

classification cs.LGcs.PF
keywords systemmodelsdevelopersbenchmarkmanyserviceautomaticbenchmarking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning (DL) models have become core modules for many applications. However, deploying these models without careful performance benchmarking that considers both hardware and software's impact often leads to poor service and costly operational expenditure. To facilitate DL models' deployment, we implement an automatic and comprehensive benchmark system for DL developers. To accomplish benchmark-related tasks, the developers only need to prepare a configuration file consisting of a few lines of code. Our system, deployed to a leader server in DL clusters, will dispatch users' benchmark jobs to follower workers. Next, the corresponding requests, workload, and even models can be generated automatically by the system to conduct DL serving benchmarks. Finally, developers can leverage many analysis tools and models in our system to gain insights into the trade-offs of different system configurations. In addition, a two-tier scheduler is incorporated to avoid unnecessary interference and improve average job compilation time by up to 1.43x (equivalent of 30\% reduction). Our system design follows the best practice in DL clusters operations to expedite day-to-day DL service evaluation efforts by the developers. We conduct many benchmark experiments to provide in-depth and comprehensive evaluations. We believe these results are of great values as guidelines for DL service configuration and resource allocation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mitigating GIL Bottlenecks in Edge AI Systems

    cs.DC 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new beta metric and library-based adaptive system mitigates GIL bottlenecks in edge AI, reaching 96.5% of optimal performance without manual tuning across tested workloads.

Pith tools