REVIEW 1 cited by
InferBench: Understanding Deep Learning Inference Serving with an Automatic Benchmarking System
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning (DL) models have become core modules for many applications. However, deploying these models without careful performance benchmarking that considers both hardware and software's impact often leads to poor service and costly operational expenditure. To facilitate DL models' deployment, we implement an automatic and comprehensive benchmark system for DL developers. To accomplish benchmark-related tasks, the developers only need to prepare a configuration file consisting of a few lines of code. Our system, deployed to a leader server in DL clusters, will dispatch users' benchmark jobs to follower workers. Next, the corresponding requests, workload, and even models can be generated automatically by the system to conduct DL serving benchmarks. Finally, developers can leverage many analysis tools and models in our system to gain insights into the trade-offs of different system configurations. In addition, a two-tier scheduler is incorporated to avoid unnecessary interference and improve average job compilation time by up to 1.43x (equivalent of 30\% reduction). Our system design follows the best practice in DL clusters operations to expedite day-to-day DL service evaluation efforts by the developers. We conduct many benchmark experiments to provide in-depth and comprehensive evaluations. We believe these results are of great values as guidelines for DL service configuration and resource allocation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Mitigating GIL Bottlenecks in Edge AI Systems
A new beta metric and library-based adaptive system mitigates GIL bottlenecks in edge AI, reaching 96.5% of optimal performance without manual tuning across tested workloads.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.